Adverse events in spine surgery: a prospective analysis at a large tertiary center in Germany.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study OBJECTIVES: The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) during surgery is a major cause of increased economic costs, disability, or even death. This study aimed to prospectively identify and quantify AEs in patients undergoing spinal surgery at a neurosurgical tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Patients who underwent spinal surgery and were discharged between January 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled prospectively. Each patient underwent a peer-reviewed AE evaluation at discharge. An AE was defined as any event that occurred up to 30 days postoperatively and resulted in an undesirable outcome. Patients were allocated to four groups according to spinal pathology (degenerative, oncologic, traumatic, and infectious). RESULTS: During the study period, 1778 patients with a mean age of 55.4 ± 10.5 years underwent surgery. Elective surgery was performed in 90.8% (1615/1778) of patients, while emergency surgery was performed in 9.2% (163/1778). The overall rate of surgery-related AEs was relatively low (8.7%). Degenerative pathologies were the most frequent reasons for surgery (78.5%, 1396/1778). Wound infection was the most prevalent AE in patients with degenerative diseases (1.4%), of which 1.1% required revision surgery. Wound infection, dural leakage, and new neurological deficits had the same prevalence (2.1%) in patients with spinal tumors. Among patients with spinal trauma, two presented with postoperative epidural bleeding and underwent emergency surgery. Postoperative wound infection was the most prevalent AE in this group (9.5%), with 7.0% of affected patients requiring revision surgery. The overall rate of non-surgery-related AEs was 4.3%, and the overall mortality rate was low (0.4%). CONCLUSION: AEs in spinal surgery remained low, with a prevalence of 8.7%. Documentation of AEs as part of clinical routine may be a key tool for identifying the occurrence of surgery-related and non-surgery-related AEs.

The use of quantitative pupillometry in patients with pituitary tumors: a technical note.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary tumors may cause compression of the optic chiasm, resulting in decreased visual acuity. Therefore, decompression of the optic chiasm is a major goal of surgical treatment in such patients. Quantitative pupillometry has been used in various clinical settings for assessing the optic system but has not been applied in patients with pituitary tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of this technique to improve treatment modalities in patients undergoing surgical resection of pituitary tumors. METHOD: Pupillometry using the automated NPi 200® Pupillometer was performed in seven patients who underwent surgical resection of large pituitary tumors at the University of Heidelberg in 2018. The neurological pupil index (NPi) was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively, and correlations with visual acuity and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings regarding optic chiasm compression were determined. RESULTS: All patients experienced visual disturbance due to a large pituitary tumor. The NPi was < 4.0 in all patients in at least one pupil. Intraoperative MRI demonstrated successful decompression of the optic chiasm in all cases. Postoperatively, the NPi values increased, and this increase was correlated with improved visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: We found that quantitative pupillometry can detect optic chiasm compression in patients with pituitary tumors. Furthermore, postoperative improvement of NPi values may indicate sufficient decompression of the optic chiasm. Further studies are warranted to substantiate the granularity of this technique to gain valuable information for patients with pituitary tumors who are indicated for surgery.