Usability Testing of Situation Awareness Clinical Decision Support in the Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the usability of an automated clinical decision support (CDS) tool previously implemented in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) to promote shared situation awareness among the medical team to prevent serious safety events within children's hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods usability evaluation of a CDS tool in a PICU at a large, urban, quaternary, free-standing children's hospital in the Midwest. Quantitative assessment was done using the system usability scale (SUS), while qualitative assessment involved think-aloud usability testing. The SUS was scored according to survey guidelines. For think-aloud testing, task times were calculated, and means and standard deviations were determined, stratified by role. Qualitative feedback from participants and moderator observations were summarized. RESULTS: Fifty-one PICU staff members, including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and respiratory therapists, completed the SUS, while ten participants underwent think-aloud usability testing. The overall median usability score was 87.5 (interquartile range: 80-95), with over 96% rating the tool's usability as "good" or "excellent." Task completion times ranged from 2 to 92 seconds, with the quickest completion for reviewing high-risk criteria and the slowest for adding to high-risk criteria. Observations and participant responses from think-aloud testing highlighted positive aspects of learnability and clear display of complex information that is easily accessed, as well as opportunities for improvement in tool integration into clinical workflows. CONCLUSION: The PICU Warning Tool demonstrates good usability in the critical care setting. This study demonstrates the value of postimplementation usability testing in identifying opportunities for continued improvement of CDS tools.

Garnering effective telehealth to help optimize multidisciplinary team engagement (GET2HOME) for children with medical complexity: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Children and young adults with medical complexity (CMC) experience high rates of healthcare reutilization following hospital discharge. Prior studies have identified common hospital-to-home transition failures that may increase the risk for reutilization, including medication, technology and equipment issues, financial concerns, and confusion about which providers can help with posthospitalization needs. Few interventions have been developed and evaluated for CMC during this transition period. OBJECTIVE: We will compare the effectiveness of the garnering effective telehealth 2 help optimize multidisciplinary team engagement (GET2HOME) transition bundle intervention to the standard hospital-based care coordination discharge process by assessing healthcare reutilization and patient- and family-centered outcomes. DESIGNS, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: We will conduct a pragmatic 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the GET2HOME bundle intervention to the standard hospital-based care discharge process on CMC hospitalized and discharged from hospital medicine at two sites of our pediatric medical center between November 2022 and February 2025. CMC of any age will be identified as having complex chronic disease using the Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm tool. We will exclude CMC who live independently, live in skilled nursing facilities, are in custody of the county, or are hospitalized for suicidal ideation or end-of-life care. INTERVENTION: We will randomize participants to the bundle intervention or standard hospital-based care coordination discharge process. The bundle intervention includes (1) predischarge telehealth huddle with inpatient providers, outpatient providers, patients, and their families; (2) care management discharge task tracker; and (3) postdischarge telehealth huddle with similar participants within 7 days of discharge. As part of the pragmatic design, families will choose if they want to complete the postdischarge huddle. The standard hospital-based discharge process includes a pharmacist, social worker, and care management support when consulted by the inpatient team but does not include huddles between providers and families. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Primary outcome will be 30-day urgent healthcare reutilization (unplanned readmission, emergency department, and urgent care visits). Secondary outcomes include 7-day urgent healthcare reutilization, patient- and family-reported transition quality, quality of life, and time to return to baseline using electronic health record and surveys at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days following discharge. We will also evaluate heterogeneity of treatment effect for the intervention across levels of financial strain and for CMC with high-intensity neurologic impairment. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle with logistic regression used to study reutilization outcomes and generalized linear mixed modeling to study repeated measures of patient- and family-reported outcomes over time. RESULTS: This pragmatic RCT is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced discharge transition support, including telehealth huddles and a care management discharge tool, for CMC and their families. Enrollment began in November 2022 and is projected to complete in February 2025. Primary analysis completion is anticipated in July 2025 with reporting of results following.

Improving Usability of the Pediatric Code Cart by Combining Lean and Human Factors Principles.

