Trends in ACGME Accreditation of Orthopedic Surgery Fellowship Training.

Currently, most surgeons pursue subspecialty fellowship training. This study answers the following questions: (1) How does the rate of fellowship training in orthopedic surgery compare with that in other surgical specialties? (2) To what extent did adoption of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation change from 2013 to 2021? Orthopedic subspecialties were analyzed for total number of fellowship programs and positions in the 2013 and 2021 Match. Rates of ACGME accreditation were analyzed via chi-square tests. In 2021, orthopedic surgery had the highest rate of fellowship selection (94%) relative to general surgery (77%), ophthalmology (66%), plastic surgery (63%), and otolaryngology (55%). Across all orthopedic subspecialties, the percentage of ACGME accreditation decreased among fellowship programs (53% in 2013 to 48% in 2021, P=.166) and positions (58% in 2013 to 50% in 2021, P<.001). Orthopedic sports medicine had the highest adoption of ACGME accreditation (100%), followed by hand surgery (99%), musculoskeletal oncology (67%), and pediatric orthopedics (56%). Significant increases in the adoption of ACGME accreditation were noted for orthopedic sports medicine (93% in 2013 to 100% in 2021, P=.016) and hand surgery (81% in 2013 to 99% in 2021, P<.001). There was a significant decrease in ACGME accreditation for adult reconstructive orthopedics (40% in 2013 to 24% in 2021, P=.042), driven by the increase in unaccredited fellowship programs. Accreditation of orthopedic subspecialty fellowship training has decreased with respect to the proportion of accredited training positions. More research is needed to understand the benefits of ACGME accreditation for fellowship training in orthopedic surgery. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):57-63.].

Analysis of Academic Accomplishments and Demographics for Elected Presidents of National Orthopedic Surgery Organizations in the United States.

This study analyzed the academic accomplishments and demographics of elected presidents of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), American Orthopaedic Association (AOA), and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS). Curriculum vitae and internet-based resources were reviewed to collect demographics, training characteristics, bibliometrics, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) research funding of contemporary presidents (1990-2020). Eighty presidents were included. Most presidents were men (97%), and 4% of presidents were non-White (3% Black and 1% Hispanic). Few had an additional graduate degree (4% MBA, 3% MS, 1% MPH, 1% PhD). Ten orthopedic surgery residency programs trained 47% of these presidents. Most had fellowship training (59%), and the top three were hand surgery (11%), pediatric orthopedics (11%), and adult reconstruction (10%). Twenty-nine presidents (36%) participated in a traveling fellowship. The mean age at appointment was 58±5 years, which was 27 years since residency graduation. The mean h-index was 36±23, resulting from 150±126 peer-reviewed manuscripts. Orthopedic surgery presidents had more peer-reviewed manuscripts (150±126) than chairs (73±81) and program directors (27±32) (P<.001). AOA presidents had the highest mean h-index (42±21) compared with AAOS (38±27) and ABOS (25±16) presidents (P=.035). Nineteen presidents had NIH funding (24%). More presidents had NIH funding in the AOA (39%) and AAOS (25%) than the ABOS (0%) (P=.007). Orthopedic surgery presidents possess high levels of scholarly output. AOA presidents had the highest h-index values and prevalence of NIH funding. Females and racial minorities remain underrepresented at the highest levels of leadership. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):e45-e51.].

Nationwide Effect of COVID-19 on Cases Performed During Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Fellowship Training in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected surgical training in the United States. We hypothesized that reported case volume during pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellowship training would decrease markedly during the 2019 to 2020 academic year, which corresponded with the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provided nationwide case logs for accredited pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellows (2017 to 2021). Annual reported case volumes were extracted and summarized as means ± SD. Parametric tests were used to compare annual case volumes. RESULTS: A total of 149 pediatric orthopaedic fellows from 23 accredited fellowships were included. A 16% year-over-year (YoY) decrease was noted in the reported case volume during the 2019 to 2020 academic year (238 ± 80 vs. 255 ± 60, P < 0.001). Nonacute case categories had the most notable YoY percentage decreases: Soft Tissue: Transfer, Lengthen, Release (-42%); Clubfoot (-34%); and Foot and Ankle Deformity (-31%). Acute case categories had the most notable YoY percentage increases: Trauma Lower Limb (12%) and Trauma Upper Limb (10%). A subsequent 42% YoY increase was noted in the reported case volume during the 2020 to 2021 academic year. DISCUSSION: A 16% YoY decrease was noted in the reported case volume during the 2019 to 2020 academic year, which corresponded to widespread economic shutdowns during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. Nonacute cases experienced the greatest negative effect. The results from this study may inform the orthopaedic surgery community on the effect of future national emergencies, such as viral outbreaks.

