RESUMEN
Introduction: Smoking topography (ST) describes smoking behavior and patterns. Removal of the cigarette filter and subsequent impact on ST has not been investigated. This is the first clinical trial comparing ST for filtered and unfiltered cigarettes in a naturalistic experiment. Methods: We conducted a crossover clinical trial following established people who smoke cigarettes (n = 32) for two weeks under filtered and unfiltered smoking experimental conditions. Participants (50 % female, mean age 38.3 yr.) smoked in each experimental condition followed by a 3-week post-washout period. ST (puff count, volume, duration, peak and average flow) was measured at six time-points. Statistical analysis included a linear repeated mixed-effects model of smoking experimental conditions by visit number and sex. Results: Average flow (ml/sec) was significantly less for filtered smoking (-6.92 lower (95 % CI: -13.44 to -0.39), p < 0.05), thus demonstrating more resistance on inhalation. No significant differences were found between filtered or unfiltered experimental conditions for other ST variables. However, average volume and average peak flow were somewhat higher in unfiltered smoking, and lower mean puff counts/cigarette were observed for unfiltered compared to filtered smoking. Conclusion: Lower average flow rates were associated with filtered cigarette smoking. No significant differences were found for other ST variables between smoking experimental conditions. ST measurements comparing cigarette smoking conditions may determine if product regulatory changes, such as removing the cigarette filter could impact smoking behavioral patterns among people who smoke. This proof-of-principle study measuring ST may be replicated in larger trials to determine potential behavioral changes in smoking unfiltered cigarettes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The omicron BA.1 bivalent booster is used globally. Previous open-label studies of the omicron BA.1 (Moderna mRNA-1273.214) booster showed superior neutralising antibody responses against omicron BA.1 and other variants compared with the original mRNA-1273 booster. We aimed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of omicron BA.1 monovalent and bivalent boosters with the original mRNA-1273 vaccine in a large, randomised controlled trial. METHODS: In this large, randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial in the UK (28 hospital and vaccination clinic sites), individuals aged 16 years or older who had previously received two injections of any authorised or approved COVID-19 vaccine, with or without an mRNA vaccine booster (third dose), were randomly allocated (1:1) using interactive response technology to receive 50 µg omicron BA.1 monovalent or bivalent vaccines or 50 µg mRNA-1273 administered as boosters via deltoid intramuscular injection. The primary outcomes were safety and immunogenicity at day 29, including prespecified non-inferiority and superiority of booster immune responses, based on the neutralising antibody geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratios of the monovalent and bivalent boosters compared with mRNA-1273. Safety was assessed in all participants who received first or second boosters, and primary immunogenicity outcomes were assessed in all participants who received the planned booster dose, had pre-booster and day 29 antibody data, had no major protocol deviations, and who were SARS-CoV-2-negative. The study is registered with EudraCT (2022-000063-51) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05249829) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 16 and March 24, 2022, 724 participants were randomly allocated to receive omicron BA.1 monovalent (n=366) or mRNA-1273 (n=357), and between April 2 and June 17, 2022, 2824 participants were randomly allocated to receive omicron BA.1 bivalent (n=1418) or mRNA-1273 (n=1395) vaccines as second boosters. Median durations (months) between the most recent COVID-19 vaccine and study boosters were similar for omicron BA.1 monovalent (4·0 months [IQR 3·6-4·7]) and mRNA-1273 (4·1 [3·5-4·7]), and for the omicron BA.1 bivalent (5·5 [4·8-6·2]) and mRNA-1273 (5·4 [4·8-6·2]) boosters. The omicron BA.1 monovalent and bivalent boosters elicited superior neutralising GMCs against the omicron BA.1 variant compared with mRNA-1273, with GMC ratios of 1·68 (99% CI 1·45-1·95) and 1·53 (1·41-1·67) at day 29 post-booster doses in participants without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Both boosters induced non-inferior ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (Asp614Gly) immune responses with GMCs that were similar for the bivalent (2987·2 [95% CI 2814·9-3169·9]) versus mRNA-1273 (2911·3 [2750·9-3081·0]) and lower for the monovalent (2699·7 [2431·3-2997·7] vs 3020·6 [2776·5-3286·2]) boosters, with respective GMC ratios of 1·05 (99% CI 0·96-1·15) and 0·82 (95% CI 0·74-0·91). Results were comparable regardless of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection status. Incidences of solicited adverse reactions with the omicron BA.1 monovalent (335 [91·3%] of 367 participants) and omicron BA.1 bivalent (1285 [90·4%] of 1421 participants) boosters were similar to those observed previously for mRNA-1273, with no new safety concerns identified and no occurrences of fatal adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Omicron-containing booster vaccines generated superior immunogenicity against omicron BA.1 and comparable immunogenicity against the original strain with no new safety concerns. It remains important to continuously monitor the immune responses and real-world vaccine effectiveness as divergent SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge. FUNDING: Moderna.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Reino Unido , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Anticuerpos AntiviralesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Behavioural research is needed to inform a ban on sales of filtered cigarettes that could reduce plastic waste due to discarded filters. This study reports on differences in perceptions, nicotine dependence and behaviour among participants in a cross-over randomised trial of filtered compared with unfiltered cigarettes. METHOD: This proof-of-concept study involved 43 people who smoke filtered cigarettes (41.9% women, mean age 36.7 years). Participants were provided 2 weeks' supply of filtered cigarettes, 2 weeks of the same brand of unfiltered cigarettes and randomly assigned to starting conditions. Measures included the Modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire; single-item cigarette perception questions; Fagerström Test of Nicotine Dependence; 7-day cigarette consumption, urinary cotinine and intention to quit. Analyses included linear and ordinal repeated measures mixed-effects models and paired t-tests. RESULTS: Filtered cigarettes were perceived as better tasting, more satisfying, more enjoyable, less aversive, less harsh, less potent and less negatively reinforcing than unfiltered cigarettes. Filtered cigarettes were smoked at a higher rate during the trial than unfiltered cigarettes (p<0.05). There was no difference in cotinine, dependence or intention to quit between filtered versus unfiltered cigarette conditions (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: People who smoke perceived unfiltered cigarettes as having greater nicotine effects and less desirable sensory effects than filtered cigarettes, and they smoked fewer of these during the trial. Although cotinine, dependence and intention to quit were similar for smoking unfiltered and filtered cigarettes in this small trial, results suggest that banning the sale of filtered cigarettes might make smoking less attractive overall to people who smoke. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03749876.
Asunto(s)
Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Productos de Tabaco , Tabaquismo , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Cotinina , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Real-world data (RWD) can contextualize findings from single-arm trials when randomized comparative trials are unethical or unfeasible. Findings from single-arm trials alone are difficult to interpret and a comparison, when feasible and meaningful, to patient-level information from RWD facilitates the evaluation. As such, there have been several recent regulatory applications including RWD or other external data to support the product's efficacy and safety. This paper summarizes some lessons learned from such contextualization from 20 notable new drug or biologic licensing applications in oncology and rare diseases. METHODS: This review focuses on 20 notable new drug or biologic licensing applications that included patient-level RWD or other external data for contextualization of trial results. Publicly available regulatory documents including clinical and statistical reviews, advisory committee briefing materials and minutes, and approved product labeling were retrieved for each application. The authors conducted independent assessments of these documents focusing on the regulatory evaluation, in each case. Three examples are presented in detail to illustrate the salient issues and themes identified across applications. RESULTS: Regulatory decisions were strongly influenced by the quality and usability of the RWD. Comparability of cohort attributes such as endpoints, populations, follow-up, index and censoring criteria, as well as data completeness and accuracy of key variables appeared to be essential to ensure the quality and relevance of the RWD. Given adequate sample size of the clinical trials or external control, the use of appropriate analytic methods to properly account for confounding, such as regression or matching, and pre-specification of these methods while blinded to patient outcomes seemed good strategies to address baseline differences. DISCUSSION: Contextualizing single-arm trials with patient-level RWD appears to be an advance in regulatory science; however, challenges remain. Statisticians and epidemiologists have long focused on analytical methods for comparative effectiveness but hurdles in use of RWD have often occurred upstream of the analyses. More specifically, we noted hurdles in evaluating data quality, justifying cohort selection or initiation of follow-up, and demonstrating comparability of cohorts and endpoints.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Mercadotecnía , Recolección de Datos/métodos , HumanosRESUMEN
