RESUMEN
Importance: Significant evidence gaps exist regarding the safety of smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy, especially for the risk of congenital malformations. Consequently, professional bodies advise against the use of varenicline and bupropion and recommend caution with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Contemporary estimates of the use of smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy are lacking. Objective: To quantify the proportion of individuals using prescribed smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy and during the first trimester specifically, in 4 countries. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study used linked birth records, hospital admission records, and dispensing records of prescribed medications from all pregnancies resulting in birth between 2015 and 2020 in New South Wales, Australia; New Zealand; Norway; and Sweden. Data analyses were conducted in October and November 2023. Exposure: Prescribed smoking cessation pharmacotherapy use (varenicline, NRT, and bupropion) during pregnancy was defined as days' supply overlapping the period from date of conception to childbirth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of use among all pregnancies and pregnancies with maternal smoking were calculated. Among women who used a pharmacotherapy, the proportion of women with use during the first trimester of pregnancy was also calculated. Results: Among 1â¯700â¯638 pregnancies in 4 countries, 138â¯033 (8.1%) had maternal smoking and 729â¯498 (42.9%) were younger than 30 years. The prevalences ranged from 0.02% to 0.14% for varenicline, less than 0.01% to 1.86% for prescribed NRT, and less than 0.01% to 0.07% for bupropion. Among pregnant individuals who smoked, use of pharmacotherapies was up to 10 times higher, with maximum prevalences of 1.25% for varenicline in New South Wales, 11.39% for NRT in New Zealand, and 0.39% for bupropion in New Zealand. Use in the first trimester occurred among more than 90% of individuals using varenicline, approximately 60% among those using NRT, and 80% to 90% among those using bupropion. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of pregnant individuals in 4 high-income countries, the low prevalence of varenicline and bupropion use during pregnancy and higher prevalence of NRT use aligned with current clinical guidelines. As most use occurred in the first trimester, there is a need for evidence on the risk of congenital malformations for these medications.
Asunto(s)
Bupropión , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Vareniclina , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico , Vareniclina/efectos adversos , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Bupropión/efectos adversos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Suecia/epidemiología , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Fumar/epidemiología , Primer Trimestre del EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the Health Care Homes (HCH) primary health care initiative on quality of care and patient outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING: Quasi-experimental, matched cohort study; analysis of general practice data extracts and linked administrative data from ten Australian primary health networks, 1 October 2017 - 30 June 2021. PARTICIPANTS: People with chronic health conditions (practice data extracts: 9811; linked administrative data: 10 682) enrolled in the HCH 1 October 2017 - 30 June 2019; comparison groups of patients receiving usual care (1:1 propensity score-matched). INTERVENTION: Participants were involved in shared care planning, provided enhanced access to team care, and encouraged to seek chronic condition care at the HCH practice where they were enrolled. Participating practices received bundled payments based on clinical risk tier. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Access to care, processes of care, diabetes-related outcomes, hospital service use, risk of death. RESULTS: During the first twelve months after enrolment, the mean numbers of general practitioner encounters (rate ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.17) and Medicare Benefits Schedule claims for allied health services (rate ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.24-1.33) were higher for the HCH than the usual care group. Annual influenza vaccinations (relative risk, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.17-1.22) and measurements of blood pressure (relative risk, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.08-1.11), blood lipids (relative risk, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.16-1.21), glycated haemoglobin (relative risk, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08), and kidney function (relative risk, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11-1.15) were more likely in the HCH than the usual care group during the twelve months after enrolment. Similar rate ratios and relative risks applied in the second year. The numbers of emergency department presentations (rate ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18) and emergency admissions (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22) were higher for the HCH group during the first year; other differences in hospital use were not statistically significant. Differences in glycaemic and blood pressure control in people with diabetes in the second year were not statistically significant. By 30 June 2021, 689 people in the HCH group (6.5%) and 646 in the usual care group (6.1%) had died (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.96-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: The HCH program was associated with greater access to care and improved processes of care for people with chronic diseases, but not changes in diabetes-related outcomes, most measures of hospital use, or risk of death.