Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Infect Dis Now ; 53(2): 104637, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36526247

RESUMEN

The persistent debate about the modes of transmission of SARS-CoV2 and preventive measures has illustrated the limits of our knowledge regarding the measures to be implemented in the face of viral risk. Past and present (pandemic-related) scientific data underline the complexity of the phenomenon and its variability over time. Several factors contribute to the risk of transmission, starting with incidence in the general population (i.e., colonization pressure) and herd immunity. Other major factors include intensity of symptoms, interactions with the reservoir (proximity and duration of contact), the specific characteristics of the virus(es) involved, and a number of unpredictable elements (humidity, temperature, ventilation…). In this review, we will emphasize the difficulty of "standardizing" the situations that might explain the discrepancies found in the literature. We will show that the airborne route remains the main mode of transmission. Regarding preventive measures of prevention, while vaccination remains the cornerstone of the fight against viral outbreaks, we will remind the reader that wearing a mask is the main barrier measure and that the choice of type of mask depends on the risk situations. Finally, we believe that the recent pandemic should induce us in the future to modify our recommendations by adapting our measures in hospitals, not to the pathogen concerned, which is currently the case, but rather to the type of at-risk situation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , ARN Viral , Pandemias/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 126: 116-122, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35569577

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Data on the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) remain conflicting. Airborne transmission is still debated. However, hospital risk control requires better understanding of the different modes of transmission. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of, and factors associated with, environmental air and surface contamination in the rooms of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in the acute phase of the disease. METHODS: Sixty-five consecutive patients were included in this study. For each patient, seven room surfaces, air 1 m and 3 m from the patient's head, the inner surface of the patient's mask, and the outer surface of healthcare workers' (HCW) masks were sampled. Environmental contamination was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for SARS-CoV-2 RNA on surfaces, air and masks. A viral isolation test was performed on Vero cells for samples with an RT-qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) ≤37. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by RT-qPCR in 34%, 12%, 50% and 10% of surface, air, patient mask and HCW mask samples, respectively. Infectious virus was isolated in culture from two samples among the 85 positive samples with Ct ≤37. On multi-variate analysis, only a positive result for SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR for patients' face masks was found to be significantly associated with surface contamination (odds ratio 5.79, 95% confidence interval 1.31-25.67; P=0.025). CONCLUSION: This study found that surface contamination by SARS-CoV-2 was more common than air and mask contamination. However, viable virus was rare. The inner surface of a patient's mask could be used as a marker to identify those at higher risk of contamination.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Chlorocebus aethiops , Hospitales , Humanos , Habitaciones de Pacientes , ARN Viral , Células Vero
4.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 25(3): 199-205, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33688808

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are associated with poor prognosis in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to assess factors associated with hospital mortality in ILD patients admitted to the ICU and to investigate long-term outcome.MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study in a teaching hospital specialised in ILD management. Patients with ILD who were hospitalised in the ICU between 2000 and 2014 were included. Independent predictors of hospital mortality were identified using logistic regression.RESULTS: A total of 196 ILD patients were admitted to the ICU during the study period. Overall hospital mortality was 55%. Two years after ICU admission, 70 (36%) patients were still alive. Of the 196 patients, 108 (55%) required invasive mechanical ventilation, of whom 21 (20%) were discharged alive from hospital. Acute exacerbation of ILD and multi-organ failure were highly associated with hospital mortality (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.9-15.5 and OR 12.6, 95% CI 4.9-32.5, respectively).CONCLUSION: Hospital mortality among ILD patients hospitalised in the ICU was high, but even where invasive mechanical ventilation was required, a substantial number of patients were discharged alive from hospital. Multi-organ failure could lead to major ethical concerns.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/terapia , Pronóstico , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
New Microbes New Infect ; 12: 31-4, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27222715

RESUMEN

Melioidosis is an endemic disease in Southeast Asia and northern Australia. An increasing number of cases are being reported in nonendemic countries, making the diagnosis less obvious. We discuss the identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei using matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry on the occasion of recent cases of imported melioidosis in French travellers.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA