RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on surgical efficiency and labor time cost of preloaded intraocular lens (IOL) implantation system compared with manual IOL implantation system in age-related cataract surgery in China. METHODS: This study was an observational, multicenter, prospective time-motion analysis. IOL preparation time, operation time, cleaning time, number and cost of cataract surgeries in eight participating hospitals were collected. The linear mixed model was used to explore factors associated with the difference in operation time between the preloaded IOL implantation system and the manual IOL implantation system. A time-motion model was constructed to convert the operation time cost saved by using preloaded IOL into economic benefits from hospital and social perspective, respectively. RESULTS: There were 2,591 cases included in the study (preloaded IOL: 1,591 cases; manual IOL: 1,000 cases). The preloaded IOL implantation system was significant time-saving in both preparation time and operation time compared to the manual IOL implantation system (25.48s vs. 47.04s, P < 0.001 and 353.84s vs. 367.46s, P = 0.004, respectively). An average total of 35.18s can be saved by using preloaded IOL per procedure. The results of linear mixed model showed that the type of IOL was the main factor leading to the difference in preparation time between preloaded IOL and manual IOL implantation system. By switching from manual IOL to preloaded IOL, the model projected additional 392 surgeries can be performed each year and an increase in revenue of $565,282 per hospital, a 9% increase from hospital perspective. And the annual productivity loss saved by using preloaded IOL was $3,006 in eight hospitals from perspective of society. CONCLUSION: Compared with manual IOL implantation system, the preloaded IOL implantation system reduces lens preparation time and operation time, which increases potential surgical volume and revenue, and reduces the loss of work productivity. This study provides real-world evidence to support the advantages of the preloaded IOL implantation system in improving efficiency of ophthalmic surgery in China.
Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Catarata , Lentes Intraoculares , Humanos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , ChinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Image-guided system (IGS) has been gradually applied in the field of rhinology, making functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) a truly minimally invasive and precise surgery. This study was based on real-world data from China hospitals and aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic benefits of the IGS navigation system in FESS. METHODS: This was a two-center retrospective chart review of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent FESS, including open frontal sinus between July 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019 in China. The intervention group consisted of 100 patients who underwent FESS with the IGS navigation system (IGS group), and the control group consisted of 100 patients who underwent conventional FESS (Non-IGS group). Data were collected from surgical notes and hospital medical records. The primary endpoints for clinical effectiveness and safety were avoid rehospitalization due to bleeding, avoid reoperation due to bleeding, and avoid reoperation due to recurrence. RESULTS: There were no cases of rehospitalization due to bleeding, reoperation due to bleeding, and reoperation due to recurrence in the IGS group, with an avoidance rate of 100%. In the non-IGS group, there were four cases of rehospitalization and reoperation due to bleeding, with an avoidance rate 96.00% (P = 0.121). No cases of reoperation due to recurrence were in the non-IGS group. The total hospitalization cost was 17,391.51 CNY in the IGS group and 17,742.41 CNY in the non-IGS group per patient, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.715). Compared with the non-IGS group, the IGS group had an overall cost saving of 350.90 CNY per patient. Although the procedure-related medical costs of IGS group were increased by 1,286.12 CNY compared with the non-IGS group, this was more than offset by other costs. CONCLUSION: The results of the study indicated that the IGS may avoid occurrence of rehospitalization and reoperation due to postoperative bleeding. Although the use of navigation technology increased the cost of surgery, its clinical effectiveness brought other medical cost savings, resulting in no significant difference in the overall cost of navigation surgery compared to conventional surgery. The IGS should be considered cost-effectiveness in the treatment of FESS.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). METHODS: Fifty-two neonates with NRDS between August 2013 and August 2015 were randomly divided into two groups: VTV and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) (n=26 each ). A/C+Vc+ ventilation model was applied in the VTV group, and A/C+PCV ventilation model was applied in the PCV group. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed at 6, 24, and 48 hours after ventilation. The following parameters were observed: time of invasive ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, mortality, and the incidence rates of hypocapnia, pneumothorax, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), grade III-IV periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage (PVH-IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). RESULTS: Compared with the PCV group, the VTV group had a significantly shorter time of invasive ventilation (P<0.05) and significantly lower incidence rates of hypocapnia, VAP, and PVL (P<0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the duration of oxygen therapy, mortality, and incidence rates of pneumothorax, grade III-IV PVH-IVH, BPD, and ROP. CONCLUSIONS: VTV has a better efficacy than PCV in the treatment of NRDS, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.