Health literacy of patients consulting in an expert gynecological tertiary center: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have highlighted patients with chronic conditions seek for medical knowledge and therapeutics on their own. So far, no data exist on the health literacy of patients with gynecological conditions and especially those suffering from endometriosis, whose symptoms' have a major impact on their daily lives. METHOD: The objective was to evaluate the health literacy of patients consulting in a referral expert center for the management of endometriosis and gynecological cancers. The secondary objective was to compare the health literacy of patients with endometriosis to patients without. We conducted an observational, prospective, monocentric study in the gynecological department of Tenon Hospital (Paris, France) between July 6, 2022 to January 3, 2023. All patients fulfilled the validated French version of HLS-EU-Q16 questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were included. The two following questions were identified as the most difficult among patients with endometriosis: "Find information about treatments for their disease" and "know when it would be helpful to have another doctor's opinion". Compared to patients consulting for other conditions, it was more difficult for patients with endometriosis to respectively "find information about treatments for diseases" and "use information given by the doctor to take decisions about the illness" (p = 0.003). Compared to patients consulting for cancer, it was more difficult for patient with endometriosis to "find information about treatments for diseases" (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Progresses in the capacity of the health care to better inform the patients would be highly beneficial, especially for those suffering from endometriosis.

Pain after oocyte retrieval in women with endometriosis undergoing fertility preservation or IVF.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation experience the same level of pain as women undergoing oocyte retrieval for IVF? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 796 cycles in women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation (n = 401) or IVF (n = 395) between January 2020 and October 2022. Post-operative pain assessments were compared between the two groups using a numeric rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: Women in the fertility preservation group were younger (32.1 ± 4.2 years versus 35.1 ± 4.1 years; P < 0.001), had a lower body mass index (22.8 ± 3.9 kg/m2 versus 24.6 ± 4.4 kg/m2; P < 0.001) and had a lower concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (1.8 ± 1.5 ng/ml versus 2.15 ± 2.11 ng/ml; P = 0.026) in comparison with women in the IVF group. The oestrogen concentration on the day of ovulation trigger was higher in women in the fertility preservation group (2188 ± 1152 pg/ml versus 2081 ± 995 pg/ml; P = 0.004), and the prevalence rates of adenomyosis and digestive endometrial lesions were lower in women in the fertility preservation group (14% versus 29%, P < 0.001; 16% versus 25%, P = 0.003, respectively) compared with women in the IVF group. After oocyte puncture, more women in the fertility preservation group had an NRS pain score >3 (moderate to severe pain) compared with women in the IVF group (20% versus 14%; P = 0.018). The progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol was identified as an independent predictive factor of greater post-operative pain (adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06-5.15; P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Women with endometriosis undergoing fertility preservation reported more intense post-operative pain in the recovery room than women undergoing IVF. The PPOS protocol was an independent risk factor of intense pain (NRS pain score >3) in women with endometriosis, but further studies are needed to confirm this result.

Surgical and Percutaneous Image-guided Therapies of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: a Systematic Review of Current Evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Despite various surgical and non-surgical strategies for abdominal wall endometriosis, the lack of definitive guidance on optimal treatment choice leads to clinical uncertainty. This review scrutinizes the safety and efficacy of abdominal wall endometriosis treatments to aid in decision-making. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from 1947 until December 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A comprehensive literature search identified studies that assessed both surgical and nonsurgical interventions, including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and microwave ablation (MWA). This review is registered in NIHR-PROSPERO (CRD 42023494969). Local tumor control (LTC), local pain relief (LPR) and adverse events (AE) were recorded. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: This review included 51 articles among 831 identified. All study designs were considered eligible for inclusion. A total of 2,674 patients are included: 2,219 patients (83%) undergoing surgery, and 455 (17%) undergoing percutaneous interventions (342 HIFU, 103 cryoablation, 1 RFA, 9 MWA). Follow-up length was 18 months in median, ranging from 1 to 235 months. Overall LTC rates ranged from 86% to 100%. Surgical interventions consistently demonstrated the highest rate of LTC with a median rate of 100%, and LPR with a median rate of 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.9-97.7). HIFU showed median LTC and LPR rates, respectively of 95.65% (95% CI, 87.7-99.9) and 76.1% (95% CI, 61.8-90.4); and cryoablation of 85.7% (95% CI, 66.0-99.9) and 79.2% (95% CI, 67.4-91.03). Minor AE were reported after surgery in 17.5% of patients (225/1284) including 15.9% (199/1284) of mesh implantation; 76.4% (239/313) after HIFU; and 8.7 % (9/103) after cryoablation. Severe AE were reported in 25 patients in the surgery group and 1 in the percutaneous group. CONCLUSION: The safety profile and efficacy of nonsurgical interventions support their clinical utility for management of abdominal wall endometriosis.

To drain or not to drain: A propensity score analysis of abdominal drainage after colorectal surgery for endometriosis.

AIM: To assess the benefit of prophylactic abdominal drainage (AD) after colorectal surgery for endometriosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 215 patients who underwent colorectal surgery for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach in our center from February 2019 to July 2023. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis (1:1 ratio) identified two groups of patients with similar characteristics. Postoperative outcomes were then compared. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohort, 151 patients (70 %) had AD at the end of surgery and 64 (30 %) did not. Clinical characteristics and surgical procedures were comparable between the groups after PSM. After PSM, AD was associated with a longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) and a greater number of postoperative complications (p = 0.03). There were no differences for readmission, repeat surgery, or severe postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort of patients undergoing colorectal resection for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach, prophylactic AD was not found to be beneficial.

Saliva-based microRNA diagnostic signature for the superficial peritoneal endometriosis phenotype.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE) present with symptoms suggestive of endometriosis but clinical and imaging exams are inconclusive. Consequently, laparoscopy is usually necessary to confirm diagnosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of microRNAs (miRNAs) to diagnose patients with SPE from the ENDOmiARN cohort STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study (NCT04728152) included 200 saliva samples obtained between January and June 2021 from women with pelvic pain suggestive of endometriosis. All patients underwent either laparoscopy and/or MRI to confirm the presence of endometriosis. Among the patients with endometriosis, two groups were defined: an SPE phenotype group of patients with peritoneal lesions only, and a non-SPE control group of patients with other endometriosis phenotypes (endometrioma and/or deep endometriosis). Data analysis consisted of two parts: (i) identification of a set of miRNA biomarkers using next-generation sequencing (NGS), and (ii) development of a saliva-based miRNA signature for the SPE phenotype in patients with endometriosis based on a Random Forest (RF) model. RESULTS: Among the 153 patients with confirmed endometriosis, 10.5 % (n = 16) had an SPE phenotype. Of the 2633 known miRNAs, the feature selection method generated a signature of 89 miRNAs of the SPE phenotype. After validation, the best model, representing the most accurate signature had a 100 % sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. CONCLUSION: This signature could constitute a new diagnostic strategy to detect the SPE phenotype based on a simple biological test and render diagnostic laparoscopy obsolete. PRéCIS: We generated a saliva-based signature to identify patients with superficial peritoneal endometriosis which is the most challenging form of endometriosis to diagnose and which is often either misdiagnosed or requires invasive laparoscopy.

Correction: Dabi et al. Clues for Improving the Pathophysiology Knowledge for Endometriosis Using Plasma Micro-RNA Expression. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 175.

In the original publication [...].

Reasons why it is time to change imaging guidelines on endometriosis.

In light of the rising number of patients referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to suspected endometriosis and the high expectations of these patients, there is a need for new imaging guidelines to optimally protocol and indicate MRI and transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) examinations. This is crucial for accurately addressing the inquiries of gynecologists, encompassing complete mapping and preoperative staging, and facilitating effective communication with patients. In this context, the development of a standardized lexicon, as well as dedicated imaging classifications, is recommended to aid in the comprehensive management of patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiologist should use a standardized lexicon and provide a score along with details about the specific compartments affected by endometriosis disease. This helps in offering clearer guidance to the surgeon. KEY POINTS: • An optimal staging is based on the combination of clinical examination, transvaginal US, and MRI. • MRI is able to detect location that is hidden at the beginning of a laparoscopic surgery and thus the need for dedicated MR classifications to correctly stage the disease. • Deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) classification is externally validated and highly correlated with operating time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

Outcomes of discoid excision and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis: robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.

Surgery for deep endometriosis with colorectal involvement is an option after medical treatment failure. Over the past decade, robotic laparoscopy has emerged as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy. We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopy for discoid excision and segmental resection. From 2019 to 2023, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 152 consecutive patients with colorectal endometriosis who underwent robotic or conventional laparoscopy for discoid excision and colorectal resection. Ninety of the patients 152 underwent robotic surgery and 62 conventional laparoscopy. The mean total surgical room occupancy and operating times were longer in the robotic group: 270 ± 81 min vs 240 ± 79 min, p = 0.010, and 216 ± 78 min vs 190 ± 76, p = 0.027, respectively. The mean intraoperative blood loss, and the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications (according to Clavien-Dindo classification) were similar in the two groups. The mean hospital stay was greater after conventional laparoscopy (8 ± 5 vs 7 ± 4 days; p = 0.03), and the rate of persistent voiding dysfunction was higher in the conventional group (9/11, 25% vs 2/11, 5%; p = 0.01). A higher incidence of persistent voiding dysfunction was also observed after segmental resection by conventional laparoscopy (25% vs 4.8%, p = 0.01). Our results support the use of robotic surgery as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy for discoid excision and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis.

O-RADS MRI scoring system has the potential to reduce the frequency of avoidable adnexal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential impact of the O-RADS MRI score on the decision-making process for the management of adnexal masses. METHODS: EURAD database (prospective, European observational, multicenter study) was queried to identify asymptomatic women without history of infertility included between March 1st and March 31st 2018, with available surgical pathology or clinical findings at 2-year clinical follow-up. Blinded to final diagnosis, we stratified patients into five categories according to the O-RADS MRI score (absent i.e. non adnexal, benign, probably benign, indeterminate, probably malignant). Prospective management was compared to theoretical management according to the score established as following: those with presumed benign masses (scored O-RADS MRI 2 or 3) (follow-up recommended) and those with presumed malignant masses (scored O-RADS MRI 4 or 5) (surgery recommended). RESULTS: The accuracy of the score for assessing the origin of the mass was of 97.2 % (564/580, CI95% 0.96-0.98) and was of 92.0 % (484/526) for categorizing lesions with a negative predictive value of 98.1 % (415/423, CI95% 0.96-0.99). Theoretical management using the score would have spared surgery in 229 patients (87.1 %, 229/263) with benign lesions and malignancy would have been missed in 6 borderline and 2 invasive cases. In patients with a presumed benign mass using O-RADS MRI score, recommending surgery for lesions >= 100 mm would miss only 4/77 (4.8 %) malignant adnexal tumors instead of 8 (50 % decrease). CONCLUSION: The use of O-RADS MRI scoring system could drastically reduce the number of asymptomatic patients undergoing avoidable surgery.

O-RADS MRI to classify adnexal tumors: from clinical problem to daily use.

Eighteen to 35% of adnexal masses remain non-classified following ultrasonography, leading to unnecessary surgeries and inappropriate management. This finding led to the conclusion that ultrasonography was insufficient to accurately assess adnexal masses and that a standardized MRI criteria could improve these patients' management. The aim of this work is to present the different steps from the identification of the clinical issue to the daily use of a score and its inclusion in the latest international guidelines. The different steps were the following: (1) preliminary work to formalize the issue, (2) physiopathological analysis and finding dynamic parameters relevant to increase MRI performances, (3) construction and internal validation of a score to predict the nature of the lesion, (4) external multicentric validation (the EURAD study) of the score named O-RADS MRI, and (5) communication and education work to spread its use and inclusion in guidelines. Future steps will include studies at patients' levels and a cost-efficiency analysis. Critical relevance statement We present translating radiological research into a clinical application based on a step-by-step structured and systematic approach methodology to validate MR imaging for the characterization of adnexal mass with the ultimate step of incorporation in the latest worldwide guidelines of the O-RADS MRI reporting system that allows to distinguish benign from malignant ovarian masses with a sensitivity and specificity higher than 90%. Key points • The initial diagnostic test accuracy studies show the limitation of a preoperative assessment of adnexal masses using solely ultrasonography.• The technical developments (DCE/DWI) were investigated with the value of dynamic MRI to accurately predict the nature of benign or malignant lesions to improve management.• The first developing score named ADNEX MR Score was constructed using multiple easily assessed criteria on MRI to classify indeterminate adnexal lesions following ultrasonography.• The multicentric adnexal study externally validated the score creating the O-RADS MR score and leading to its inclusion for daily use in international guidelines.

Discoid excision for colorectal endometriosis associated infertility: A balance between fertility outcomes and complication rates.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to study the impact of discoid excision for deep endometriosis (DE) with colorectal involvement on fertility outcomes. METHODS: 49 patients with a desire for pregnancy treated with discoid excision for colorectal endometriosis in our endometriosis expert center between January 2015 and August 2020 were selected from our prospectively maintained database. Indications for surgery were either infertility and / or pelvic pain. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Fertility outcomes, both spontaneous and post-ART pregnancies, were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 49 patients who underwent discoid excision exclusively (no other digestive resection) with a desire to conceive, 25 had a pregnancy after surgery and 24 did not. Double discoid excision was performed in 6.1 % of the cases (3/49). A colpectomy was performed in 12.2 % of the patients (6/49), and a protective stoma in 12.2 % (6/49). Fenestration of endometriomas was performed in 28.6 % of the patients (14/49), and parametrectomy in 40.8 % (20/49). The postoperative complication rate was 24.5 % (12/49) including 10.2 % (5/49) grade I, 12.2 % (6/49) grade II, and 2 % (1/49) grade III. Prior to surgery, 28 (57.1 %) patients had infertility including 13 (52 %) that successfully conceived following surgery and 15 (62.5 %) that remain infertile. Spontaneous pregnancy was achieved in 60 % (15/25) of infertile patients' prior surgery. The live-birth rate in patients conceiving spontaneously was 75 % (12/16). CONCLUSION: Our results support that discoid excision is safe and associated with good fertility outcomes. Whether first-line surgery using discoid excision is superior to first-line ART remains to be determined.

Interstitial pregnancy management: A multicentric analysis of 98 patients from the FRANCOGENT group comparing surgery and medical treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes associated with each therapeutic option for patients diagnosed with interstitial pregnancy (IP). METHODS: We conducted a multicentric retrospective cohort study within the departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics involved in the Francogent research group. Women treated for an interstitial pregnancy between January 2008 to December 2019 were included. Three therapeutic options were evaluated: surgical treatment (ST); in situ methotrexate combined with systemic methotrexate (IS-MTX); and systemic methotrexate (IM-MTX). Success of first-line treatment was defined by hCG negativation (<5I U/L). Secondary outcomes included the need for secondary surgical procedure, secondary medical treatment, emergency surgery, postoperative complications, duration of hospitalization, and delay before hCG negativation. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were managed for IP: 42 (42.9%) patients had IM-MTX; 34 (34.7%) had IS-MTX; and 22 (22.4%) had ST. First-line treatment was successful in all patients of the ST group (22/22, 100%), in 31% of patients within the IM-MTX group (13/42) and 70.6% (24/34) in the IS-MTX group. The sole parameter associated with the risk of treatment failure was the mode of methotrexate administration. The size of the gestational sac or the presence of fetal heartbeat was not associated with decreased medical treatment (IS or IM-MTX) efficiency. CONCLUSION: Either ST or IS-MTX are good options for IP treatment associated with high success rates. A single-dose regimen of IM-MTX is less efficient than IS-MTX or ST. Symptomatic patients with severity criteria should always undergo emergency surgery. IP remains a high-risk condition that should be managed, whenever possible, in referral centers to potentialize the chances of favorable outcomes.

[FRANCOGYN group: A brief history]. / Le groupe FRANCOGYN : bilan et avenir.

OBJECTIVES: Describing the constitution of the FRANCOGYN group (a national French research group in Oncological and Gynecological Surgery) and present its current and future development. METHODS: Literature review using PUBMed database with the keyword "FRANCOGYN". OBJECTIVES: Describing the constitution of the FRANCOGYN group (a national French research group in Oncological and Gynecological Surgery) and present its current and future development. RESULTS: The FRANCOGYN group was formed in December 2015, bringing together over the years more than 17 gynecological and oncological surgical department in France. The group carries out clinical research on gynecological pelvic cancers by constituting retrospective cohorts. Its legitimacy allows it to lead or co-lead the drafting of recommendations for clinical practice in the field of gynecological cancers. It now offers prospective randomized research funded by national grants. CONCLUSION: The FRANCOGYN network allows us to propose a national reflection on the surgical management of pelvic cancers in women, resulting in numerous international reference publications.

O-RADS scoring system for adnexal lesions: Diagnostic performance on TVUS performed by an expert sonographer and MRI.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) performed by an US specialist and MRI based on the O-RADS scoring system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 5th 2013 and December 31st 2021, 227 patients, referred to our center, underwent TVUS and pelvic MRI for characterization of an adnexal lesion proven by surgery or two years of negative follow-up. All lesions were classified according to O-RADS US and O-RADS MRI risk scoring systems. Imaging data were then correlated with histopathological diagnosis or negative follow-up for 2 years. RESULTS: The prevalence of malignancy was 11.1%. Sensitivity of O-RADS US / O-RADS MRI were respectively of 83.3%/83.3% and specificity was 73.2%/92.9% (p < 0.001). O-RADS MRI was more accurate than O-RADS US even when performed by an US specialist (p < 0.001). When MRI was used after US, 51 lesions were reclassified correctly by MRI and only 4 lesions incorrectly reclassified. Most of the lesions (49/51) rated O-RADS US 4 or 5 and reclassified correctly by MRI were benign, mainly including cystadenomas or cystadenofibromas. Only 4 lesions were misclassified by MRI but correctly classified by ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that MR imaging has equally high sensitivity but higher specificity than TVUS for the characterization of adnexal lesions based on O-RADS scoring system. MRI should be the recommended second-line technique when a mass is discovered during TVUS and is rated O-RADS 4 and 5 over than TVUS by an US specialist.

Brachytherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for IB2 (FIGO 2018) cervical cancers: A FRANCOGYN study.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the management by first brachytherapy followed by radical hysterectomy (Wertheim type) compared to radical hysterectomy alone (Wertheim type) for the treatment of IB2 cervical cancer. METHODS: Data from women with histologically proven FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer treated between April 1996 and December 2016 were retrospectively abstracted from twelve French institutions with prospectively maintained databases. RESULTS: Of the 211 patients with FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer without lymph node involvement included, 136 had surgical treatment only and 75 had pelvic lymph node staging and brachytherapy followed by surgery. The surgery-only group had significantly more adjuvant treatment (29 vs. 3; p = 0.0002). A complete response was identified in 61 patients (81%) in the brachytherapy group. Postoperative complications were comparable (63,2% vs. 72%, p = 0,19) and consisted mainly of urinary (36vs. 27) and digestive (31 vs 22) complications and lymphoceles (4 vs. 1). Brachytherapy had no benefit in terms of progression-free survival (p = 0.14) or overall survival (p = 0.59). However, for tumors of between 20 and 30 mm, preoperative brachytherapy improved recurrence-free survival (p = 0.0095) but not overall survival (p = 0.41). This difference was not observed for larger tumors in terms of either recurrence-free survival (p = 0.55) or overall survival (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Our study found that preoperative brachytherapy had no benefit for stage IB2 cervical cancers in terms of recurrence-free survival or overall survival. For tumor sizes between 2 and 3 cm, brachytherapy improves progression-free survival mainly by reducing pelvic recurrences without improving overall survival.

New class of RNA biomarker for endometriosis diagnosis: The potential of salivary piRNA expression.

OBJECTIVES: In contrast to miRNA expression, little attention has been given to piwiRNA (piRNA) expression among endometriosis patients. The aim of the present study was to explore the human piRNAome and to investigate a potential piRNA saliva-based diagnostic signature for endometriosis. METHODS: Data from the prospective "ENDOmiRNA" study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04728152) were used. Saliva samples from 200 patients were analyzed in order to evaluate human piRNA expression using the piRNA bank. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), barcoding of unique molecular identifiers and both Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) were used. For each piRNA, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC AUC values were calculated for the diagnosis of endometriosis. RESULTS: 201 piRNAs were identified, none had an AUC ≥ 0.70, and only three piRNAs (piR-004153, piR001918, piR-020401) had an AUC between ≥ 0.6 and < 0.70. Seven were differentially expressed: piR-004153, piR-001918, piR-020401, piR-012864, piR-017716, piR-020326 and piR-016904. The respective correlation and accuracy to diagnose endometriosis according to the F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC ranged from 0 to 0.862 %, 0-0.961 %, 0.085-1, and 0.425-0.618. A correlation was observed between the patients' age (≥35 years) and piR-004153 (p = 0.002) and piR-017716 (p = 0.030). Among the 201 piRNAs, four were differentially expressed in patients with and without hormonal treatment: piR-004153 (p = 0.015), piR-020401 (p = 0.001), piR-012864 (p = 0.036) and piR-017716 (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Our results support the link between piRNAs and endometriosis physiopathology and establish its utility as a potential diagnostic biomarker using saliva samples. Per se, piRNA expression should be analyzed along with the clinical status of a patient.

Adherence to ESGO guidelines and impact on survival in obese patients with endometrial cancer: a multicentric retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Obesity is known to be both a major risk factor for endometrial cancer and associated with surgical complexity. Therefore, the management of patients with obesity is a challenge for surgeons and oncologists. The aim of this study is to assess the adherence to European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) guidelines in morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2). The secondary objectives were the impact on overall survival and recurrence-free survival. METHODS: All the patients who were treated for an endometrial cancer in the 11 cancer institutes of the FRANCOGYN group were included and classified into three weight groups: morbid (BMI >40 kg/m2), obese (BMI 30-40), and normal or overweight (BMI <30). Adherence to guidelines was evaluated for surgical management, lymph node staging, and adjuvant therapies. RESULTS: In total, 2375 patients were included: 1330 in the normal or overweight group, 763 in the obese group, and 282 in the morbid group. The surgical management of the morbid group was in accordance with the guidelines in only 30% of cases, compared with 44% for the obese group and 48% for the normal or overweight group (p<0.001); this was largely because of a lack of lymph node staging. Morbid group patients were more likely to receive the recommended adjuvant therapy (61%) than the obese group (52%) or the normal or overweight group (46%) (p<0.001). Weight had no impact on overall survival (p=0.6) and morbid group patients had better recurrence-free survival (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Adherence to international guidelines for surgical management is significantly lower in morbid group patients, especially for lymph node staging. However, morbidly obese patients had more often the adequate adjuvant therapies. Morbid group patients had a better recurrence-free survival likely because of better prognosis tumors.

Changes in hospital consumption of opioid and non-opioid analgesics after colorectal endometriosis surgery.

The aim of this study was to analyze postoperative consumption of analgesics during hospitalization following colorectal surgery for endometriosis. We conducted a retrospective study at Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France from February 2019 to December 2021. One hundred sixty-two patients underwent colorectal surgery: eighty-nine (55%) by robotic and seventy-three (45%) by conventional laparoscopy. The type of procedure had an impact on acetaminophen and nefopam consumed per day: consumption for colorectal shaving, discoid resection, and segmental resection was, respectively, 2(0.5), 2.1(0.6), 2.4(0.6) g/day (p = 10-3), and 25(7), 30(14), 31(11) mg/day (p = 0.03). The total amount of tramadol consumed was greater following robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy (322(222) mg vs 242(292) mg, p = 0.04). We observed a switch in analgesic consumption over the years: tramadol was used by 70% of patients in 2019 but only by 7.1% in 2021 (p < 10-3); conversely, ketoprofen was not used in 2019, but was consumed by 57% of patients in 2021 (p < 10-3). A history of abdominal surgery (OR = 0.37 (0.16-0.78, p = 0.011) and having surgery in 2020 rather than in 2019 (OR = 0.10 (0.04-0.24, p < 10-3)) and in 2021 than in 2019 (OR = 0.08 (0.03-0.20, p < 10-3)) were the only variables independently associated with the risk of opioid use. We found that neither clinical characteristics nor intraoperative findings had an impact on opioid consumption in this setting, and that it was possible to rapidly modify in-hospital analgesic consumption modalities by significantly reducing opioid consumption in favor of NSAIDS or nefopam.

ENDOGRADE: A four level classification to rate surgical complexity in endometriosis.

OBJECTIVES: We studied a post operative classification of surgical complexity in endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective monocentric observational study was conducted between January 2001 to December 2019 and included 764 women with DE that underwent surgery. We retrospectively graded surgical complexity through operative reports according to the ENDOGRADE classification, that grades the surgical complexity of DE in four progressive levels. RESULTS: Operating time was longer for patients rated ENDOGRADE 3 (228±93 min) compared to patients rated ENDOGRADE 2 (120± 51 min) (p<10-3) and for patients rated ENDOGRADE 4 (301±99 min) compared to patients rated ENDOGRADE 3 (228±93 min), (p<10-3). Eighty percent (20/25) of peroperative complications were rated ENDOGRADE 3 or 4, 20% (5/25) were rated ENDOGRADE 1 or 2 (p = 0.01). Patients rated ENDOGRADE 2, 3 and 4 were 10.3 times (95CI=2.4-44.9, p = 2.10-3), 12.2 times (95CI=2.9-50.2, p = 5.10-4) and 38.3 times (95CI=9.1-162, p = 7.10-7) more likely to experience postoperative complications than those rated ENDOGRADE 1. According to multivariate analysis, only patients rated ENDOGRADE 2, 3, and 4 had a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications with an OR=16.0 (95CI=2.0-127.4, p = 9.10-3), OR=16.2 (95CI=1.6-159.7, p = 0.02) and OR=104.2 (95CI=24.6-440.5, p = 4.10-3), respectively. CONCLUSION: ENDOGRADE classification of surgical complexity in DE is correlated to operating time, per- and post-operative complications.

Value of non-coding RNAs to assess lymph node status in cervical cancer.

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth cancer in women and is the leading cause of cancer death in 42 countries. Lymph node metastasis is a determinant prognostic factor, as underlined in the latest FIGO classification. However, assessment of lymph node status remains difficult, despite the progress of imaging such as PET-CT and MRI. In the specific setting of CC, all data underlined the need for new biomarkers easily available to assess lymph node status. Previous studies have underlined the potential value of ncRNA expression in gynecological cancers. In this review, we aimed to evaluate the contribution of ncRNAs in tissue and biofluid samples to determine lymph node status in CC with potential impact on both surgical and adjuvant therapies. In tissue samples, our analysis found that there are arguments to support the role of ncRNAs in physiopathology, differential diagnosis from normal tissue, preinvasive and invasive tumors. In biofluids, despite small studies especially concerning miRNAs expression, promising data opens up new avenue to establish a non-invasive signature for lymph node status as well as a tool to predict response to neo- and adjuvant therapies, thus improving management algorithm of patients with CC.