Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction With Breast Augmentation: A BREAST-Q Effect of Magnitude Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is one of the most performed cosmetic surgeries. Despite this, patient satisfaction following breast augmentation is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate what patient and surgical factors influence patient satisfaction following primary breast augmentation. METHODS: The BREAST-Q Augmentation module was sent to all females undergoing primary breast augmentation at a single private clinic (Amalieklinikken, Copenhagen, Denmark) between 2012 and 2019. Patient and surgical characteristics at the time of surgery were obtained from the patients' medical records, and data on factors that occurred after the surgery (eg, breastfeeding) were obtained by patient contact. Multivariate linear regression modeled the impact of these factors on BREAST-Q outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 554 females with a mean follow-up time of 5 years after primary breast augmentation were included in this study. Implant type and volume did not affect patient satisfaction. However, higher patient age was associated with significantly higher postoperative patient satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being (P < .05). Conversely, higher patient BMI, postoperative weight gain, and breastfeeding were associated with significantly lower satisfaction (P < .05). Additionally, subglandular implant placement was associated with significantly lower satisfaction than submuscular implant placement (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Implant type and volume did not affect patient satisfaction with breast augmentation. However, young age, higher BMI, subglandular implant placement, and postoperative weight gain were associated with lower patient satisfaction. These factors should be considered when aligning outcome expectations with breast augmentation.

Autologous Fat Grafting as Treatment of Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy pain syndrome is a common and disabling side effect of breast cancer treatment. Medical treatment seems to be insufficient for a considerable proportion of patients. Fat grafting has shown promise in relieving pain from postmastectomy pain syndrome, but no randomized clinical trial comparing fat grafting to a sham operation has been performed to date. The authors' objective was to compare the effect of fat grafting compared to a sham operation for treating postmastectomy pain syndrome. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial with two arms between October of 2017 and September of 2020. The authors assessed four patients suffering from postmastectomy pain syndrome for inclusion. The intervention group received scar-releasing rigottomy and fat grafting to the area of pain. The control group received scar-releasing rigottomy and a placebo of saline solution. The primary outcome was the degree of pain measured using the Numerical Rating Scale. The secondary outcomes were the degree and quality of neuropathic pain (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) and quality of life (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey). Follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants completed follow-up: 18 participants in the intervention group and 17 in the control group. The authors detected no statistically significant changes in average and maximum pain or neuropathic pain. Regarding quality of life, the control group reported a statistically significant improvement in emotional problem parameters, whereas the intervention group reported a deterioration. The authors observed no serious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The authors did not find evidence to support that fat grafting is superior to a placebo when treating postmastectomy pain syndrome. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

The impact of lymphedema on health-related quality of life up to 10 years after breast cancer treatment.

The impact of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) on long-term quality of life is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of BCRL on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 10 years after breast cancer treatment. This regional population-based study enrolled patients treated for breast cancer with axillary lymph node dissection between January 1st 2007 and December 31th 2017. Follow up and assessments of the included patients were conducted between January 2019 and May 2020. The study outcome was HRQoL, evaluated with the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire and the Short Form (36) Health Survey Questionnaire. Multivariate linear logistic regression models adjusted for confounders provided mean score differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals in each HRQoL scale and item. This study enrolled 244 patients with BCRL and 823 patients without BCRL. Patients with BCRL had significantly poorer HRQoL than patients without BCRL in 16 out of 18 HRQoL subscales, for example, in physical function (MDs 27, 95%CI: 24; 30), mental health (MDs 24, 95%CI: 21; 27) and social role functioning (MDs 20, 95%CI: 17; 23). Age, BMI, BCRL severity, hand and dominant arm affection had only minor impact on HRQoL (MDs < 5), suggesting a high degree of inter-individual variation in coping with lymphedema. This study showed that BCRL is associated with long-term impairments in HRQoL, especially affecting the physical and psychosocial domains. Surprisingly, BCRL diagnosis rather than clinical severity drove the largest impairments in HRQoL.

