Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of heterologous and homologous mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccination: A multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial.

Background: Although effective mRNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 infection have been deployed worldwide, their interchangeability could facilitate the scale-up of vaccination programs. The objective of the trial was to assess whether the immune response induced by a heterologous SARS-CoV-2 mRNA primo vaccination is non-inferior to that of a homologous mRNA vaccination. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial in adults 18 years of age and older who received a first dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, 28 to 49 days after the first dose. Randomization was stratified on the vaccine received at the first vaccination. The primary endpoint was the anti-spike IgG antibodies titer measured 28 days after the second vaccine dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Trial, NCT04900467. Findings: Of the 414 randomized participants recruited from May 28 to July 2, 2021, 390 were included in the per protocol analysis: 94 participants in group 1 (BNT162b2/BNT162b2), 96 in group 2 (BNT162b2/mRNA-1273), 97 in group 3 (mRNA-1273/mRNA-1273), and 103 in group 4 (mRNA-1273/BNT162b2). The geometric mean titers ratios of anti-spike IgG antibodies for each heterologous regimen relative to the corresponding homologous regimen were 1·37 (two-sided 95% CI, 1·10 to 1·72) in the groups 1 and 2 and 0·67 (two-sided 95% CI, 0·55 to 0·82) in the groups 3 and 4. Levels of neutralizing antibodies to the main circulating SARS-Cov-2 viral strains were higher with the vaccine regimen containing mRNA-1273. Participants who received mRNA-1273 as a second dose experienced a higher rate of local adverse reactions and general symptoms than those who received BNT162b2 (p < 0·0001). Interpretation: The two SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines could be used with flexibility for the second dose of COVID-19 primo vaccination. Tolerance remains good regardless of vaccine sequence although mRNA-1273 was more reactogenic. Funding: French Ministries of Solidarity and Health and Research. BNT162b2 was provided by Pfizer/BioNTech. mRNA-1273 was provided by Moderna.

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in erosive hand osteoarthritis: protocol for the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled ESTIVAL trial.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with erosive hand osteoarthritis (EHOA) experience pain and inflammation, two features that can be targeted by vagus nerve stimulation using electrical auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS). A pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the procedure, so we designed a randomised sham-controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of tVNS in EHOA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ESTIVAL Study (Essai randomisé comparant la STImulation auriculaire transcutanée du nerf Vague versus sham stimulation dans l'Arthrose DigitaLe Érosive symptomatique et inflammatoire) is a superiority, randomised, double-blind sham-controlled trial comparing two parallel arms: active and sham tVNSs in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with symptomatic EHOA (score ≥40/100 mm on a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain of 0-100 mm) and inflammatory EHOA (≥1 clinical and ultrasonography-determined interphalangeal synovitis) are included in 18 hospital centres (17 rheumatology and 1 rehabilitation departments) in France. Active and sham tVNSs use an auricular electrode connected to the Vagustim device, with no electric current delivered in the sham group. Patients undergo stimulation for 20 min/day for 12 weeks. The follow-up visits take place at weeks 4, 8 and 12. The enrolment duration is 2 years and started in April 2021; 156 patients are scheduled to be included. The primary outcome is the difference in self-reported hand pain in the previous 48 hours measured on a VAS of 0-100 mm between baseline and week 12. Secondary outcomes include other pain outcomes, function, quality of life, serum biomarker levels, compliance and tolerance. For a subset of patients, MRI of the hand is performed at baseline and week 12 to compare the change in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology/Hand Osteoarthritis MRI Scoring System subscores. The primary analysis will be performed at the end of the study according to the intent-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes, 2020-A02213-36). All participants will be required to provide written informed consent. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04520516; Pre-results. PROTOCOL VERSION AND NUMBER: V.2 of 11 March 2021.

The DIGICOD cohort: A hospital-based observational prospective cohort of patients with hand osteoarthritis - methodology and baseline characteristics of the population.

OBJECTIVE: Despite its prevalence, there are few worldwide hand osteoarthritis (HOA) cohorts. The main objective of DIGItal COhort Design (DIGICOD) cohort is to investigate prognostic clinical, biological, genetic and imaging factors of clinical worsening after 6years follow-up. METHODS: DIGICOD is a hospital-based prospective cohort including patients>35years-old with symptomatic HOA fulfilling: (i) ACR criteria for HOA with≥2 symptomatic joints among proximal/distal interphalangeal joints or 1st interphalangeal joint with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)≥2; or (ii) symptomatic thumb base OA with KL≥2. Main exclusion criteria were inflammatory arthritis and crystal arthropathies. Annual clinical evaluations were scheduled with imaging (X-rays of the hands and of other OA symptomatic joints) and biological sampling every 3years. Hand radiographs are scored using KL and anatomical Verbruggen-Veys scores. Follow-up visits are ongoing. Cohort methodology and baseline characteristics are presented. RESULTS: Between April 2013 and June 2017, from the 436 HOA included patients, 426 have been analysed of whom 357 (84%) are women. Mean age±standard deviation was 66.7±7.3years and mean disease duration was 12.6±9.6years. Metabolic syndrome affected 151 (36.5%) patients. Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) hand pain (0-100mm) was 44.4±26.7mm at activity. Mean FIHOA (0-100) was 19.9±18.6. Elevated serum CRP level (≥5mg/L) involved 10% patients. Mean KL score (0-128) was 46.7±18 and the mean number of joint with KL≥2 was 15.1±6.3. Erosive HOA (defined as≥1 Erosive or Remodeling phase joint according to Verbruggen-Veys score) involved 195/426 (45.8%) patients and the median number (interquartile range) of erosive joints in erosive patients was 3.0 (1.0-5.0). CONCLUSION: DIGICOD is a unique prospective HOA cohort with a long-term 6years standardized assessment and has included severe radiologically HOA patients with a high prevalence of erosive disease.

Adipokine profile in glucocorticoid-treated patients: baseline plasma leptin level predicts occurrence of lipodystrophy.

CONTEXT: Glucocorticoid therapy may result in adipose tissue redistribution of unknown pathophysiology. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of glucocorticoids on adipokine levels and adipose tissue inflammation. To compare the results in patients with or without glucocorticoid-induced lipodystrophy (GIL) after 3 months of therapy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective monocentric study. PATIENTS: Adult patients initiating systemic, high-dose prednisone therapy for at least 3 months. Blood samples and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue biopsies were collected at baseline and month 3. The presence of GIL after 3 months of therapy was assessed using standardized photography. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled. Blood samples and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue were available at baseline and month 3 for 30 patients [median age: 61 (38-79) years, 77% women]. Among those 30 patients, 15 were classified as GIL+ and 15 were GIL- at month 3. Between baseline and month 3, adiponectin and leptin levels increased in the overall population while the level of resistin remained unchanged. At baseline, leptin level was higher [19.3 (8.3-31.1) vs 4.5 (2.4-11.3) µg/l, P = 0.006] and resistin level lower [7.1 (6.3-12.4) vs 10.4 (8.0-21.7) µg/l, P = 0.05] in GIL+ than in GIL- patients. Baseline leptin level was predictive of GIL occurrence. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the best diagnostic accuracy was obtained with a baseline leptin cut-off of 5.9 µg/l (sensitivity: 93%, specificity: 60%). At month 3, leptin and adiponectin levels increased more in the GIL+ than in the GIL- group, as did the number of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages in subcutaneous abdominal fat. CONCLUSION: Glucocorticoid-induced lipodystrophy is associated with a different adipokine profile both before and after glucocorticoid therapy. Serum leptin level prior to glucocorticoid therapy is highly predictive of GIL occurrence.