RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medical complications in peripartum patients are uncommon. Often, these patients are transferred to tertiary care centers, but their conditions and outcomes are not well understood. Our study examined peripartum patients transferred to an intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic quaternary center. METHODS: We reviewed charts of adult, non-trauma, interhospital transfer (IHT) peripartum patients sent to an academic quaternary ICU between January 2017 and December 2021. We conducted a descriptive analysis and used multivariable ordinal regression to examine associations of demographic and clinical factors with ICU length of stay (LOS) and hospital length of stay (HLOS). RESULTS: Of 1,794 IHT peripartum patients, 60 (3.2%) were directly transferred to an ICU. The average was 32 years, with a median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 3 (1-4.25) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of 8 (7-12). Respiratory failure was most common (32%), followed by postpartum hemorrhage (15%) and sepsis (14%). Intubation was required for 24 (41%), and 4 (7%) needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Only 1 (1.7%) died, while 45 (76.3%) were discharged. Median ICU LOS and HLOS were 5 days (212) and 8 days (5-17). High SOFA score was linked to longer HLOS, as was APACHE II. CONCLUSIONS: Transfers of critically ill peripartum patients between hospitals were rare but involved severe medical conditions. Despite this, their outcomes were generally positive. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.
RESUMEN
Objectives: To explore clinician perspectives on the development, utility, and feasibility of a provider-facing point-of-care tool to assist in provision of patient-centered contraceptive care for Latina/x patients in Baltimore, MD. Methods: We conducted 25 semi-structured qualitative interviews with a sample of clinicians who provide contraceptive care to Latina/x patients. An interview guide was developed based on prior research related to patient-centered care and extant point-of-care tools. Transcripts were independently coded by two study team members and analyzed using a directed content analysis approach. Results: Four themes emerged from the data: (1) clinician perception of a need for a tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive care, (2) concern for tool burden and burnout, (3) desire for tool ease of use, and (4) a need for cultural awareness during tool development to avoid bias and typecasting. Conclusions: A provider-facing, point-of-care tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive counseling was acceptable among providers, provided the tool is easy to use and promotes cultural awareness. Innovation: In the current era of more limited reproductive choice across the U.S., the need and support for non-coercive, patient-centered contraceptive care is timely. A provider-facing, point-of-care tool can facilitate the provision of patient-centered care among clinicians proving contraceptive counseling to Latina/s.