Wake Up Safe in the USA & International Patient Safety.

Patient safety is the most important aspect of anesthetic care. For both healthcare professionals and patients, the ideal would be no significant morbidity or mortality under anesthesia. Lessons from harm during healthcare can be shared to reduce harm and to increase safety. Many nations and individual institutions have developed robust safety systems to improve the quality and safety of patient care. Large registries that collect rare events, analyze them, and share findings have been developed. The approach, the funding, the included population, support from institutions and government and the methods of each vary. Wake Up Safe (WUS) is a patient safety organization accredited by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Wake Up Safe was established in the United States in 2008 by the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia. The initiative aims to gather data on adverse events, analyze these incidents to gain insights, and apply this knowledge to ultimately reduce their occurrence. The purpose of this review is to describe the patient safety approaches in the USA. Through a national patient safety database WUS. Similar approaches either through WUS international or independent safety approaches have been described in Australia-New Zealand, India, and Singapore. We examine the patient safety processes across the four countries, evaluating their incident review process and the distribution of acquired knowledge. Our focus is on assessing the potential benefits of a WUS collaboration, identifying existing barriers, and determining how such a collaboration would integrate with current incident review databases or systems.

How the Wake Up Safe pediatric anesthesia collaborative increased quality improvement capability and collaboration.

Wake Up Safe is a patient safety organization consisting of 40 institutions with a mission to improve the processes of care and outcomes for newborns, infants, and children having anesthesia for surgery and medical procedures. It was recognized that the level of quality improvement (QI), knowledge, and experience varied greatly between member institutions. In Fiscal Year 2015, the group's leadership created a subcommittee on QI and education in efforts to provide member institutions with the skills and resources to use QI methodology to improve care at their own institution. This subcommittee developed a program to improve members' knowledge in safety analytics and QI science and to help members implement change in their own institutions. This review describes the development and implementation of this initiative. As a result of this initiative, significant progress was made improving the QI capability of the collaborative over a two-year period. This educational and support program included workshops, an online discussion forum, site visits, and project presentations.

Self-reported awareness during general anesthesia in pediatric patients: A study from Wake Up Safe.

BACKGROUND: Awareness under general anesthesia occurs rarely, but can result in emotional trauma. Although well-studied in adults, there is a paucity of data on unintentional awareness in children. AIMS: This case series examines instances of self-reported awareness registered with Wake Up Safe, a patient safety organization that maintains a database of adverse events in pediatric anesthesia. METHODS: Cases of self-reported intraoperative awareness submitted to Wake Up Safe from January 1, 2010 to May 31, 2020 were reviewed for circumstances, causative factors, and level of harm. RESULTS: Fourteen cases of self-reported intraoperative awareness out of 555 360 cases in patients aged 5-20 years were noted during the study period. Overall incidence of awareness was 2.52 (95% CI: 1.38-4.23) cases per 100 000 patients, or approximately 1:40 000. Self-reported intraoperative awareness was more frequently associated with cardiac and gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Incidence for cardiac procedures was 20.34 (95% CI: 8.18-41.90) cases per 100 000 patients. Incidence for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures was 7.74 (95% CI: 1.60-22.62) cases per 100 000 patients. Most patients were assessed to have suffered harm. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported intraoperative awareness is a rare complication in pediatric patients that has implications for harm. Compared to awareness cases elicited by a questionnaire method, cases of self-reported awareness during general anesthesia may represent those that have a greater impact. A preoperative discussion of intraoperative awareness should be considered for procedures that carry a higher likelihood of awareness in order to mitigate harm.

Perioperative Management and In-Hospital Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Multicenter Registry Report From the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Improvement Network.

BACKGROUND: There are few comparative data on the analgesic options used to manage patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). The Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Improvement Network was established to investigate outcomes for procedures where there is significant management variability. For our first study, we established a multicenter observational database to characterize the analgesic strategies used to manage pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE. Outcome data from the participating centers were used to assess the association between analgesic strategy and pain outcomes. METHODS: Fourteen institutions enrolled patients from June 2014 through August 2015. Network members agreed to an observational methodology where each institution managed patients based on their institutional standards and protocols. There was no requirement to standardize care. Patients were categorized based on analgesic strategy: epidural catheter (EC), paravertebral catheter (PVC), wound catheter (WC), no regional (NR) analgesia, and intrathecal morphine techniques. Primary outcomes, pain score and opioid consumption by postoperative day (POD), for each technique were compared while adjusting for confounders using multivariable modeling that included 5 covariates: age, sex, number of bars, Haller index, and use of preoperative pain medication. Pain scores were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. Opioid consumption was analyzed using a multivariable quantile regression. RESULTS: Data were collected on 348 patients and categorized based on primary analgesic strategy: EC (122), PVC (57), WC (41), NR (120), and intrathecal morphine (8). Compared to EC, daily median pain scores were higher in patients managed with PVC (POD 0), WC (POD 0, 1, 2, 3), and NR (POD 0, 1, 2), respectively (P < .001-.024 depending on group). Daily opioid requirements were higher in patients managed with PVC (POD 0, 1), WC (POD 0, 1, 2), and NR (POD 0, 1, 2) when compared to patients managed with EC (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate variation in pain management strategies for patients undergoing MIRPE within our network. The results indicate that most patients have mild-to-moderate pain postoperatively regardless of analgesic management. Patients managed with EC had lower pain scores and opioid consumption in the early recovery period compared to other treatment strategies.

Wake Up Safe and root cause analysis: quality improvement in pediatric anesthesia.

In 2006, the Quality and Safety Committee of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia initiated a quality improvement project for the specialty of pediatric anesthesiology that ultimately resulted in the development of Wake Up Safe (WUS), a patient safety organization that maintains a registry of de-identified, serious adverse events. The ultimate goal of WUS is to implement change in processes of care that improve the quality and safety of anesthetic care provided to pediatric patients nationwide. Member institutions of WUS submit data regarding the types and numbers of anesthetics performed and information pertaining to serious adverse events. Before a member institution submits data for any serious adverse event, 3 anesthesiologists who were not involved in the event must analyze the event with a root cause analysis (RCA) to identify the causal factor(s). Because institutions across the country use many different RCA methods, WUS educated its members on RCA methods in an effort to standardize the analysis and evaluate each serious adverse event that is submitted. In this review, we summarize the background and development of this patient safety initiative, describe the standardized RCA method used by its members, demonstrate the use of this RCA method to analyze a serious event that was reported, and discuss the ways WUS plans to use the data to promote safer anesthetic practices for children.

A retrospective study of multimodal analgesic treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a common emergency pediatric surgery procedure accompanied by substantial pain (pain scores >4 for >60% of the time) in 33% of these patients. We introduced a bundle of pain management interventions including local anesthetic infiltration at the incision site, intravenous (IV) opioids by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and scheduled doses of IV ketorolac and oral acetaminophen/hydrocodone. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of these pain management interventions on pain control after laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively studied pain in 206 children above 7 years of age undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy from December 2011 to February 2012 at our institution. We extracted data on patient demographics, duration of anesthesia and surgery, intraoperative opioids, local anesthetic infiltration, surgical procedure reports, along with pain scores, postoperative PCA use, and opioid-related complications and hospital stays. Patients were divided into two groups - simple appendicitis without peritonitis and appendicitis with generalized peritonitis. RESULTS: The incidence of substantial pain when the multimodal regimen was used was 12%, which is significantly lower than earlier reports (Fisher's exact test P < 0.001). Patients with generalized peritonitis experienced more pain, consumed more opioids, had more unmet PCA demands, and a higher incidence of respiratory depression compared with those with simple appendicitis. CONCLUSION: The multimodal regimen of local anesthetic infiltration, opioid by PCA, NSAIDs, and oral acetaminophen/hydrocodone reduced the incidence of substantial pain. Additional studies are required to identify subgroups of patients with minimal opioid requirements who can benefit from modifications of this regimen.

The effect of obesity on the ED(95) of propofol for loss of consciousness in children and adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: Anesthesiologists face a dilemma in determining appropriate dosing of anesthetic drugs in obese children. In this study we determined the dose of propofol that caused loss of consciousness in 95% (ED(95)) of obese and nonobese children as determined by loss of eye lash reflex. METHODS: Forty obese (body mass index [BMI] > 95th percentile for age and gender) and 40 normal weight (BMI 25th to 84th percentile) healthy ASA 1 to 2 children ages 3 to 17 years presenting for surgical procedures were studied using a biased coin design. The primary endpoint was loss of lash reflex at 20 seconds after propofol administration. The first patient in each group received 1.0 mg/kg of IV propofol, and subsequent patients received predetermined propofol doses based on the lash reflex response in the previous patient. If the lash reflex was present, the next patient received a dose increment of 0.25 mg/kg. If the lash reflex was absent, the next patient was randomized to receive either the same dose (95% probability) or a dose decrement of 0.25 mg/kg (5% probability). The ED(95) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using isotonic regression and bootstrapping methods respectively. RESULTS: The ED(95) of propofol for loss of lash reflex was significantly lower in obese pediatric patients (2.0 mg/kg, approximate 95% CI, 1.8 to 2.2 mg/kg) in comparison with nonobese patients (3.2 mg/kg, approximate 95% CI, 2.7 to 3.2 mg/kg), P ≤ 0.05. DISCUSSION: A simple approach to deciding what dose of propofol should be used for induction of anesthesia in children ages 3 to 17 years is to first establish the child's BMI on readily available gender-specific charts. Obese children (BMI >95th percentile for age and gender) require a lower weight-based dose of propofol for induction of anesthesia, than do normal-weight children.

Subclavian venipuncture following ipsilateral extrapleural dissection is hazardous.

Subclavian artery puncture is an infrequent complication of subclavian vein cannulation. In spite of the limited ability to apply direct pressure to the bleeding vessel, significant hematoma or exsanguinating bleeding rarely occurs. This study was a retrospective chart review of a neonate who underwent extrapleural repair of a tracheo-esophageal fistula and sustained significant blood loss following an accidental ipsilateral subclavian artery puncture. This case highlights the importance of an intact apical pleura in controlling bleeding from the subclavian vessels. Thus, ipsilateral percutaneous subclavian venipuncture should be avoided in patients in whom the apical pleura is not intact.