Symptoms in the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Danish children aged 0-14 years.

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence and burden of proxy-reported acute symptoms in children in the first 4 weeks after detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and factors associated with symptom burden. Methods: Nationwide cross-sectional survey using parental proxy reporting of symptoms associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. In July 2021, a survey was sent to the mothers of all Danish children aged 0-14 years with a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test between January 2020 and July 2021. The survey included 17 symptoms associated with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and questions about comorbidities. Results: Of 38,152 children with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, 10,994 (28.8%) mothers responded. The median age was 10.2 (range 0.2-16.0) years and 51.8% were male. Among participants, 54.2% (n=5957) reported no symptoms, 43.7% (n=4807) reported mild symptoms, and 2.1% (n=230) reported severe symptoms. The most common symptoms were fever (25.0%), headache (22.5%) and sore throat (18.4%). Asthma {odds ratio (OR) 1.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-2.32) and OR 2.11 (95% CI 1.36-3.28)}, allergy [OR 1.31 (95% CI 1.14-1.52) and OR 1.70 (95% CI 1.18-2.46], eczema [OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.20-1.71) and OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.38-2.97)] and OCD/anxiety/depression [OR 2.06 (95% CI 1.39-3.06) and OR 3.79 (95% CI 1.80-7.97)] were associated with reporting a higher symptom burden [values indicate outcomes reporting three or more acute symptoms (upper quartile) and reporting a severe symptom burden, respectively]. The highest prevalence of symptoms was found among children aged 0-2 and 12-14 years. Conclusions: Among SARS-CoV-2-positive children aged 0-14 years, approximately half reported no acute symptoms within the first 4 weeks after a positive PCR test. Most symptomatic children reported mild symptoms. Several comorbidities were associated with reporting a higher symptom burden.

Long COVID symptoms in SARS-CoV-2-positive children aged 0-14 years and matched controls in Denmark (LongCOVIDKidsDK): a national, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: After the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, children can develop long COVID symptoms. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of long-lasting symptoms, the duration and intensity of symptoms, quality of life, number of sick days and absences from daycare or school, and psychological and social outcomes in children aged 0-14 years who had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 relative to controls with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted including children with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive PCR test (cases) and matched controls from Danish national registers. A survey was sent to mothers (proxy reporting) of children aged 0-14 years who had had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test between Jan 1, 2020, and July 12, 2021, and a control group matched (1:4) by age and sex. The survey included the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and the Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory-24 (CSSI-24) to capture current overall health and wellbeing, and ancillary questions about the 23 most common long COVID symptoms. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were used. Clinically relevant differences were defined as those with a Hedges'g score greater than 0·2. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04786353). FINDINGS: Responses to the survey were received from 10 997 (28·8%) of 38 152 cases and 33 016 (22·4%) of 147 212 controls between July 20, 2021, and Sept 15, 2021. Median age was 10·2 years (IQR 6·6-12·8) in cases and 10·6 years (6·9-12·9) in controls. 5267 (48·2%) cases and 15 777 (48·3%) controls were female, and 5658 (51·8%) cases and 16 870 (51·7%) controls were male. Cases had higher odds of reporting at least one symptom lasting more than 2 months than did controls in the 0-3 years age group (478 [40·0%] of 1194 vs 1049 [27·2%] of 3855; OR 1·78 [95% CI 1·55-2·04], p<0·0001), 4-11 years age group (1912 [38·1%] of 5023 vs 6189 [33·7%] of 18 372; 1·23 [1·15-1·31], p<0·0001), and 12-14 years age group (1313 [46·0%] of 2857 vs 4454 [41·3%] of 10 789; 1·21 [1·11-1·32], p<0·0001). Differences in CSSI-24 symptom scores between cases and controls were statistically significant but not clinically relevant. Small clinically relevant differences in PedsQL quality-of-life scores related to emotional functioning were found in favour of cases in the children aged 4-11 years (median score 80·0 [IQR 65·0-95·0]) in cases vs 75·0 [60·0-85·0] in controls; p<0·0001) and 12-14 years (90·0 [70·0-100·0] vs (85·0 [65·0-95·0], p<0·0001). PedsQL social functioning scores were also higher in cases (100·0 [90·0-100·0] than controls (95·0 [80·0-100·0]) in the 12-14 years age group (p<0·0001; Hedges g>0·2). INTERPRETATION: Compared with controls, children aged 0-14 years who had a SARS-CoV-2 infection had more prevalent long-lasting symptoms. There was a tendency towards better quality-of-life scores related to emotional and social functioning in cases than in controls in older children. The burden of symptoms among children in the control group requires attention. Long COVID must be recognised and multi-disciplinary long COVID clinics for children might be beneficial. FUNDING: A P Møller and Chastine Mc-Kinney Møller Foundation.

