High incidence of undetected low sensor glucose events among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes more than a decade on after the ACCORD study.

OBJECTIVE: Hypoglycaemia leads to significant morbidity and impacts negatively on quality-of-life, especially in elderly people with increased frailty. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of low interstitial fluid glucose (IFG) in patients with tightly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D), and to evaluate whether there were differences in burden of low IFG between sulphonylurea and insulin treated groups. METHODS: A Freestyle Libre-Pro sensor was used for sampling of the IFG continuously. Patients were blinded to the IFG levels. The sensor was returned to the investigators after a 2-week period and the data were downloaded for analysis. RESULTS: There was a total of 69 patients (median age 72 years (IQR = 69-74)) - 40 were sulfonylurea-treated and 29 insulin-treated. In total, 781 low sensor glucose events (<4.0 mmol/L) were detected, of which 254 were very low sensor glucose events (<2.8 mmol/L). Twenty-six out of 29 insulin-treated (89.6%) and 36 out of 40 sulphonylurea-treated patients (90%) contributed to the 781 events of low sensor glucose. Twenty out of 29 insulin-treated (69%) and 26 out of 40 sulphonylurea-treated patients (65.0%) contributed to the 254 very low sensor glucose events. Only 9% of all events were identified by patients. Nocturnal events represented 55.8% of low sensor glucose events and 61.0% of very low sensor glucose events. At a cut-off of <2.8 mmol/L, it was found that the insulin group had a significantly greater number of such events as compared to the sulfonylurea group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that elderly patients with tightly-controlled T2D have a significant number of low sensor glucose events which go by undetected.

Rapid Desensitization for Insulin Allergy in Type 1 Diabetes Using an Insulin Pump: A Case Report and Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: Insulin allergy, although uncommon, poses a significant challenge in those with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) as insulin replacement is a necessity. Our objective is to describe a patient in whom rapid desensitization to insulin aspart was achieved using an insulin pump. METHODS: A 40-year-old woman with newly diagnosed T1D developed pruritic wheals over the abdomen after being injected with insulin glargine U-300 (Toujeo) and insulin aspart. Type 1 insulin hypersensitivity was confirmed through intradermal testing and positive insulin-specific immunoglobulin E levels. RESULT: The patient underwent rapid desensitization with an insulin pump. Half the anticipated daily basal requirement was initially subcutaneously administered before initiating low-dose insulin via the pump (0.000025 units/h) and increasing the dose every 30 minutes to reach her basal requirements within 5 hours. Subsequent larger bolus insulin doses did not produce any local or anaphylactic reactions. No pretreatment with corticosteroids or antihistamines was provided. CONCLUSION: Previous protocols for insulin desensitization span over days and often involve routine premedication. The case we presented suggests that insulin desensitization can be achieved over several hours using an insulin pump. A subcutaneous basal insulin cover should be provided prior to desensitization to avoid hyperglycemia necessitating an insulin bolus. Routine premedication may not always be necessary depending on reaction severity.