Acquisition of Medical Knowledge Varies During Allopathic and Osteopathic Orthopedic Surgery Residency Training.

Currently, little is known about the differences in medical knowledge acquisition between osteopathic and allopathic orthopedic surgery residents. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) performance and training pathway in orthopedic surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study of all orthopedic surgery residents taking the OITE during the 2019-2020 academic year. Comparisons in OITE performance were made with parametric tests. A total of 4407 orthopedic surgery residents were in allopathic (86%) and osteopathic (14%) training programs. There was significant improvement in OITE performance between subsequent postgraduate year (PGY) levels among allopathic residents (P<.001). Among osteopathic residents, OITE performance increased between PGY1 and PGY4 (P<.001) but plateaued between PGY4 and PGY5 (P>.05). At the PGY1 level, osteopathic residents had higher OITE performance than allopathic residents (P<.001), but scores were equivalent at the PGY2 to PGY4 levels (P>.05). At the PGY5 level, allopathic residents had higher OITE performance than osteopathic residents (P<.001). Allopathic medical students scored higher on the Step 1 (248±19 vs 242±17, P<.001) and Step 2 (255±16 vs 250±15, P<.001) board examinations. Medical knowledge increases during orthopedic surgery residency. Disparities exist by training pathway, with osteopathic residents outperforming allopathic residents at the PGY1 level but then underperforming at the PGY5 level. Ultimately, this study provides insights into how resident promotion and training pathway impacts the acquisition of medical knowledge during orthopedic surgery residency. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):379-383.].

Diversity in Leadership at Musculoskeletal Oncology Fellowships in the United States.

Musculoskeletal oncology fellowship directors (MOFDs) possess the unique ability to influence treatment paradigms in musculoskeletal oncology through teaching and research. Currently, the characteristics that define this important role including demographics, training characteristics, research activity, and grant funding are poorly defined. A list of musculoskeletal oncology fellowship programs was obtained from the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons and Musculoskeletal Oncology Fellowship Match. Bibliometric data including the h-index were abstracted from Scopus. Demographics, training, and federal grant characteristics were collected from academic websites. Comparisons were made using t-tests and data were presented as means ± SD. The average age at the appointment was 41±9 years and most were male (80%) and Caucasian (85%). Few had an additional graduate degree (10% MS, 5% PhD). The mean h-index was 23±15 resulting from 91±56 publications. There was a positive correlation between age and h-index (r=0.398, p=0.082). Four MOFDs (20%) had at least one National Institutes of Health research grant. Sex, race, additional graduate degree, and procurement of NIH funding were not associated with higher h-index values. Full professors had higher h-index values than assistant/associate professors (p=0.014). Women and racial minorities are underrepresented among leadership positions in musculoskeletal oncology fellowship programs. This study can help provide a benchmark for departments in orthopedic surgery and aspiring orthopedic surgeons for MOFD positions.