Cardiac arrests are common in hospitalized children. Well-organized code carts are needed during these events to help staff efficiently find supplies and medications for the patient. This study aimed to improve the efficiency and utilization of the code cart at a major academic pediatric medical center. Methods: This quality improvement project used a phased approach to redesign the code cart. A multidisciplinary team used Lean and Human Factors principles to improve the efficiency and intuitiveness of the redesigned cart. Nurses and respiratory therapists participated in simulations asking for certain supplies with the original and redesigned code cart and filled out surveys for feedback on each code cart. Facilitators measured retrieval times during each simulation. Results: We performed 10 simulations with the original code cart and 13 with the redesigned code cart. Staff could find intraosseous access equipment more quickly (23.9 versus 46.4 seconds; P = 0.003). In addition, staff reported they were less likely to open the wrong drawer or grab the wrong equipment and that the redesigned code cart was overall more well organized than the original code cart. Finally, the redesigned code cart reduced the cost by over 800 dollars per full cart restock. Conclusion: Revising the code cart using Lean and Human Factors improves efficiency and usability and can contribute to cost savings.

CPR quality and outcomes after extracorporeal life support for pediatric In-Hospital cardiac arrest.

AIM OF STUDY: To determine outcomes in pediatric patients who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest and subsequently received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Our secondary objective was to identify cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) event characteristics and CPR quality metrics associated with survival after ECPR. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients in the pediRES-Q database who received ECPR after in-hospital cardiac arrest between July 1, 2015 and June 2, 2021. Primary outcome was survival to ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic outcome at ICU and hospital discharge. RESULTS: Among 124 patients included in this study, median age was 0.9 years (IQR 0.2-5) and the majority of patients had primarily cardiac disease (92 patients, 75%). Survival to ICU discharge occurred in 61/120 (51%) patients, 36/61 (59%) of whom had favorable neurologic outcome. No demographic or clinical variables were associated with survival after ECPR. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who received ECPR for IHCA we found a high rate of survival to ICU discharge with good neurologic outcome.

Inappropriate Shock Delivery Is Common During Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize inappropriate shock delivery during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An international pediatric cardiac arrest quality improvement collaborative Pediatric Resuscitation Quality [pediRES-Q]. PATIENTS: All IHCA events from 2015 to 2020 from the pediRES-Q Collaborative for which shock and electrocardiogram waveform data were available. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed 418 shocks delivered during 159 cardiac arrest events, with 381 shocks during 158 events at 28 sites remaining after excluding undecipherable rhythms. We classified shocks as: 1) appropriate (ventricular fibrillation [VF] or wide complex ≥ 150/min); 2) indeterminate (narrow complex ≥ 150/min or wide complex 100-149/min); or 3) inappropriate (asystole, sinus, narrow complex < 150/min, or wide complex < 100/min) based on the rhythm immediately preceding shock delivery. Of delivered shocks, 57% were delivered appropriately for VF or wide complex rhythms with a rate greater than or equal to 150/min. Thirteen percent were classified as indeterminate. Thirty percent were delivered inappropriately for asystole (6.8%), sinus (3.1%), narrow complex less than 150/min (11%), or wide complex less than 100/min (8.9%) rhythms. Eighty-eight percent of all shocks were delivered in ICUs or emergency departments, and 30% of those were delivered inappropriately. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of inappropriate shock delivery for pediatric IHCA in this international cohort is at least 30%, with 23% delivered to an organized electrical rhythm, identifying opportunity for improvement in rhythm identification training.

Weight-Based Versus Flat Dosing of Epinephrine During Cardiac Arrest in the PICU: A Multicenter Survey.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) guidelines include weight-based epinephrine dosing recommendations of 0.01 mg/kg with a maximum of 1 mg, which corresponds to a weight of 100 kg. Actual practice patterns are unknown. DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional survey regarding institutional practices for the transition from weight-based to flat dosing of epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in PICUs. Exploratory analyses compared epinephrine dosing practices with several institutional characteristics using Fisher exact test. SETTING: Internet-based survey. SUBJECTS: U.S. PICU representatives (one per institution) involved in resuscitation systems of care. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 137 institutions surveyed, 68 (50%) responded. Most responding institutions are freestanding children's hospitals or dedicated children's hospitals within combined adult/pediatric hospitals (67; 99%); 55 (81%) are academic and 41 (60%) have PICU fellowship programs. Among respondents, institutional roles include PICU medical director (13; 19%), resuscitation committee member (23; 34%), and attending physician with interest in resuscitation (21; 31%). When choosing between weight-based and flat dosing, 64 respondents (94%) report using patient weight, 23 (34%) patient age, and five (7%) patient pubertal stage. Among those reporting using weight, 28 (44%) switch at 50 to less than 60 kg, 17 (27%) at 60 to less than 80 kg, five (8%) at 80 to less than 100 kg, and eight (12%) at greater than or equal to 100 kg. Among those reporting using age, four (17%) switch at 14 to less than 16 years, five (22%) at 16 to less than 18, and six (26%) at greater than or equal to 18. Twenty-nine respondents (43%) report using ideal body weight when dosing epinephrine in obese patients. Using patient age in choosing epinephrine dosing is more common in institutions that require Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) certification for some/all code team responders compared with institutions that do not require ACLS certification (52% vs 22%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of PICUs surveyed report epinephrine dosing practices that are inconsistent with PALS guidelines.

Improving CPR Quality by Using a Real-Time Feedback Defibrillator During Pediatric Simulation Training.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a defibrillator with real-time feedback during code team training to improve adherence to the American Heart Association (AHA) resuscitation guidelines. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study designed to compare pediatric resident adherence to the AHA cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines before and after use of real-time feedback defibrillator during code team training simulation. After institution of a real-time feedback defibrillator, first-year resident's adherence to the AHA guidelines for chest compression rate (CCR), fraction, and depth during code team training from January 2017 to December 2018 was analyzed. It was then compared with results of a previously published study from our institution that analyzed the CCR and fraction from January 2015 to January 2016, before the implementation of a defibrillator with real-time feedback. RESULTS: We compared 19 eligible session preintervention and 36 postintervention sessions. Chest compression rate and chest compression fraction (CCF) were assessed preintervention and postintervention. The depth of compression was only available postintervention. There was improvement in the proportion of code team training sessions with mean compression rate (74% preintervention vs 100% postintervention, P = 0.003) and mean CCF (79% vs 97%, P = 0.04) in adherence with the AHA guideline. CONCLUSIONS: The use of real-time feedback defibrillators improved the adherence to the AHA cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines for CCF and CCR during pediatric resident simulation.

2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients With Consideration of the ICU Environment and Early Mobility.

RATIONALE: A guideline that both evaluates current practice and provides recommendations to address sedation, pain, and delirium management with regard for neuromuscular blockade and withdrawal is not currently available. OBJECTIVE: To develop comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for critically ill infants and children, with specific attention to seven domains of care including pain, sedation/agitation, iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment, and early mobility. DESIGN: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility Guideline Taskforce was comprised of 29 national experts who collaborated from 2009 to 2021 via teleconference and/or e-mail at least monthly for planning, literature review, and guideline development, revision, and approval. The full taskforce gathered annually in-person during the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress for progress reports and further strategizing with the final face-to-face meeting occurring in February 2020. Throughout this process, the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures Manual for Guidelines development was adhered to. METHODS: Taskforce content experts separated into subgroups addressing pain/analgesia, sedation, tolerance/iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment (family presence and sleep hygiene), and early mobility. Subgroups created descriptive and actionable Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. An experienced medical information specialist developed search strategies to identify relevant literature between January 1990 and January 2020. Subgroups reviewed literature, determined quality of evidence, and formulated recommendations classified as "strong" with "we recommend" or "conditional" with "we suggest." Good practice statements were used when indirect evidence supported benefit with no or minimal risk. Evidence gaps were noted. Initial recommendations were reviewed by each subgroup and revised as deemed necessary prior to being disseminated for voting by the full taskforce. Individuals who had an overt or potential conflict of interest abstained from relevant votes. Expert opinion alone was not used in substitution for a lack of evidence. RESULTS: The Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility taskforce issued 44 recommendations (14 strong and 30 conditional) and five good practice statements. CONCLUSIONS: The current guidelines represent a comprehensive list of practical clinical recommendations for the assessment, prevention, and management of key aspects for the comprehensive critical care of infants and children. Main areas of focus included 1) need for the routine monitoring of pain, agitation, withdrawal, and delirium using validated tools, 2) enhanced use of protocolized sedation and analgesia, and 3) recognition of the importance of nonpharmacologic interventions for enhancing patient comfort and comprehensive care provision.

