RESUMEN
Introduction The United Kingdom was one of the hardest-hit countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The UK government announced three national lockdowns to control the spread of the coronavirus and prevent the NHS from getting overburdened with COVID-19 related attendances. Two of the most significant peaks in terms of COVID-19 related hospitalizations and COVID-19 related deaths were in Summer 2020 (corresponding to lockdown 1, which was in effect from 26th March to 26th May 2020) and early 2021 (corresponding to lockdown 3, which was in effect 6th January to 8th March 2021). During this time, a significant proportion of NHS resources was being diverted towards the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Measures were being taken to prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and reduce patient contact. These included but were not limited to measures to reduce attendances to Emergency departments, introducing telemedicine clinics, and pausing elective services. Our hospital is a Major Trauma Centre providing Tertiary Pelvic trauma service to the Greater Manchester area and the North West of England. We conducted this retrospective comparative study to compare the trends in presentation and Management of Pelvic trauma and identify trends in how these changed throughout the pandemic. We want to share these insights with our readers. Methodology We conducted a retrospective comparative study by comparing two cohorts of patients, patients presenting to the Pelvic Trauma service during Lockdown 1 and Lockdown 3 in the UK, named Group A and Group B, respectively. Data on patient demographics, injuries, and their management was identified from the Electronic Patient Record System. The data analysis was carried out with the aid of Stata/IC version 16.1. using descriptive Statistics. Results Group A contained 19 patients, with a mean age of 66.9 years. Group B contained 23 patients with a mean age of 67.4 years. There was no statistically significant difference in these patients' population demographics, injury patterns, and management (operative vs conservative). However, there was an absolute reduction in the complication rate from Group A to Group B of 17.2% (26.3% vs 9.1%). The higher complication rate during Lockdown 1 can be explained by conservatively managing Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures that would have been eligible for fixation, had COVID-19 not been a factor. Conclusions Within the limitations of our study, it appears that operatively managing a carefully selected cohort of acute Pelvic Trauma patients with proper precautions was safe and effective. It is unclear whether there was an added benefit to having a higher threshold to operate and adopting the watch-and-wait policy in Lockdown 1. We recommend continuing to follow the current evidence and fix these fractures early.
RESUMEN
Calcium sulphate beads are increasingly being used in the management of prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Traditionally their use was limited to a void or dead space-filling combined with other additives such as Hydroxyapatite. Over the last decade, they have been developed to act more frequently as an antibiotics delivery system. Stimulan, a bio-absorbable form of Calcium sulfate, theoretically has an increased risk of hypercalcemia. Over the last few years, there have been published case reports which report it as an isolated cause of iatrogenic hypercalcemia. The sparsity of literature on this topic makes it difficult for surgeons to decide on the use of Calcium sulphate beads in patients with hypercalcemia predisposition in conditions like autoimmune disorders, sarcoidosis, malignancy, granulomatous diseases, heterotopic ossification, and hyperparathyroidism. The study was performed to assess the risk of hypercalcemia in patients after Calcium sulphate beads implantation in PJI. Two reviewers searched relevant literature in 3 online databases using cochrane methodology for systematic reviews. Studies reporting complications with the use of calcium sulphate beads in prosthetic joints were included. Studies reporting on less than five patients and studies reporting use in any other surgeries were excluded. The search of databases resulted in a total of 96 articles. After screening, a total of four articles were deemed suitable to be included in the analysis. A total of 1049 patients underwent calcium sulfate beads implantation, out of which 44 (4.2%) reported hypercalcemia with 41 (3.91%) transient in nature and 3 (0.28%) required management, including one with ICU admission. The result of this systematic review shows that calcium sulphate beads are safe and effective against PJI. There is a significant risk of transient hypercalcemia in susceptible patients and a low risk of symptomatic hypercalcemia.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has greatly impacted surgical specialities throughout the globe leading to a decrease in hospital admissions and referrals. Neurosurgery has seen a great decline in cases including head trauma leading to a negative impact on the development of neurosurgical trainees. The main objective of this study is to the identify changes in neurosurgical referrals, admissions and management during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also aim to assess how current practise could be adapted to help manage future pandemic peaks. METHODS: Data was collected for the first 31 days of lockdown during 2020 (23rd March - 22nd April) and compared to the same time period in the years 2016-2019. We assessed the number of referrals, admissions and clinical information of patients during this period with a key emphasis on head trauma. RESULTS: Neurosurgical head injury referrals and admissions reduced by 57.5% and 48.3% respectively during the first 31 days of lockdown when compared to the mean figures for the same period in the previous 4 years. This was also seen with head trauma with a 21.9% decline in referrals and 39.1% reduction in admissions for the period of interest. A significant decrease in length of stay (P < 0.001) was seen between 2020 and the years 2017-19. CONCLUSION: The impact of COVID-19 makes it imperative that we plan for future pandemics to lessen the impact on neurosurgery. Special considerations need to be taken so that trainees are sufficiently prepared for completion of training whilst still priotising patient safety and providing high quality care.