Utility of Spine Surgery Fellowship Training for Orthopaedic Surgeons in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic spine surgeons gain surgical experience through cases conducted during residency and fellowship training. This study elucidates the incremental benefit in spine surgery volume from orthopaedic spine surgery fellowship training. METHODS: This was a retrospective national cohort study of orthopaedic surgery residents and orthopaedic spine surgery fellows graduating from US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited training programs during the 2017 to 2020 academic years. Comparisons in spine surgery case volume were made with parametric tests. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen spine surgery fellows and 3,000 orthopaedic surgery residents were included. There was a 3.5-fold increase in total spine surgery cases conducted during fellowship versus residency (314 ± 129 vs. 89 ± 61, P < 0.001). Spine surgery fellows one standard deviation more than the mean reported 443 total spine cases. The largest differences between fellows and residents were Decompression (104 ± 48 vs. 28 ± 23, P < 0.001), Posterior Arthrodesis (94 ± 46 vs. 21 ± 18, P < 0.001), Anterior Arthrodesis (64 ± 31 vs. 13 ± 13, P < 0.001), and Instrumentation (43 ± 25 vs. 22 ± 12, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Spine surgery fellowship training affords orthopaedic surgeons the opportunity to increase spine surgery case volume by over threefold. The greatest increases in case volume were reported for Decompression, Posterior Arthrodesis, Anterior Arthrodesis, and Instrumentation.

Impact of COVID-19 on the Reported Case Volume of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellows in the United States.

Background: The impact of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on reported case volume during orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship training remains poorly understood from a national perspective. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that reported case volume during orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship training would decrease during the 2019-2020 academic year, which corresponded to the COVID-19 outbreak. It was also hypothesized that there would be a subsequent rebound in case volume during the 2020-2021 academic year. Study Design: Cohort study. Methods: Reported mean case volumes were extracted for 4 academic years (2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020, and 2020-2021), and year-over-year percentage changes were calculated. Parametric tests were used for interyear comparisons. Results: There was a 7% decrease in mean ± SD case volume between the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 academic years (339 ± 123 vs 316 ± 108; P = .042). Case categories with the greatest percentage declines were foot and ankle (-20%), knee instability (-11%), meniscus (-8%), and glenohumeral instability (-7%). There was a 13% year-over-year increase in case volume between the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 academic years (316 ± 108 vs 357 ± 117; P < .001). Conclusion: There was a slight decrease in total orthopaedic sports medicine case volume during the 2019-2020 academic year, corresponding to widespread lockdowns during the COVID-19 outbreak. Certain case categories experienced the greatest negative impact. Results from this study may inform accrediting bodies and surgical educators on the impact of future disruptions to health care delivery.

Correlation of Scholarly Activity and Departmental Clinical Productivity in a Surgical Subspecialty.

INTRODUCTION: Promotion within academic surgery involves demonstrated excellence in administrative, clinical, and scholarly activities. The present study analyzes the relationship between scholarly and clinical productivity in the field of reconstructive microsurgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of microsurgery fellowship directors (MFDs). Data on clinical productivity were obtained from the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery and scholarly productivity from Scopus. Outcomes were department annual free flap volume, number of publications, and h-index. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and nonparametric tests were used to compare continuous variables. RESULTS: Thirty-nine MFDs were included in this study. All were plastic surgery residency trained and 38% trained under the independent training pathway. Most underwent formal fellowship training in reconstructive microsurgery (89%). The top three microsurgery fellowships trained 37% of all MFDs. Twenty-five percent of MFDs trained at the institution where they ultimately became program director. Twenty percent of MFDs had an additional degree (4 MS, 2 PhD, and 1 MBA). The median number of annual free flaps performed per institution was 175 (interquartile range [IQR] 122). The median h-index was 17 (IQR 13) resulting from 48 (IQR 99) publications. There was a correlation between department annual free flap volume and h-index (r = 0.333, P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between academic productivity of MFDs and the clinical productivity of their department. This study provides a benchmark for aspiring reconstructive microsurgeons.

