Elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A pase II study with weekly cisplatin and gemcitabine.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasing among the elderly. We studied the toxicity and efficacy of a weekly schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients aged 70 years or above with advanced NSCLC were treated in a phase II prospective trial with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 35 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with a median age of 74 years (range 70-78) participated in the study. We observed 14 cases with partial response, 14 with stable disease and 16 with progressive disease, whilst 4 patients were not evaluable. By intention-to-treat analysis, partial response rate was 31.8% whilst progressive disease was 33.3%. Median survival was 9 months; 1-year survival probability was 34.4% and median time to progression was 4 months. Grade III-IV leukopenia was observed in 5/48 patients (10.4%), 20/48 patients (41.7%) had grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and 7/48 patients (14.6%) had grade III-IV anemia. One patient experienced grade III emesis and 2 patients had grade III-IV fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: At this dose and schedule the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin appears to be an active and well-tolerated regimen for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has proven effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six untreated patients with stage IIIB IV NSCLC entered the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 i.v., both given weekly on day 1,8, and 15, followed by one week of rest. RESULTS: Ninety-seven courses (273 weekly administrations) were delivered. The median dose-intensity was 612 mg/m2 per week for gemcitabine (82%) and 21 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin (80%). All 36 of the patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 for response. Partial remissions were observed in 12 patients, for an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 22.5%-57.5%). Most of the partial remissions were seen in IIIB patients (54% of the stage IIIB and 22% of the stage IV patients responded). According to the intent-to-treat principle, the response rate was 33.3% (12 of 36 patients). The median response duration was 9.9 months (range 4-23) and the median survival time 11.8 months (range 1-24). World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4 myelotoxicity was: thrombocytopenia in nine patients (25%), neutropenia in six (16.6%) and anemia in six (16.6%); there was very little additional major toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen appears to be active and to have a favourable toxicity profile.

First line chemotherapy in patients with brain metastases from non-small and small cell lung cancer.

In this study we evaluated the role of systemic chemotherapy in 23 previously untreated patients with brain metastases from both non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In NSCLC group, 2 patients out of 14 had a brain response after treatment (1 complete and 1 partial response). In the group of 9 patients with SCLC, we observed 5 brain responses (3 complete and 2 partial responses). Brain responses were in accordance with extracranial responses although this appeared more clearly in SCLC than in NSCLC patients.

Positive immunostaining with MLuC1 of bone marrow aspirate predicts poor outcome in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunocytochemistry has been proven able to identify tumor cells in bone marrow aspirate (BMA) of patients with SCLC. However, few data exist about the clinical significance of the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 108 BMA taken from 60 patients were incubated with the MoAb MLuC1 (cluster 6) and stained by the APAAP (alkaline phosphatase-antialkaline phosphatase) method. The serum levels of LDH, TPA, NSE and CEA were also studied in relation to bone marrow involvement by means of discriminant analysis. RESULTS: Immunocytochemistry of the aspirate with MLuC1 detected positive cells in 23 patients (38%) (38 of 108 samples) vs. 13% of the conventional biopsies studied without MLuC1 (P < 0.001). With respect to bone marrow positivity, three groups of patients were identified: those with no positive cells in the aspirate and negative biopsy (group A); those with less than 10 positive cells in the aspirate and negative biopsy (group B); and those with more than 10 positive cells or clumps in the aspirate or positive biopsy (group C). Group C patients had poorer median survivals than those in the other two groups (5.5 vs. 11 months, respectively, P = 0.01). Discriminant analysis showed that the four serum markers were poor discriminators of the degree of bone marrow involvement, with only 55% of grouped cases being correctly classified. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that detection of bone marrow involvement i) can be improved by the use of MLuC1 ii) is not predictable by conventional tumor markers, and iii) is related to poor outcome.

A randomized, controlled phase III study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine with etoposide (CAV-E) or teniposide (CAV-T), followed by recombinant interferon-alpha maintenance therapy or observation, in small cell lung carcinoma patients with complete responses.

BACKGROUND: Studies of chemotherapy for patients with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) have shown that teniposide (T) may have higher activity than etoposide (E). In this randomized, controlled Phase III study, the authors compared cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) with E and CAV with T as induction treatments for patients with SCLC. A second objective of the study was to study patients who had achieved complete response (CR). They were considered for a second randomization to maintenance therapy, in which they would receive either recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFN-alpha) or no treatment. METHODS: From June 1990 to December 1995, 140 untreated SCLC patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were stratified by either limited disease (LD) or extensive disease (ED) and randomized to one of two treatment arms. The schedules for both arms included cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2 administered intravenously (i.v.), doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 i.v., and vincristine 2 mg i.v. on Day 1. Arm A (CAV-E) involved the addition of E 100 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 2, 3, and 4; Arm B (CAV-T) involved the addition of T 60 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 2, 3, and 4. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. After 3 courses, patients with LD received chest radiotherapy and 2 additional consolidation courses, whereas patients with ED received 5 consecutive courses only. Patients with CR were considered for the second randomization, which consisted of either maintenance therapy with intramuscular (i.m.) rIFN-alpha-2b, 3 M.U., once a day for 9 months (IFN-alpha arm) or no therapy (control arm). RESULTS: At 5 years from start-up (3-year median observation time and 90% death rate), the study was closed. Results were as follows: 140 patients (71 in Arm A and 69 in Arm B) were eligible for survival analysis; 131 were evaluable for response and toxicity (66 in Arm A and 65 in Arm B), whereas 9 were not (6 early deaths and 3 with protocol violations). Among evaluable patients, 68 showed LD (35 assigned to Arm A and 33 to Arm B); the responses to treatment were 28.5% (10/35) CR and 51% (18/35) partial response (PR) to CAV-E, and 39% (13/33) CR and 39% PR (13/33) to CAV-T. Sixty-three patients showed ED (31 assigned to Arm A and 32 to Arm B); their responses were 22.5% (7/31) CR and 52% (16/31) PR to CAV-E, and 12.5% (4/32) CR and 50% (16/32) PR to CAV-T. Drug-related toxicity was WHO Grade 3-4 myelosuppression in 20% of 292 CAV-E courses and in 27% of 252 CAV-T courses. There were 6 toxic deaths, 1 in Arm A and 5 in Arm B (chi-square = 2.86); 2 patients in Arm A discontinued therapy due to persistent leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. No other remarkable toxicities were observed. Actuarial median survival (MS) was 13.7 months (range, 1.0-62.5 months) for patients with LD receiving CAV-E (Arm A) and 15.2 months (range, 0.5-68.2 months) for those receiving CAV-T (Arm B) (chi-square = 0.89); in patients with ED it was 10.5 months (range, 0.6-30.4 months) and 8.2 months (range, 0.2-24.8 months), respectively (chi-square = 3.42). Overall, MS was 12 months (range, 0.6-62.5 months) in Arm A and 10 months (range, 0.2-68.2 months) in Arm B (chi-square = 0.059). Thirty-nine patients with CR (27.8%) were candidates for the second randomization. Among them, 26 patients (18.5%) complied with the program and were randomized as follows: 14 were assigned to the IFN-alpha arm and 12 to the control arm. Starting from the second randomization, median time to progression was 12 months (range, 3-51 months) for patients in the IFN-alpha arm versus 7 months (range, 1-59 months) for patients in the control arm (chi-square = 0.12). MS was 15 months (range, 5-52.3 months) versus 9 months (range, 2-60.5 months) (chi-square = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show a wide difference in activity and toxicity between CAV-E and CAV-T. The number of patients who entered the second randomization was too small to reach the second study endpoint.

Assessing quality of life in patients with cancer: a comparison of a visual-analogue and a categorical model.