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Puntaje de Propensión , Australia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica , Atención a la SaludAsunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Embarazo , Femenino , Preescolar , Humanos , Australia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Repeated sublethal hypoxia exposure induces brain inflammation and affects the initiation and progression of cognitive dysfunction. Experiments from the current study showed that hypoxic exposure downregulates PKA/CREB signaling, which is restored by forskolin (FSK), an adenylate cyclase activator, in both Neuro2a (N2a) cells and zebrafish brain. FSK significantly protected N2a cells from hypoxia-induced cell death and neurite shrinkage. Intraperitoneal administration of FSK for 5 days on zebrafish additionally led to significant recovery from hypoxia-induced social interaction impairment and learning and memory (L/M) deficit. FSK suppressed hypoxia-induced neuroinflammation, as indicated by the observed decrease in NF-κB activation and GFAP expression. We further investigated the potential effect of FSK on O-GlcNAcylation changes induced by hypoxia. Intriguingly FSK induced marked upregulation of the protein level of O-GlcNAc transferase catalyzing addition of the GlcNAc group to target proteins, accompanied by elevated O-GlcNAcylation of nucleocytoplasmic proteins. The hypoxia-induced O-GlcNAcylation decrease in the brain of zebrafish was considerably restored following FSK treatment. Based on the collective results, we propose that FSK rescues hypoxia-induced cognitive dysfunction, potentially through regulation of HBP/O-GlcNAc cycling.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Pez Cebra , Animales , Colforsina/farmacología , Cognición , Hipoxia/complicaciones , Trastornos de la MemoriaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AFree oral spray, in combination with Standard of Care, in treating mild to moderate COVID-19 patients. This was an open-label, single-blinded, and controlled randomized clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved 1,252 patients, who were randomly assigned to either the control or study group, with 626 patients in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with Standard of Care recommended by the Ministry of Health of Vietnam, while patients in the study group received AFree oral spray in addition to Standard of Care for a period of 10 days. The clinical progression and outcomes of both groups were compared. RESULTS: The results showed that the proportion of patients with clinical symptoms on the 5th, 7th and 10th days were significantly lower in the study group (45.05%, 3.19% and 0%, respectively) compared to the control group (86.10%, 67.73% and 22.84%, respectively). Additionally, the rate of Real-time PCR test positivity for COVID-19 was significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group on the 4th, 7th, and 10th days (82.75% vs. 98.72%, 9.27% vs. 92.97%, and 1.12% vs. 50.48%, respectively). Furthermore, no side effects or complications related to AFree oral spray were recorded in the study group. CONCLUSION: The use of AFree oral spray resulted in significant improvements in clinical symptoms, recovery time, and viral clearance in COVID-19 patients with mild to moderate symptoms. This therapy has been shown to be safe and can be used as an adjuvant treatment for COVID-19 as well as other respiratory viral infections.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Vaporizadores Orales , SARS-CoV-2 , Salud Pública , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: A prospective randomized, open-label, single-blinded clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of AFree on the symptoms and course of moderate and severe COVID-19 in the field hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were enrolled. The patients were randomized into 100 patients in the interventional AFree group and 100 in the control group. The AFree group patients were treated with AFree oral spray in conjunction with the standard COVID-19 treatment protocol, while the control group of patients were treated with only standard care. RESULTS: Patients of the AFree group demonstrated a remarkedly faster improvement in all COVID-19-related symptoms, resulting in a shorter time for complete recovery than the control group. More importantly, they showed a shorter time for complete viral clearance. Adding AFree to the standard of care protocol also significantly improved the restoration of taste and smell and reduced lung infiltration. Additionally, the patients in the AFree group also exhibited fewer adverse effects related to treatment. CONCLUSION: AFree oral spray is a simple-to-use, safe, and effective adjunctive treatment for moderate and severe COVID-19 cases. AFree oral spray was demonstrated to potentially be effective for COVID-19 prevention.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Vaporizadores Orales , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Estudios Prospectivos , Unidades Móviles de Salud , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Poor household dietary diversity has been linked to malnutrition in individuals, households, and cumulatively in populations. High rates of malnutrition among Khmer ethnic children aged five years and younger have been reported in Tri Ton district, Vietnam. This paper aims to further investigate household dietary diversity and associated factors among Khmer ethnic minority populations in Vietnam. A cross sectional study was conducted from October 2018 to April 2019 in Tri Ton District, An Giang Province. By employing a multistage sampling technique, a total of 402 (99.8% response rate) participants were interviewed to measure household dietary diversity using a structured and validated questionnaire developed by FAO. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with household dietary diversity. The results showed that the prevalence of low, medium and high dietary diversity scores were 21.4%, 70.4% and 8.2%, respectively. Male-headed households, literacy level, household income, exposure to mass media on nutrition and health information, and frequency of eating were positively associated with household dietary diversity (p < 0.05). However, owning a vegetable and rice farm was not statistically related to households' dietary diversification. The paper concludes that the magnitude of household diversified dietary intakes was essentially low to medium in participants' households. These findings have provided evidence to inform the development of the National Nutrition Strategy2021−2030 in Vietnam, to be revised in 2045. This national strategy proposes appropriate interventions, programs and policies to improve socioeconomic status in ethnic groups and in mountainous areas to enhance populations' health and well-being including controlling childhood malnutrition. In order to improve population health and wellbeing in Tri Ton District, further actions to address effective dietary practices including strengthening nutrition and health communication about the need to improve household dietary diversity to high levels are recommended.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Desnutrición , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Minorías Étnicas y Raciales , Vietnam , Estudios Transversales , Salud Pública , Grupos Minoritarios , Dieta , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Política NutricionalRESUMEN
Importance: Although concerns exist regarding a potential increased risk of cardiovascular events for smoking cessation pharmacotherapies, there is general consensus that any increased risk associated with their use would be outweighed by the benefits of smoking cessation; thus, clinical guidelines recommend that such pharmacotherapies be offered to everyone who wants to quit smoking. In the interest of minimizing risk to patients, prescribers need evidence indicating how these pharmacotherapies compare with one another in terms of cardiovascular safety. Objective: To compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among individuals initiating varenicline, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) patches, or bupropion. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked pharmaceutical dispensing, hospital admissions, and death data was conducted in New South Wales, Australia. Participants included adults who were dispensed a prescription smoking cessation pharmacotherapy between 2008 and 2015 or between 2011 and 2015, depending on the availability of the pharmacotherapies being compared. Pairwise comparisons were conducted for risk of MACE among 122â¯932 varenicline vs 92â¯148 NRT initiators; 342â¯064 varenicline vs 10â¯457 bupropion initiators; and 102â¯817 NRT vs 6056 bupropion initiators. Exposure: First course of the smoking cessation pharmacotherapy of interest. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was MACE, defined as a composite of acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of MACE. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with high-dimensional propensity scores was used to account for potential confounding. Cox proportional hazards regression models with robust variance were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Data were analyzed January 24, 2019, to September 1, 2021. Results: The mean (SD) age of included individuals ranged from 41.9 (14.2) to 49.8 (14.9) years, and the proportion of women ranged from 42.8% (52â¯702 of 123â¯128) to 52.2% (53â¯693 of 102â¯913). The comparison of 122â¯932 varenicline initiators and 92â¯148 NRT patch initiators showed no difference in the risk of MACE (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72-1.07) nor in the risk of the secondary outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.21) and stroke (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.14). However, decreased risk of cardiovascular death was found among varenicline initiators (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.79). The results of comparisons involving bupropion were inconclusive owing to wide confidence intervals (eg, risk of MACE: 342â¯064 varenicline vs 10â¯457 bupropion initiators, HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.53-1.41]; 102â¯817 NRT patch vs 6056 bupropion initiators, HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.39-1.62]). Conclusions and Relevance: The finding of this cohort study that varenicline and NRT patch use have similar risk of MACE suggests that varenicline, the most efficacious smoking cessation pharmacotherapy, may be prescribed instead of NRT patches without increasing risk of major cardiovascular events. Further large-scale studies of the cardiovascular safety of varenicline and NRT relative to bupropion are needed.
Asunto(s)
Bupropión/efectos adversos , Bupropión/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/efectos adversos , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/uso terapéutico , Fumar/tratamiento farmacológico , Vareniclina/efectos adversos , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In the general population, varenicline is consistently shown to be more efficacious for smoking cessation than nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Current clinical guidelines for the management of smoking during pregnancy recommend against the use of varenicline, whilst supporting the use of NRT. However, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of these smoking cessation therapies among pregnant women. AIMS AND METHODS: Routinely-collected records of all births in two Australian States during 2011 and 2012 were used to create a population-based cohort of women who smoked during the first half of pregnancy. Pharmaceutical dispensing data were used to identify varenicline and nicotine patch dispensings in the first half of pregnancy. Propensity score matching was used to account for the potentially different distribution of confounding factors between the treatment groups. The outcome was defined as smoking abstinence during the second half of pregnancy. RESULTS: After propensity score-matching, our cohort comprised 60 women who used varenicline and 60 who used nicotine patches during the first half of pregnancy. More varenicline users (33.3%, 95% CI: 21.7%-46.7%) quit smoking than nicotine patch users (13.3%, 95% CI: 5.9%-24.6%). The adjusted rate difference was 24.2% (95% CI: 10.2%-38.2%) and the adjusted relative risk was 2.8 (95% CI: 1.4-5.7). CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline was almost three times more effective than nicotine patches in assisting pregnant women to quit smoking. Further studies are needed to corroborate our results. Together with data on the safety of varenicline during pregnancy, evidence regarding the relative benefit of varenicline and NRT during pregnancy important for informing clinical decisions for pregnant smokers. IMPLICATIONS: This study is the first to measure the comparative effectiveness of varenicline and nicotine patches during pregnancy - women using varenicline were almost three times as likely to quit smoking than those using nicotine patches. This study addressed a clinically important question using an observational study, noting that there is an absence of evidence from randomized controlled trials because of the ethical issues associated with including pregnant women in clinical trials of medicines of unknown safety.
Asunto(s)
Nicotina , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Fumar , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Vareniclina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To identify medications used disproportionately more or less among pregnant women relative to women of childbearing age. METHODS: Medication use among pregnant women in New South Wales, Australia was identified using linked perinatal and pharmaceutical dispensing data from 2006 to 2012. Medication use in women of childbearing age (including pregnant women) was identified using pharmaceutical dispensing data for a 10% random sample of the Australian population. Pregnant social security beneficiaries (n = 111 612) were age-matched (1:3) to female social security beneficiaries in the 10% sample. For each medication, the risk it was dispensed during pregnancy relative to being dispensed during an equivalent time period among matched controls was computed. Medications were mapped to Australian pregnancy risk categories. RESULTS: Of the 181 included medications, 35 were statistically significantly more commonly dispensed to pregnant women than control women. Of these, 23 are categorised as posing no increased risk to the foetus. Among medications suspected of causing harm or having insufficient safety data, the strongest associations were observed for hydralazine, ondansetron, dalteparin sodium and ranitidine. Use was less likely during pregnancy than control periods for 127 medications, with the strongest associations observed for hormonal contraceptives and progestogens. CONCLUSIONS: Most medications found to be used disproportionately more by pregnant women are indicated for pregnancy-related problems. A large number of medications were used disproportionately less among pregnant women, where avoidance of some of these medications may pose a greater risk of harm. For many other medications avoided during pregnancy, current data are insufficient to inform this risk-benefit assessment.
Asunto(s)
Medición de Riesgo , Australia , Femenino , Humanos , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , EmbarazoRESUMEN
The use of surveys is popular in dental education research. However, designing and conducting a survey can have many pitfalls. This article aims to prepare a new researcher or one with little experience to undertake survey research. It covers points such as survey design (including question construction), pilot testing for validity and reliability, sampling strategy, methods to increase response rates, logistical considerations, and items to include when writing the manuscript. Careful consideration of a survey from beginning to end can help one design and conduct a successful study that meets its research aims and adds valuable evidence to the literature.
