Regulation of Mutant p53 Protein Expression.

For several decades, p53 has been detected in cancer biopsies by virtue of its high protein expression level which is considered indicative of mutation. Surprisingly, however, mouse genetic studies revealed that mutant p53 is inherently labile, similar to its wild type (wt) counterpart. Consistently, in response to stress conditions, both wt and mutant p53 accumulate in cells. While wt p53 returns to basal level following recovery from stress, mutant p53 remains stable. In part, this can be explained in mutant p53-expressing cells by the lack of an auto-regulatory loop with Mdm2 and other negative regulators, which are pivotal for wt p53 regulation. Further, additional protective mechanisms are acquired by mutant p53, largely mediated by the co-chaperones and their paralogs, the stress-induced heat shock proteins. Consequently, mutant p53 is accumulated in cancer cells in response to chronic stress and this accumulation is critical for its oncogenic gain of functions (GOF). Building on the extensive knowledge regarding wt p53, the regulation of mutant p53 is unraveling. In this review, we describe the current understanding on the major levels at which mutant p53 is regulated. These include the regulation of p53 protein levels by microRNA and by enzymes controlling p53 proteasomal degradation.

The p53-Mdm2 loop: a critical juncture of stress response.

The presence of a functional p53 protein is a key factor for the proper suppression of cancer development. A loss of p53 activity, by mutations or inhibition, is often associated with human malignancies. The p53 protein integrates various stress signals into a growth restrictive cellular response. In this way, p53 eliminates cells with a potential to become cancerous. Being a powerful decision maker, it is imperative that p53 will be activated properly, efficiently and temporarily in response to stress. Equally important is that p53 activation will be extinguished upon recovery from stress, and that improper activation of p53 will be avoided. Failure to achieve these aims is likely to have catastrophic consequences for the organism. The machinery that governs this tight regulation is largely based on the major inhibitor of p53, Mdm2, which both blocks p53 activities and promotes its destabilization. The interplay between p53 and Mdm2 involves a complex network of positive and negative feedback loops. Relief from Mdm2 suppression is required for p53 to be stabilized and activated in response to stress. Protection from Mdm2 entails a concerted action of modifying enzymes and partner proteins. The association of p53 with the PML-nuclear bodies may provide an infrastructure in which this complex regulatory network can be orchestrated. In this chapter we use examples to illustrate the regulatory machinery that drives this network.

Efficacy and safety of celgosivir in patients with dengue fever (CELADEN): a phase 1b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial.

BACKGROUND: Dengue infection is the most common mosquito-borne viral disease worldwide, but no suitable antiviral drugs are available. We tested the α-glucosidase inhibitor celgosivir as a treatment for acute dengue fever. METHODS: To establish eligibility for inclusion in a phase 1b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial, individuals aged 21-65 years who had had a fever (≥38°C) for less than 48 h, met at least two criteria indicating probable dengue infection, and had a positive result on a dengue point-of-care test kit or PCR assay were referred for screening at a centre in Singapore between July 30, 2012, and March 4, 2013. Using a web-based system, we randomly assigned patients who met full inclusion criteria after screening (1:1; random permuted block length four) to celgosivir (initial 400 mg loading dose within 6 h of randomisation, followed by 200 mg every 12 h for a total of nine doses) or matched placebo. Patients and the entire study team were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoints were mean virological log reduction (VLR) from baseline for days 2, 3, and 4, and area under the fever curve (AUC) for a temperature above 37°C from 0 h to 96 h. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01619969. FINDINGS: We screened 69 patients and randomly assigned 50 (24 to celgosivir, 26 to placebo). Mean VLR was greater in the celgosivir group (-1·86, SD 1·07) than in the placebo group (-1·64, 0·75), but the difference was non-significant (-0·22, 90% CI -0·65 to 0·22; one-sided p=0·203). The mean AUC was also higher in the celgosivir group (54·92, SD 31·04) than in the placebo group (40·72, 18·69), but again the difference was non-significant (14·20, 90% CI 2·16-26·25; one-sided p=0·973). We noted similar incidences of adverse events between groups. INTERPRETATION: Although generally safe and well tolerated, celgosivir does not seem to reduce viral load or fever burden in patients with dengue. FUNDING: STOP Dengue Translational Clinical Research.

Cell-based flavivirus infection (CFI) assay for the evaluation of dengue antiviral candidates using high-content imaging.

Large-scale screening of antiviral compounds that target dengue virus life cycle requires a robust cell-based assay that is rapid, easy to conduct, and sensitive enough to be able to assess viral infectivity and cell viability so that antiviral efficacy can be measured. In this chapter we describe a method that uses high-content imaging to evaluate the in vitro antiviral efficacy in a modification to the cell-based flavivirus immunodetection (CFI) assay that was described previously in Wang et al. (Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(5):1823-1831, 2009).

The magnitude of dengue virus NS1 protein secretion is strain dependent and does not correlate with severe pathologies in the mouse infection model.

There are conflicting data on the relationship between the level of secreted NS1 (sNS1), viremia, and disease severity upon dengue virus (DENV) infection in the clinical setting, and therefore, we examined this relationship in the widely accepted AG129 mouse model. Because of the failure of a routinely used NS1 detection kit to detect sNS1 of the mouse-adapted DENV2 strain, we screened 15 previously undescribed NS1 monoclonal antibodies and developed a robust capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with detection sensitivity at the low nanogram level (0.2 ng/ml) using recombinant baculovirus-expressed sNS1 as well as sNS1 that was immunoaffinity purified from the various DENV2 strains employed in this study. Using this test, we demonstrated that increased viremia paralleled severe pathologies; however, sNS1 level did not correlate with viremia or severity. Furthermore, among the DENV2 strains that were tested, the level of NS1 secretion did not correspond to virus replication rate in vitro, at the cellular level. Together, our data indicate that the magnitude of NS1 secretion appears to be strain dependent and does not correlate with viral virulence in the AG129 mouse model.

Celgosivir treatment misfolds dengue virus NS1 protein, induces cellular pro-survival genes and protects against lethal challenge mouse model.

Dengue virus (DENV) infections continue to spread aggressively around the world. Here we demonstrate that celgosivir (6-O-butanoyl castanospermine), strongly inhibits all four DENV serotypes. We show by fluorescence microscopy that the antiviral mechanism of celgosivir, is in part, due to misfolding and accumulation of DENV non-structural protein 1 (NS1) in the endoplasmic reticulum. Moreover, celgosivir modulates the host's unfolded protein response (UPR) for its antiviral action. Significantly, celgosivir is effective in lethal challenge mouse models that recapitulate primary or secondary antibody-dependent enhanced DENV infection. Celgosivir treated mice showed enhanced survival, reduced viremia and robust immune response, as reflected by serum cytokine analysis. Importantly, survival increased even after treatment was delayed till 2 days post-infection. Together the present study suggests that celgosivir, which has been clinically determined to be safe in humans, may be a valuable candidate for clinical testing in dengue patients.