A Scintigraphic Method for Quantitation of Lymphatic Function in Arm Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoscintigraphy is commonly used to assess breast cancer-related lymphedema. However, a reliable quantitative method that clearly distinguishes normal lymphatic function from lymphedema is desired. We propose a quantitative method based upon the physiological mean transit time (MTT) measure of lymph fluid passing through the arm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven patients, aged 34-68 years, with unilateral arm lymphedema following breast cancer treatment underwent simultaneous bilateral lymphoscintigraphy using intradermal injection of 99mTc-labeled human serum albumin (HSA). Imaging was performed at 30-45 minute intervals for 5 hours. Time activity curves from each injection site and each arm region were recorded. The input into the arm region was obtained as the (minus) time derivative of the injection site activity curve. In the proposed model the arm activity curve was considered to arise from the convolution of the retention function and the input function. The retention function was obtained by fitting the calculated arm activity curve to the measured arm activity curve. The MTT of activity passing through the arm was calculated as the time integral of the resulting retention function. All measured time activity curves were well described by the model. The MTT of the lymphedema arm (mean 60.1 minutes, range 22-105 minutes) was markedly different from that of the contralateral normal arm (mean 5.4 minutes, range 1.2-8.7 minutes), p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: The proposed model showed great similarity with measured time activity curves and was capable of quantitatively distinguishing lymphatic function of the lymphedema arm from that of the normal arm in terms of calculated MTT.

The effect of prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis and shunts for preventing cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema is one of the most dreaded side effects to any cancer treatment involving lymphadenectomy. Progressed lymphedema is adversely complex and currently there is no widely acknowledged curative treatment. Therefore recent focus has shifted to risk reduction and prevention. It has been hypothesized that bypassing lymphatic vessels to veins prophylactically, could minimize the lymphatic dysfunction seen following lymphadenectomy. METHODS: To investigate this possible future treatment modality, we performed a systematic meta-analysis of studies treating patients with prophylactic lymphovenous analysisstomosis (LVA) for the prevention of secondary lymphedema following lymphadenectomy. A systematic search yielded 12 articles included in the qualitative analysis and four of these were further eligible to be included in the quantitative analysis. RESULTS: We found that patients treated with prophylactic LVA had a significant reduction in lymphedema incidence (Relative risk: 0.33, 95%CI: 0.19 to 0.56) when compared to patients receiving no prophylactic treatment (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic LVA in relation to lymphadenectomy shows promising results, however because of the low number of eligible studies and method heterogeneity between studies, there is an urgent need for uniformly high quality studies, before the treatment can be concluded effective.

Tc-99m-Human Serum Albumin Transit Time as a Measure of Arm Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoscintigraphy has often been used for evaluating arm lymphatic dysfunction, but no optimal approach for quantification has so far emerged. We propose a quantifiable measure of lymphatic function that we applied in patients treated for breast cancer. METHODS: Eleven patients, aged 34-68 years, with unilateral arm lymphedema following breast cancer treatment underwent bilateral lymphoscintigraphy using intradermal injection in both hands of technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin and sequential 5 min imaging for 5 hours. The mean transit time (MTT) in the arms was calculated based on time activity curves generated from injection site and arm regions. Visual lymphedema scoring was performed based on dermal backflow and lymph node presence. Excess arm volume was calculated from circumference measurements. RESULTS: The MTT (mean ± SD) was significantly longer in the lymphedema arm than in the normal arm: 60.1 ± 27.7 versus 5.4 ± 2.5 minutes (mean difference, 54.7 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 36.5-72.9 minutes; P < 0.0001). Patients with previous erysipelas infection had significantly longer MTT than other patients (mean difference, 43.7 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 18.6-68.7 minutes; P < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between MTT and excess arm volume (r = 0.64; P = 0.04) and number of lymph nodes removed (r = 0.65; P = 0.03) but no correlation between visual score and MTT. CONCLUSION: Measurements of MTT were able to discriminate lymphedema from healthy arm and MTT correlated with relevant markers for lymphedema severity. We encourage further research using the MTT approach for monitoring lymphedema and evaluation of treatment response.