Variability in procedure volume of physical medicine and rehabilitation residents graduating from 2014 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: Adequate exposure to commonly performed procedures during physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residency is an important issue. OBJECTIVE: To assess temporal trends and variabilities in reported procedural volumes, including the number of residents achieving procedure minimum requirements as established by the Accredited Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) PM&R Residency Review Committee. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of PM&R residents graduating from 2013-2014 to 2020-2021. Descriptive statistics were calculated for tracked procedures and compared over time with analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Variability was calculated as the procedure volume difference between the 90th and 10th percentile groups. SETTING: ACGME-accredited PM&R residency training programs. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3231 PM&R residents graduating from 2014 to 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported procedure volume and number of residents achieving minimum requirements. RESULTS: Total procedure volume increased over the study period (436 ± 225 to 523 ± 238, p = .013). The percentage of all procedures that were performed versus observed was stable over the study period (81%-77%, p = .234). Variability in total reported procedure volume remained stable over the study period. The percentage of PM&R residents not achieving minimum requirements ranged from 2% for peripheral joint injections to 22% for ultrasound in the contemporary training period. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of reported procedures has increased along with the number of PM&R residency programs and residents. Variabilities in total reported procedure volume were stable over time, but PM&R residents struggle to obtain minimum requirements for ultrasound procedures.

Academic career outcomes of Orthopedic Research and Education Foundation resident grant recipients.

The Orthopedic Research and Education Foundation (OREF) awards resident research grants to orthopedic surgery residents. Outcomes are lacking for OREF resident grant recipients including academic career choice and scholarly productivity. This was a retrospective cohort study of OREF resident grant recipients (2012-2020). The percentage of OREF resident grant recipients selecting an academic career was compared with the percentage of academic orthopedic surgeons in the United States via a χ2 test. Two hundred and seventy-six OREF resident grants were issued to 272 orthopedic surgery residents at 73 programs. OREF resident grant recipients were predominantly male (79.0%) and Caucasian (70.2%). OREF resident grant recipients had greater women representation than the national cohort of orthopedic surgery residents (21.0% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.030) with similar proportions of underrepresented racial minorities (29.8% vs. 27.2%, p = 0.351). OREF resident grants consisted of clinical (69.6%) and basic/translational science (30.4%) research and were awarded mostly for sports medicine (25.4%), trauma (18.8%), and adult reconstruction (15.9%) topics. The average h-index was 8.5 ± 9.2 resulting from 29.5 ± 51.2 manuscripts. The majority of OREF resident grant recipients selected an academic career, which was higher than the national benchmark of academic orthopedic surgeons (63.8% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.001). Two OREF resident grant recipients transitioned to National Institutes of Health research funding (0.7%). Multivariable logistical regression demonstrated two independent characteristics associated with pursuit of a future academic career: female sex (p = 0.042) and higher h-index values (p = 0.002). Procurement of OREF resident grants is associated with pursuit of an academic career. Clinical significance: There is great interest in fostering the next generation of orthopedic surgeon scientists. Results from this study demonstrate the association between receipt of an OREF resident research grant and pursuit of a future career in academic orthopedic surgery.

Impact of Orthopaedic Surgeons on National Institutes of Health Funding for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Research.

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) remains one of the predominant sources of biomedical research funding in the United States, yet its impact on total hip and knee arthroplasty research is poorly understood. This study defines the portfolio of NIH funding for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and the impact of orthopaedic surgeons on this portfolio. METHODS: The Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) database was queried for NIH grants that had been awarded for total hip and knee arthroplasty and total NIH funding from 2010 to 2020. Compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) were calculated. Funding totals were compared with those from 20 other clinical areas. The principal investigators (PIs) and grants were characterized, and comparisons were made with use of the Student t test. RESULTS: A total of 489 grants were awarded, totaling $181 million (CAGR of 10.3%). This was >3 times the growth rate for the total NIH budget (CAGR of 2.9%), which increased from $31.2 to $41.7 billion over the 11-year period. When compared with 20 other clinical areas, TJA received the least amount of NIH funding over that period. Alzheimer disease received the most funding ($12.1 billion, CAGR of 19.5%), and cerebral palsy received the penultimate amount of funding ($284 million, CAGR of 6.3%). The R01 grant mechanism was the predominant source (63.1%), and the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) received the most funding (9.7%). Departments of orthopaedic surgery were awarded the most funding (23.5%), yet only 20 orthopaedic surgeons were identified as PIs (16.0%). There were no significant differences in NIH funding totals by PI demographic and academic characteristics (p > 0.05), yet orthopaedic surgeons had among the highest Hirsch indices (h-indices) (p < 0.001). Funding supported clinical (63.5%), translational (19.3%), basic science (7.1%), and other types (10.1%) of research. The top areas with funding were postoperative complications (44.4%), postoperative pain management (17.6%), rehabilitation (15.1%), and implant design (12.4%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of orthopaedic surgeon representation among NIH grants awarded for TJA. Opportunities may exist for orthopaedic surgeons to collaborate in identified areas of clinical interest. Additional research is needed to understand the obstacles to obtaining NIH grant funding for orthopaedic surgeon PIs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Increasing the levels of funding from the NIH is a strategic priority for departments of orthopaedic surgery. Understanding levels of funding for clinical areas in total joint arthroplasty is critical to foster research and discovery support from the NIH.

Surgical Benchmarks for ACGME-accredited Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Fellowship Training.

INTRODUCTION: Higher case volumes correlate with improved outcomes in total joint arthroplasty surgery. The purpose of this study was to understand the effect of adult reconstruction fellowship training on reported case volume in a contemporary cohort of orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provided case logs for orthopaedic surgery residents and adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellows from 2017 to 2018 to 2020 to 2021. Reported case volumes for total joint arthroplasty surgeries were compared using Student t tests. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-three adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellows and 3,000 orthopaedic surgery residents were included. Residents reported more total hip arthroplasty cases (98.9 ± 30 to 106.1 ± 33, 7.3% increase, P < 0.05) and total knee arthroplasty cases (126.0 ± 41 to 136.5 ± 44, 8.3% increase, P < 0.05) over the study period. On average, fellows reported 439.6 total cases: primary total knee arthroplasty, 164.9 cases (37.5%); primary total hip arthroplasty, 146.8 cases (33.4%); revision total knee arthroplasty, 35.2 cases (8.0%); revision total hip arthroplasty, 33.0 cases (7.5%); unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, 4.4 cases (1.0%); and other, 55.0 cases (12.5%). Overall, adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellowship reported between 1.7- and 2.0-fold more joint arthroplasty cases during 1 year of fellowship training than 5 years of residency ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellowship training provides notable exposure to additional cases after residency training. The results from this study may inform prospective applicants on the effect of fellowship training in total joint arthroplasty and help establish benchmarks in case volume for independent practice.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Total Joint Arthroplasty Fellowship Training.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 created unprecedented challenges in surgical training especially in specialties with high elective case volume. We hypothesized that case volume during total joint arthroplasty fellowship training would decrease by 25% given widespread economic shutdowns encountered during the fourth quarter of the 2019-2020 academic year. METHODS: Case logs from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education were obtained for accredited total joint arthroplasty fellowships (2017-2018 to 2020-2021). Case volumes were extracted and summarized as means ± SD. Student's t tests were used for inter-year comparisons. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty three arthroplasty fellows from 24 accredited fellowships were included. There was a 14% year-over-year decrease in total case volume during the 2019-2020 academic year (390 ± 108 vs 453 ± 128, P < .001). Case volume rebounded during the 2020-2021 academic year to 465 ± 93 (19% increase, P < .001). Case categories with the most significant percentage declines in 2019-2020 were primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA, -23%), revision total hip arthroplasty (THA, -19%), revision TKA (rTKA, -11%), and primary THA (-10%). CONCLUSION: There was a 14% overall decrease in arthroplasty case volume during the 2019-2020 academic year, which correlated with the widespread economic shutdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain elective case categories like primary TKA experienced the greatest negative impact. Results from this study may inform prospective trainees and faculty during future national emergencies.

Analysis of Strengths in Exposure to Cases During Plastic and Orthopaedic Hand Surgery Fellowships.

