A single centre prospective study of three device-assisted therapies for Parkinson's disease.

Comparative studies assessing outcomes with the three device-assisted therapies could help to individualise treatment for patients living with Parkinson's disease. We designed a single-centre non-randomised prospective observational study assessing the quality of life (QoL), motor and non-motor outcomes at 6 and 12-months in patients treated with subcutaneous apomorphine continuous 16-hours infusion (APO), levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) or subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). In this study, 66 patients were included (13 APO; 19 LCIG; 34 STN-DBS). At baseline, cognitive, non-motor and motor scores were significantly less severe in the STN-DBS group, whereas the LCIG group had a longer disease duration and higher non-motor scores. In the APO group, there were no statistically significant changes in non-motor, motor and QoL scales. The LCIG group had significant changes in QoL and motor scales that were significant after multiple comparison analysis at 6 and 12-months. The STN-DBS group showed improvement in QoL scores and non-motor and motor scores at 6 and 12-months after multiple comparison analysis. In this real-life prospective study, device-assisted therapies showed differences in their effects on QoL and motor and non-motor function at 12-months. However, there were also differences in baseline characteristics of the patient groups that were not based on pre-determined selection criteria. Differences in characteristics of patients offered and/or treatment with different device-assisted therapies may reflect within-centre biases that may, in turn, influence perceptions of treatment efficacy or outcomes. Treatment centres should be aware of this potential confounder when assessing and offering device-assisted treatment options to their patients and potential baseline differences need to be taken into consideration when comparing the results of non-randomised studies.

Nursing and Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review of Worldwide Studies.

This scoping review aims to evaluate the characteristics of worldwide studies evolving the scope of nursing practice in Parkinson's disease (PD). We conducted a three-step search strategy using 11 databases and reference lists. Of the 4,174 screened studies we included 324 (8%). Most were published during 1978 to 2020, with significant increasing in publications from 2002 onwards and a forecast to double in the next 10 years (total expected = 614, ±62.2, R2 = .998). We identified studies involving nine contexts of nursing practice in PD, in four continents and 31 countries, most of them of observational design (47.2%), funded (52.2%), authored by nurses (70.1%), and related to Nursing care/Guidelines (32.1%), Educational/Research content (16.4%), Symptom management/Medication adherence (14.5%), and Family caregiving (11.1%). The worldwide studies evolving the scope of nursing practice in PD is growing in several health context. These results can guide future research and evidence-based practice involving the role of nurses in PD.

24-hour levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel may reduce troublesome dyskinesia in advanced Parkinson's disease.

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is effective for the control of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD). The objective of this study is to report the reduction of dyskinesias after transitioning from 16 to 24-h/day LCIG infusion. From a cohort of 74 PD patients treated with LCIG for motor fluctuations, we identified 12 patients that were treated with 24-h per day infusion with the aim to control troublesome daytime dyskinesia. Clinical, demographic, dyskinesia rating scales were evaluated. Daytime dyskinesia was reduced in 75% (9/12) patients following treatment with 24-h therapy, including 7 who were compared with 16-h therapy and 2 that were transitioned from oral dopaminergic therapy to 24-h LCIG. Combining the data from all 12 subjects, troublesome dyskinesias were reduced during 24-h LCIG; UPDRS 4.1 (time spent with dyskinesias) mean change was -1.5 ± 0.75, p = 0.010 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and UPDRS 4.2 (functional impact of dyskinesias) mean change was -1.7 ± 0.90, p = 0.016, without changing their UPDRS part 3 "ON" scores (p = 0.138) or H&Y (p = 0.157). In 5 patients, improvement in dyskinesia occurred despite an overall increase in the total daily levodopa dose. None of the patients had worsening of dyskinesia after a median follow-up of 28 months. 24-h per day infusion of LCIG may be a useful strategy in the management of troublesome dyskinesias in PD patients with disabling dyskinesias resistant to attempts to optimise 16-hours per day therapy. We postulate that this may be due to a pharmacodynamic as opposed to pharmacokinetic mechanism.

24 h Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel may reduce falls and "unresponsive" freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: We report a prospective, open label study of 24 h levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) as treatment for levodopa "unresponsive" freezing of gait (FOG) associated with Parkinson's disease. METHOD: 5 patients with disabling FOG, documented as being levodopa "unresponsive", were commenced on continuous 24 h infusion LCIG therapy with the night-time rate at 50-80% of the daytime infusion rate. Patients underwent baseline, 3 and 6 month gait assessments, documentation of their falls frequency and completed FOG questionnaires. RESULT: Median 360° turn time improved by 54%, fall frequency score reduced from 3 to 0 at 6 months, FOG questionnaire score improved by 14% and Timed Up- and -Go 8 m walk was unchanged. CONCLUSION: 24 h LCIG therapy may reduce levodopa "unresponsive" FOG and associated falls. A larger prospective study is needed for confirmation.