Bee Venom Induces the Interaction between Phosphorylated Histone Variant, H2AX, and the Intracellular Site of beta-Actin in Liver and Breast Cancer Cells.

Bee venom is a natural mixture and candidate anti-cancer agent with selective cytotoxic effect on some cancer cells. However, the cellular mechanisms of how bee venom selectively targets cancer cells remain elusive. The aim of this study was to reveal the genotoxic effect of bee venom in concordance with the location of ß-actin protein throughout the nucleus or/and cytoplasm. For this aim, the level of H2AX phosphorylation (γH2AX) and intracellular location of ß-actin were assessed by immunofluorescence in liver (HEPG2) and metastatic breast (MDA-MB-231) cancer cell lines compared to normal fibroblasts (NIH3T3) after bee venom treatment. Colocalisation profiles of γH2AX and ß-actin in each cell line were also analysed. The results showed that the levels of γH2AX staining decreased in normal cells but increased in cancer cells. The majority of ß-actin was localised within the cytoplasm of normal cells after bee venom treatment, but it was mostly accumulated within the nucleus in cancer cells. Colocalisation of ß-actin and γH2AX both in nucleus and cytoplasm was induced in each cancer cell by different patterns. The results showed that normal and cancerous cells had different responses against bee venom, and suggested that bee venom induced a cellular response by the interaction between γH2AX and ß-actin.

Distinct Epigenetic Reprogramming, Mitochondrial Patterns, Cellular Morphology, and Cytotoxicity after Bee Venom Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Bee venom is a promising agent for cancer treatment due to its selective cytotoxic potential for cancer cells through apoptotic pathways. However, there is no evidence for changes in the epigenome and mitochondrial DNA copy numbers after bee venom application. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of bee venom on cytosine modifications and mitochondrial DNA copy number variation. METHODS: A broad range of methods was applied to elucidate the impact of bee venom on neoplastic cells. These included MTT assay for detection of cytotoxicity, immunostaining of cytosine modifications and mitochondria, assessment of cellular morphology by flow cytometry, and quantification of mitochondrial DNA copy numbers using QPCR. RESULTS: Bee venom-induced cell death was selective for cancer cells, where it triggered a response characterized by alteration of cytosine modification. In contrast, normal cells were more resistant to DNA modifications. Furthermore, application of the venom resulted in variation of mitochondrial membrane permeability and mitochondrial DNA copy numbers, together with alterations in cell morphology, manifesting as reduced affected cell size. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that bee venom can be used as a selective DNA (de)methylating agent in cancer. Various agents (such as decitabine and 5-azacytidine) have been synthesized and developed for cancer treatment, and a range of syntheses and preparation and application methods have been described for these patented drugs. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous research has investigated the use of bee venom or any component thereof for epigenetic therapy in cancer cells.