Low Inadequate Oxygen Delivery Index is Associated with Decreased Cardiac Arrest Risk in High-Risk Pediatric ICU Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the Inadequate Oxygen Delivery Index (IDO2) in the PICU to identify patients labeled as high risk by clinician concern who will not experience a cardiac arrest. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational cohort study in a single PICU from February 1, 2017, to May 20, 2020. All mean calculated IDO2 was collected for patients in 12-hour increments. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We monitored 3,087 patients over 24,505 12-hour periods. Four thousand seventeen were watcher periods-12-hour period following watcher determination to watch for clinical deterioration. Overall, there were 224 clinical deterioration events of which 21% (n = 48) were cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) events. Twenty-three CPR events (48%) and 93 clinical deteriorationevents (42%) occurred during 4,017 watcher periods. Following addition of a mean IDO2 threshold less than 5 during the prewatcher period, 23 CPR events (48%) and 77 clinical deterioration events (34%) occurred during 2,958 watcher periods. Using clinical concern alone, the number needed to evaluate for CPR events was 167 watcher periods for each single CPR event and 43 watcher periods for each clinical deterioration event. With the addition of a mean IDO2 less than 5, the number needed to evaluate decreased to 125 and 38, respectively, with no change in the prediction of CPR events. CONCLUSIONS: The use of physiologic monitor data can be applied to clinician-activated situation awareness systems to decrease the number needed to alert and improve system efficiency.

Assessment of a Situation Awareness Quality Improvement Intervention to Reduce Cardiac Arrests in the PICU.

OBJECTIVES: To use improved situation awareness to decrease cardiopulmonary resuscitation events by 25% over 18 months and demonstrate process and outcome sustainability. DESIGN: Structured quality improvement initiative. SETTING: Single-center, 35-bed quaternary-care PICU. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the PICU from February 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions targeted situation awareness and included bid safety huddles, bedside mitigation signs and huddles, smaller pod-based huddles, and an automated clinical decision support tool to identify high-risk patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome metric, cardiopulmonary resuscitation event rate per 1,000 patient-days, decreased from a baseline of 3.1-1.5 cardiopulmonary resuscitation events per 1,000 patient-days or by 52%. The secondary outcome metric, mortality rate, decreased from a baseline of 6.6 deaths per 1,000 patient-days to 3.6 deaths per 1,000 patient-days. Process metrics included percent of clinical deterioration events predicted, which increased from 40% to 67%, and percent of high-risk patients with shared situation awareness, which increased from 43% to 71%. Balancing metrics included time spent in daily safety huddle, median 0.4 minutes per patient (interquartile range, 0.3-0.5), and a number needed to alert of 16 (95% CI, 14-25). Neither unit acuity as measured by Pediatric Risk of Mortality III scores nor the percent of deaths in patients with do-not-attempt resuscitation orders or electing withdrawal of life-sustaining technologies changed over time. CONCLUSIONS: Interprofessional teams using shared situation awareness may reduce cardiopulmonary resuscitation events and, thereby, improve outcomes.