INTRODUCTION: Prospective residents interested in hand surgery must decide to apply for hand surgery fellowships sponsored by different specialties. This study compares case volumes reported during plastic surgery and orthopaedic hand surgery fellowships. METHODS: The American Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs of accredited hand surgery fellowships were analyzed for hand surgery cases (2012 to 2013 to 2020 to 2021). The reported case volume was compared by specialty. Temporal trends were described, intrapathway variabilities calculated, and interpathway differences calculated with Student t -tests. RESULTS: Two hundred plastic surgery (13%) and 1,323 orthopaedic (87%) hand surgery fellows were included. The number of orthopaedic hand surgery fellowships increased from 58 in 2012 to 2013 to 70 in 2020 to 2021 (21% increase), whereas the number of plastic surgery fellowships was stable at 16. Orthopaedic hand surgery fellows reported more hand surgery cases (764 ± 22 versus 628 ± 226), arthroscopy cases (53 ± 54 versus 23 ± 38), and miscellaneous hand surgery cases (42 ± 23 versus 31 ± 18) than plastic surgery hand fellows. Plastic surgery hand fellows reported more cases in wound closure with graft, wound reconstruction with flap, nerve injury, and vascular repair. Overall, orthopaedic surgery offered more experience in 15 case categories (58%), while plastic surgery offered more experience in five case categories (19%). Six case categories (23%) had no difference between specialties. DISCUSSION: Although orthopaedic hand surgery fellowship affords more cases overall, plastic surgery hand fellowships have unique strengths in wound reconstruction with grafts and flaps, nerve injury, and vascular repair. Ultimately, results from this study create a benchmark to improve future training opportunities for hand surgery fellows and orthopaedic surgery residents.

Case Volume Benchmarks During Residency and Fellowship Training for Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeons.

Higher case volumes correlate with improved clinical outcomes across surgical specialties. This study establishes case volume benchmarks after completion of pediatric orthopedic fellowship training. Case logs for orthopedic surgery residents and pediatric orthopedic fellows at accredited programs were analyzed (2017-2018 to 2020-2021). Case volumes for pediatric orthopedic surgery were compared using parametric tests. Case logs from 3,000 orthopedic surgery residents and 149 pediatric orthopedic fellows were analyzed. There was an increase in total pediatric cases among orthopedic surgery residents over the study period (273 ± 68 to 285 ± 76, 1.1% annual increase, P<0.001). On average, pediatric orthopedic fellows reported 276 cases: Spine deformity (55 cases, 20%), foot and ankle deformity (45 cases, 16%), hip reconstruction (34 cases, 12%), limb deformity (32 cases, 12%), trauma lower limb (24 cases, 9%), treatment of supracondylar humerus fracture (23 cases, 8%), trauma upper limb (19 cases, 7%), clubfoot (18 cases, 7%), soft tissue procedures (13 cases, 5%), open treatment of femoral shaft fractures (6 cases, 2%), and treatment of infection (7 cases, 3%). Pediatric orthopedic fellows effectively doubled their pediatric case volume from fellowship training. The distribution of pediatric orthopedic fellow case volume percentiles was: 10th - 191 cases; 30th - 237 cases; 50th - 275 cases; 70th - 318 cases; 90th - 382 cases. Case volume benchmarks can help inform orthopedic trainees, faculty, and patients about the impact of pediatric orthopedic fellowship training. More research is needed to elucidate optimal training environments for future pediatric orthopedic surgeons.

Differences in Nutrient Intake and Diet Quality Between Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White Men in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Non-Hispanic black (NHB) men have higher rates of chronic disease than men in other racial/ethnic groups. Poor diet quality is one risk factor for chronic disease, but research on the diet quality and nutrient intake of NHB men is sparse. The objective of this study was to describe and compare the diet quality and nutrient intake of NHB and non-Hispanic white (NHW) men in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional data on 5050 men (31.3% NHB, 68.7% NHW) who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) during 2007-2012. To assess diet quality, we calculated Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2010 scores from each participant's 24-hour recall data. We used logistic regression models to determine if NHB men had lower odds of meeting dietary recommendations for nutrient intake than NHW men. We used linear regression models to identify significant differences in HEI-2010 scores between NHB and NHW men. RESULTS: After adjusting for sociodemographic measures, NHB and NHW men had similar diet quality (P = .59). Compared with NHW men, NHB men had lower odds of meeting recommendations for dietary fiber and cholesterol intake and higher odds of meeting recommendations for saturated fat and sodium intake. CONCLUSION: Differences between NHB and NHW men in the intake of certain nutrients may be related to chronic disease disparities. Future research should consider racial/ethnic differences in dietary intake among men and the impact these differences have on men's health.

Twelve cases of exertional rhabdomyolysis in college football players from the same institution over a 23-year span: a descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyolysis is a syndrome characterized by muscle necrosis that leads to release of the intracellular contents of muscle cells into the systemic circulation. Rhabdomyolysis due to overexertion is an uncommon but well-known severe complication of strenuous activity. Exertional rhabdomyolysis (ER) is typically described in weight lifters and military recruits undergoing basic training. Few cases have been reported in football players without known predisposing risk factors. We report our experience with this condition in college football players in a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: College football players hospitalized for heat illness complicated by rhabdomyolysis were identified over a 23-year period. Clinical and laboratory findings were collected. Clinical course was recorded. RESULTS: Twelve patients were identified. All were Black males. One had sickle cell trait. BMI averaged 33 kg/m2 (range 23-45 kg/m2). Peak creatine phosphokinase (CPK) averaged 14,850 IU/L (range 1,021-109,616 IU/L). Serum creatinine averaged 1.9 mg/dl (range 1.2-3.1 mg/dl). Ten of twelve cases occurred in August. All responded to intravenous hydration with normalization of CPK and renal function. All returned to football. CONCLUSIONS: ER is a serious complication of strenuous physical activity that can threaten renal function. ER tends to occur in August, which coincides with the start of football practice when athletes are more likely to be detrained. The condition can occur in Black athletes in the absence of sickle cell trait. ER carries a good prognosis when recognized early and treated adequately.

Musculoskeletal Manifestations of Amyloidosis: A Focused Review.

Amyloidosis is a poorly understood condition that can wreak havoc on numerous systems within the human body. In addition, this disease can present in multiple forms which each have their own unique physiology and subsequent effects. However, while the literature on the etiology and effect of amyloidosis on various organ systems is numerous, few have highlighted the musculoskeletal manifestations of this devastating disease. This review focuses on the recent research on amyloid deposition in the musculoskeletal system. Additionally, risk factors, classification, differential diagnoses, indications for biopsy, and manifestations of amyloidosis in the musculoskeletal system as well as in other tissues are discussed. Furthermore, the surgical and nonsurgical approaches to treatment are covered. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(1):1-5, 2018).

Changes by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: Success or Failure?: An AOA Critical Issues Symposium.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has introduced far-reaching changes to the educational requirements for postgraduate trainees over the past 15 years. These steps were taken to improve the quality of education and to enhance patient safety. This symposium will explore the design and implementation of these changes and determine if they are succeeding.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Predictors of Mental Health Treatment in Persons with Comorbid Diabetes and Depression.

Diabetes and depression are two of the most frequently diagnosed health conditions in the United States and often co-occur. The present study examines racial/ethnic differences in predictors of mental health service use among a national sample of African Americans, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic Whites with a self-reported diabetes and depression diagnosis. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze a cross-sectional sample (N = 3377) of the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey. African Americans were less likely to have visited a mental health professional in the last 12 months (odds ratio [OR] = .634, confidence interval [CI] [0.429, 0.911]). Significant odds ratios also uncovered results for the "never married" (OR = 1.737, CI [1.322, 2.281]) category. Also for the entire sample, being 55 years or older (OR = .352, CI [0.234, 0.533]) was found to be strongly associated with mental health service use for individuals with diabetes. Being unemployed or not in the labor force increased the odds of mental health service use in persons with diabetes and depression, whereas having less than a high school diploma or Graduate Equivalency Diploma decreased odds of visits (OR = .611, CI [0.394, 0.945]) as did not having health insurance (OR = .540, CI [0.365, 0.800]). Racial/ethnic variation in mental health service utilization exists among persons with self-reported diabetes and depression. Due to the challenges associated with comorbid depression and diabetes, as well as the impact depression can have on diabetes self-management, it is imperative that more strategies for managing both depression and diabetes be explored.