Background: On approval of JYNARQUE (tolvaptan) for use in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) at risk for rapid progression, the US Food and Drug Administration required a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) from the sponsor, which includes collection of post marketing liver safety data. Methods: This is a retrospective interim analysis of the ongoing REMS. The period evaluated was from REMS implementation (14 May 2018) at tolvaptan commercialization to the analysis cutoff date (23 February 2021). Patients were previously tolvaptan-naïve and initiated tolvaptan in the post marketing setting. Reports of possible severe drug-induced liver injury (DILI) were evaluated for severity based on the evidence obtained (e.g. liver enzyme levels, symptoms, diagnostic tests and event outcomes). The incidence of DILI was compared between the REMS and tolvaptan clinical trials in ADPKD. Results: Among 6711 REMS patients, 60 (0.9%) cases of possible severe DILI were reported, 4 of which were confirmed as serious and potentially fatal by the sponsor. One of these four patients met Hy's law criteria. In all four patients, liver enzymes normalized after tolvaptan discontinuation. The duration of tolvaptan exposure in the REMS is currently shorter than in completed clinical trials, but within this limitation, the incidence of possible severe DILI was lower in the REMS than in clinical trials (incidence rate ratio 0.587; P = .000411). Conclusions: In interim data on >6000 tolvaptan REMS patients, <1% experienced possible severe DILI. Monthly monitoring, as described in the tolvaptan prescribing information, enables the prompt detection of liver enzyme abnormalities and appropriate drug discontinuation.
RESUMEN
Plasma-derived polyclonal antibody therapeutics, such as intravenous immunoglobulin, have multiple drawbacks, including low potency, impurities, insufficient supply and batch-to-batch variation. Here we describe a microfluidics and molecular genomics strategy for capturing diverse mammalian antibody repertoires to create recombinant multivalent hyperimmune globulins. Our method generates of diverse mixtures of thousands of recombinant antibodies, enriched for specificity and activity against therapeutic targets. Each hyperimmune globulin product comprised thousands to tens of thousands of antibodies derived from convalescent or vaccinated human donors or from immunized mice. Using this approach, we generated hyperimmune globulins with potent neutralizing activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in under 3 months, Fc-engineered hyperimmune globulins specific for Zika virus that lacked antibody-dependent enhancement of disease, and hyperimmune globulins specific for lung pathogens present in patients with primary immune deficiency. To address the limitations of rabbit-derived anti-thymocyte globulin, we generated a recombinant human version and demonstrated its efficacy in mice against graft-versus-host disease.
Asunto(s)
Linfocitos B/inmunología , COVID-19/terapia , Globulinas/biosíntesis , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Células CHO , Cricetulus , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Globulinas/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Ratones , Proteínas Recombinantes/biosíntesis , Proteínas Recombinantes/inmunología , Virus Zika/inmunología , Sueroterapia para COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent case series and retrospective studies have raised concerns that patients who receive direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are at increased risk of developing varicella-zoster virus infection (VZV reactivation). We investigated the relationship between DAA treatment and VZV reactivation by analyzing pooled participant-level data from 37 clinical trials of DAA agents. METHODS: We obtained demographic, adverse event, and laboratory data from 13,816 participants in 37 clinical trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration for approval of DAA agents for treatment of HCV infection. Participants received DAAs (n = 12,249), placebo (n = 997), pegylated interferon (n = 243), or a combination of DAAs and pegylated interferon (n = 327). Occurrence of VZV reactivation was identified using systematically reported adverse event data. HCV virologic response was evaluated by measurement of HCV RNA. RESULTS: VZV reactivation occurred in 9.9 cases per 1000 person-years of DAA treatment (95% CI, 6.8-14.0 per 1000 person years) and 13.8 cases per 1000 person-years of placebo (95% CI, 3.5-37.5 per 1000 person years). No participants in the pegylated interferon or combination DAA and pegylated interferon groups experienced VZV reactivation. Within the placebo-controlled trials there was no significant difference in VZV reactivation between DAA treatment and placebo. VZV reactivation was associated with age older than 40 years, female sex, and HIV coinfection. We did not find an association between time of virologic response and time to VZV reactivation. CONCLUSION: In an analysis of data from 37 trials, we found no evidence for an association between DAA treatment for HCV infection and increased risk of VZV reactivation.
Asunto(s)
Coinfección , Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Herpes Zóster , Adulto , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Herpes Zóster/tratamiento farmacológico , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Plastic filters on cigarette butts are a widespread source of nonbiodegradable, toxic environmental waste. State and local legislation to ban the sale of single-use cigarettes may be considered to prevent this waste, but scientific evidence on the impact of switching smokers to unfiltered cigarettes on smoking behavior and toxicant exposures is needed to inform this policy. We have designed an open-label, randomized, 9-week, crossover clinical trial of adult filtered-cigarette smokers who switch to unfiltered cigarettes. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to understand the impact of switching smokers of filtered cigarettes to unfiltered cigarettes on smoking behavior and toxic exposures. METHODS: This trial involves a 1-week baseline period; a 2-week period of smoking filtered or unfiltered cigarettes, where groups are randomly assigned; a 3-week washout period; another 1-week baseline period; and a 2-week crossover period of smoking the opposite condition (ie, filtered or unfiltered cigarettes) for a sufficient sample size of 40 participants. We will determine changes in (1) observed topography (ie, puff count, interpuff interval, and puff volume) and cigarettes smoked per day, via butt counts and self-report, (2) expired carbon monoxide and excretion of urinary cotinine, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol, and volatile organic compounds, and (3) participants' knowledge and attitudes toward unfiltered cigarettes, satisfaction with smoking, and intention to quit if they were not able to smoke filtered cigarettes. RESULTS: This study was funded in June 2018 and approved by the relevant Institutional Review Boards in July 2018. This study has enrolled 37 participants as of October 2020. Data analysis is currently underway, and trial results are expected to be published in spring 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot proof-of-principle study will inform the design of a larger, future research project that can provide robust scientific evidence on our research question. Such a large study could inform possible state or local legislation to ban the sale of single-use filtered cigarettes in order to mitigate the environmental impact of discarded single-use plastic filters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03749876; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03749876. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/19603.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Since 1999, the US Food and Drug Administration approved neuraminidase and endonuclease inhibitors to treat uncomplicated outpatient influenza but not severe hospitalized influenza. After the 2009 pandemic, several influenza hospital-based clinical therapeutic trials were unsuccessful, possibly due to certain study factors. Therefore, in 2014, the US Health and Human Services agencies formed a Working Group (WG) to address related clinical challenges. METHODS: Starting in 2014, the WG obtained retrospective data from failed hospital-based influenza therapeutic trials and nontherapeutic hospital-based influenza studies. These data allowed the WG to identify factors that might improve hospital-based therapeutic trials. These included primary clinical endpoints, increased clinical site enrollment, and appropriate baseline enrollment criteria. RESULTS: During 2018, the WG received retrospective data from a National Institutes of Health hospital-based influenza therapeutic trial that demonstrated time to resolution of respiratory status, which was not a satisfactory primary endpoint. The WG statisticians examined these data and believed that ordinal outcomes might be a more powerful primary endpoint. Johns Hopkins' researchers provided WG data from an emergency-department (ED) triage study to identify patients with confirmed influenza using molecular testing. During the 2013-2014 influenza season, 4 EDs identified 1074 influenza-patients, which suggested that triage testing should increase enrollment by hospital-based clinical trial sites. In 2017, the WG received data from Northwestern Memorial Hospital researchers regarding 703 influenza inpatients over 5 seasons. The WG applied National Early Warning Score (NEWS) at patient baseline to identify appropriate criteria to enroll patients into hospital-based therapeutic trials. CONCLUSIONS: Data received by the WG indicated that hospital-based influenza therapeutic trials could use ordinal outcome analyses, ED triage to identify influenza patients, and NEWS for enrollment criteria.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The US Veterans Affairs (VA)/Department of Defense (DoD) Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Clinical Practice Guidelines provide evidence-based pharmacologic treatment recommendations. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are considered first-line medications. Benzodiazepines are relatively contraindicated with a warning that they may cause harm. This population-based study is the first to describe prescribing patterns for active duty service members (ADSMs) diagnosed with PTSD. METHODS: Health-care-related administrative DoD data from federal fiscal years 2007 through 2013 identified ADSMs with PTSD using ICD-9 codes. Prescription frequencies for antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and other psychotropic medications were calculated for each year. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2013, ADSMs with a PTSD diagnosis increased from 16,931 to 70,942. SSRI or SNRI prescribing decreased from 55.4% in 2007 to 41.8% in 2010 before increasing to 54.9% in 2013. Benzodiazepine prescribing was stable between 20.9% and 22.3% through 2010 before increasing to 24.7% by 2013. Antipsychotic prescribing declined from 22.6% in 2007 to 14.6% in 2013, driven by a decrease in low-dose quetiapine (≤ 300 mg/d) prescribing, which declined from 19.1% in 2007 to 8.2% in 2013. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in SSRI or SNRI prescribing after 2010 and the overall increase in prazosin and decrease in low-dose quetiapine prescribing all suggest increased concordance with the VA/DoD PTSD Clinical Practice Guidelines. The decline in SSRI prescribing up to 2010 is not concordant. The increase in benzodiazepine prescribing, a trend opposite that observed in the VA, is concerning.
