Feasibility, Safety and Impact of (18F)-FDG PET/CT in patients with pregnancy-associated cancer: experience of the French CALG (Cancer Associé à La Grossesse) network.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of pregnancy-associated cancers has been increasing for decades. (18F)-FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) imaging has become a golden standard in the staging of many malignant diseases. The aims of the current study were to evaluate the feasibility, safety and impact of (18F)-FDG PET/CT performed during pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis from the prospective database of the Cancer Associé à La Grossesse (CALG) network (Tenon Hospital, France) including patients who underwent (18F)-FDG PET/CT during their pregnancy between 2015 and 2020. RESULTS: Of the 536 patients for whom advice from the CALG network was requested during the study period, 359 were diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy. Study population was composed of 63 (17.5%) patients who underwent (18F)-FDG PET/CT. Most cancers were diagnosed during the second trimester. Seventy-five percent were diagnosed with breast cancer, mostly locally advanced invasive ductal carcinomas. Median term of pregnancy at PET/CT was 24.8 weeks of gestation. Twelve (19%), 24 (38.1%) and 22 (34.9%) patients underwent the exam during the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester, respectively. (18F)-FDG PET/CT resulted in stage modification for 38 (60.3%) of the patients (28 with more extensive lymph node involvement and 10 with metastatic disease) with subsequently/accordingly modified first-line medical treatment. Fifty patients gave birth to healthy newborns. Two patients had a medical termination of pregnancy, five had a medical abortion, one neonatal death occurred in a patient with severe preeclampsia (unrelated to (18F)-FDG PET/CT). The data of 46 children were available at 6 months, 29 at 12 months, and 15 at 24 months. No cases of mental retardation, childhood cancer, or malformation were reported within 2 years. CONCLUSION: (18F)-FDG PET/CT has a major impact on the management of pregnancy-associated cancers and does not appear to cause fetal side effects suggesting that the exam is feasible during pregnancy as maternal benefits outweigh fetal risks.

Diffusion-weighted MRI in pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) provided by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) at baseline in patients according to their breast tumour phenotypes. MATERIALS & METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board. One hundred eighteen consecutive women with locally advanced breast cancer who had undergone NACT followed by breast surgery were included. DWI was performed at 1.5 T less than 2 weeks before NACT. We studied the correlation between pretreatment ADC and response in pathology after surgery according to immunohistochemical features and intrinsic subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple-negative tumours). RESULTS: After surgery, the pathologist recognized 24 complete responders (CRps) and 94 non-complete responders (NCRps). No difference was identified between the pretreatment ADCs of the CRp and NCRp patients. There were differences in pretreatment ADCs among the luminal A (1.001 ± 0.143 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s), luminal B (0.983 ± 0.150 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s), HER2-enriched (1.132 ± 0.216 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s), and triple-negative (1.168 ± 0.245 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P = 0.0003) tumour subtypes. In triple-negative tumours, the pretreatment ADC was higher in NCRp (1.060 ± 0.143 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than in CRp patients (1.227 ± 0.271 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment ADC can predict the response of breast cancer to NACT if tumour subtypes are considered. Key Points • Apparent diffusion coefficient helps clinicians to assess patients with breast cancer. • Pretreatment ADC is related to tumour grade and hormone receptor status. • Pretreatment ADC is lower in luminal A and B than in triple-negative tumours. • Pretreatment ADC is higher in complete than in non-complete responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Accuracy of perfusion MRI with high spatial but low temporal resolution to assess invasive breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To illustrate that Breast-MRI performed in high spatial resolution and low temporal resolution (1 minute) allows the measurement of kinetic parameters that can assess the final pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. METHODS: Breast-MRI was performed in 24 women before and after treatment. Eight series of 1.11 minute-duration were acquired with a sub-millimeter spatial resolution. Transfer constant (K(trans)) and leakage space (V(e)) were calculated using measured and theoretical Arterial Input Function (AIF). Changes in kinetic parameters after treatment obtained with both AIFs were compared with final pathologic response graded in non-responder (< 50% therapeutic effect), partial-responder (> 50% therapeutic effect) and complete responder. Accuracies to identify non-responders were compared with receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: With measured-AIF, changes in kinetic parameters measured after treatment were in agreement with the final pathological response. Changes in V(e) and K(trans) were significantly different between non-(N = 11), partial-(N = 7), and complete (N = 6) responders, (P = 0.0092 and P = 0.0398 respectively). A decrease in V(e) of more than -72% and more than -84% for K(trans) resulted in 73% sensitivity for identifying non-responders (specificity 92% and 77% respectively). A decrease in V(e) of more than -87% helped to identify complete responders (Sensitivity 89%, Specificity 83%). With theoretical-AIF, changes in kinetic parameters had lower accuracy. CONCLUSION: There is a good agreement between pathological findings and changes in kinetic parameters obtained with breast-MRI in high spatial and low temporal resolution when measured-AIF is used. Further studies are necessary to confirm whether MRI contrast kinetic parameters can be used earlier as a response predictor to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Fertility after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis: preliminary results.

OBJECTIVE: To examine fertility, reproductive outcomes, and determinants of fertility after laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal study. SETTING: Tertiary university gynecology unit. PATIENT(S): The study population consisted of 34 women with colorectal endometriosis, of whom 22 wished to conceive. Demographic, surgical, and histological characteristics of 10 women who conceived were compared with those of 12 women who failed to conceive. INTERVENTION(S): Laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rates of pregnancy and live birth. RESULT(S): Mean follow-up after segmental colorectal resection was 24 months (range 6-42 months), and the pregnancy rate was 45.5%. The median time to conceive was 8 months (range 3-13 months). Twelve pregnancies occurred in 10 women, comprising nine spontaneous singleton pregnancies (7 vaginal deliveries, 1 cesarean section, and 1 ongoing pregnancy), and three pregnancies obtained by IVF (one miscarriage, one ongoing twin pregnancy, and one triplet pregnancy necessitating cesarean section at 29 weeks for premature rupture of the membranes, with two surviving infants). The live birth rate was 82%. The women who did and did not conceive did not differ in terms of mean follow-up, mean age, body mass index (BMI), parity, smoking, use and duration of oral contraception (OC), duration of infertility, or the length of the resected colorectal segment. Uterine adenomyosis was the main determinant of pregnancy after colorectal resection. CONCLUSION(S): These preliminary results suggest that extensive laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis can enhance fertility, with high rates of spontaneous pregnancy and live birth.

Feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility and complications of laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis and its efficacy on gynecologic and digestive symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: After magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonographic evaluation of symptomatic colorectal endometriosis, 40 consecutive women requiring colorectal resection were included in this study. Symptom questionnaires were completed before and after the procedure. Perioperative complications and linear intensity scores for several gynecologic and digestive symptoms were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-six women (90%) underwent laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection and 4 required laparoconversion. Major complications occurred in 4 cases (10%), including 3 rectovaginal fistulae and 1 pelvic abscess. Transient urinary dysfunction occurred in 7 women (17.5%). Median follow-up after colorectal resection was 15 months (3-22 months). Median overall preoperative and postoperative pain scores were 8 +/- 1 (range 4-10) and 2 +/- 2 (0-10), respectively ( P < .0001). Nonmenstrual pelvic pain ( P = .0001), dysmenorrhea ( P < .0001), dyspareunia ( P = .0001), and pain on defecation ( P < .0005) were improved by colorectal resection. Lower back pain and asthenia were not improved. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis is feasible but carries a risk of major postoperative complications. Colorectal resection improved gynecologic and digestive symptoms, and the overall pain score.

Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the preoperative diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis and extension of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-five patients (mean age, 34.2 years; range, 20-71 years) who were suspected of having pelvic endometriosis were recruited at two institutions. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the MR images independently. Deep pelvic endometriosis was defined as implants or tissue masses that appeared as hypointense areas and/or hyperintense foci on T1- or T2-weighted MR images in the following locations: torus uterinus, uterosacral ligaments (USLs), vagina, rectovaginal septum, rectosigmoid, and bladder. MR imaging results were compared with surgical and pathologic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of MR imaging for prediction of deep pelvic endometriosis were assessed. RESULTS: Pelvic endometriosis was confirmed at pathologic examination in 163 (83.6%) of 195 patients. Endometriomas, peritoneal lesions, and deep pelvic endometriosis were diagnosed on the basis of surgical findings, alone or combined with pathologic findings, in 111 (68.1%), 83 (50.9%), and 103 (63.2%) of 163 patients, respectively. Torus uterinus and USL were the most frequent sites of deep pelvic endometriosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of MR imaging for deep pelvic endometriosis were 90.3% (93 of 103), 91% (84 of 92), 92.1% (93 of 101), 89% (84 of 94), and 90.8% (177 of 195), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, of MR imaging for the diagnosis of endometriosis in specific sites were as follows: USL, 76% (57 of 75), 83.3% (100 of 120), and 80.5% (157 of 195); vagina, 76% (16 of 21), 95.4% (166 of 174), and 93.3% (182 of 195); rectovaginal septum, 80% (eight of 10), 97.8% (181 of 185), and 96.9% (189 of 195); rectosigmoid, 88% (53 of 60), 97.8% (132 of 135), and 94.9% (185 of 195); and bladder, 88% (14 of 16), 98.9% (177 of 179), and 97.9% (191 of 195). CONCLUSION: MR imaging demonstrates high accuracy in prediction of deep pelvic endometriosis in specific locations.

Symptoms before and after surgical removal of colorectal endometriosis that are assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of colorectal resection for endometriosis on symptoms and quality of life or on potential side effects. STUDY DESIGN: After magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonographic evaluations of symptomatic colorectal endometriosis, 27 consecutive women who underwent colorectal resection were included in this prospective study. They completed symptom questionnaires before and after the procedure. Linear pain scores for several gynecologic and digestive symptoms and impact on quality of life were recorded. RESULTS: The sensitivity and positive predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonographic evaluation for the diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis were 92.6% and 100% and 89% and 100%, respectively. Nonmenstrual pelvic pain (P = .001), dysmenorrhea (P < .0001), dyspareunia (P = .0002), and pain on defecation (P < .005) were improved by colorectal resection. No correlation was found between symptom intensity and lesion size, as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging, rectal endoscopic sonographic evaluation, or histologic examination of the surgical specimen. Respectively, the conditions of 14, 11, 0, and 2 women were cured, improved, unchanged, or worsened. Median overall pre- and postoperative quality-of-life scores were 9 (range, 4-10) and 0 (range, 0-10), respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Colorectal resection for endometriosis appears to relieve some symptoms. However, women should be informed that some symptoms may persist and that there is a risk of urinary and digestive side effects.