Asunto(s)
Educación en Odontología , Escritura , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de Investigación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Few smokers use smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during pregnancy. It is hypothesised that health-care providers' reluctance due to safety concerns contributes to their low use. This study examined the extent of providers' concern regarding smoking cessation pharmacotherapies, relative to other medications in the same and other pregnancy risk categories. Calls made to a teratology information service (MotherSafe, Australia) were taken as a proxy indicator of concern regarding safety during pregnancy. DESIGN AND METHODS: The primary exposure discussed in 66 687 calls made to MotherSafe between 2001 and 2016 was categorised as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), bupropion, varenicline or category A (low risk), B1, B2, B3, C, D or X (teratogenic). Separate logistic regression models estimated the odds that calls regarding pharmacotherapies were from providers, relative to medications in the same and other risk categories. Models adjusted for caller remoteness and socio-economic status. RESULTS: Calls regarding bupropion were more likely to be made by providers than calls regarding other medications in its corresponding risk category [B2, adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17, 6.59]. Calls about varenicline were also more likely to be from providers than calls regarding other category B3 medications (aOR 95% CI 2.33:1.30, 4.17). Calls regarding NRT were not more or less likely to be from providers than calls regarding other category D medications. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Providers were more concerned about bupropion and varenicline than other medications within the same pregnancy risk categories. As this overestimation of risk may limit cessation pharmacotherapy use during pregnancy, research investigating strategies for correcting this imbalance is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Centrales de Llamados , Personal de Salud/ética , Embarazo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/tratamiento farmacológico , Australia , Terapia Conductista , Bupropión , Femenino , Humanos , Servicios de Información , Nicotina , Teratología , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , VareniclinaRESUMEN
This study examines the development of a spatial decision support system (SDSS) to address operational challenges for combatting malaria in a priority remote forest area of Vietnam including locating active malaria transmission, guiding targeted response, and identifying mobile and high-risk populations. A customized SDSS was developed for three communes in Phu Yen Province, Vietnam. Geographical reconnaissance (GR) was conducted to map and enumerate all households in the study site. During 2015 and 2016, detected malaria cases were reported to the SDSS and georeferenced to household residence. Individual case data were analysed in the SDSS to guide targeted response. Case investigation data, including suspected forest and remote area transmission locations, were also integrated into the SDSS. Surveys and in-depth interviews were conducted to assess utility and user acceptability. In 2015 and 2016, 4,667 households and a population of 17,563 were captured during GR. During the study period, 128 malaria cases were reported and automatically mapped in the SDSS. Targeted response interventions were conducted in 12 villages, testing 1,872 individuals. Intervention and remote-area sleeping site data were mapped and analysed using the SDSS. During follow-up interviews in 2017 the SDSS was found to be highly acceptable to malaria surveillance personnel. Results suggest that an SDSS can provide an effective tool in Vietnam to support the implementation of specialized surveillance, and calls for further research, application and roll-out in the Greater Mekong Subregion.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Bosques , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control , Vigilancia en Salud Pública/métodos , Análisis Espacial , Sistemas de Información Geográfica , Mapeo Geográfico , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Características de la Residencia , Vietnam/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify distinct trajectories of antipsychotic use prior to and during pregnancy and describe the associated maternal and birth characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of births (2005-2012) using linked administrative data in New South Wales, Australia. We used group-based trajectory modelling to classify trajectories of antipsychotic use in the 450 days prior to pregnancy and during pregnancy. We characterised women with different trajectories according to maternal sociodemographic characteristics, mental health diagnoses and hospitalisations, use of psychotropic medicines and birth outcomes. RESULTS: Of 137,993 women who gave birth, 2741 (2.0%) were exposed to antipsychotics prior to or during pregnancy. We identified six trajectories of antipsychotic use: two involved short-term use of low daily doses prior to pregnancy (51.1%), while three involved long-term use of low (20.9%), moderate (11.0%) and high (2.0%) daily doses throughout pregnancy. One trajectory (15.0%) involved increasing use during pregnancy. Women with long-term use were more likely to have a schizophrenia or bipolar disorder diagnosis, to have used multiple psychotropics and to have a mental health hospitalisation during pregnancy. Overall, women using antipsychotics had elevated rates of adverse birth outcomes compared to unexposed women. Women with the greatest antipsychotic exposure had the highest rates of gestational diabetes and gestational hypertension. CONCLUSION: Women using antipsychotics around pregnancy are heterogeneous, with varying patterns of use and associated birth outcomes, reflecting underlying differences in the indications for treatment and/or severity of illness. This diversity should be considered when developing clinical guidelines and designing safety studies.