Case Report: Durable partial response to icotinib plus crizotinib in a lung adenocarcinoma patient with double uncommon EGFR G719D/L861Q mutations and an acquired novel CUX1-MET fusion.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping or high MET amplification display a high rate of response to MET inhibitors. However, MET fusions in NSCLC have rarely been revealed. In this report, a 63-year-old woman with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC), harboring EGFR exon 18 G719D and exon 21 L861Q mutations, received first-generation, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) icotinib therapy. Next generation sequencing (NGS) results only displayed an EGFR T790M point mutation following icotinib resistance. Thus, the patient was treated with osimertinib and achieved a stable disease (SD). However, disease progressed after 15 months and a novel MET fusion (CUX1 exon14-MET exon15) in addition to EGFR G719D/L861Q mutations were simultaneously detected in a tissue biopsy sample. After more than nine months, the patient subsequently achieved a PR with the combination of icotinib and crizotinib. To our knowledge, this is the first case of LADC patient displaying the presence of EGFR double uncommon mutations and an acquired novel CUX1-MET fusion that has benefited from icotinib plus crizotinib treatment. Following nine months of PR with icotinib plus crizotinib, the patient, until the time of publication, is exhibiting stable disease. The results suggest that the CUX1-MET fusion may be sensitive to crizotinib, although previous reports indicated that some MET fusion cases did not respond to crizotinib. Given this disparity, distinguishing MET fusion partners when crizotinib is used in LADC treatment is also very important.

Cloning and expression of the EsxA gene and the growth-promoting effects of the encoded protein on rice seedlings.

An EsxA-encoding gene (esxA) was previously identified in the genome of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus terrae strain NK3-4. The esxA was cloned and expressed in Pichia pastoris, after which the effects of the EsxA protein on rice seedling growth were analyzed to determine whether EsxA contributes to the plant growth-promoting activity of strain NK3-4. The esxA was successfully cloned from the NK3-4 genome and ligated to the eukaryotic expression vector pPICZαA. The resulting pPICZαA-esxA recombinant plasmid was transinfected into yeast cells, and esxA expression in the yeast cells was confirmed. The treatment of seed- buds with the EsxA protein increased the root length by 1.35-times, but decreased the bud length. Additionally, in rice seedlings treated with EsxA, the root and shoot lengths increased by 2.6- and 1.7-times, respectively. These findings imply that EsxA is important for the promotion of rice plant growth by P. terrae strain NK3-4. Furthermore, the construction of the esxA expression vector and the engineered strain may be useful for future investigations of the mechanism underlying the plant growth-promoting effects of EsxA, with implications for the application of EsxA for regulating plant growth.

A 12-hour rapid titration method for cancer pain: a randomized, controlled, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Opioid titration is the best way to achieve a balance of pain relief and tolerable side effects for moderate-to-severe cancer pain. Rapid dose titration helps to achieve early analgesia. We explored the efficacy and safety of a 12-hour rapid dose titration in treating cancer pain. METHODS: Opioid-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain were randomly divided into oxycodone group and morphine group. The medicines were adjusted to oxycodone sustained-release tablets after 12 hours, and the dose of oxycodone sustained-release tablets was adjusted every 12 hours. The analgesic efficacy and adverse reactions during the treatment were observed until the 72nd hour. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were included in the analysis, with 51 patients in the oxycodone group and 55 in the morphine group. The pain control rate of all patients reached 96.2% 24 hours after treatment, and it was not significantly different between two groups (P=0.619). The proportion of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score that decreased by ≥50% was significantly higher in the oxycodone group than in the morphine group (P=0.013). In the first 12 hours and 24 hours, significantly lower proportions of patients in the oxycodone group experienced multiple episodes of breakthrough pain (BTP) than in the morphine group (P=0.032, P=0.021, respectively). The quality of life of the patients in the oxycodone group was significantly higher than that in the morphine group at the 24th hour (P=0.047), as was the degree to which the quality of life had improved (P<0.001). Only grade 1 or 2 adverse reactions were observed during the study period, and no significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 12-hour rapid dose titration method can achieve early analgesia, with mild adverse reactions. In particular, the rapid titration method with background sustained-release oxycodone can reduce BTP episodes and achieve significant early pain relief.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib as third- or further-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Apatinib, an oral small-molecule angiogenesis inhibitor, selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), which inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulated endothelial cell migration and proliferation and decreases tumour growth and metastasis. Recently, the efficacy of multi-target angiogenic drugs has been demonstrated for many cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of apatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 70 patients with advanced NSCLC who received second-line and later treatment from November 2015 to July 2017 with poor results. Out of the 70 patients, 36 patients received apatinib treatment after second-line or later treatment, whereas 34 patients in the control group did not receive further treatment. The patients were treated with oral apatinib 500 mg once a day every day for 4 weeks per cycle. Treatment was continued in responding and stable patients until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and side effects of the drug were recorded and reviewed. RESULTS: ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS were evaluated in 36 patients receiving apatinib and 34 patients in the control group. The ORR and DCR in patients receiving apatinib therapy were 22.2% and 77.8%, respectively. The median PFS and OS in the treatment group were 5.6 and 9.6 months, respectively. The median OS in the apatinib group was significantly longer than that in the control group (9.6 versus 3.8 months; p < 0.0001). In contrast, there were no differences in adverse reactions between the patients in the treatment and control groups. CONCLUSION: Apatinib showed favourable efficacy and safety and can thus be used as a treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC.

The concentration of erlotinib in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer.

It has been demonstrated that erlotinib is effective in treating patients with brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the number of studies determining the erlotinib concentration in these patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to measure the concentration of erlotinib in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Six patients were treated with the standard recommended daily dose of erlotinib (150 mg) for 4 weeks. All the patients had previously received chemotherapy, but no brain radiotherapy. At the end of the treatment period, blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected and the erlotinib concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The average erlotinib concentration in the blood plasma and the cerebrospinal fluid was 717.7±459.7 and 23.7±13.4 ng/ml, respectively. The blood-brain barrier permeation rate of erlotinib was found to be 4.4±3.2%. In patients with partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD), the average concentrations of erlotinib in the cerebrospinal fluid were 35.5±19.0, 19.1±8.7 and 16.4±5.9 ng/ml, respectively. In addition, the efficacy rate of erlotinib for metastatic brain lesions was 33.3%, increasing to 50% in patients with EGFR mutations. However, erlotinib appeared to be ineffective in cases with wild-type EGFR. In conclusion, a relatively high concentration of erlotinib was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer. Thus, erlotinib may be considered as a treatment option for this patient population.