Risk factors and outcomes for recurrent paediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest: Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

AIM OF STUDY: Recurrent in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is associated with morbidity and mortality in adults. We aimed to describe the risk factors and outcomes for paediatric recurrent IHCA. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients ≤18 years old with single or recurrent IHCA. Recurrent IHCA was defined as ≥2 IHCA within the same hospitalization. Categorical variables expressed as percentages and compared via Chi square test. Continuous variables expressed as medians with interquartile ranges and compared via rank sum test. Outcomes assessed in a propensity match cohort. RESULTS: From July 1, 2015 to January 26, 2021, 139/894 (15.5%) patients experienced recurrent IHCA. Compared to patients with a single IHCA, recurrent IHCA patients were more likely to be trauma and less likely to be surgical cardiac patients. Median duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was shorter in the recurrent IHCA (5 vs. 11 min; p < 0.001) with no difference in IHCA location or immediate cause of CPR. Patients with recurrent IHCA had worse survival to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge (31% vs. 52%; p < 0.001), and worse survival to hospital discharge (30% vs. 48%; p < 0.001) in unadjusted analyses and after propensity matching, patients with recurrent IHCA still had worse survival to ICU (34% vs. 67%; p < 0.001) and hospital (31% vs. 64%; p < 0.001) discharge. CONCLUSION: When examining those with a single vs. a recurrent IHCA, event and patient factors including more pre-existing conditions and shorter duration of CPR were associated with risk for recurrent IHCA. Recurrent IHCA is associated with worse survival outcomes following propensity matching.

Contextual Factors Affecting Implementation of In-hospital Pediatric CPR Quality Improvement Interventions in a Resuscitation Collaborative.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric quality improvement (QI) collaboratives are multisite clinical networks that support cooperative learning. Our goal is to identify the contextual facilitators and barriers to implementing QI resuscitation interventions within a multicenter resuscitation collaborative. METHODS: A mixed-methods evaluation of the contextual facilitators and barriers to implementation of a resuscitation QI bundle. We administered a quantitative questionnaire, the Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ), to the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality (pediRES-Q) Collaborative. Its primary goal is to optimize the care of children who experience in-hospital cardiac arrest through a resuscitation QI bundle. We also conducted semistructured phone interviews with site primary investigators adapted from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research qualitative interview guide. RESULTS: All 13 actively participating US sites completed the MUSIQ questionnaire. Total MUSIQ scores ranged from 86.0 to 140.5 (median of 118.7, interquartile range 103.6-124.5). Evaluation of the QI team subsection noted a mean score of 5.5 for low implementers and 6.1 for high implementers (P = 0.02). We conducted 8 interviews with the local QI team leadership. Contextual facilitators included a unified institutional approach to QI, a fail forward climate, leadership support, strong microculture, knowledge of other organizations, and prioritization of goals. Contextual barriers included low team tenure, no specific allocation of resources, lack of formalized QI training, and lack of support and buy-in by leaders and staff. CONCLUSIONS: Using mixed methods, we identified an association between the local QI team's strength and the successful implementation of the QI interventions.

Care Does Not Stop Following ROSC: A Quality Improvement Approach to Postcardiac Arrest Care.

Pediatric cardiac arrests carry significant morbidity and mortality. With increasing rates of return of spontaneous circulation, it is vital to optimize recovery conditions to decrease morbidity. METHODS: We evaluated all patients who presented to a large quaternary pediatric intensive care unit with return of spontaneous circulation. We compared patient-specific postcardiac arrest care preimplementation and postimplementation of a standardized postcardiac arrest resuscitation pathway. We implemented evidence-based best practices using the Translating Research into Practice framework and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Our primary aim was to increase the percent of postcardiac arrest care events meeting guideline targets for blood pressure and temperature within the first 12 hours by 50% within 18 months. RESULTS: Eighty-one events occurred in the preintervention group (August 1, 2016-April 30, 2018) and 64 in the postintervention group (May 1, 2018-December 1, 2019). The percent of postcardiac arrest events meeting guideline targets for the entirety of their postarrest period improved from 10.9% for goal mean arterial blood pressure to 26.3%, P = 0.03, and increased from 23.4% for temperature to 71.9%, P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a postcardiac arrest standardized care plan improved adherence to evidence-based postcardiac arrest care metrics, specifically preventing hypotension and hyperthermia. Future multicenter research is needed to link guideline adherence to patient outcomes.

Code Team Structure and Training in the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality International Collaborative.

