Biological treatment approach to inflammatory bowel disease is similar in academic and nonacademic centres - prime time for decentralisation of inflammatory bowel disease care?

BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, it is difficult to manage them within specialised IBD teams in academic medical centres: many are therefore treated in nonacademic IBD centres. It is unclear whether the time to introducing biologics is the same in both settings. AIM: We aimed to compare treatment approach with biologics in academic vs. nonacademic centres. METHODS: We analysed Slovenian national IBD registry data (UR-CARE Registry, supported by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation), which included 2 academic (2319 patients) and 4 nonacademic IBD (429 patients) centres. RESULTS: The disease phenotype was similar in both settings. In total, 1687 patients received 2782 treatment episodes with biologics. We observed no differences in treatment episodes with TNF-alpha inhibitors (60% vs. 61%), vedolizumab (24% vs. 23%), or ustekinumab (17% vs. 16%) in academic compared to nonacademic centres ( P  = 0.949). However, TNF inhibitors were less often the first biologic in academic centres (TNF inhibitors: 67.5% vs. 74.0%, vedolizumab: 20.3% vs. 17.9%, ustekinumab: 12.1% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.0096). Consequently, more patients received ustekinumab (29.8% vs. 18.3%) and vedolizumab (17.4% vs. 13.5%) and fewer TNF inhibitors (52.7% vs. 68.2%) for Crohn's disease in academic compared to nonacademic centres, with no such differences for ulcerative colitis. The time to initiation of the first biologic from diagnosis was short and similar in both settings (11.3 vs. 10.4 months, P  = 0.2). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide registry analysis, we observed that biological treatment choice was similar in academic and nonacademic settings. These findings support the decentralisation of IBD care.

Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Effectiveness between Anti-TNF and Ustekinumab after Vedolizumab Failure as First-Line Therapy in Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of anti-TNF or ustekinumab (UST) as a second-line biologic after vedolizumab (VDZ) failure has not yet been described. AIMS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, We aim to investigate the effectiveness of anti-TNF and UST as second-line therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who failed VDZ as a first-line treatment. The primary outcome was clinical response at week 16-22. Secondary outcomes included the rates of clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission, CRP normalization, and adverse events. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients who failed on VDZ as a first-line treatment for CD were included; 52.8% patients received anti-TNF and 47.2% UST as a second-line therapy. In initial period (Week 16-22), the clinical response and remission rate was similar between both groups: 61.2% vs. 68%, p = 0.8 and 48.3% vs. 56%, p = 0.8 on anti-TNF and UST therapy, respectively. Furthermore, in the maintenance period the rate was similar: 75% vs. 82.3%, p = 0.8 and 62.5% vs. 70.5%, p = 0.8, respectively. Of the patients, 12 out of the 59 stopped the therapy, without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.6). CONCLUSION: Second-line biological therapy after VDZ failure therapy was effective in >60% of the patients with CD. No differences in effectiveness were detected between the use of anti-TNF and UST as a second line.

Effectiveness of Third-Class Biologic Treatment in Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have described the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) failing anti- Tumor necrosis factors (TNFs); however, the effectiveness of VDZ or UST as a third-class biologic has not yet been described. AIMS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of VDZ and UST as a third-class biologic in patients with CD. RESULTS: Two-hundred and four patients were included; 156/204 (76%) patients received VDZ as a second- and UST as a third-class therapy (group A); the remaining 48/204 (24%) patients received UST as a second- and VDZ as a third-class therapy (group B). At week 16-22, 87/156 (55.5%) patients and 27/48 (56.2%) in groups A and B, respectively, responded to treatment (p = 0.9); 41/156 (26.2%) and 15/48 (31.2%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5). At week 52; 89/103 (86%) patients and 25/29 (86.2%) of the patients with available data had responded to third-class treatment in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.9); 31/103 (30%) and 47/29 (24.1%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Third-class biological therapy was effective in more than half of the patients with CD. No differences in effectiveness were detected between the use of VDZ and UST as a third-class agent.

Helicobacter pylori Eradication Rates in Slovenia in the Period from 2017 to 2019: Data from the European Registry on H. pylori Management.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the most common chronic bacterial infection in the world, affecting over 50% of the world's population. H. pylori is a grade I carcinogen, responsible for the development of 89% of noncardia gastric cancers. In the present study, we analyzed the data for H. pylori eradication treatments in Slovenia after the 3rd national recommendations were implemented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Slovenia is part of the European Registry on H. pylori Management since the Registry was launched in 2013. Data were collected at Asociación Española de Gastroenterología-Research Electronic Data Capture electronic case report form from September 2017 to December 2019. H. pylori eradication treatment was assessed by modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 853 patients from 3 medical institutions were included. Effectiveness with first-line 14-day triple therapy with a proton-pomp-inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1,000 mg, all BID, was 93% by mITT (714 patients). In patients allergic to penicillin, first-line 14-day triple therapy with PPI-clarithromycin-metronidazole achieved 83% effectiveness by mITT (35 patients). Second-line 14-day triple therapy with a PPI-amoxicillin-levofloxacin achieved 89% mITT eradication rate (51 patients). Second-line therapy with the 10-day three-in-one single capsule containing bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole achieved optimal effectiveness (100% mITT) in 10 patients (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Slovenia is a country with <15% H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin. Triple therapy with a PPI plus 2 antibiotics during 14 days reported optimal effectiveness (over 90%). Ten-day quadruple-bismuth second-line therapy had better results than 14-day triple therapy with levofloxacin.

Diagnosing cytomegalovirus in patients with inflammatory bowel disease--by immunohistochemistry or polymerase chain reaction?

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a common complication in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), particularly in those with steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis. It is usually diagnosed by histopathologic and immunohistochemical examination of the colon biopsy. The introduction of quantitative, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has been recommended to improve the sensitivity, but there is little consensus on how to use it. We compared the two methods in samples from resected bowel of patients with IBD. Twelve patients with IBD who had undergone bowel resection were analysed for CMV, using qPCR and immunohistochemistry. In all cases, tissue samples from the base and the edge of ulcers and from uninvolved mucosa were obtained. The highest densities of CMV-positive cells were found in samples from the base of ulcers (immunohistochemistry 0-0.47 positive cells/mm(2); qPCR 10-3809 viral copies/mg) or the edge of ulcers (immunohistochemistry 0.06-0.32 positive cells/mm(2); qPCR 35-1049 viral copies/mg). In samples of uninvolved mucosa, immunohistochemistry was negative, whereas qPCR was either negative or showed very low values (0-3 viral copies/mg). We conclude that both immunohistochemistry and qPCR can be successfully used for diagnosing CMV reactivation in patients with IBD. The base and the edge of ulcers are the optimal sites for endoscopic biopsies. The density of CMV-positive cells was low and their distribution within the colon uneven. It therefore seems that the number of sampled biopsies and/or the number of investigated levels is more important that the choice of diagnostic method.