RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Atherosclerosis contributes to the underlying pathophysiology for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and cerebrovascular disease. Several studies have been conducted to demonstrate PAD as a major risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events, however, the regional data are limited. This study aims to highlight PAD as a major risk factor in CV events in a local setting. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, 400 hypertensive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAD were enrolled from the outpatient department of the cardiology unit. Diagnosis of PAD was made using the ankle brachial index (ABI). ABI less than 0.9 was labeled as participants with PAD. Another group of 400 without PAD was also enrolled as the control group from the outpatient department of cardiology unit. Patients were followed up for 12 months or for the development of myocardial infarction (MI). RESULT: Participants with PAD had a significant increased risk of total MI events with a relative risk (RR) of 1.67 (confidence interval, CI 95%: 1.05-2.66; p-value: 0.02). The RR for fatal MI was 2.62 (CI 95%: 0.94-7.29; p-value: 0.06) compared to the participants without PAD, however, it was not significant. CONCLUSION: This study has focused on the risk factors of PAD and has suggested that the patients who have any of the mentioned risk factors should be treated with caution under strict instructions given by doctors. A variety of treatment options is available, but the initial changes should be made in the lifestyle of these patients, making sure the risk factors are being treated.
RESUMEN
The frequency of extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is observed in most of the patients. Extraintestinal manifestations of IBD have been implicated in all the anatomic sites of the pulmonary tree, and include airway inflammation of the bronchi and bronchioles and parenchymal inflammation. There is a wide range of pulmonary manifestations in IBD, and most of them look a lot like other diseases. Doctors should keep a track of these conditions to avoid unnecessary complications and to provide an early diagnosis with correct and efficient treatment. IBD-related respiratory disorders are treated depending on the patient, but in most of them, steroids are generally chosen first. Steroids, both inhalational and systemic, are the primary approach. Antibiotics could also be given if the patient has infections or suppuration, usually followed by surgeries. However, drug-induced complications and toxicity should be kept in mind.
RESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Warfarin dosing algorithms do not account for genetic mutations that can affect anticoagulation response. We retrospectively assessed to what extent the VKORC1 variant genotype would alter the likelihood of being a hyperresponder or hyporesponder to warfarin in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. We used the international normalized ratio (INR) on the third postoperative day of 3.0 or greater to define warfarin hyperresponders and 1.07 or less to define hyporesponders. A control group of normal responders was identified. From a cohort of 1125 patients receiving warfarin thromboprophylaxis, we identified 30 free of predisposing factors that could affect warfarin response: 10 hyperresponders, eight hyporesponders, and 12 normal responders. Homozygous carriers of the VKORC1 mutant AA genotype were more likely (compared with carriers of GA or GG genotypes) to be hyperresponders (odds ratio, 7.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-54.1). Homozygous carriers of the GG (normal) genotype were more likely (compared with carriers of AA or GA genotypes) to be hyporesponders (odds ratio, 9; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-71). Preoperative screening for the VKORC-1 genotype could identify patients with a greater potential for being a hyperresponder or hyporesponder to warfarin. This may allow an adjusted pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dose to optimize anticoagulation, reducing postoperative risks of bleeding and thrombosis or embolism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Resistencia a Medicamentos/genética , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/genética , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Variación Genética , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trombosis/epidemiología , Trombosis/genética , Trombosis/prevención & control , Vitamina K Epóxido ReductasasRESUMEN
We prospectively compared the utility and precision of preoperative templating performed in printed films (analogue) with that performed on digital radiographs (digital) in 69 patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. Five patients were excluded when misplacement of the marker resulted in a magnification error greater that 10%; in the remaining patients (64 hips), the cup size was within +/- one size in 62 (97%) of the analogue and 52 (81%) of the digital (p=0.01) plans. The stem size was within +/- one size in 63 (98%) of the analogue and 60 (94%) of the digital (p=0.39) plans. The distance from the proximal corner of the lesser trochanter to the center of the prosthetic head (LTCD) in the analogue differed by 5 mm or more from the digital plan in nine cases (14%). Analogue preoperative planning yielded more predictable results than digital planning, particularly in terms of acetabular component size and LTCD that dictates limb lengthening-shortening. The sources of error were not clearly explained by variations in magnification. Inconsistent positioning of the magnification marker may jeopardise the safe implementation of digital templating.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica , Película para Rayos X , Fémur/cirugía , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis/métodos , Ajuste de Prótesis/métodosRESUMEN
The ability of bone cement to adhere to the implant surface is dependent on the surface finish. Stems with a rough surface finish require greater force to disrupt their interface with the cement than do stems with a smooth or polished surface. However, if micromotion occurs at the cement-metal interface, the fretting of a smoother surface implant results in less cement and metallic abrasion than an implant with a rough surface finish. Today, surgeons implant femoral stems with a wide variety of surface finish and textures that are supported by the previously mentioned contrasting philosophy of fixation. This article presents the micro and macro surface finish mechanics, history, and rationale for changes in surface finish, the clinical and operative implications of changes in surface finish, the retrieval analysis, and the clinical evidence that examine the consequences of changes in surface finish in the outcome of cemented femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty. Current data and our own experience support the use of cemented femoral stems with a smooth or polished surface finish.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Cementos para Huesos , Prótesis de Cadera , Propiedades de Superficie , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/instrumentación , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess if pneumatic compression in conjunction with chemoprophylaxis is an effective way to reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in orthopedic trauma patients sustaining fragility hip fractures. DESIGN: Two hundred patients admitted to the authors' institution between May 1998 and June 2002 for fractures of the hip were prospectively studied. All patients were treated operatively and received the VenaFlow calf compression device on both lower extremities immediately following surgery. Chemical prophylaxis of either aspirin (n = 67) or warfarin (n = 133) was administered in addition to mechanical compression. A noninvasive serial color flow duplex scan was performed 1 to 11 days postoperatively (mean 4.5 days) to determine the presence or absence of deep vein thrombosis. All patients were followed clinically 3 months postoperatively for a clinical evaluation of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: Overall, the incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 3.5% (7 of 200) and included only 1 proximal thrombosis (1 out of 200, or 0.5%) and no pulmonary embolism. Five of the 7 patients positive for deep vein thrombosis were in the mechanical compression and warfarin prophylaxis group and 2 were in the aspirin arm of the study. For patients with deep vein thrombosis, the average number of risk factors was 3.71, whereas patients without clots averaged 1.75 clinical risk factors (P < or = 0.05). Three patients in the warfarin group developed bleeding complications (1 with a gastrointestinal bleed and 2 with minor bleeding not at the operative site). No evidence of a symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was reported within a 3-month period following hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest mechanical compression with the VenaFlow calf compression device in conjunction with chemoprophylaxis is an effective means of reducing thromboembolic disease in this high-risk population.