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Resultado del Embarazo , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Embarazo , Embarazo de Alto Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Records of antidepressant dispensings are often used as a surrogate measure of depression. However, as antidepressants are frequently prescribed for indications other than depression, this is likely to result in misclassification. This study aimed to develop a predictive algorithm that identifies patients using antidepressants for the treatment of depression. METHODS: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) claims data were linked to follow-up questionnaires (completed in 2012-2013) for participants of the 45 and Up Study-a cohort study of residents of New South Wales, Australia, aged 45 years and older. The sample composed participants who were dispensed an antidepressant in the 30 days prior to questionnaire completion (n = 3162). An algorithm based on patient characteristics, pharmaceutical dispensings, and claims for mental health services was built using group-lasso interaction network (glinternet), with self-reported receipt of treatment for depression as the outcome. The predictive performance of the algorithm was assessed via bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: The algorithm composes 15 main effects and 11 interactions, with type of antidepressant dispensed and claims for mental health services the strongest predictors. The ability of the algorithm to discriminate between antidepressant users with and without depression was 0.73. At a predicted probability cut-off of 0.6, specificity was 93.8% and sensitivity was 23.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Using this algorithm with a high probability cut-off yields high specificity and facilitates the exclusion of individuals using antidepressants for indications other than depression, thereby mitigating the risk of confounding by indication when evaluating the outcomes of antidepressant use.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Servicios de Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Farmacoepidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Previous research reported greater risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with first trimester exposure to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in comparison to unexposed pregnancies among non-hypertensive women. We examined the relationship between first trimester exposure to ACEIs and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and maternal and perinatal outcomes, whilst controlling for the underlying hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a population-based cohort study among 130,061 pregnancies resulting in birth in NSW, Australia between 2005 and 2012. Birth data were linked to hospital discharge and pharmaceutical dispensing records. After restricting to women with chronic hypertension, 67 and 73 pregnancies exposed to ACEIs and ARBs respectively during the first trimester were compared with 316 pregnancies exposed to methyldopa. STUDY OUTCOMES: Preterm delivery, caesarean section, low birth weight, small for gestational age and Apgar score <7. RESULTS: Compared to pregnancies exposed to methyldopa, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for ACEI exposure was 0.5 (95% CI: 0.2-1.1) for preterm delivery, 1.6 (0.8-3.1) for caesarean section, 0.6 (0.2-1.3) for LBW and 0.8 (0.4-1.9) for SGA. The corresponding aORs and confidence intervals for ARB exposure were 0.7 (0.3-1.5), 1.2 (0.6-2.6), 1.3 (0.7-2.6), and 1.2 (0.6-2.4). CONCLUSION: No association between early pregnancy exposure to ACEIs and ARBs and perinatal outcomes was observed, however, the possibility of an association cannot be ruled out due to limited power. Nonetheless, this study suggests that the magnitude of risk is smaller than that reported previously.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Metildopa/administración & dosificación , Metildopa/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whether an association between alcohol consumption and periodontitis exists is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between alcohol consumption and periodontitis. METHODS: 7062 adults 30 years or older who participated in 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were included. Alcohol consumption measurement included self-reported average number of alcoholic drinks per week over the previous 12 months and was categorized into four groups (0, < 1, 1- < 8, and ≥8 drinks per week). Participants were categorized using surveillance case definitions for periodontitis that included both clinical attachment level (CAL) and periodontal probing depth (PD) measurements. The association between alcohol consumption and chronic periodontitis was evaluated by multivariable regression analyses adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education level, income-to-poverty ratio, smoking, self-rated overall oral health, and HbA1c . RESULTS: The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of having severe periodontitis was 1.9 (1.2-3) among participants who reported alcohol consumption of ≥8 drinks compared to participants consuming some alcohol but < 1 drink per week on average. Participants who consumed 1- < 8, and ≥8 drinks per week, on average, also had higher mean PD, percentage of sites with PD ≥4 mm, mean CAL, and percentage of sites with CAL ≥3 mm compared to participants reporting consumption of < 1 drink per week. Meanwhile, the odds of having periodontitis, mean PD, extent PD ≥4 mm, mean CAL, and extent CAL ≥3 mm were not significantly different for nondrinkers than for participants who consumed some alcohol but < 1 drink per week on average. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol consumption was associated with an increase in the likelihood of having periodontitis, particularly severe periodontitis. Consumption of some alcohol, < 1 drink per week on average, was associated with similar odds of having periodontitis compared to consumption of no alcohol.
Asunto(s)
Periodontitis Crónica , Encuestas Nutricionales , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , FumarRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study examined the impact of antismoking activities targeting the general population and an advertising campaign targeting smoking during pregnancy on the prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. METHODS: Monthly prevalence of smoking during pregnancy was calculated using linked health records for all pregnancies resulting in a birth (800 619) in NSW from 2003 to 2011. Segmented regression of interrupted time series data assessed the effects of the extension of the ban on smoking in enclosed public places to include licensed premises (evaluated in combination with the mandating of graphic warnings on cigarette packs), television advertisements targeting smoking in the general population, print and online magazine advertisements targeting smoking during pregnancy and increased tobacco tax. Analyses were conducted for all pregnancies, and for the population stratified by maternal age, parity and socioeconomic status. Further analyses adjusted for the effect of the Baby Bonus maternity payment. RESULTS: Prevalence of smoking during pregnancy decreased from 2003 to 2011 overall (0.39% per month), and for all strata examined. For pregnancies overall, none of the evaluated initiatives was associated with a change in the trend of smoking during pregnancy. Significant changes associated with increased tobacco tax and the extension of the smoking ban (in combination with graphic warnings) were found in some strata. CONCLUSIONS: The declining prevalence of smoking during pregnancy between 2003 and 2011, while encouraging, does not appear to be directly related to general population antismoking activities or a pregnancy-specific campaign undertaken in this period.
Asunto(s)
Política Pública , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Publicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Fumar/tendencias , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate compliance with telephone helpline advice to attend an emergency department (ED) and the acuity of patients who presented to ED following a call. DATA SOURCES/COLLECTION METHODS: In New South Wales (NSW), Australia, 2009-2012, all (1.04 million) calls to a telephone triage service, ED presentations, hospital admissions and death registrations, linked using probabilistic data linkage. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based, observational cohort study measuring ED presentations within 24 hours of a call in patients (1) with dispositions to attend ED (compliance) and (2) low-urgency dispositions (self-referral), triage categories on ED presentation. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 66.5 percent of patients were compliant with dispositions to attend an ED. A total of 6.2 percent of patients with low-urgency dispositions self-referred to the ED within 24 hours. After age adjustment, healthdirect compliant patients were significantly less likely (7.8 percent) to receive the least urgent ED triage category compared to the general NSW ED population (16.9 percent). CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based data linkage study provides precise estimates of ED attendance following calls to a telephone triage service and details the predictors of ED attendance. Patients who attend an ED compliant with a healthdirect helpline disposition are significantly less likely than the general ED population to receive the lowest urgency triage category on arrival.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Teléfono , Triaje/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur , Factores de Tiempo , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare dental implant survival rates when placed in native bone and grafted sites. Additionally, risk factors associated with dental implant loss were identified. This study was based on the hypothesis that bone grafting has no effect on implant survival rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients receiving dental implants at the University of Texas, School of Dentistry from 1985 to 2012. Exclusion criteria included patients with genetic diseases, radiation and chemotherapy, or an age less than 18 years. To avoid misclassification bias, implants were excluded if bone grafts were only done at the same time of placement. Data on age, sex, tobacco use, diabetes, osteoporosis, anatomical location of the implant, implant length and width, bone graft, and professional maintenance were collected for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,222 patients with 2,729 implants were included. The cumulative survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 92% and 87% for implants placed in native bone and 90% and 79% for implants placed in grafted bone, respectively. The results from multivariate analysis (Cox regression) indicated no significant difference in survival between the two groups; having maintenance therapy after implant placement reduced the failure rate by 80% (P < .001), and using tobacco increased the failure rate by 2.6-fold (P = .001). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the dental implant survival rate when implants were placed in native bone or bone-grafted sites. Smoking and lack of professional maintenance were significantly related to increased implant loss.