Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Phys Med ; 123: 103405, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870645

RESUMEN

The effect of mammography measurement conditions was investigated to evaluate their impact on measurement uncertainties in clinical practice. The most prominent physical X-ray beam quantities i.e., - air kerma, half-value layer, and X-ray tube voltage - were examined by measuring the response of two ionization chambers and six X-ray multimeters (XMMs) of different models. Measurements were performed using several anode/filter combinations and both with and without the compression paddle in the X-ray beam. Maximum differences of higher than 6 % were found for all quantities when the dosimeter displayed value was compared with the reference value or the variation within the clinical anode/filter combinations Mo/Mo and Mo/Rh were considered. The study showed that the calibration procedure with the W/Al anode/filter combination was reliable only for ionization chambers, and the response of XMMs varies in such a way that the calibration coefficient cannot be predicted between various measurement conditions used in calibration and clinical practices. XMM calibrations are typically performed without a compression paddle in the beam, and the response of the XMM changes when radiation quality is slightly altered. If XMM specific data is not available, based on this study, an additional uncertainty of 2 % (k = 1) could be used as a typical estimate, at least for air kerma measurements. XMMs should be used for clinical measurements in mammography only with correct settings. If the correct settings are not available, the XMMs should not be used or used only with extreme caution.


Asunto(s)
Mamografía , Mamografía/instrumentación , Calibración , Incertidumbre , Radiometría/instrumentación , Dosímetros de Radiación
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(9): 842-847, 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828501

RESUMEN

Imaging parameters, frequencies and resulting patient organ doses in treatments of prostate cancer were assessed in Finnish radiotherapy centres. Based on a questionnaire to the clinics, Monte Carlo method was used to estimate organ doses in International Commission on Radiological Protection standard phantom for prostate, bladder, rectum and femoral head. The results show that doses from cone beam computed tomography imaging have reduced compared to earlier studies and are between 3.6 and 34.5 mGy per image for the above-mentioned organs and for normal sized patients. There still is room for further optimization of the patient exposure, as many centres use the default imaging parameters, and the length of the imaged region may not be optimal for the purpose.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Método de Montecarlo , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Finlandia , Dosis de Radiación , Fantasmas de Imagen , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Vejiga Urinaria/efectos de la radiación , Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Cabeza Femoral/efectos de la radiación , Próstata/efectos de la radiación , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 199(13): 1423-1430, 2023 Aug 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37491894

RESUMEN

In radiation beam-profile measurements, an accurate positioning of the detector with high position resolution is essential. For this purpose, we built a scanning device capable of moving a detector in three dimensions (3D) using mainly parts from a commercial 3D-printer. The accuracy and repeatability of movement was tested with caliper, laser displacement sensor and repeated 60Co beam-profile measurements in a water phantom. The results from the caliper and the sensor showed position accuracy for the scanner to be better than $\pm$150 µm. The standard deviation of the error in position from laser sensor measurements was approximately 30 µm, and the beam profile scans showed a maximum deviation from the mean position of 50 µm. The effect of volume averaging correction factors on 60Co beam-profile was investigated with two different sized ionization chambers. The differences in the profiles were reduced significantly after applying the correction factors.


Asunto(s)
Radiometría , Agua , Fantasmas de Imagen , Radiometría/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA