Predicting the Time to Relapse Following Withdrawal from Different Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis who Responded to Therapy: A 12-Year Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: For patients with psoriasis, discontinuation of biologics following remission has become more common in daily practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify predictors and construct a predictive model for time to relapse following withdrawal from biologics. METHODS: This 12-year, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed in six dermatology centers between February 2011 and February 2024. We identified biological treatment episodes in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and included only treatment episodes in which a clinical response (≥ 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score [PASI 50] from baseline) was achieved and the patient withdrew from biological therapy with a well-controlled status (PASI < 10 and ≥ 50% improvement in PASI from baseline). The primary outcome was time to relapse, which was defined as the period from the last biologic administration to relapse. An extended multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Prentice-Williams-Peterson Gap time model) was used to predict relapse and generate a predictive model. RESULTS: This study screened 1613 biological treatment episodes, and 991 treatment episodes were enrolled. The time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment increased (p < 0.001). Similarly, the time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous biologics used increased (p < 0.001). The maximum PASI improvement during biological treatment decreased and the PASI score at withdrawal of biological treatment increased in parallel as the number of prior withdrawals from biologics increased. The time to relapse following withdrawal was longest for interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors (IL-23i), followed by the IL-12/23i, IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. After adjustment, multivariate Cox regression identified the following significant predictors of relapse following withdrawal: the mechanisms of action of biologics (hazard ratio [HR] for IL-17i vs IL-12/23i, 1.59; HR for IL-23i vs IL-12/23i, 0.60), number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment (HR 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13‒1.33), time to achieve PASI 50 (HR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00‒1.02), maximum PASI improvement on biologics (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.98‒0.99), and PASI at the end of therapy (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01‒1.05). The model had good predictive and discriminative ability. CONCLUSIONS: These results have the potential to help physicians and patients make individualized treatment decisions; information on the risk of relapse of psoriasis at specific timepoints following the withdrawal of biologics is particularly valuable for patients considering discontinuation of biologics or as-needed biologic therapy. However, the benefit and risk of repeated withdrawals of biologics should be carefully weighed, as the treatment efficacy and duration of remission decline as the number of withdrawals increases.

Nodal T-Follicular Helper Cell Lymphoma, Angioimmunoblastic-Type, Diagnosed in a Patient with Psoriasis Following COVID-19 Vaccination under Adalimumab Treatment: A Causal Association?

Biologics have expanded the armamentarium for psoriasis, but there has been a growing concern about the risk of lymphoma in patients under tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor and methotrexate. Besides, the mRNA-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination was known to stimulate the proliferation of T-follicular helper cells. We report a case of a patient with psoriasis under adalimumab developing nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic-type following the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. We suspect that adalimumab, methotrexate, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, previous reactive lymphoid hyperplasia and psoriasis per se predispose our patient to a lymphoma-prone condition, and the two doses of the mRNA vaccine act as the last straw.

Dupilumab improves pruritus and skin lesions in patients with prurigo nodularis: Pooled results from 2 phase 3 trials (LIBERTY-PN PRIME and PRIME2).

Background: Phase 3 PRIME/PRIME2 trials independently demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable safety profile of dupilumab adults with moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis. Objective: To obtain a more precise estimate of onset and magnitude of treatment effect using PRIME/PRIME2 pooled data. Methods: In PRIME/PRIME2, patients were randomized to dupilumab or placebo for 24 weeks. Pooled analysis assessed proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement in itch, clear/almost-clear skin, or both; at weeks 12 and 24; overall and by demographic subgroups and changes from baseline to week 24 in symptoms, signs, and quality of life. Results: Patients receiving dupilumab (n = 153) vs placebo (n = 158) experienced significant improvements in all tested endpoints. At week 24, 90 (58.8%) dupilumab-treated vs 30 (19.0%) placebo-treated patients achieved clinically meaningful improvement in itch, 71 (46.4%) vs 27 (17.1%) clear/almost clear skin, and 54 (35.3%) vs 14 (8.9%) achieved both (P < .0001 for all). Treatment benefits were independent of baseline demographics. Safety to week 36 was generally consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. Limitations: On-treatment data limited to 24 weeks. Conclusions: Pooled analysis confirmed improvements reported in individual trials and revealed earlier effect onset in itch and skin pain. Dupilumab treatment showed benefits across demographics.

Spesolimab Reduces Inflammation in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: Molecular Characterization of Flare Treatment in EFFISAYIL 1.

EFFISAYIL 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled study of spesolimab, an anti-IL-36 receptor antibody, in patients presenting with a generalized pustular psoriasis flare. Treatment with spesolimab led to more rapid pustular and skin clearance versus treatment with placebo in approximately half of the patients. In this study, we present histologic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses of lesional and nonlesional skin and whole-blood samples collected from EFFISAYIL 1. Treatment with spesolimab led to a transition toward a nonlesional profile, with a downregulation of gene expressions in the skin of IL-36 transcripts (IL36α, IL36ß, IL36γ) and those associated with neutrophil recruitment (CXCL1, CXCL6, CXCL8), proinflammatory cytokines (IL6, IL19, IL20), and skin inflammation (DEFB4A, S100A7, S100A8). Changes were manifest at week 1 and sustained to week 8. At the systemic level, reductions in serum biomarkers of inflammation (IL-17, IL-8, IL-6) were sustained until 12 weeks after spesolimab treatment. Considerable overlap was observed in the spesolimab-induced changes in gene and protein expressions from skin and blood samples, demonstrating the molecular basis of the effects of spesolimab on controlling local and systemic inflammation. Data are consistent with the mode of action of spesolimab, whereby inhibition of the IL-36 pathway leads to subsequent reductions in the key local and systemic pathologic events associated with generalized pustular psoriasis flares.

Comparison of Drug-Free Remission after the End of Phase III Trials of Three Different Anti-IL-23 Inhibitors in Psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: Knowing the remission duration after biologics discontinuation in patients with psoriasis is important, especially when disease relapse is defined as the restart of systemic agents, because it also reflects the real-world clinical practice when topical treatment alone is not adequate for disease control, and a systemic treatment, including biologic, is needed. Biologics are currently indicated for patients with psoriasis who are candidates for systemic treatments. METHODS: We included 42 patients who were followed up with regularly after the end of risankizumab, guselkumab and mirikizumab trials and investigated the drug-free remission (DFR). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model were employed to identify the possible risk factors for relapse. RESULTS: Overall, 38/42 (90.5%) patients experienced relapses after discontinuing trial biologics during the follow-up period of at least 96 weeks and up to 227 weeks. In all patients with relapse, the median DFR was 104 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant 1-year drug-free survival (DFS) difference between risankizumab (Z) and guselkumab (T) + mirikizumab (M) (p = 0.0462). A difference in DFS curves was noted when patients were categorized by disease duration > or ≤ 2 years (p = 0.1577) and maintenance of a psoriasis area and severity index score (PASI) of 90 at the end of trials (p = 0.1177). Univariate Cox regression model identified that age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.030 (1.000-1.060), p = 0.0467] and disease duration [HR = 1.046(1.009-1.084), p = 0.0134] were significantly associated with relapse risk. A risk model was established on the basis of multivariable Cox regression results. Risk value = 0.021038 * Age + 0.515628 * Biologic_type (Z = 0,T/M = 1) + 0.025048 * Disease_Duration. The validated patients were divided into two groups by median risk value (1.5). The high-risk group (risk value > 1.5) had a non-significant higher relapse risk than the low-risk group (risk value < 1.5), with a hazard ratio of 1.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-3.23, p = 0.1809]. CONCLUSION: Types of biologics used, disease duration > or ≤ 2 years, and PASI 90 improvement at the end of trial affect the 1-year DFS after biologics discontinuation. Further studies consisting of a larger patient number and longer follow-up period are needed to verify our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02694523, NCT03047395, NCT02207224, NCT02576431, NCT03482011, and NCT03556202.

Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Resource Utilization Study of Patients With Alopecia Areata in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and resource utilization in patients with alopecia areata (AA) in Taiwan using the National Health Insurance Research Database. AA severity was determined by treatment use and diagnostic codes in the year after enrollment (including corticosteroids, systemic immunosuppressants, topical immunotherapy, and phototherapy). METHODS: The cross-sectional analysis was conducted to estimate the incidence and prevalence of AA from 2016 to 2020. For the longitudinal analysis, 2 cohorts were identified: mild/moderate and severe. The cohorts were matched based on age, gender, and comorbidities. Patients were enrolled upon their first claim with an AA diagnosis during the index period of 2017-2018. RESULTS: The number of patients with AA increased from 3221 in 2016 to 3855 in 2020. The longitudinal analysis identified 1808 mild/moderate patients and 452 severe patients. Mild/moderate patients used higher levels of topical corticosteroids (82.41%) than severe patients (73.45%). Conversely, severe patients used more topical nonsteroids (41.81%) and systemic therapies (51.77%) than mild/moderate patients (0.44% and 16.15%, respectively). Oral glucocorticoids use was higher in severe patients (47.57%) relative to mild/moderate patients (14.88%), whereas the use of injectable forms was similar. The most used systemic immunosuppressants were methotrexate, cyclosporin, and azathioprine. Topical immunotherapy utilization decreased with subsequent treatment lines for severe patients. Treatment persistence at 6 months was low for all treatments. Severe patients had higher annual AA-related outpatient visits than the mild/moderate cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need for additional innovations and therapies to address the clinical and economic burden of AA.

International Consensus Definition and Diagnostic Criteria for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis From the International Psoriasis Council.

Importance: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) lacks internationally accepted definitions and diagnostic criteria, impeding timely diagnosis and treatment and hindering cross-regional clinical and epidemiological study comparisons. Objective: To develop an international consensus definition and diagnostic criteria for GPP using the modified Delphi method. Evidence Review: The rarity of GPP presents a challenge in acquiring comprehensive published clinical data necessary for developing standardized definition and criteria. Instead of relying on a literature search, 43 statements that comprehensively addressed the fundamental aspects of the definitions and diagnostic criteria for GPP were formulated based on expert reviews of 64 challenging GPP cases. These statements were presented to a panel of 33 global GPP experts for voting, discussion, and refinements in 2 virtual consensus meetings. Consensus during voting was defined as at least 80% agreement; the definition and diagnostic criteria were accepted by all panelists after voting and in-depth discussion. Findings: In the first and second modified Delphi round, 30 (91%) and 25 (76%) experts participated. In the initial Delphi round, consensus was achieved for 53% of the statements, leading to the approval of 23 statements that were utilized to develop the proposed definitions and diagnostic criteria for GPP. During the second Delphi round, the final definition established was, "Generalized Pustular Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by cutaneous erythema and macroscopically visible sterile pustules." It can occur with or without systemic symptoms, other psoriasis types, and laboratory abnormalities. GPP may manifest as an acute form with widespread pustules or a subacute variant with an annular phenotype. The identified essential criterion was, "Macroscopically visible sterile pustules on erythematous base and not restricted to the acral region or within psoriatic plaques." Conclusions and Relevance: The achievement of international consensus on the definition and diagnostic criteria for GPP underscores the importance of collaboration, innovative methodology, and expert engagement to address rare diseases. Although further validation is needed, these criteria can serve as a reference point for clinicians, researchers, and patients, which may contribute to more accurate diagnosis and improved management of GPP.

Use of biologics in Chinese pregnant patients with deficiency of interleukin-36 receptor antagonist (DITRA): A case series.

OBJECTIVE: Impetigo herpetiformis (IH) is a rare form of pustular psoriasis which may result in maternal and fetal morbidity and even mortality. Deficiency of interleukin-36 receptor antagonist (DITRA) is the most frequently identified genetic defect of IH. Currently there are no biologics approved for IH despite the revolutionary role of biologics in the treatment of plaque and pustular psoriasis. Anecdotal reports of biologics use in DITRA patients with IH are also limited. CASE REPORTS: We present herein a case series of 6 Chinese IH patients harboring IL36RN gene c.115+6T>C mutation during 8 pregnancies, treated with various biologics, including adalimumab, etanercept and secukinumab. CONCLUSION: Most pregnancy courses were uneventful, except for one woman who had recurrent episodes of decreased fetal heart rate variability after adalimumab injections, which subsided after switching to etanercept. The treatment effectiveness and safety demonstrated in our cases suggested the role of biologics for the treatment of IH in patients with DITRA.

Acquired diffuse palmoplantar erythema with keratoderma in Chinese patients with pustular psoriasis: A predictor for IL36 receptor antagonist c.115+6T>C mutation?

