Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 16(7): 979-85, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20880412

RESUMEN

Since it is unknown whether ß-lactam antimicrobial agents can be used effectively against borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) with oxacillin MICs ≥4 mg/L, the in vitro bactericidal activity and pharmacodynamic effect of oxacillin against clinical BORSA isolates was evaluated. Time-kill experiments with oxacillin were performed and the results compared with those obtained with vancomycin, daptomycin and linezolid against BORSA with oxacillin MICs ≥4 mg/L and BORSA with oxacillin MICs ≤2 mg/L. Furthermore, the effect of ß-lactamase production and plasmid profile analysis were taken into account to clarify responses to oxacillin. Oxacillin killing activity was attenuated against BORSA compared with ATCC 29213 since the pharmacodynamic parameters revealed that the potency of oxacillin was markedly reduced (c. ten-fold) against BORSA with oxacillin MICs ≥4 mg/L. pBORa53-like plasmid-containing BORSA with oxacillin MICs ≤2 mg/L showed markedly more regrowth. In conclusion, oxacillin was non-effective in the eradication of either (i) BORSA with oxacillin MICs ≥4 mg/L or (ii) ß-lactamase-hyperproducing BORSA (MICs ≤2 mg/L). Further investigation into ß-lactam dosing strategies against different BORSA strains is warranted in order to avoid possible therapy failure.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Oxacilina/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Acetamidas/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Daptomicina/farmacología , Humanos , Linezolid , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Oxazolidinonas/farmacología , Resistencia a las Penicilinas , Proteínas de Unión a las Penicilinas , Plásmidos/genética , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/enzimología , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Vancomicina/farmacología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
2.
Ann Oncol ; 18(6): 1080-4, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17369599

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomized, controlled pilot study is to address the question whether normal hospital diet (NHD) is safe when compared with low-bacterial diet (LBD) given to prevent infections in cytopenic patients who receive antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients were randomized into two groups: one group to receive AP and LBD, the other to receive the same AP and NHD. The primary outcome parameter is colonization of the digestive tract with aerobic gram-negative bacilli and yeasts. Secondary outcome parameters were infections and total societal costs. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were observed regarding the primary outcome parameter, gut colonization by yeasts or gram-negative bacilli, or infections, use of antimicrobials, days with fever and total societal costs. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the results of this pilot study, NHD appears to be as safe as LBD in patients with chemotherapy-induced cytopenia. Furthermore, the results indicate that LBD may offer no additional benefit as an infection preventive measure to the measures already implemented, such as AP. Thus, a larger randomized study, powered adequately to determine noninferiority of NHD to LBD is warranted and safe to be carried out.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/inducido químicamente , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Dieta , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anemia/prevención & control , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Microb Drug Resist ; 11(2): 154-8, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15910230

RESUMEN

The prevalence of antibiotic resistant Enterococcus faecalis was determined in fecal samples of 263 patients admitted to the surgical wards of three university-affiliated hospitals on admission, at discharge, and at 1 and 6 months after discharge. A slight increase in the prevalence of antibiotic resistance of E. faecalis was found at discharge for the antibiotics tested compared to those on admission, vancomycin excepted. At 6 months after discharge, the prevalence of resistance for amoxicillin (0%), ciprofloxacin (3%), erythromycin (47%), and oxytetracycline (60%) decreased to the level on admission (respectively 0%, 8%, 45%, and 64%). Gentamicin resistance was the same at discharge (10%) as 1 month later (12%), but decreased 6 months after discharge (8%) to the level on admission (7%). In conclusion, hospitalization resulted in the study population in a slight increase in the prevalence of resistant fecal E. faecalis isolates at discharge, which decreased again (slowly) to the level on admission 6 months after discharge. Thus, the influence of hospitalization on the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in the extramural situation disappears between 1 and 6 months after discharge in this population.


Asunto(s)
Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Heces/microbiología , Hospitalización , Adulto , Anciano , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA