RESUMEN
X chromosome architecture and integrity are essential for normal ovarian function. Both numerical and structural X chromosome abnormalities play an important role in female infertility. This study aims to determine the types and frequency of X chromosome aberrations detected in women referred for cytogenetic investigation due to reproductive problems. 2936 women (average age: 37.5 years) were enrolled in the present study. Peripheral blood karyotyping was performed by conventional cytogenetic techniques. For each woman, 20 G-banded metaphases were studied and in case of suspected mosaicism, analysis was extended to 100 metaphases. 2588/2936 (88.15%) of women had a normal karyotype (46,XX), while 348/2936 (11.85%) had an abnormal one. Thirty-two women (1.09%) carried autosomal chromosome abnormalities and 316 (10.76%) had X chromosome rearrangements. In 311/2936 women (10.59%) X chromosome numerical aberrations were detected (low-level mosaicism) and in 5/2936 cases (0.17%) X structural abnormalities (two with pericentric inversion, one with Xq deletion and two 45,X mosaics, one with an Xp deletion cell line and the other with isochromosome Xq cell line). Low-level X mosaicism was a common finding in women > 35 years, as compared to younger ones (92.93% vs 7.07%), a finding consistent with loss of chromosome X with ageing. Other X chromosome abnormalities were detected in younger women (32.3 ± 4.13 vs. 41.04 ± 4.5 years). The mean age of women with Turner-like phenotype was 28.75 ± 6.6 years. The study confirms that the incidence of X chromosome abnormalities is increased in women with fertility problems and that karyotype is the gold standard for their identification. Genetic counselling is recommended in these cases to provide information concerning available treatment and fertility options.
RESUMEN
46,XX male sex reversal syndrome is a rare genetic cause of male infertility. We report on two new cases of this syndrome in men presenting with hypogonadism and infertility. Cytogenetic and molecular analysis was performed in both patients. An extensive review of the literature for 46,XX male sex reversal syndrome cases related to infertility was also performed to fully characterise this syndrome. Genetic analyses showed translocation of the SRY on Xp chromosome and complete absence of all Azoospermia factor (AZF) genetic regions. All patients included in the review presented hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. Small testes were the most common clinical characteristic present in 90.2% of the patients, followed by small penis (31.8%), gynecomastia (26.8%) and poor hair distribution (15.4%). The presence of the SRY was identified in 130/154 (84.4%) patients: in 98.5% of cases, it was translocated on the Xp chromosome and in 1.5% on an autosome. All patients were azoospermic, due to the lack of AZF genetic regions. Males with normal phenotype and primary hypogonadism should be properly evaluated by the physicians and must be referred for cytogenetic and molecular analysis to exclude or confirm 46,XX male sex reversal syndrome. More cases of this syndrome with SRY translocated on an autosome are needed to identify if these patients have different characteristics than those with SRY translocated on Xp chromosome. Whole genome analysis of these patients is required to elucidate the genetic differences which are responsible for the phenotypic variability of the syndrome.
