Work/study productivity gain and associated indirect cost savings with guselkumab compared with adalimumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the VOYAGE 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Work productivity loss (WPL) is a major contributor to the indirect costs of psoriasis. Newer biologic therapies are effective at reducing disease symptoms and improving quality of life, but their impact on WPL and associated indirect cost savings compared to previously approved biologic therapies is largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of guselkumab and adalimumab on WPL and associated indirect cost savings in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Using data from the VOYAGE 1 (NCT02207231) trial, improvements from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) work/study domain scores were compared for patients receiving guselkumab or adalimumab at 24 and 48 weeks of treatment. Improvements in WPL and associated cost savings were calculated using a previously established DLQI-WPL algorithm. RESULTS: Among patients who could not work/study at baseline (DLQI work/study domain score = 3), a significantly greater proportion of guselkumab-treated patients could work/study without problems (DLQI work/study domain score = 0) than adalimumab-treated patients at Weeks 24 and 48. Improvements from baseline in WPL and associated cost savings were greater with guselkumab than with adalimumab at Week 48. CONCLUSIONS: Guselkumab was superior to adalimumab for improvement in WPL and associated indirect cost savings, and its use may reduce the economic burden of psoriasis.

Use of the Dermatology Life Quality Index work/study domain to estimate overall work productivity loss among patients with psoriasis: an analysis based on real-world data.

Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune disease that is associated with substantial economic burden related to work productivity loss (WPL). WPL is commonly measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. However, WPAI does not measure outcomes among unemployed patients, and may therefore underestimate the burden of psoriasis. This study evaluated the relationship between the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire work/study domain and WPL using the WPAI, as DLQI assesses the impact of psoriasis on the ability to work/study regardless of employment status, but does not estimate WPL. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Psoriasis Disease Specific Programme survey. A positive linear relationship was observed between DLQI work/study scores and WPAI results, showing that higher DLQI scores were associated with greater percent WPL. These findings suggest that the DLQI work/study domain can be used to estimate overall WPL among patients with psoriasis, including those who cannot work because of their disease.

A multinational assessment of work-related productivity loss and indirect costs from a survey of patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Total work productivity loss (WPL) and associated indirect costs contribute to the economic burden of psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To estimate total WPL and related indirect costs, and identify predictors of WPL associated with psoriasis severity in France, Germany, Spain, the U.K. and Italy (EU5) and the U.S.A. METHODS: Data from the 2015 Adelphi Real World Psoriasis Disease Specific Programme, analysed for absenteeism, presenteeism and total WPL, were quantified (0-100%) from participants who completed the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) instrument. These measures were converted to indirect costs using the human capital method. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses controlling for patient demographic and clinical characteristics were conducted. RESULTS: Of the 936 respondents (29·6% U.S.A., 70·4% EU5) who completed the WPAI, 32·6%, 40·7% and 26·6% had mild [body surface area (BSA) 0-2%], moderate (BSA 3-10%) and severe (BSA > 10%) psoriasis, respectively. Average age, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score and BSA were, respectively, 42·4 years, 5·1 and 9·6%; and 37·2% of respondents were female. Mean percentages of total WPL for respondents with mild, moderate and severe psoriasis were 10·1%, 18·9% and 29·4%, respectively. Presenteeism contributed considerably more to total WPL than did absenteeism across all countries and disease severity classes. Mean annual indirect costs per patient due to WPL ranged from 3742 U.S. dollars in Spain to 9591 U.S. dollars in the U.S.A. Multivariate regression showed that a one-unit increase in DLQI score increases total WPL by 1·8% (P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: WPL increased progressively with increasing DLQI scores and BSA, confirming the relationship between psoriasis severity and its economic burden. What's already known about this topic? The economic burden of psoriasis is exceptionally high given the high prevalence and lifelong nature of the condition. Several studies have attempted to assess the overall economic burden of psoriasis but there is a lack of comparative data from different countries, and issues around inconsistent methodologies, including statistical analyses. Total work productivity loss (WPL) and associated indirect costs are believed to contribute to the economic burden of psoriasis. What does this study add? This study measured total WPL and indirect costs via the same method and at the same time point in the U.S.A., France, Germany, Spain, U.K. and Italy. Total WPL increased progressively with psoriasis disease severity. Disease severity and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores significantly correlated with WPL after controlling for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. The U.S.A. had the highest annual mean indirect costs associated with total WPL. Linked Comment: Drabo et al. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:420-421.

Physician attitudes about non-medical switching to biosimilars: results from an online physician survey in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to understand the level of familiarity of US rheumatologists, gastroenterologists and dermatologists with biosimilar therapies, their experience with non-medical switching (switching medications for reasons unrelated to patient health) of patients between biologics and their attitudes towards switching from a biologic to a biosimilar. METHODS: A total of 297 US physicians who currently prescribe biologics for their patients completed a 15-minute online survey. Rheumatologists, dermatologists and gastroenterologists were included. RESULTS: The majority of physicians (84%) did not want stable patients undergoing a non-medical switch to a biosimilar. While 60% of physicians believed non-medical switching to biosimilars may have a positive impact on healthcare system costs, multiple negative impacts were also expected. A majority of physicians anticipated a negative impact on patient mental health (59%), treatment efficacy (57%), patient safety (53%) and physician office management (60%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of physicians had concerns regarding non-medical switching to biosimilars and the impact such switching would have on patient care and physician practice.

Patient attitudes about non-medical switching to biosimilars: results from an online patient survey in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient attitudes regarding non-medical switching (NMS) to biosimilars among patients with autoimmune disease currently receiving a biologic. METHODS: An online survey was conducted among patients meeting the following criteria: ≥18 years of age; residing in the US; diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis; currently taking a biologic; and consenting to participate. Patients answered questions about their attitudes and experiences related to NMS. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. RESULTS: A total of 1696 patients completed the 20-min survey. Eighty-five per cent of patients were concerned that biosimilars wouldn't treat their disease as well; 85% didn't want to switch to a biosimilar if their current biologic was helping their disease; and 83% were concerned that switching may cause more side-effects. Twenty per cent of patients had previously received notification about a potential NMS to another biologic (that was not a biosimilar) from their insurance company. Of these, 79% took at least one action to avoid the NMS and 45% ultimately switched. Of these patients (n = 150), 67% indicated that their previous biologic worked well for them and 70% didn't want to switch to another biologic. Most patients who switched (67%) did so to avoid paying a higher cost. More than half (56%) went without therapy for administrative reasons during the period of transition from the old biologic to the other treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients reported multiple concerns about NMS that might impact treatment outcomes, and many of the patients who non-medically switched in this survey missed treatments. Future studies should be conducted on patient expectations and experiences with NMS to understand the impact on healthcare delivery, treatment persistency, and patient outcomes. The patient perspective and experience should be considered by decision-makers when developing coverage policies for biosimilar medications and associated communication strategies.

The anti-HIV activity of the phytochemical alpha-terthienyl.

The plant trithiophene, alpha-terthienyl (alpha T), was evaluated for activity against the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). Antiviral activity specifically required long wavelength light (UVA, 320-400 nm). The compound had little or no activity in visible light or in the dark. The anti-HIV effect was UVA-dose dependent and was proportional to the concentration of alpha T, according to several parameters of virus infectivity and replication. The efficacy was decreased to some extent by the presence of bovine serum in the reactions; but under optimal conditions 0.1 microgram/ml. alpha T (3 x 10(-7) M) could inactivate 10(4)-10(5) infectious particles. In contrast poliovirus and Coxsackievirus infectivity were relatively resistant to alpha T + UVA.