OBJECTIVES: Code team structure and training for pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest are variable. There are no data on the optimal structure of a resuscitation team. The objective of this study is to characterize the structure and training of pediatric code teams in sites participating in the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative. METHODS: From May to July 2017, an anonymous voluntary survey was distributed to 18 sites in the international Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative. The survey content was developed by the study investigators and iteratively adapted by consensus. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: All sites have a designated code team and hospital-wide code team activation system. Code team composition varies greatly across sites, with teams consisting of 3 to 17 members. Preassigned roles for code team members before the event occur at 78% of sites. A step stool and backboard are used during resuscitations in 89% of surveyed sites. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) feedback is used by 72% of the sites. Of those sites that use CPR feedback, all use an audiovisual feedback device incorporated into the defibrillator and 54% use a CPR coach. Multidisciplinary and simulation-based code team training is conducted by 67% of institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Code team structure, equipment, and training vary widely in a survey of international children's hospitals. The variations in team composition, role assignments, equipment, and training described in this article will be used to facilitate future studies regarding the impact of structure and training of code teams on team performance and patient outcomes.

Code Team Training: Demonstrating Adherence to AHA Guidelines During Pediatric Code Blue Activations.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric code blue activations are infrequent events with a high mortality rate despite the best effort of code teams. The best method for training these code teams is debatable; however, it is clear that training is needed to assure adherence to American Heart Association (AHA) Resuscitation Guidelines and to prevent the decay that invariably occurs after Pediatric Advanced Life Support training. The objectives of this project were to train a multidisciplinary, multidepartmental code team and to measure this team's adherence to AHA guidelines during code simulation. METHODS: Multidisciplinary code team training sessions were held using high-fidelity, in situ simulation. Sessions were held several times per month. Each session was filmed and reviewed for adherence to 5 AHA guidelines: chest compression rate, ventilation rate, chest compression fraction, use of a backboard, and use of a team leader. After the first study period, modifications were made to the code team including implementation of just-in-time training and alteration of the compression team. RESULTS: Thirty-eight sessions were completed, with 31 eligible for video analysis. During the first study period, 1 session adhered to all AHA guidelines. During the second study period, after alteration of the code team and implementation of just-in-time training, no sessions adhered to all AHA guidelines; however, there was an improvement in percentage of sessions adhering to ventilation rate and chest compression rate and an improvement in median ventilation rate. CONCLUSIONS: We present a method for training a large code team drawn from multiple hospital departments and a method of assessing code team performance. Despite subjective improvement in code team positioning, communication, and role completion and some improvement in ventilation rate and chest compression rate, we failed to consistently demonstrate improvement in adherence to all guidelines.

Development and Implementation of Augmented Reality Enhanced High-Fidelity Simulation for Recognition of Patient Decompensation.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation is a core aspect of training and assessment; however, simulation laboratories are limited in their ability to visually represent mental, respiratory, and perfusion status. Augmented reality (AR) represents a potential adjunct to address this gap. METHODS: A prospective, observational pilot of interprofessional simulation assessing a decompensating patient was conducted from April to June 2019. Teams completed 2 simulations: (1) traditional training (TT) using a manikin (Laerdal SimJunior) and (2) AR-enhanced training (ART) using a manikin plus an AR patient. The primary outcome was self-assessed effectiveness at the assessment of patient decompensation. Secondary outcomes were attitudes toward and adverse effects during the AR training. RESULTS: Twenty-one simulation sessions included 84 participants in headsets. Participants reported improved ability to assess the patient's mental status, respiratory status, and perfusion status (all P < 0.0001) during ART in comparison to TT. Similar findings were noted for recognition of hypoxemia, shock, apnea, and decompensation (all P ≤ 0.0003) but not for recognition of cardiac arrest (P = 0.06). Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that ART accurately depicted a decompensating patient (89%), reinforced key components of the patient assessment (88%), and will impact how they care for patients (68%). Augmented reality-enhanced training was rated more effective than manikin training and standardized patients and equally as effective as bedside teaching. CONCLUSIONS: This novel application of AR to enhance the realism of manikin simulation demonstrated improvement in self-assessed recognition of patient decompensation. Augmented reality may represent a viable modality for increasing the clinical impact of training.