A simple instrument for self-assessment of quality of life (QL) in patients with cancer was elaborated using a linear analogue scale (LAS). The instrument was based on five questions, exploring different functional areas; the same questions were also addressed in a parallel format, where problems were seen from an opposite point of view (positive/negative). The LAS was given to 222 patients, for a total of 372 tests collected. Internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.75); QL score was significantly correlated to parameters of disease. Concordance between scales, as judged by comparison of parallel formats, was statistically significant but poor. A questionnaire was then elaborated with similar items, based on a categorical scale. A direct comparison between LAS and our questionnaire was made on a group of 41 patients. Internal consistency was poor for the LAS (alpha = 0.58) and good for the questionnaire (alpha = 0.93); Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were disappointing for the LAS and good for the questionnaire; the questionnaire was judged reliable in 82.9% of cases, the LAS in 29.3% only; the questionnaire score, and not the LAS score, was significantly correlated with PS and disease status. In conclusion, many patients appeared unable to correctly interpret the visual-analogue scale; the categorical scale was more immediate and correctly understood by the large majority of patients; the correlation between score and important parameters of QL was maintained, and internal consistency was excellent, indicating a satisfactory reliability of this instrument.

Consolidation biochemotherapy for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma responding to induction PVM (cisplatin, vinblastine, mitomycin-C) regimen. A phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated a consolidation biochemotherapy program with subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFN alpha) biologic response modifiers (BRM) in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with responsive or stable disease to induction chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with proven, advanced, previously untreated NSCLC were entered into the study. Induction chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin, 120 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.), on Day 1; vinblastine, 6 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 1; and mitomycin-C, 6 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 1 (PVM), every 3 weeks. Subsequently, patients with complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) received consolidation biochemotherapy with subcutaneous rIL-2, 3 MU/m2 twice/day, and rIFN alpha, 3 MU once/day, 5 days a week, starting 2 weeks after the second PVM course. After 3 and 6 weeks of BRM treatment, patients had a 14-day rest period to intercalate consolidating PVM courses. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled in the trial. After 2 PVM induction courses, 16 patients progressed and went off the study, whereas 61 patients were eligible for consolidation biochemotherapy. Among the 61 patients, 9 were not treated with BRM for several reasons, whereas 52 patients began biochemotherapy and were evaluable for toxicity. Furthermore, a few days after starting BRM, 9 patients discontinued therapy due to side effects; the remaining 43 patients received adequate treatment and were fully evaluable. In the 52 evaluable patients, the following BRM related toxicities were observed: World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2-3 fever in 85% of patients, asthenia in 71%, anorexia in 63%, and flu-like syndrome in 18.5%. PVM-related vomiting was present in 19% of patients. WHO Grade 3-4 myelosuppression, from both BRM and PVM (overlapping toxicity), was anemia in 16% of patients, leukopenia in 12%, and thrombocytopenia in 19%. There were three toxic deaths: two due to BRM-induced hypotension and one from pneumonia. In the 43 fully evaluable patients (23 PR and 20 SD after induction chemotherapy), after a median of 6 weeks of biochemotherapy (range, 3-16 weeks), we observed 5 of 20 patients achieving PR from SD, and 6 of 23 with confirmed PR. In these 11 patients, the median duration of response was 21 weeks (range, 7-80 weeks). Overall response improvement was 11.6% in the 43 patients and 6.4% in the 77 total enrolled patients. Median survival was 41 weeks (range, 15-173 weeks) in the 43 patients and 38 weeks (range, 1.4-173 weeks) in the 77 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, biochemotherapy, when administered by this dose and schedule, did not offer substantial benefit although it caused significant toxicity.

Symptomatic, stage IV, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): response, toxicity, performance status change and symptom relief in patients treated with cisplatin, vinblastine and mitomycin-C.

In a series of 46 symptomatic patients with metastatic, stage IV, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we used a three-drug combination with cisplatin (120 mg/m2), vinblastine (6 mg/m2) and mitomycin-C (6 mg/m2) (PVM), repeated every 3 weeks. After two courses, we observed that none of the patients had achieved a complete response; 33% (15/46) had partial response (95% confidence limits: 19.2-46.8); 39% (18/46), stable disease and 28% (13/46), progressive disease. Median response duration was 14.0 weeks (range, 4-36.7), median time to progression 22.4 weeks (range, 7-44.4), and median survival time 26.4 weeks (range, 1-103). WHO grade III-IV myelotoxicity occurred in 15.2% of the courses administered, affecting 39.5% of patients, and severe nephrotoxicity was observed in 9.3% of patients. No toxic death occurred. The post-treatment KPS score increased in 7 patients with partial response (47%), 4 with stable disease (22%) and 1 with progressive disease (8%), while it decreased in 3 patients with partial response (20%), 3 with stable disease (17%) and 10 with progressive disease (77%). In all, KPS increased in 12/46 cases (26%). However, no statistically significant difference was observed when the KPS score before and after treatment was compared in the total group of patients or when it was compared in the total group of patients or when it was compared in responders and in non-responders. After chemotherapy, there was complete disappearance of at least one symptom in 27.1% of cases and improvement in 27.1%. Overall, major symptom control occurred in 54.3% of cases, with a median palliation time lasting 10 weeks (range, 4-32). Patients with partial remission and stable disease achieved symptomatic palliation in 90% and 55.5% of cases, respectively. When we compared the palliation rate between responders and non-responders, a significant difference was noted (Chi-square test: P < 0.05). Although our schedule did not produce a higher objective response rate and the KPS score was not significantly improved, the symptom palliation appeared worthwhile considering the highly unfavourable prognosis of the patients investigated.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC): a randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine plus etoposide (CAV-E) or teniposide (CAV-T) as induction treatment, followed in complete responders by alpha-interferon or no treatment, as maintenance therapy.

In this phase III, double-random study, we compared CAV-E to CAV-T combination as induction treatment (1st randomization) for SCLC. Subsequently, patients achieving a complete response (CR) were randomized again (2nd randomization) to receive maintenance treatment with alpha-IFN or no treatment. From June 1990 to June 1992, 75 untreated patients were enrolled in this trial. After stratification according to limited disease (LD) or extensive disease (ED), patients were randomized to receive the following treatment: cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2, adriamycin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 2 mg, day 1 i.v., plus etoposide (E) 100 mg/m2 (CAV-E: arm-A) or teniposide (T) 60 mg/m2 on day 2, 3, 4 i.v., every 3 weeks (CAV-T: arm-B). LD patients after 3 cycles of treatment received chest radiotherapy and 2 further cycles, whereas ED patients received 5 consecutive cycles. Patients who achieved a CR entered the 2nd randomization receiving a-IFN (3 x 10(6) I.U., i.m. daily x 9 months) or no treatment. A second-line treatment with carboplatin 300 mg/m2 plus E (if T was initially used) or T (if E was initially used) was also scheduled for patients achieving less than CR to induction treatment. Preliminary results are as follows: 75 patients were randomized, 72 were eligible for survival (arm-A = 37 and arm-B = 35) and 60 were fully evaluable for response (arm-A = 34 and arm-B = 26). In patients with LD the overall response rate was 79% (CR 21%) in arm-A vs 92% (CR 50%) in arm-B. In patients with ED, the overall response rate was 80% (CR 33%) in arm-A vs 84% (CR 7%) in arm-B. At a mean observation time of about 1 year (range 1-25 months), median survival of LD patients was 15 months in arm-A and 13 months in arm-B (Chi-square = 1.55; p > 0.05); in ED patients survival was 10.8 months and 8 months respectively (Chi-square = 2.88; p > 0.05). Cumulative survival probability was identical (12 months) in all patients of both arms. Toxicity was mainly haematologic and gastrointestinal: WHO grade 3-4 myelosuppression and vomiting were observed in 20% and 11% respectively, of cycles delivered in arm-A, compared to 19% and 8%, respectively, of cycles in arm-B. Two septic deaths occurred with CAV-T, while 1 patient discontinued treatment due to persistent myelosuppression with CAV-E. After the first and second-line treatment 20 patients showed a CR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Chemotherapeutic treatment in unresectable nonsmall cell lung-cancer (nsclc) - a further attempt to modulate Cisplatin, vinblastine and mitomycin-C (pvm) schedule.

