RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sacral masses can be removed using anterior, posterior, or combined approaches. Achieving total sacrectomy through a posterior-only approach results in a shorter procedure time, minimal tissue damage, and a reduced risk of complications. In this study, we aimed to share our experience with performing total sacrectomy using a posterior-only approach in 26 patients and to assess their clinical outcomes at our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study examines the clinical progression, surgical response, and outcomes of 26 patients with various sacral mass pathologies. We accessed patient information from our hospital records. RESULTS: The study included 14 men (54%) and 12 women (46%), with an average age of 49.8 years. Most cases had a normal body mass index, while 6 were overweight. Sacrectomy was performed at a high level in 12 patients and at a middle level in 14 patients. In addition to pain, motor deficits were observed in 9 patients, and sphincter dysfunction was found in 5. Preoperative embolization was conducted for 11 patients. The most prevalent lesions were chordoma (8 patients), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (4 patients), giant cell tumor (3 patients), and solitary plasmacytoma (3 patients). Only 1 patient experienced a temporary partial motor deficit after surgery. There were no instances of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Five patients experienced local recurrence, and 1 had distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Performing sacrectomy for large or giant sacral tumors through a posterior approach is both feasible and safe, resulting in reduced morbidity and no significant change in overall survival.
