Single institution retrospective review of perioperative chemotherapy in adult and adolescent patients with operable osteosarcoma.

AIMS: Perioperative chemotherapy has improved the prognosis for patients with operable osteosarcoma. The literature is conflicting about which regimen is optimal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival outcomes of two cohorts of patients with operable osteosarcoma treated with different perioperative chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with operable osteosarcoma treated at the Princess Alexandra Hospital from 1986 to 2009. The standard perioperative chemotherapy regimen changed from the modified T10 Rosen protocol to cisplatin/doxorubicin in 1997. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were generated for the cisplatin/doxorubicin and the modified T10 Rosen cohorts. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were identified of whom 63 had potentially curable disease. Of these, 24 received the modified T10 Rosen regimen and 39 received cisplatin/doxorubicin. There was a non-significant trend toward better OS and DFS in the patients who received the modified T10 Rosen protocol. CONCLUSION: The trend toward poorer survival in the cisplatin/doxorubicin cohort, in combination with current evidence, has prompted our institution to change its practice.

Is concurrent radiation therapy required in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus? A randomised phase II trial.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for resectable oesophageal cancer have been shown to improve overall survival in meta-analyses. There are limited data comparing these preoperative therapies. We report the outcomes of a randomised phase II trial comparing preoperative CT and CRT for resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction. METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive preoperative CT with cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) and infusional 5 fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 and 21, or preoperative CRT with the same drugs accompanied by concurrent radiation therapy commencing on day 21 of chemotherapy and the 5 fluorouracil reduced to 800 mg/m(2)/d. The radiation dose was 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. The endpoints were toxicity, response rates, resection (R) status, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were enrolled on the study: 36 received preoperative CT and 39 preoperative CRT. Toxicity was similar for CT and CRT. Eight patients (11%) did not proceed to resection. The histopathological response rate (CRT 31% versus CT 8%, p = 0.01) and R1 resection rate (CRT 0% versus CT 11%, p = 0.04) favoured those receiving CRT. The median PFS was 14 and 26 months for CT and CRT respectively (p = 0.37). The median OS was 29 months for CT compared with 32 months for CRT (p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Despite no difference in survival, the improvement from preoperative CRT with respect to margin involvement makes this treatment a reasonable option for bulky, locally advanced resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

Comparison of two standard chemotherapy regimens for good-prognosis germ cell tumors: updated analysis of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The Australian and New Zealand Germ Cell Trials Group conducted a multicenter randomized phase III trial in men with good-prognosis germ cell tumors of two standard chemotherapy regimens that contained bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin but differed in the scheduling and total dose of cisplatin, the total dose of bleomycin, and the scheduling and dose intensity of etoposide. The trial was stopped early at a median follow-up of 33 months after a planned interim analysis found a survival benefit for the more dose-intense regimen. The aim of this analysis was to determine if this survival benefit was maintained with long-term follow-up. METHODS: Between February 1994 and April 2000, 166 men with good-prognosis metastatic germ cell tumors defined by modified Memorial Sloan-Kettering criteria were randomly assigned to receive 3B(90)E(500)P (three cycles, repeated every 21 days, of 30 kU bleomycin on days 1, 8, and 15; 100 mg/m(2) etoposide on days 1-5; and 20 mg/m(2) cisplatin on days 1-5; n = 83) or 4B(30)E(360)P (four cycles, repeated every 21 days, of 30 kU bleomycin on day 1, 120 mg/m(2) etoposide on days 1-3, and 100 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 1; n = 83). Endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life and side effects, which were assessed using the Spitzer Quality of Life Index and the GLQ-8, respectively, before random assignment and during and after treatment. All analyses were by intention to treat. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 8.5 years. All but five survivors (3%) were followed up for at least 5 years. Overall survival remained better in those assigned to 3B(90)E(500)P than in those assigned to 4B(30)E(360)P (8-year survival: 92% vs 83%; hazard ratio of death = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.15 to 0.97, P = .037). Progression-free survival favored 3B(90)E(500)P but was not statistically significantly different between the treatment groups (8-year progression-free survival, 3B(90)E(500)P vs 4B(30)E(360)P: 86% vs 79%; hazard ratio of progression = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.3 to 1.1, P = .15). At the end of treatment, average scores for most side effect scales favored 3B(90)E(500)P. After the completion of treatment, average GLQ-8 scores for numbness (P = .003) and hair loss (P = .04) and the Spitzer Quality of Life Index (P = .05) favored 3B(90)E(500)P. CONCLUSION: The survival benefit of 3B(90)E(500)P over 4B(30)E(360)P was maintained with long-term follow-up.

Enhanced toxicity with concurrent cetuximab and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To report toxicity data from the first 13 consecutive patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC), ineligible for cisplatin, treated with concurrent cetuximab and radiotherapy (RT) at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively between August 2007 and May 2008. Planned treatment consisted of a cetuximab loading dose (400mg/m(2)) via intravenous infusion 1 week prior and then weekly (250mg/m(2)) with 70Gy in 35 daily fractions over 7 weeks. RESULTS: Median age was 68 years (range 52-82 years). The predominant primary sites were hypopharyngeal (5) and oropharyngeal (5). Ineligibility for cisplatin consisted of renal impairment (5), hearing impairment (4) and of other major co-morbidities (4). Of the 13 patients, 10 (77%) had grade 3/4 skin reactions and 10 (77%) grade 3/4 mucositis. Six (46%) patients required admission for management of severe skin reactions and/or mucositis with 4 (31%) requiring a treatment break, median 10 days (9-15days). Only 4 (31%) patients managed to complete the planned 8 cycles of cetuximab. Of the 9 patients with 12-week post-therapy data, 7 (78%) achieved a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience with cetuximab/RT has demonstrated a higher rate of toxicity compared with the recently reported randomised trial, resulting in low treatment compliance and delays in completing RT.

A phase II trial of chemoradiation therapy with weekly oxaliplatin and protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiation therapy using regimens containing cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil are most commonly used for inoperable cancer of the esophagus. Cisplatin is relatively toxic and is not suitable for many patients. Little data exists using platinum analogues together with protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy in the curative setting. METHODS: Fourteen patients with localised oesophageal cancer suitable for curative chemoradiation therapy registered on the study. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) daily throughout radiation therapy, with oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) weekly. The radiation dose was 56 to 60 Gy in 28 to 30 fractions. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 70.5 years. Therapy was associated with excessive grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicity. There was one treatment related death. The median progression-free survival was 31.5 months and median overall survival 32.6 months. Six patients achieved a prolonged complete endoscopic and radiological response. CONCLUSIONS: Although weekly oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5 fluorouracil produces durable remissions in esophageal cancer, the regimen used in this trial was not acceptable for routine use. Future protocols should incorporate lower chemotherapy doses.

Refining esophageal cancer staging after neoadjuvant therapy: importance of treatment response.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate staging is vital for esophageal cancer management. The utility of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system 6th edition for esophageal cancer has been questioned for resected patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This study was undertaken to assess the AJCC staging system for patients with esophageal cancer that have received neoadjuvant CRT and to identify clinicopathological variables that predict survival. METHODS: Review of a prospective esophageal cancer database was undertaken for patients that received neoadjuvant CRT and resection. Primary tumor response was defined as major (10% residual tumor cells). Cox regression and concordance analyses were used to determine prognostic factors. Median follow-up was 61 months. RESULTS: Of 131 patients with invasive cancer, there were 40/131 (31%) with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 88/131 (65%) with adenocarcinoma. The procedure-related mortality rate was 3.8%. Median survival was 33 months. A major response was demonstrated by 79/131 (60%) patients. Survival analyses found that the AJCC 6th edition was unable to discriminate between stages 0, I, and IIa or stages IIb and III. Multivariate survival analyses found age, pretreatment tumor length >6 cm, positive lymph nodes, and a major tumor response were independent prognostic factors. These data were used to derive a new staging system that had improved discrimination of stage groups over the current AJCC system. CONCLUSION: The current AJCC staging system for esophageal cancer is inadequate for patients that receive neoadjuvant CRT. Refinement of the AJCC staging system should include primary tumor response for patients receiving neoadjuvant CRT.

A phase II study of the heparanase inhibitor PI-88 in patients with advanced melanoma.

Treatment options for advanced melanoma are limited. PI-88, a potent inhibitor of heparanase, demonstrates anitangiogenic properties and has shown activity against melanoma in phase I studies. This was an open-label, multicenter, phase II study of PI-88 in patients with advanced melanoma. Patients received a fixed-dose of 250 mg/day given subcutaneously for four consecutive days followed by three drug-free days per week in a 28-day cycle. A total of 44 patients were enrolled in the intent to treat population, with 59.1% having received previous therapy. The median time to progression and overall survival was 1.7 months and 9 months, respectively. Forty-one patients are included in the efficacy analysis. One (2.4%) patient achieved a partial response, six (14.6%) patients had stable disease as best response, and 30 (73.2%) had progressive disease. At the end of six cycles of treatment, three of the 41 evaluable patients had non-progressive disease. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Injection site bruising occurred in 45% of patients. Serious bleeding did occur in two patients and three patients developed a positive anti-platelet antibody test during the study. One of these four patients experienced an associated thrombosis. In patients with advanced melanoma, PI-88 demonstrates an overall survival and time to progression similar to standard chemotherapy. Although the current study did not meet the primary end-point of progression free survival of >or=20%, there is some evidence of activity and further investigation is warranted.

Feasibility of chemoradiation therapy with protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil for esophageal cancer patients not suitable for cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiation therapy is the standard treatment for esophageal cancer in patients not fit for surgery. The regimen most commonly used includes cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Little data exists regarding alternative chemotherapy regimens in patients not suitable for cisplatin. We report on a regimen using protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil alone for both curative and palliative indications. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with localized esophageal cancer suitable for curative chemoradiation therapy and 24 patients suitable for palliative therapy were enrolled. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) daily throughout the radiation therapy. The radiation dose was 56 to 60 Gy in 28 to 30 fractions (curative patients) and 30 to 35 Gy in 15 fractions (palliative patients). RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 75 years. The regimen was tolerable. Significant grade 3 toxicities experienced were esophagitis (11%) and venous catheter toxicity (9%). The median survival was 17 months for curative patients and 9 months for palliative patients. The complete response rate was 86% endoscopically and 45% radiologically for curative patients. Relief of dysphagia was experienced in 67% of palliative patients. Quality of life was satisfactory in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil given concurrently with radiation therapy is a useful alternative to platinum-based chemoradiation therapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.