Searching for a more appropriate PVM (cisplatin, vinblastine and mitomycin-C) schedule against NSCLC, we treated 62 patients with unresectable NSCLC (49 males and 13 females), with the following regimen: high-dose cisplatin, 120 mg/m(2) i.v., day 1; common-dose vinblastine, 6 mg/m(2) i.v., day 1, and low-dose-mitomycin-C, 6 mg/m(2) i.v., day 1, repeated every 3 weeks, until progression or tolerance. Following a minimum of 2 courses, responses, by extent of disease, were as follows: in 16 patients with stage IIIB: 2 CR, 5 PR (total response rate, 44%), 8 SD and 1 PD; in 42 patients with stage IV: no CR, 15 PR (total response rate, 33%), 18 SD and 13 PD. Overall response rate was 35% with (95%) confidence limit range 23%-47%. In all the series, median duration of response was 17 weeks (range, 4-98 wks) and median time to progression 26 weeks (range, 7-111 wks). Drug related toxicity was WHO grade III and IV, leucopenia: in 30% and 11% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 27% and 10% of patients, respectively. Twelve patients (19%) developed severe anemia requiring transfusions. Three out of 5 patients dismissed treatment due to irreversible nephrotoxicity. No pulmonary toxic effect was recorded and no drug related death occurred. Fifty out of 62 patients (81%) received full doses as scheduled and 12 (19%) required cisplatin-dose reduction alone from 30% to 50%. Median duration of survival, in overall patients, was 27 weeks (range, 2-144 wks). Our results were in line with those of literature; this schedule with low-dose mitomycin-C and a single-dose vinblastine per course, seemed well feasible and safe. However, we recommend a cisplatin dose reduction to 80-90 mg/m(2) to optimise this schedule.

Factors influencing response to second-line treatment with teniposide (VM26) in patients with progressive small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Twenty-eight patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), 12 with limited (LD) and 16 with extensive (ED) disease, 22 of them relapsed to first-line treatment and 6 not responsive, were treated with a single-agent second-line treatment consisting of teniposide (VM26) 60 mg/m2, i.v. on days 1 to 5, every three weeks, until progression. After a minimum of two courses, we observed no complete response, 7 (LD/ED = 4/3) partial responses (25%), 4 (LD/ED = 2/2) minor responses (14%), and 17 (LD/ED = 6/11) with no change (61%). Median duration of response (partial plus minor) was 3.5 months (range 1-8). Median duration of survival, from VM26 administration, was in LD 6 months (range 2.5-11), in ED 3 months (range 1.5-6) and in all patients 4 months (1.5-11). Correlating the 11 responses with major prognostic variables present in the patients, we observed that KPS > 70, few initial courses of PL/VP16 and response to first-line treatment were significant determinants for successful salvage treatment. This study suggests the need to consider detailed patient characteristics of exposure to previous treatment before prompting new drug phase II studies on SCLC.

Teniposide as single drug therapy for elderly patients affected by small cell lung cancer.