Asunto(s)
Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/tendencias , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Age and sex effects on antiretroviral therapy (ART) response are not well elucidated. Our pooled analysis of 40 randomized clinical trials measured the association of age and sex on CD4+ T cell count changes and virologic suppression using multivariable regression modeling. The average increase in CD4+ T cell count from baseline to week 48 was 17.3 cells/mm3 lower and clinically insignificant (95% confidence interval -30.8 to -3.8) among women ages ≥ 50 years (n = 573), compared to women ≤ 35 years (n = 3,939). Results were similar for men. Virologic suppression odds were 60% and 21% times greater among participants ≥50 years compared to ≤35 years, in women and men, respectively. In both sexes, larger increases in CD4+ T cell count changes were observed in younger, compared to older, participants; however, virologic suppression was higher in older, compared to younger, participants suggesting a non-sex-specific age effect response to ART.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/métodos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , VIH-1/efectos de los fármacos , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/virología , VIH-1/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Health communication and social mobilization efforts to improve the public's knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding Ebola virus disease (Ebola) were important in controlling the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic in Guinea (1), which resulted in 3,814 reported Ebola cases and 2,544 deaths.* Most Ebola cases in Guinea resulted from the washing and touching of persons and corpses infected with Ebola without adequate infection control precautions at home, at funerals, and in health facilities (2,3). As the 18-month epidemic waned in August 2015, Ebola KAP were assessed in a survey among residents of Guinea recruited through multistage cluster sampling procedures in the nation's eight administrative regions (Boké, Conakry, Faranah, Kankan, Kindia, Labé, Mamou, and Nzérékoré). Nearly all participants (92%) were aware of Ebola prevention measures, but 27% believed that Ebola could be transmitted by ambient air, and 49% believed they could protect themselves from Ebola by avoiding mosquito bites. Of the participants, 95% reported taking actions to avoid getting Ebola, especially more frequent handwashing (93%). Nearly all participants (91%) indicated they would send relatives with suspected Ebola to Ebola treatment centers, and 89% said they would engage special Ebola burial teams to remove corpses with suspected Ebola from homes. Of the participants, 66% said they would prefer to observe an Ebola-affected corpse from a safe distance at burials rather than practice traditional funeral rites involving corpse contact. The findings were used to guide the ongoing epidemic response and recovery efforts, including health communication, social mobilization, and planning, to prevent and respond to future outbreaks or sporadic cases of Ebola.
Asunto(s)
Epidemias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/epidemiología , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Guinea/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In 2014-2016, an Ebola epidemic devastated Guinea; more than 3800 cases and 2500 deaths were reported to the World Health Organization. In August 2015, as the epidemic waned and clinical trials of an experimental, Ebola vaccine continued in Guinea and neighboring Sierra Leone, we conducted a national household survey about Ebola-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) and opinions about "hypothetical" Ebola vaccines. METHODS: Using cluster-randomized sampling, we selected participants aged 15+ years old in Guinea's 8 administrative regions, which had varied cumulative case counts. The questionnaire assessed socio-demographic characteristics, experiences during the epidemic, Ebola-related KAP, and Ebola vaccine attitudes. To assess the potential for Ebola vaccine introduction in Guinea, we examined the association between vaccine attitudes and participants' characteristics using categorical and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 6699 persons invited to participate, 94% responded to at least 1 Ebola vaccine question. Most agreed that vaccines were needed to fight the epidemic (85.8%) and that their family would accept safe, effective Ebola vaccines if they became available in Guinea (84.2%). These measures of interest and acceptability were significantly more common among participants who were male, wealthier, more educated, and lived with young children who had received routine vaccines. Interest and acceptability were also significantly higher among participants who understood Ebola transmission modes, had witnessed Ebola response teams, knew Ebola-affected persons, believed Ebola was not always fatal, and would access Ebola treatment centers. In multivariable analyses of the majority of participants living with young children, interest and acceptability were significantly higher among those living with vaccinated children than among those living with unvaccinated children. DISCUSSION: The high acceptability of hypothetical vaccines indicates strong potential for introducing Ebola vaccines across Guinea. Strategies to build public confidence in use of Ebola vaccines should highlight any similarities with safe, effective vaccines routinely used in Guinea.
Asunto(s)
Epidemias/prevención & control , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , Vacunación/psicología , Adolescente , Vacunas contra el Virus del Ébola/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra el Virus del Ébola/efectos adversos , Ebolavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Ebolavirus/fisiología , Epidemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Guinea/epidemiología , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Elbasvir/grazoprevir demonstrated high sustained virologic response rates 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) across five clinical trials in subjects infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, including those with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), and GT4. Despite favorable results overall, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) encountered challenging regulatory issues due to the limitations of clinical trial data in certain subpopulations. In GT1a-infected subjects, baseline NS5A resistance-associated polymorphisms emerged as the strongest baseline characteristic associated with diminished SVR12 rates following 12 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment. The decision for recommending 16 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir + ribavirin in this population and for extrapolating these recommendations to patients with advanced CKD was based on benefit-versus-risk analyses using the available data. Conversely, FDA had insufficient data to define a specific elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment regimen for GT1a-infected subjects with baseline NS5A resistance-associated polymorphisms who failed prior treatment with pegylated interferon + ribavirin (PR) and either boceprevir, simeprevir, or telaprevir. For GT4 PR-experienced patients, leveraging of data in related populations and additional pooled analyses were employed to support labeling for elbasvir/grazoprevir. This article describes FDA's rationale for labeling determinations in situations where limited data made these decisions challenging.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Benzofuranos/administración & dosificación , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Quinoxalinas/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Ribavirina/administración & dosificación , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Elbasvir (an NS5A inhibitor) and grazoprevir (an NS3/4A protease inhibitor) are direct-acting antiviral agents recently approved in the United States for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 4 infections, as a fixed-dose combination. Trials of elbasvir and grazoprevir, with or without ribavirin, demonstrated high rates of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment ended (SVR12). However, 12 weeks of treatment with elbasvir and grazoprevir failed in a small proportion of patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. We summarize findings from independent US Food and Drug Administration analyses of drug resistance data from trials of elbasvir and grazoprevir, with and without ribavirin. METHODS: We independently analyzed HCV drug resistance and HCV RNA measurement results that were submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration to support the regulatory approval of elbasvir and grazoprevir. These data were reported from selected phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of elbasvir and grazoprevir, with and without ribavirin. Genotypic resistance analyses were conducted using Sanger population nucleotide sequencing data derived from blood samples from study patients. RESULTS: In 56 of 506 (11%) patients with HCV genotype 1a infection who received elbasvir and grazoprevir for 12 weeks, baseline HCV genetic variants encoding amino acid polymorphisms in NS5A (M28, Q30, L31, or Y93) reduced treatment efficacy; rates of SVR12 were 70% and 98% for patients with or without NS5A polymorphisms, respectively (P < .0001). Most patients with treatment failure acquired resistance-associated substitutions in NS3 and/or NS5A. Based on data from a small number of patients (n = 6), an intensified 16-week regimen of elbasvir and grazoprevir plus ribavirin could increase efficacy in patients with HCV genotype 1a infection with NS5A polymorphisms. Among patients with HCV genotype 4a or 4d infections with NS5A polymorphisms, all 26 who received the elbasvir and grazoprevir regimens recommended in prescribing information achieved an SVR12. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of elbasvir and grazoprevir, with or without ribavirin is safe and effective for patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infections. In patients with HCV genotype 1a infection, polymorphisms in NS5A at baseline (before treatment) can affect the efficacy of this direct-acting antiviral regimen, and pretreatment resistance analyses can optimize treatment selection.
