Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Ecol Lett ; 24(5): 1114-1116, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33538034

RESUMEN

Banks-Leite et al. (2021) claim that our suggestion of preserving ≥ 40% forest cover lacks evidence and can be problematic. We find these claims unfounded, and discuss why conservation planning urgently requires valuable, well-supported and feasible general guidelines like the 40% criterion. Using region-specific thresholds worldwide is unfeasible and potentially harmful.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Bosques , Ecosistema
2.
Ecol Lett ; 23(9): 1404-1420, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32537896

RESUMEN

Agriculture and development transform forest ecosystems to human-modified landscapes. Decades of research in ecology have generated myriad concepts for the appropriate management of these landscapes. Yet, these concepts are often contradictory and apply at different spatial scales, making the design of biodiversity-friendly landscapes challenging. Here, we combine concepts with empirical support to design optimal landscape scenarios for forest-dwelling species. The supported concepts indicate that appropriately sized landscapes should contain ≥ 40% forest cover, although higher percentages are likely needed in the tropics. Forest cover should be configured with c. 10% in a very large forest patch, and the remaining 30% in many evenly dispersed smaller patches and semi-natural treed elements (e.g. vegetation corridors). Importantly, the patches should be embedded in a high-quality matrix. The proposed landscape scenarios represent an optimal compromise between delivery of goods and services to humans and preserving most forest wildlife, and can therefore guide forest preservation and restoration strategies.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Ecosistema , Biodiversidad , Bosques , Humanos , Árboles
3.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 116(33): 16442-16447, 2019 08 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31358630

RESUMEN

Agricultural landscape homogenization has detrimental effects on biodiversity and key ecosystem services. Increasing agricultural landscape heterogeneity by increasing seminatural cover can help to mitigate biodiversity loss. However, the amount of seminatural cover is generally low and difficult to increase in many intensively managed agricultural landscapes. We hypothesized that increasing the heterogeneity of the crop mosaic itself (hereafter "crop heterogeneity") can also have positive effects on biodiversity. In 8 contrasting regions of Europe and North America, we selected 435 landscapes along independent gradients of crop diversity and mean field size. Within each landscape, we selected 3 sampling sites in 1, 2, or 3 crop types. We sampled 7 taxa (plants, bees, butterflies, hoverflies, carabids, spiders, and birds) and calculated a synthetic index of multitrophic diversity at the landscape level. Increasing crop heterogeneity was more beneficial for multitrophic diversity than increasing seminatural cover. For instance, the effect of decreasing mean field size from 5 to 2.8 ha was as strong as the effect of increasing seminatural cover from 0.5 to 11%. Decreasing mean field size benefited multitrophic diversity even in the absence of seminatural vegetation between fields. Increasing the number of crop types sampled had a positive effect on landscape-level multitrophic diversity. However, the effect of increasing crop diversity in the landscape surrounding fields sampled depended on the amount of seminatural cover. Our study provides large-scale, multitrophic, cross-regional evidence that increasing crop heterogeneity can be an effective way to increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes without taking land out of agricultural production.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura , Biodiversidad , Productos Agrícolas , Ecosistema , Animales , Abejas , Aves , Mariposas Diurnas , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , América del Norte , Arañas
5.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 17(2): 214-230, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30762963

RESUMEN

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumor among fair-skinned individuals, and its incidence had been steadily rising in the past decades. In order to maintain the highest quality of patient care possible, the German S2k guidelines were updated following a systematic literature search and with the participation of all professional societies and associations involved in the management of the disease. Part 2 addresses issues such as proper risk stratification, the various therapeutic approaches, and prevention as well as follow-up of patients with basal cell carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Basocelular/prevención & control , Carcinoma Basocelular/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia
7.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 17(1): 94-103, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30592557

RESUMEN

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor among fair-skinned individuals, and its incidence has been rising steadily in the past decades. In order to maintain the highest quality of patient care possible, the German S2k guidelines were updated following a systematic literature search and with the participation of all professional societies and associations involved in the management of the disease. Part 1 highlights new developments in genetics in particular as well as aspects regarding epidemiology, diagnosis, and histology.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Basocelular/genética , Humanos , Epidemiología Molecular , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética
8.
Oecologia ; 141(3): 444-51, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15293042

RESUMEN

We conducted an experimental landscape study to test the hypotheses that: (1) habitat removal results in short-term increases in population density in the remaining habitat patches (the crowding effect); (2) following habitat removal, density is higher in landscapes with more, smaller patches and more habitat edge (i.e., a higher level of habitat fragmentation per se) than in less fragmented landscapes, for the same total amount of habitat on the landscapes; (3) this positive effect of fragmentation per se on density is larger in landscapes with smaller inter-patch distances; and (4) these last two effects should be reduced or disappear over time following habitat removal. Our results did not support the first hypothesis, but they provided some support for the other three hypotheses, for two of the four Coccinellid species studied. As in other empirical studies of fragmentation per se on population density, the effects of fragmentation per se were weak and positive (when they did occur). This is the first study to document a transient effect of fragmentation per se on population density, and to show that this effect depends on inter-patch distances. We suggest that fragmentation per se increased the rate of immigration to patches, resulting in higher population densities in more fragmented landscapes.


Asunto(s)
Escarabajos , Ambiente , Animales , Movimiento , Densidad de Población
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA