Aberrant endometrial steroid receptor expression in in-vitro maturation cycles despite hormonal luteal support: A pilot study.

Clinical outcomes of fresh embryo transfer in non-hCG triggered in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles are inferior compared to vitrified-warmed embryo transfer. This is a prospective observational pilot study in a consecutive cohort of 31 polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients and 37 normo-ovulatory egg donors who underwent IVM without fresh embryo transfer between July 2009 and June 2014. All subjects received 150 IU of highly purified menotropin (HP-hMG) daily for three days. On cycle day 6, all patients started transdermal oestradiol (E2) at a daily dose of 9 mg. There was no human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger before oocyte retrieval (OR). Vaginal micronized progesterone was commenced on the evening after OR, at a daily dose of 600 mg. Additional luteal phase support (LPS) was administered as follows: Group A: no additional LPS; Group B: 1500 IU of hCG administered 4 h after OR and Group C: 5000 IU of hCG administered 4 h after OR + an additional injection of 5000 IU of hCG 1 day before endometrial biopsy. Endometrial biopsy for histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on day 5 or 6 after OR. Instead of being downregulated, both PR-B and ERα in endometrial glands and stroma were moderately to strongly expressed in all three protocols, suggesting that the mid-luteal histological signature of endometrial receptivity is deficient in a non-hCG-triggered IVM cycle. Poor clinical outcomes after fresh embryo transfer following IVM are probably related to inappropriate endometrial development which may be linked to the short follicular phase of IVM cycles.

Pituitary suppression protocol among Bologna poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation using corifollitropin alfa: does it play any role?

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the type of pituitary suppression protocol influence cumulative live birth rate (LBR) in Bologna poor responders treated with corifollitropin alfa (CFA)? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis including poor responder patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria who underwent their first intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle using a CFA-based ovarian stimulation protocol between 2011 and 2017. The starting dose of CFA was 150 µg. The primary outcome was cumulative LBR, defined as the first delivery of a live born resulting from the fresh and all the subsequent frozen embryo transfers. RESULTS: A total of 717 cycles were divided into three groups: A (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist protocol, n = 407), B (long GnRH agonist protocol, n = 224) and C (short GnRH agonist protocol, n = 86). Cumulative LBR did not significantly differ between groups (20.1% versus 17.4% versus 14.0%; P = 0.35). Significantly more patients in Group A had supernumerary embryos cryopreserved (28.3% versus 18.4% versus 11.6%; P < 0.001). Days of additional highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin 300 IU injections following CFA were significantly different between Groups A, B and C (3 versus 5 versus 3 days; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the number of oocytes retrieved remained an independent predictive factor (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.31) for cumulative LBR. CONCLUSIONS: Poor responders according to the Bologna criteria in whom CFA is used for ovarian stimulation had comparable cumulative LBR, irrespective of the type of pituitary suppression. An increase in number of oocytes retrieved is an independent variable related to cumulative LBR.

Intracytoplasmic spermatid injection and in vitro maturation: fact or fiction?

Intracytoplasmic injection with testicular spermatozoa has become a routine treatment in fertility clinics. Spermatozoa can be recovered in half of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. The use of immature germ cells for intracytoplasmic injection has been proposed for cases in which no spermatozoa can be retrieved. However, there are low pregnancy rates following intracytoplasmic injection using round spermatids from men with no elongated spermatids or spermatozoa in their testes. The in vitro culture of immature germ cells to more mature stages has been proposed as a means to improve this poor outcome. Several years after the introduction of intracytoplasmic injection with elongating and round spermatids, uncertainty remains as to whether this approach can be considered a safe treatment option. This review outlines the clinical and scientific data regarding intracytoplasmic injection using immature germ cells and in vitro matured germ cells.

Intracytoplasmic spermatid injection and in vitro maturation: fact or fiction?

Intracytoplasmic injection with testicular spermatozoa has become a routine treatment in fertility clinics. Spermatozoa can be recovered in half of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. The use of immature germ cells for intracytoplasmic injection has been proposed for cases in which no spermatozoa can be retrieved. However, there are low pregnancy rates following intracytoplasmic injection using round spermatids from men with no elongated spermatids or spermatozoa in their testes. The in vitro culture of immature germ cells to more mature stages has been proposed as a means to improve this poor outcome. Several years after the introduction of intracytoplasmic injection with elongating and round spermatids, uncertainty remains as to whether this approach can be considered a safe treatment option. This review outlines the clinical and scientific data regarding intracytoplasmic injection using immature germ cells and in vitro matured germ cells.