Assessing how routes to diagnosis vary by the age of patients with cancer: a nationwide register-based cohort study in Denmark.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with cancer have poorer prognosis compared to younger patients. Moreover, prognosis is related to how cancer is identified, and where in the healthcare system patients present, i.e. routes to diagnosis (RtD). We investigated whether RtD varied by patients' age. METHODS: This population-based national cohort study used Danish registry data. Patients were categorized into age groups and eight mutually exclusive RtD. We employed multinomial logistic regressions adjusted for sex, region, diagnosis year, cohabitation, education, income, immigration status and comorbidities. Screened and non-screened patients were analysed separately. RESULTS: The study included 137,876 patients. Both younger and older patients with cancer were less likely to get diagnosed after a cancer patient pathways referral from primary care physician compared to middle-aged patients. Older patients were more likely to get diagnosed via unplanned admission, death certificate only, and outpatient admission compared to younger patients. The patterns were similar across comorbidity levels. CONCLUSIONS: RtD varied by age groups, and middle-aged patients were the most likely to get diagnosed after cancer patient pathways with referral from primary care. Emphasis should be put on raising clinicians' awareness of cancer being the underlying cause of symptoms in both younger patients and in older patients.

Nationwide cohort study of the impact of education, income and social isolation on survival after acute colorectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute colorectal cancer surgery has been associated with a high postoperative mortality. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between socioeconomic position and the likelihood of undergoing acute versus elective colorectal cancer surgery. A secondary aim was to determine 1-year survival among patients treated with acute surgery. METHODS: All patients who had undergone a surgical procedure according to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk) database, or who were registered with stent or diverting stoma in the National Patient Register from 2007 to 2015, were reviewed. Socioeconomic position was determined by highest attained educational level, income, urbanicity and cohabitation status, obtained from administrative registries. Co-variables included age, sex, year of surgery, Charlson Co-morbidity Index score, smoking status, alcohol consumption, BMI, stage and tumour localization. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the likelihood of acute colorectal cancer surgery, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods were used for analysis of 1-year overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 35 661 patients were included; 5310 (14·9 per cent) had acute surgery. Short and medium education in patients younger than 65 years (odds ratio (OR) 1·58, 95 per cent c.i. 1·32 to 1·91, and OR 1·34, 1·15 to 1·55 respectively), low income (OR 1·12, 1·01 to 1·24) and living alone (OR 1·35, 1·26 to 1·46) were associated with acute surgery. Overall, 40·7 per cent of patients died within 1 year of surgery. Short education (hazard ratio (HR) 1·18, 95 per cent c.i. 1·03 to 1·36), low income (HR 1·16, 1·01 to 1·34) and living alone (HR 1·25, 1·13 to 1·38) were associated with reduced 1-year survival after acute surgery. CONCLUSION: Low socioeconomic position was associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing acute colorectal cancer surgery, and with reduced 1-year overall survival after acute surgery.

ANTECEDENTES: La cirugía urgente del cáncer colorrectal se ha asociado con una mortalidad postoperatoria elevada. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue determinar la relación entre el estatus socioeconómico y la probabilidad de indicación de cirugía de cáncer colorrectal de forma urgente o electiva. El objetivo secundario fue determinar la supervivencia a 1 año en los pacientes tratados con cirugía urgente. MÉTODOS: Se revisaron todos los pacientes en los que se había realizado un procedimiento quirúrgico recogidos en la base de datos Danish Colorectal Cancer (DCCG.dk) o que se hubiera colocado una prótesis o efectuado un estoma de derivación que constasen en el National Patient Register entre 2007 y 2015. El estatus socioeconómico se estableció según el nivel más alto de educación alcanzado, los ingresos, el lugar de residencia y la situación de convivencia, datos que se obtuvieron de registros administrativos. Las covariables analizadas fueron el género, la edad, el año de la cirugía, el índice de comorbilidad de Charlson, el hábito tabáquico, el consumo de alcohol, el índice de masa corporal, el estadio y la localización del tumor. Se calcularon las regresiones logísticas según la probabilidad de cirugía de cáncer colorrectal urgente y se utilizó el método de Kaplan Meier y Cox para el análisis de la supervivencia global a 1 año. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 35.661 pacientes, de los que a 5.310 (15%) se realizó un procedimiento quirúrgico de urgencia. Los factores que se asociaron a cirugía urgente fueron un nivel educativo bajo o medio en menores de 65 años (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR = 1,58, i.c del 95% 1,32-1,91 y OR = 1,34, i.c. del 95% 1,15-1,55, respectivamente), los bajos ingresos (OR = 1,12, i.c del 95% 1,01 -1,24) y vivir solo (OR = 1,35, i.c. del 95% 1,26-1,46). El 41,0% de los pacientes a los que se realizó cirugía urgente fallecieron en el primer año postoperatorio. Los factores asociados con una baja tasa de supervivencia al año de la cirugía urgente fueron un nivel educativo bajo (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR = 1,18, i.c. del 95% 1,03-1,36), unos ingresos bajos (HR = 1,16, i.c. del 95% 1,01-1,34) y vivir solo (HR = 1,25, i.c. del 95% 1,13-1,38). CONCLUSIÓN: La probabilidad de ser sometido a cirugía urgente por un cáncer colorrectal y ver reducida la probabilidad de supervivencia en el primer año postoperatorio es mayor en pacientes con un estatus socioeconómico bajo.