Several studies have suggested that mutation of the interleukin 36 receptor antagonist gene (IL36RN) is related to generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP), and the presence of IL36RN mutation may affect the clinical manifestations and treatment responses. However, genetic testing is not routinely available in clinical practice for the diagnosis of GPP. Previously, GPP patients with acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH) were found to have a high percentage of carrying IL36RN mutation. In this study, we reported six patients with pustular psoriasis presenting as diffuse palmoplantar erythema with keratoderma among 60 patients who carried IL36RN mutation. ACH was present in five patients and five patients had acute flare of GPP. This unique presentation may serve as a predictor for IL36RN mutation in patients with pustular psoriasis, similar to ACH.

Drug- or Vaccine-Induced/Aggravated Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Drugs and vaccines have been less studied as inducing or aggravating factors for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) compared with psoriasis. Thus, the present study collected and summarized the publications to date about this issue. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search through the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify all reports on potential drug- and vaccine-related PsA events until 28 February 2023. RESULTS: In total, 179 cases from 79 studies were eligible for study. Drugs commonly reported include coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines (6 cases), bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine (3 cases), interferon (18 cases), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (19 cases), and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (127 cases). Drugs causing psoriasis may also induce or aggravate PsA (6 cases). BDMARD-related PsA mostly occurred in a "paradoxical" setting, in which the bDMARDs approved for the treatment of psoriasis induce or aggravate PsA. The reported latency may be delayed up to 2 years. Peripheral arthritis (82.3%) was the most common manifestation of drug- and vaccine-related PsA, followed by dactylitis (29.1%), enthesitis (23.4%), and spondyloarthritis (17.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Drugs and vaccines may be implicated in the aggravation of PsA. Possible mechanisms include cytokine imbalance, immune dysregulation, or inadequate PsA treatment response compared with psoriasis. Most reports are case based without controls, so more studies are needed to further prove the causality. However, early recognition of factors causing or aggravating PsA is important to prevent the irreversible joint damage.

Clinical advances in biological therapy for generalized pustular psoriasis: a review.

INTRODUCTION: In 2022, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first biologics, intravenous spesolimab, for acute flare of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). The drug works by blocking IL-36 signaling, the key pathway of GPP. Among the known mutations causing GPP, IL36RN mutations are most common, and the presence of IL36RN mutations had been found to affect the clinical manifestations and treatment response of GPP. AREAS COVERED: Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies discussing biologic treatment for GPP with special emphasis on larger studies, pediatric group, pregnant women, and the influence of IL36RN mutation on the effectiveness of biologics. EXPERT OPINION: The approval of spesolimab for GPP flare treatment marks a new era. However, whether spesolimab will be placed as the treatment of choice remains unknown, considering its higher cost, lack of direct comparison with existing biologics, and uncertain effects on co-existing plaque-type psoriasis. However, the demonstration of numerically better efficacy for patients carrying pathogenic IL36RN mutations suggests the role of pharmacogenetics in the choices of GPP treatment. Future randomized studies are warranted to investigate the effectiveness and safety of biologics for GPP in pediatric and pregnant groups.

A Review of Dupilumab-Induced Adverse Events to Dermatologists and the Potential Pathogenesis in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis.

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 antibody, is approved for use in many type 2 inflammatory diseases, including atopic dermatitis. It is generally well tolerated with no need of routine laboratory monitoring. However, several adverse events have been reported during real-world practice and in pivotal trials. We conducted a systematic literature research of the PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases to identify articles recording the clinical manifestation and potential pathogenesis of these adverse events with interests (AEIs) to dermatologists. In total, 547 cases from 134 studies have developed 39 AEIs 1 day to 2.5 years after dupilumab treatment. The most common AEIs are facial and neck dermatitis (299 cases), psoriasis (70 cases), arthralgia (56 cases), alopecia (21 cases), cutaneous T cell lymphoma (19 cases), severe ocular diseases (19 cases), and drug eruption (6 cases). Most of the AEIs recorded in this review resolved or improved after dupilumab discontinuation or the addition of another treatment, whereas 3 of the cases died of severe AEI. The potential pathogenesis included T help type 1 (Th1)/T help type 2 (Th2) imbalance, Th2/T help type 17 (Th17) imbalance, immune reconstitution, hypersensitivity reaction, transient hypereosinophilia related, and Th1 suppression. Clinicians should be alert of these AEIs for timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment.