Efficacy, residual effectiveness and safety of diacerein in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause of disability in the elderly. Prevention and treatment of OA have become an urgent global demand. The pharmacologic role of diacerein in the treatment of osteoarthritis is controversial. We systematically reviewed the efficacy, safety, and residual effectiveness of diacerein. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the symptomatic efficacy, residual effect and safety of diacerein in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, using a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: On December 1, 2021, we searched PubMed Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, Wan Fang Medical Database, and National Knowledge Infrastructure. This study followed the inclusion criteria of the principle P(Population), I(Intervention), C(Comparison), O(Outcome), S (Study design) principle. All studies were randomized controlled trials of knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. To explore sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, regression analysis and publication bias analysis were performed. Drug side effects with complete data were extracted from the included articles and then a combined analysis of these data was performed. RESULTS: Eight studies were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 1277 participants). All studies were randomized controlled trials of knee osteoarthritis. There was no significant difference in reduction of joint pain and improvement of function between diacerein and the control group. However, subgroup analysis suggested, compared with the placebo group, diacerein treatment yielded an improved mean reduction in visual analogue scale score of-0.44% (95% confidence interval [CI]-0.79 to 0.09), an improved the western Ontario and McMaster universities (physical function) score of -0.44% (95% CI-0.72 to -0.12). Follow-up analysis after discontinuation showed that diacerein treatment had a significant residual effect (95% CI-0.81 to- 0.24). Data on drug side effects described in the included articles were extracted for statistical analysis. There was an increased risk of diarrhea with diacerein (Risk Ratio [RR] = 1.95 [1.03 to 2.47]) and withdrawal event from therapy (RR = 0.93 [0.75 to 1.15]). CONCLUSION: Diacerein might be considered an effective drug for the treatment of patients with KOA, showing short-term residual effectiveness. Although it is associated with an increased risk of diarrhea, the adverse event is mostly tolerable.

Rapamycin alleviates renal damage in mice with systemic lupus erythematosus through improving immune response and function.

This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effect and mechanism of rapamycin (RAPA) on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in BALB/C mice induced by pristane. The mice were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 6): control, model, saline, RAPA (1 mg/kg) and RAPA (2 mg/kg). All groups were injected with pristane except control. HE staining revealed 1 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg RAPA treatments obviously alleviated pathological changes in the kidney of SLE mice such as glomeruli enlargement, hyperplasia of mesangial cells, epithelial and endothelial cells, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and edema-like degeneration of renal tubules. Compared with control group, body weights and anti-ribosomal P-protein antibody (ARPA) level of the mice in model group and saline group decreased (P < 0.05), while immune complex deposition and levels of anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-smRNP antibody and urine protein in model group and saline group increased (P < 0.05). However, compared with model group and saline group, body weights of the mice in RAPA (1 mg/kg) group and RAPA (2 mg/kg) group increased (P < 0.05), while immune complex deposition and levels of anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-smRNP antibody, ARPA, and urine protein in RAPA (1 mg/kg) group and RAPA (2 mg/kg) group decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with control group, the proportion of dentritic cells (DC) in the kidney and peripheral blood decreased while the proportion of Th1, Th2 and Th17 cells in the spleen, kidney and peripheral blood increased in model group and saline group (P < 0.05). Compared with model group and saline group, 1 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg RAPA treatments boosted the proportion of DC in the kidney and peripheral blood, reduced the proportion of Th1 and Th17 cells in the spleen, kidney and peripheral blood, and lessened the proportion of Th2 cells in the kidney and peripheral blood (P < 0.05). In conclusion, RAPA alleviated renal damage in SLE mice through improving immune response and function.

Serum magnesium levels and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether serum magnesium levels were lower in patients with lung cancer than that in healthy controls is controversial. The aim of this study was to identify and synthesize all citations evaluating the relationship between serum magnesium levels and lung cancer. METHODS: We searched PubMed, WanFang, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), and SinoMed databases for relevant studies before December 31, 2017. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. RESULTS: Eleven citations comprising 707 cases with lung cancer and 7595 healthy controls were included in our study. Serum magnesium levels were not significantly lower in patients with lung cancer [summary SMD = 0.193, 95%CI = - 1.504 to 1.890] when compared to health controls, with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99.6%, P < 0.001) found. Negative associations were found among Asian populations [summary SMD = 0.229, 95%CI = - 1.637 to 2.094] and European populations [summary SMD = - 0.168, 95%CI = - 0.482 to 0.147]. No publication bias was found using the test of Egger and funnel plot. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that serum magnesium levels had no significant association on lung cancer risk.