From January 1987 to December 1990, 26/105 previously untreated patients affected by small cell lung cancer (SCLC), not suitable for intensive SCLC treatment since 19 of them were older than 70 years and 7 suffered from severe chronic diseases, received induction therapy consisting of teniposide alone, 60 mg/m2 on days 1-5, every 3 weeks until disease progression. After a minimum of two courses, 24 patients were evaluable for response: 13 with limited disease (LD) and 11 with extensive disease (ED) (2 patients were unevaluable: 1 early death and 1 protocol violation). Response rate, by disease stage, was: in the 13 LD, 1 complete response (CR), 8 partial responses (PR), 2 minor responses and 2 failures; in the 11 ED, 1 CR, 4 PR and 6 failures. The overall response rate was 58% (14/24) (95% confidence limits = 38-78%), comprising 8% CR and 50% PR. Median duration of response was 7 months (range 2-32). Median overall duration of survival was 9 months (range 1.5-36+). Toxicity was haematological WHO grade III in 13% of courses delivered, whereas no further important side-effects were recorded, excluding alopecia, which was common. Teniposide used alone appeared a safe and effective palliative treatment for poor-risk patients; the major limitation was the low CR rate.

A randomized trial of alternating chemotherapy versus best supportive care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

From April 1985 to September 1988, 128 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial evaluating chemotherapy (arm A) versus best supportive care (arm B). Chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 IV day 1, and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 IV day 1 (CE'P regimen) alternating every 4 weeks with methotrexate 30 mg/m2 IV day 1, etoposide 200 mg/m2 IV day 1, and lomustine (CCNU) 70 mg/m2 orally day 1 (MEC' regimen) until progression. Of the 123 patients (62 treated and 61 controls) eligible for survival, 115 were fully evaluable for response (58 treated and 57 controls). Response rates were 21% partial response, 53% stable disease, and 26% progressive disease in arm A, and 47% stable disease and 53% progressive disease in arm B. Median survival was 34.3 weeks (range, 4.3 to 218.6+ weeks) in arm A versus 21.1 weeks (range, 4.3 to 188.6 weeks) in arm B; the difference was not significant at P = .153 (Mantel-Cox). Subgroups of patients retrospectively analyzed by age, performance status, stage M0/M1, and weight loss or not showed no significant difference in survival. Poor-risk patients (at least two of the following: poor performance status, stage M1, weight loss) of arm A survived significantly longer than poor-risk patients of arm B (23.6 weeks v 12.4 weeks, Mantel-Cox P = .008); a significant difference in survival was also observed between nonsquamous cell patients of arm A and those of arm B (median survival, 38.6 weeks v 16.7 weeks; Mantel-Cox P = .041). Toxicity on the chemotherapy arm was hematologic (World Health Organization [WHO] grade greater than 3) in 12% of CE'P and in 13% of MEC' courses and gastroenteric (WHO grade greater than 3) in 24% of CE'P courses and in 8% of MEC' courses. Our alternating treatment was not significantly superior to supportive care. It is likely that certain subgroups of the NSCLC category may have an advantage with chemotherapy.

Lymphangitic carcinomas of the lung as presentation of prostatic cancer. A case report.

Lymphangitic carcinomatosis of the lung is a late and often fatal manifestation of cancer. We describe a case of a biopsy-proved pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis in an asymptomatic 61-year-old man. The pulmonary picture proved to be the initial sign of a prostatic cancer. Therapy with LH-RH analogues and antiandrogens achieved a complete clearance of lung involvement.

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: no difference in survival rate between exploratory laparotomy and inadequate debulking surgery as treatment approach before chemotherapy.

In this study we have retrospectively evaluated 40 untreated patients with stage III-IV (FIGO) epithelial ovarian cancer. Sixteen patients had received, as initial treatment, inadequate surgical removal of the tumor with bulky residue (BR) of disease and 24 had had an exploratory laparotomy (EL) only. Subsequently, both groups received equivalent chemotherapy consisting of AC combination (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) in 25 patients. Following surgery plus chemotherapy the two groups achieved a similar high remission rate (BR patients: 73% with AC scheme and 80% with PEC scheme; EL patients: 57% with AC and 100% with PEC). Furthermore, when all responsive patients were surgically re-explored, there was a pathologically complete remission in 5/12 BR patients and in 4/10 EL patients. Median survival was 20 months (range 3-50) in BR patients and 16 months (range 3-31) in EL patients. The statistical comparison between the two groups showed no significance; similarly, there was no significant difference in comparing AC-treated with PEC-treated patients. These data show that in poor risk patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma, inadequate surgery with BR is not prognostically superior to EL alone; therefore, chemotherapy as first treatment approach could be a valid alternative to surgery in such cases.

Teniposide (VM26) as second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer.

Twenty-six out of 53 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapsed or progressed following a first treatment (induction plus maintenance), were treated by a second-line chemotherapy consisting of: Teniposide (VM26), 60 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-5, every 3 weeks until further progression. The response rate obtained in 24 evaluable patients was: 7 (29%) partial response, 4 (17%) minor response, 8 stable disease, 5 progressive disease and 2 patients with early death. In the whole group, median survival time from the start of VM26 treatment, was 4 months (range 1-11). These data were compared to the median survival (1.5 months, range 1-7) of the remaining 27 patients, the control group, who at the time of progression did not receive further treatment. The difference between survivals was statistically significant (Log-rank test: p less than 0.05). According to these data VM26 seemed to be active, but larger studies better focused on all clinical variables are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Induction chemo-radiotherapy and maintenance alternating chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer.

Seventy-four patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) entered a program consisting of induction with three courses of CAV (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine) in limited disease or two courses of CAV plus two courses of DDP-VP16 (cisplatin, etoposide) in extensive disease, followed by chest radiotherapy (45 Gy) and prophylactic brain irradiation (30 Gy) in responsive patients. Subsequently, patients with response or stable disease received maintenance therapy by alternating courses of CAV, DDP-VP16 and C'MP (CCNU, methotrexate, procarbazine) during 1 year or until relapse. Sixty-seven patients were evaluable. Among 24 patients with limited disease 7/23 (30%) showed complete response, 15/23 (65%) partial response and 1/23 (5%) stable disease. Among 50 patients with extensive disease 1/44 (2%) showed complete response, 21/44 (48%) partial response, 13/44 (30%) stable disease and 9/44 (20%) progressive disease. Actuarial median survival in all patients was 8 months, in responders 11 months, and in failures (stable plus progressive patients) 4 months. Median survival was 11 months in limited disease patients and 7 months in extensive disease patients. Six patients became long-term survivors (8%). Despite the maintenance therapy with three different alternating chemotherapy regimens, our results were not superior to those obtained by more conventional chemotherapy.

Etoposide and mitomycin-C in pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Twenty-five patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression after prior chemotherapy +/- hormonotherapy were treated with etoposide 50 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 to 5 every 21 days and mitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 every 42 days. A partial response (PR) occurred in 10 patients with an overall response rate of 40% (47% when only the 21 patients evaluable after 3 courses or more were considered). The median duration of PR was 10.5 months (range 3-31). The soft tissue metastatic sites were the most responsive. Toxicity was mild.

Phase II trial with alternating two drug schedules, CAP/MEC', for advanced (stage III Mo/M1) non-small-cell lung cancer.

Sixty-eight evaluable patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (48), large cell carcinoma (2) and adenocarcinoma (18) of the lung were treated with a six-drug regimen delivering two monthly alternated combinations. The combinations were cisplatin, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (CAP) and methotrexate, etoposide and CCNU (MEC'). Following a minimum of two courses, the overall response rate was 22% (confidence limits, 12% to 32%) (15/68, 2 complete responses and 13 partial responses); 47% (32/68) had stable disease and 31% (21/68) had progressive disease. The responses lasted a median of 3 months (range, 1-15 months). The actuarial median survival was 11 months in responsive patients, 10 months in stable disease patients, and 5 months in progressive patients. The overall median survival obtained was 9 months (range, 2-28+ months). Toxicity was minimal, and subjective tolerance of the treatment appeared good. However, this alternating program did not improve response rate or survival.