Asunto(s)
Benzofuranos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Viral/genética , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Quinoxalinas/uso terapéutico , ARN Viral/genética , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/genética , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genotipo , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Polimorfismo Genético , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
TRICARE Prime beneficiaries view cancer screening as important for overall health but may need more frequent scheduling reminders, education, and scheduling options to increase below-average screening rates.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chloroquine-azithromycin is being evaluated as combination therapy for malaria. It may provide added benefit in treating or preventing bacterial infections that occur in children with malaria. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the effect of treating clinical malaria with chloroquine-azithromycin on the incidence of respiratory-tract and gastrointestinal-tract infections compared to treatment with chloroquine monotherapy. METHODS: We compared the incidence density and time to first events of respiratory-tract and gastrointestinal-tract infections among children assigned to receive chloroquine-azithromycin or chloroquine for all symptomatic malaria episodes over the course of 1 year in a randomized longitudinal trial in Blantyre, Malawi. RESULTS: The incidence density ratios of total respiratory-tract infections and gastrointestinal-tract infections comparing chloroquine-azithromycin to chloroquine monotherapy were 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], .48, .94) and 0.74 (95% CI, .55, .99), respectively. The time to first lower-respiratory-tract and gastrointestinal-tract infections were significantly longer in the chloroquine-azithromycin arm compared to the chloroquine arm (P = .04 and P = .02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Children treated routinely with chloroquine-azithromycin had fewer respiratory and gastrointestinal-tract infections than those treated with chloroquine alone. This antimalarial combination has the potential to reduce the burden of bacterial infections among children in malaria-endemic countries.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Cloroquina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/prevención & control , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/microbiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Preescolar , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/parasitología , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaui/epidemiología , Masculino , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/parasitología , RiesgoRESUMEN
New drug and biologic product marketing applications submitted to FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) between 2006 and 2010 were analyzed to identify rare disease application characteristics associated with higher approval rates. The results show that approval rates were similar for rare and common disease applications. Larger company size, prior regulatory experience and priority review designation were associated with higher approval rates. The study findings show that rare disease product development is feasible, and increased interactions between product developers and FDA in early investigational phases can facilitate product development.
Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Raras/tratamiento farmacológico , United States Food and Drug Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Mercadotecnía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Trends in Staphylococcus aureus infections are not well described. To calculate incidence in overall S. aureus infection and invasive and noninvasive infections according to methicillin susceptibility and location, we conducted a 10-year population-based retrospective cohort study (1999-2008) using patient-level data in the Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System. We found 3,674 S. aureus infections: 2,816 (77%) were noninvasive; 2,256 (61%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA); 2,517 (69%) were community onset, and 1,157 (31%) were hospital onset. Sixty-one percent of noninvasive infections were skin and soft tissue infections; 1,112 (65%) of these were MRSA. Ten-year averaged incidence per 100,000 veterans was 749 (± 132 SD, range 549-954) overall, 178 (± 41 SD, range 114-259) invasive, and 571 (± 152 SD, range 364-801) noninvasive S. aureus infections. Incidence of all S. aureus infections significantly increased (p<0.001), driven by noninvasive, MRSA, and community-onset infections (p<0.001); incidence of invasive S. aureus infection significantly decreased (p<0.001).
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Meticilina/farmacología , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Human papillomavirus vaccines have potential to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality; however, cultural and economic barriers may hinder success in developing countries. We assessed impact of a single vaccine campaign in Mali with use of mathematical modeling. Our model shows that decreases in the prevalence of Human papillomavirus infection are proportional to achieved vaccination coverage.