Implementing a peer-to-peer, self-management intervention for young people with depression and anxiety in Denmark.

BACKGROUND: Depressive and anxiety disorders share major risk factors and can often be effectively prevented or treated with similar interventions. However, less than half of young people with mental health problems seek professional help and hence innovative approaches to support this group are needed. To this end Coping with Anxiety and Depression shows promise. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the implementation of Coping with Anxiety and Depression for young people aged 15-25 years showing symptoms of anxiety and/or depression in a Danish community setting. METHODS: The programme was implemented in 39 Danish municipalities. To evaluate the implementation of the programme, we collected quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously and subsequently we triangulated it in the data analysis. The qualitative data collection comprised semi-structured interviews in seven case municipalities. In each municipality we conducted interviews with a local municipality coordinator of the program, a group interview with two voluntary instructors facilitating the program and a group interview with two to seven participants in the programme. In total, seven local coordinators, 14 voluntary instructors and 23 participants (8 men and 15 women) were interviewed. We also carried out a baseline and post-intervention survey. Interview data was coded via an inductive and deductive analysis approach. Survey data was analysed via descriptive statistics in the statistical software programme STATA 16. RESULTS: The evaluation showed that the implementation of the programme is feasible, and that most participants (83%) were satisfied with the programme to a high/very high extent. In total, 84% of the participants strongly agreed/agreed that it was advantageous that instructors themselves had experience with anxiety and depression. Qualitative data showed that the participants were very positive about the group format. It also showed that recruitment and retention of participants and especially young instructors were challenging but doable. Thus our findings suggest that the programme can be implemented in a way that is perceived as useful and satisfying to young people. CONCLUSIONS: Coping with Anxiety and Depression constitutes a feasible peer-to-peer, group-based community programme that is well-received by its target group. Recruitment and retention of participants and instructors is challenging but doable.

Sexual rehabilitation for cardiac patients with erectile dysfunction: a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction is common in patients with either ischaemic heart disease (IHD) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and has a negative impact on quality of life. Non-pharmacological treatment options are lacking. The purpose of this trial was to assess the effect of sexual rehabilitation versus usual care for males with erectile dysfunction and either IHD and/or ICD. METHODS: Participants with erectile dysfunction and IHD and/or ICD were randomised to 12 weeks of sexual rehabilitation consisting of physical exercise training, pelvic floor exercise and psychoeducation, or usual care. PRIMARY OUTCOME: sexual function by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Secondary outcome: sexual function by the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale. Exploratory outcomes: exercise capacity, pelvic floor strength/endurance, self-reported health and mental health. RESULTS: 154 participants were included, mean age 61.6 years (SD 6.1). Sexual rehabilitation compared with usual care improved sexual function with a mean difference IIEF score of 6.7 (95% CI 3.1 to 10.4, p<0.0003) at 4 months between groups (unadjusted IIEF mean scores 36.4 vs 31.3) and a mean difference of 6.7, 95% CI 3.2 to 10.1 (p<0.0002) at 6 months between groups (unadjusted mean scores IIEF 37.1 vs 32.2). No effects were seen on the secondary outcome. Sexual rehabilitation improved exercise capacity on cycle ergometer measured by Watt max with a mean difference of 10.3, 95% CI 3.6 to 16.9 (p<0.003) and pelvic floor strength (p<0.01). No differences were seen on self-reported health and mental health. CONCLUSION: Sexual rehabilitation compared with usual care improves sexual function and exercise capacity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01796353; Results.