Evaluating the physical, psychosocial and ergonomic burden of lead aprons among Jordanian interventionists: a nationwide study.

Objectives. This study assessed the physical and psychological burden of lead apron use on Jordanian interventionists and investigated the attitudes and knowledge of interventional personnel toward ergonomic guidelines and practices. Methods. A cross-sectional investigation of a randomly sampled Jordanian cohort of interventional personnel was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire.Results. A nationwide sample of 130 practitioners with a mean 9.3 ± 8.1 years of experience in interventional procedures participated. Practitioners were aware of their apron's weight but not of its lead equivalence (71.5%). More than 60% of respondents complained of back pain. While 66.9% did not develop musculoskeletal pathologies, 64.3% of those with already established musculoskeletal pathologies experienced worse pain due to apron usage. Despite believing in the effect of lead aprons on muscular strain and work performance, 78.5% adhere to its usage. In terms of ergonomics, only 39.2% were aware of ergonomic guidelines; however, 90.0% believe that ergonomic practices are essential as 49.2% have experienced discomfort due to bad ergonomics. In terms of psychological burden, anxiety and depression were suggested in 16.4 and 21.6% of the sample.Conclusion. Jordanian interventionists portray positive attitudes toward lead aprons; nevertheless, their awareness of ergonomic practices warrants the implementation of evidenced-based interventions.

Knowledge and awareness among patients with epilepsy observed at Jordan University Hospital.

The objective of this study was to assess the level of knowledge and awareness about epilepsy among patients with epilepsy (PWE) and to determine the correlation with sociodemographic and disease-related factors. A prospective cross-sectional study was set, and it included PWE attending the adult neurology clinic at Jordan University Hospital (JUH), Amman, Jordan. A structured questionnaire was utilized, which consisted of 3 parts: sociodemographic factors, disease characteristics, and an epilepsy knowledge scale - the Epilepsy Knowledge Profile-General (E.K.P-G) scale. There was a total of 108 patients, 43 males and 65 females with an age range from 16 to 63 years. The average score of the subjects in the E.K.P-G scale was 16.4/34 (48%). Twenty out of the 34 questions were answered correctly by less than 50% of the respondents. There was an overall poor understanding of the etiology of epilepsy. A higher E.K.P-G score was significantly correlated with higher levels of education, higher household income, controlled seizures for more than 2 years, and living in urban areas. On the other hand, there was no significant correlation between the level of knowledge and age, gender, marital status, occupational status, type of seizure, duration of epilepsy, source of information, number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and family history of epilepsy. In conclusion, the study showed a significant lack of knowledge about epilepsy among PWE at JUH. A public educational program is necessary in Jordan to educate PWE about their disorder.