EMA commentary on the guideline on quality, nonclinical and clinical aspects of medicinal products containing genetically modified cells.

Great advances have been made in the knowledge of development and regulatory approval of medicinal product containing genetically modified cells. Although a guideline has been available in the EU since 2012, the current updated version provides a useful guide to developers and professionals involved in the regulatory process of these medicines. This article presents the main issues communicated in that guidance, the regulators' insights and a commentary from the academic developers' point of view.

Marketing Regulatory Oversight of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Europe.

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) in the European Union (EU) are regulated by Regulation 1394/2007 and comprise gene and cell therapy and tissue-engineered products. Under this framework, ATMP are authorised by the centralised procedure, coordinated by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), whereas clinical trial authorisations remain at the remit of each National Competent Authority. The Committee for Advanced Therapies is responsible for the scientific evaluation of the marketing authorisation applications and for generating a draft opinion that goes to the Committee for Human Medicinal Products for a final opinion. For every application, data and information relating to manufacturing processes and quality control of the active substance and final product have to be submitted for assessment together with data from non-clinical and clinical safety and efficacy studies. Technical requirements for ATMP are defined in the legislation, and guidance for different products is available through several EMA/CAT guidelines.Due to the diverse and complex nature of ATMP, a need for some regulatory flexibility was recognised. Thus, a risk-based approach was introduced in Regulation 1394/2007 allowing adapted regulatory requirements. This has led, for instance, to the development of good manufacturing practice (GMP) guidelines specific for ATMP. This, together with enhanced regulatory support, has allowed an increasing number of successful marketing authorisation applications resulting in 25 licensed ATMP in the EU, mainly gene therapy medicinal products. The promise of messenger RNA and genome editing technologies as therapeutic tools make the future for these innovative medicinal products look even brighter.This chapter reviews the regulatory landscape together with some of the support initiatives developed for ATMP in the EU.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Products in Spain (2004-2022): Experience and Challenges for the Future.

Clinical investigation is the basis for establishing how useful advanced therapy investigational medicinal products (ATiMP) are for the treatment of serious diseases.In Spain, clinical trials (CT) on ATiMP need to follow the general European legislation on CT with medicinal products plus some specific legislation and guidance depending on the type of ATiMP.This chapter describes the characteristics of CT on ATiMP authorized in Spain in the period 2004-2022 and the legislation applicable along this period. There are clear differences in the clinical trials conducted by non commercial and commercial sponsors: the first have been more involved in CT on somatic cell therapy medicinal products (sCTMP) and tissue-engineered products (TEP), while the second drive more the CT on gene therapy medicinal products (GTMP) in the last years. Difficulties of budget and resources especially by non-commercial sponsors to meet the regulatory requirements are highlighted. The importance of complying with transparency rules with respect to CT on ATiMP is also discussed.

The harmonization of World Health Organization International Nonproprietary Names definitions for cell and cell-based gene therapy substances: when a name is not enough.

The World Health Organization (WHO) assigns International Nonproprietary Names (INN) to pharmaceutical substances, including advanced therapy medicinal products, to ensure that each substance is globally recognized by a unique name. The majority of INN are published in the WHO Drug Information in accordance with the nomenclature rules of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. However, advanced therapy medicinal products, and in particular cell therapy and cell-based gene therapy substances, cannot be defined by such chemical nomenclature. Instead, they are published together with a textual definition paragraph to unambiguously describe their characteristics. These definitions are an integral part of the INN nomenclature system, and their presence contributes to pharmacovigilance and patient safety, as they help to distinguish regulated substances from cell-based interventions that have no INN and are marketed without regulatory oversight. Particular attention is therefore allocated to these descriptive paragraphs, as they form the basis for defining the uniqueness of a particular cell substance. This review describes the INN nomenclature system for cell-based substances and focuses on the progress made by the WHO INN Programme to develop and harmonize these definition paragraphs, which is reflected in a newly revised INN application form for cell therapy substances.

Manufacturing, characterization and control of cell-based medicinal products: challenging paradigms toward commercial use.

