Repeated polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test in narcolepsy type 1 and other hypersomnolence disorders.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of narcolepsy is based on clinical information, combined with polysomnography (PSG) and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT). PSG and the MSLT are moderately reliable at diagnosing narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) but unreliable for diagnosing narcolepsy type 2 (NT2). This is a problem, especially given the increased risk of a false-positive MSLT in the context of circadian misalignment or sleep deprivation, both of which commonly occur in the general population. AIM: We aimed to clarify the accuracy of PSG/MSLT testing in diagnosing NT1 versus controls without sleep disorders. Repeatability and reliability of PSG/MSLT testing and temporal changes in clinical findings of patients with NT1 versus patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 were compared. METHOD: 84 patients with NT1 and 100 patients with non-NT1-hypersomnolence disorders, all with congruent cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin-1 (CSF-hcrt-1) levels, were included. Twenty-five of the 84 NT1 patients and all the hypersomnolence disorder patients underwent a follow-up evaluation consisting of clinical assessment, PSG, and a modified MSLT. An additional 68 controls with no sleep disorders were assessed at baseline. CONCLUSION: Confirming results from previous studies, we found that PSG and our modified MSLT accurately and reliably diagnosed hypocretin-deficient NT1 (accuracy = 0.88, reliability = 0.80). Patients with NT1 had stable clinical and electrophysiological presentations over time that suggested a stable phenotype. In contrast, the PSG/MSLT results of patients with hypersomnolence, and normal CSF-hcrt-1 had poor reliability (0.32) and low repeatability.

Repeated measures of hypocretin-1 in Danish and Italian patients with narcolepsy and in controls.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The assay currently used worldwide to measure cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin-1 (CSF-hcrt-1) for diagnosing narcolepsy uses a competitive radioimmunoassay with polyclonal anti-hcrt-1 antibodies. This assay detects multiple hypocretin-1 immunoreactive species in the CSF that are all derived from full-length hcrt-1. We aimed to revalidate CSF-hcrt-1 cut-offs for narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) diagnosis and to evaluate temporal changes in CSF-hcrt-1 levels in patients suspected of having central hypersomnia. METHOD: We carried out a repeat lumbar puncture with a mean follow-up of 4.0 years, to measure CSF-hcrt-1 in patients suspected of having central hypersomnia in a follow-up study. Data from CSF samples of patients with NT1 and of controls without known hypersomnia, from the Italian-Stanford and Danish populations, were examined using a receiver-operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The optimal CSF-hcrt-1 cut-offs for identifying NT1 were 129 pg/ml and 179 pg/ml for the Italian-Stanford and Danish populations, respectively. The sensitivity was 0.93-0.99 and the specificity was 1. Follow-up lumbar puncture measurements of CSF-hcrt-1 were obtained from 73 patients. 30 of 32 patients with low CSF-hcrt-1 levels continued to be categorized as low, with an unaltered diagnosis; two patients showed a marked increase in CSF-hcrt-1, attaining normal values at follow-up. One of these patients relapsed to low CSF-hcrt-1 after follow-up. All 41 patients with normal CSF-hcrt-1 at baseline had normal CSF-hcrt-1 at follow-up. CONCLUSION: CSF-hcrt-1 measurement can provide an accurate test for diagnosing NT1, although it is important to validate the CSF-hcrt-1 cut-off for specific testing locations. Stable CSF-hcrt-1 levels support the already established prognosis of narcolepsy as permanent once the disorder has fully developed.

Diagnostic value of actigraphy in hypersomnolence disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Differentiating between the central hypersomnias presents a challenge to the diagnosis of patients with hypersomnolence. Actitigraphy may support efforts to distinguish them. We aimed to evaluate: 1) the ability of actigraphy to quantify sleep continuity measures in comparison with polysomnography in patients with hypersomnolence; 2) whether actigraphy can distinguish patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with narcolepsy type 1 and from sleep-healthy controls; and 3) the distinct activity profiles and circadian rhythms of patients with narcolepsy type 1, patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid, and sleep-healthy controls. METHOD: Polysomnography, multiple sleep latency tests and actigraphy were conducted in 14 patients with narcolepsy type 1, 29 patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid and 15 sleep-healthy controls. RESULTS: Actigraphy quantified several sleep continuity measures consistently with polysomnography in all the patients. Actigraphy distinguished patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with narcolepsy type 1 and sleep-healthy controls. Patients with narcolepsy type 1 had poor sleep quality and altered circadian rest-activity rhythm compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Actigraphy is an adequate tool for establishing the amount of night sleep and supports the differential diagnosis of patients with hypersomnolence.

Type 1 narcolepsy is not present in 29 HPV-vaccinated individuals with subjective sleep complaints.

INTRODUCTION: Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine uptake in girls and women is dropping markedly in some countries. Concern about the presumed side effects is the commonest reason why. Reports about side effects include specific sleep complaints such as excessive daytime sleepiness, altered dream activity and periods of muscle weakness. These symptoms are commonly seen in individuals with narcolepsy type 1. We aimed to evaluate whether HPV vaccination was associated with the development of hypocretin-deficient narcolepsy. METHODS: We report the evaluation for sleep disorders, including narcolepsy, in 29 HPV-vaccinated girls and women who were submitted for evaluation of narcolepsy. All were evaluated by polysomnography and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test, and 18 individuals were also evaluated by measures of cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin-1 concentration. RESULTS: None of the 29 girls and women showed signs of narcolepsy type 1. CONCLUSION: Our results do not suggest that an association exists between HPV vaccination and the development of narcolepsy type 1. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.