Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 27(9): 1804-1812, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28976447

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Women with endometriosis carry an increased risk for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinomas (CCCs). Clear cell adenocarcinoma may develop from endometriosis lesions. Few studies have compared clinical and prognostic factors and overall survival in patients diagnosed as having CCC according to endometriosis status. METHODS: Population-based prospectively collected data on CCC with coexisting pelvic (including ovarian; n = 80) and ovarian (n = 46) endometriosis or without endometriosis (n = 95) were obtained through the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database. χ Test, independent-samples t test, logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier test, and Cox regression were used. Statistical tests were 2 sided. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Patients with CCC and pelvic or ovarian endometriosis were significantly younger than CCC patients without endometriosis, and a higher proportion of them were nulliparous (28% and 31% vs 17% (P = 0.07 and P = 0.09). Accordingly, a significantly higher proportion of women without endometriosis had given birth to more than 1 child. Interestingly, a significantly higher proportion of patients with ovarian endometriosis had pure CCCs (97.8% vs 82.1%; P = 0.001) as compared with patients without endometriosis. Overall survival was poorer among CCC patients with concomitant ovarian endometriosis (hazard ratio, 2.56 [95% confidence interval, 1.29-5.02], in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Age at CCC diagnosis and parity as well as histology differ between CCC patients with and without concomitant endometriosis. Furthermore, CCC patients with concomitant ovarian endometriosis have a poorer prognosis compared with endometriosis-negative CCC patients. These differences warrant further research to determine whether CCCs with and without concomitant endometriosis develop through distinct pathogenic pathways.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/epidemiología , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patología , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Endometriosis/mortalidad , Endometriosis/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 27(2): 382-389, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28114238

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Proper planning of intervention and care of ovarian cancer surgery is of outmost importance and involves a wide range of personnel at the departments involved. The aim of this study is to evaluate the introduction of an ovarian surgery classification (COVA) system for facilitating multidisciplinary team (MDT) decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighteen women diagnosed with ovarian cancers (n = 351) or borderline tumors (n = 66) were selected for primary debulking surgery from January 2008 to July 2013. At an MDT meeting, women were allocated into 3 groups named "pre-COVA" 1 to 3 classifying the expected extent of the primary surgery and need for postoperative care. On the basis of the operative procedures performed, women were allocated into 1 of the 3 corresponding COVA 1 to 3 groups. The outcome measure was the predictive value of the pre-COVA score compared with the actual COVA performed. RESULTS: The MDT meeting allocated 213 women (51%) to pre-COVA 1, 136 (33%) to pre-COVA 2, and 52 (12%) to pre-COVA 3. At the end of surgery, 168 (40%) were classified as COVA 1, 158 (38%) were classified as COVA 2, and 28 (7%) were classified as COVA 3. Traced individually, 212 (51%) patients were correctly preclassified at the MDT meeting and distributed into 110 (52%) COVA 1, 71 (52%) COVA 2, and 17 (32%) COVA 3. Analyzing the subgroup of patients with cancer, 164 (47%) were correctly preclassified. Regarding the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages, the pre-COVA classification predicted the actual COVA group in 79 (49%) FIGO stages I to IIIB and in 85 (45%) FIGO stages IIIC to IV. CONCLUSIONS: The COVA classification system is a simple and useful tool in the MDT setting where specialists make treatment decisions based on advanced technology. The use of pre-COVA classification facilitates well-organized patient care-relevant procedures to be undertaken. Pre-COVA accurately predicts the final COVA in 51% classified women.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/clasificación , Toma de Decisiones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/clasificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...