During the past decade, a large number of cell-based medicinal products have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of various diseases and tissue defects. However, licensed products and those approaching marketing authorization are still few. One major area of challenge is the manufacturing and quality development of these complex products, for which significant manipulation of cells might be required. While the paradigms of quality, safety and efficacy must apply also to these innovative products, their demonstration may be demanding. Demonstration of comparability between production processes and batches may be difficult for cell-based medicinal products. Thus, the development should be built around a well-controlled manufacturing process and a qualified product to guarantee reproducible data from nonclinical and clinical studies.

Leishmania infection: laboratory diagnosing in the absence of a "gold standard".

There is no gold standard for diagnosing leishmaniases. Our aim was to assess the operative validity of tests used in detecting Leishmania infection using samples from experimental infections, a reliable equivalent to the classic definition of gold standard. Without statistical differences, the highest sensitivity was achieved by protein A (ProtA), immunoglobulin (Ig)G2, indirect fluorescenece antibody test (IFAT), lymphocyte proliferation assay, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction of bone marrow (qPCR-BM), qPCR-Blood, and IgG; and the highest specificity by IgG1, IgM, IgA, qPCR-Blood, IgG, IgG2, and qPCR-BM. Maximum positive predictive value was obtained simultaneously by IgG2, qPCR-Blood, and IgG; and maximum negative predictive value by qPCR-BM. Best positive and negative likelihood ratios were obtained by IgG2. The test having the greatest, statistically significant, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was IgG2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Thus, according to the gold standard used, IFAT and qPCR are far from fulfilling the requirements to be considered gold standards, and the test showing the highest potential to detect Leishmania infection is Leishmania-specific ELISA IgG2.

Vaccination with plasmid DNA encoding KMPII, TRYP, LACK and GP63 does not protect dogs against Leishmania infantum experimental challenge.

Vaccination of dogs, the domestic reservoir of Leishmania infantum, is the best method for controlling zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. This strategy would reduce the incidence of disease in both the canine and, indirectly, the human population. Different vaccination approaches have been investigated against canine leishmaniasis (CaL) but to date there is only one licensed vaccine against this disease in dogs, in Brazil. DNA immunization is a promising method for inducing both humoral and cellular immune responses against this parasitic disease. Here, we report the results of a multiantigenic plasmid DNA vaccine encoding KMPII, TRYP, LACK and GP63 L. infantum antigens against experimentally induced CaL. Twelve dogs were randomly assigned to two groups receiving, at a 15 days interval, either four doses of plasmid DNA or similar injections of PBS. After vaccination, dogs were intravenously challenged with 5 x 10(7) promastigotes of L. infantum. The vaccine showed to be safe and well-tolerated. Neither cellular immune response nor antibodies directed against whole Leishmania antigen were detected after immunization in vaccinated dogs, although anti-LACK-specific antibodies were sporadically detected in two vaccinated dogs before challenge, thus suggesting that antigens were indeed expressed. A delay in the development of detectable specific immune response and parasite multiplication in vaccinated dogs was observed after challenge. Nevertheless, the multiantigenic Leishmania DNA vaccine was unable to induce protection against parasite dissemination or disease. This study emphasizes the need to strengthen DNA vaccines in order to obtain effective immune responses in models other than the murine.

A long term experimental study of canine visceral leishmaniasis.

Previous studies on Leishmania infantum and the canine immune response are derived mainly from short-term studies. To date, there have been no longitudinal studies that perform a serial analysis of the intensity of infection in conjunction with immunological parameters and clinical signs in Leishmania-infected dogs. For this purpose, six dogs were infected experimentally by the i.v. route and were monitored for 1 year. Clinical, immunological (humoral and cellular response) and parasitological (parasitaemia) parameters were evaluated monthly. Four dogs developed clinico-pathological signs compatible with leishmaniasis, whereas two dogs showed few abnormalities during the study. Evaluation of clinical, immunological and parasitological parameters showed that the intensity of Leishmania infection in blood samples, as indicated by the amount of Leishmania DNA, was correlated significantly with IgG, IgG1, IgG2, IgA, and IgM concentrations and with clinical signs. Parasitaemia and Leishmania-specific cell-mediated immunity were inversely correlated. Moreover, higher quantities of Leishmania DNA were detected in the liver, spleen, lymph node, skin and bone marrow of dogs exhibiting clinical signs than those exhibiting few such signs. These findings suggest that progressive disease in experimental canine leishmaniasis is associated with specific T-cell unresponsiveness and unprotective humoral responses which allow the dissemination and multiplication of L. infantum in different tissues.