Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; : 1-8, 2024 Feb 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412375

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Behcet's Disease is a chronic multisystem vasculitis associated with a blinding uveitis. Few comparative studies exist between conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs in Behcet's uveitis (BU). We therefore used drug retention time (DRT), an accepted surrogate measure of pharmacological efficacy and tolerability, to compare these treatments in patients with BU. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients who met the revised International Criteria for Behcet's Disease (ICBD) treated at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Australia, between 1985-2021. DRT was analysed with Kaplan-Meier plots and defined as total time on drug in the first medication-period for each DMARD in each patient. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (37 males) with median age of 28.6 years were followed-up for a median of 8.0 years. At initial presentation, half had bilateral disease and median logMAR visual acuity was 0.176 (Snellen 6/9) in 62 uveitic eyes (16 anterior uveitis, 11 intermediate, 2 posterior, and 33 panuveitis). Thirty-three patients met ICBD initially. Prescribed corticosteroid-sparing agents were Cyclosporin (N = 24), Mycophenolate (N = 22), Azathioprine (N = 22), Methotrexate (N = 16), and Adalimumab (N = 15). Median DRT was 14.0, 27.4, 8.3, 24.0, and 52.0 months, respectively. DMARDs were discontinued 116 times and adverse effects (N = 37) were the main reason for cessation. Over time, patients were switched from Cyclosporin to Adalimumab earlier in the disease course due to poorer tolerance of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab's drug retention time was found to be similar to and possibly better than cDMARDs in patients with BU, who often suffer from vision-threatening disease at first presentation.

2.
Orbit ; 42(3): 299-305, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34781813

RESUMEN

Lemierre's syndrome is a triad consisting of oropharyngeal infection, internal jugular vein thrombophlebitis, and systemic embolisation typically involving lung and brain. Orbital involvement in this life-threatening condition is rare but potentially blinding and may be an indicator of intracranial involvement. We describe a case of odontogenic Lemierre's syndrome complicated by extensive orbital and intracranial septic venous thrombosis, with optic and cranial neuropathy resulting in monocular blindness and ophthalmoplegia. A multidisciplinary approach with abscess drainage, antibiotic and antithrombotic therapy, and close radiological monitoring was critical for preserving contralateral vision and neurological function.


Asunto(s)
Trombosis del Seno Cavernoso , Síndrome de Lemierre , Oftalmoplejía , Tromboflebitis , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Síndrome de Lemierre/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Lemierre/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis del Seno Cavernoso/diagnóstico , Trombosis del Seno Cavernoso/diagnóstico por imagen , Tromboflebitis/complicaciones , Tromboflebitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Tromboflebitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ceguera/etiología , Oftalmoplejía/diagnóstico , Oftalmoplejía/tratamiento farmacológico , Oftalmoplejía/etiología
3.
Lung ; 198(1): 143-150, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31894409

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Spirometry is required to accurately diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Following an acute exacerbation, it is recommended that spirometry be performed after a delay of 4-6 weeks to allow stability and a measure of 'baseline' lung function. However, poor attendance at these appointments can occur, leading to an inability to confirm the diagnosis of COPD or assess the severity of airflow obstruction. Portable spirometry (PS) is a proven surrogate device that may provide a convenient method to address these issues. The purpose of this study was to compare PS values, obtained prior to hospital discharge to laboratory-based spirometry (LS) results undertaken 4 weeks later. METHODS: Thirty-three eligible inpatients with a clinically determined exacerbation of COPD were recruited. Patients underwent PS prior to discharge and LS 4 weeks later. RESULTS: Reliability of PS values at discharge compared with outpatient LS 4 weeks later was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). The PS confirmed a new diagnosis of COPD at the bedside in 29% of patients and excluded COPD in 6% at both time points. Patients were found to have a similar severity of airflow obstruction on both PS and LS, with clinical stability maintained between visits. The PS and LS may be used interchangeably for earlier diagnosis of COPD. PS at the point of discharge from hospital offers a unique opportunity to diagnose and facilitate COPD management from hospital to primary care.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Espirometría/instrumentación , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Posteriores , Anciano , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diferencia Mínima Clínicamente Importante , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapéutico , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Espirometría/métodos , Capacidad Vital
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA