Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Small Choroidal Melanocytic Lesions.

PURPOSE: To determine the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with indeterminate small choroidal melanocytic lesions (SCMLs). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven patients with choroidal melanocytic lesions 2.5 mm or less in tumor thickness and ≤ 10 mm in largest basal diameter (LBD). METHODS: Blood samples were analyzed for CTCs and the presence of monosomy-3 (M3) in CTCs. Tissue biopsy was performed in the patients who were CTC-positive (pCTC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence and M3 status of the CTCs with regard to the clinical characteristics and results from tissue biopsy. RESULTS: Median thickness of all (n = 47) lesions was 1.1 mm (range: 0.2-2.5 mm), and LBD was 5.6 mm (range: 2.0-10.0 mm). Circulating tumor cells were found in 25 patients (n = 25). This group was classified as pCTC and compared with the CTC-negative (nCTC) group consisting of 22 patients (n = 22). Median tumor dimensions in the pCTC versus the nCTC group were 1.6 mm (range: 0.6-2.5 mm) versus 0.5 mm (range: 0.2-2.5 mm) for thickness and 6.6 mm (range: 4.1-10.0 mm) versus 4.0 mm (range: 2.0-8.0 mm) for LBD, respectively. Both LBD and thickness were positively associated (P < 0.001) with the presence of CTC. Compared with the nCTC group, a higher percentage of the pCTC group exhibited LBD > 5 mm (36% vs. 88%), subretinal fluid (9.1% vs. 56%), orange pigment (4.5% vs. 60%), sonographic hollowness (9.1% vs. 60%), and the presence of multiple risk factors (0% vs. 68% for ≥3 factors) with P < 0.001 for all parameters. No significant difference was detected in the clinical parameters of the patients who had disomy-3 (D3) (n = 7) versus M3 (n = 17) in their CTC. The tissue biopsy confirmed the uveal melanoma (UM) in 22 of the 25 pCTC patients (88%), whereas no conclusive diagnosis could be determined in the remaining 3 cases because of insufficient or invalid material. CONCLUSIONS: We report compelling evidence for the potential of liquid biopsy as an additional tool to screen SCMLs for malignancy. These findings pave the way toward the implementation of liquid biopsy to detect small UM and monitor melanocytic lesions. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

[Uveal melanoma : Early detection as the key to successful personalized medicine]. / Uveales Melanom : Früherkennung als Schlüssel einer erfolgreichen personalisierten Medizin.

BACKGROUND: Personalized medicine in the oncological care of patients aims to ensure the best possible outcome for patients by tailoring the diagnostics and treatment to the individual. This goal also applies to patients with uveal melanoma (UM). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to define the present and future potential of personalized medicine and maximize its benefits in patients with UM. METHODS: This article gives an overview of current theranostics for UM and describes a recent paradigm shift in diagnostics and the potential impact of new therapeutic developments. RESULTS: Treatment is initiated when the diagnosis of UM is histologically confirmed or is very probable based on clinical characteristics. Current treatment concepts are primarily influenced by various factors, such as the anatomical features of the primary tumor, situation of the contralateral eye and also the age, health status and wishes of the patient. The current treatment and control of the primary tumor are very successful but they have little influence on the development of metastases and life expectation. The life expectation of the patient essentially depends on the timing of the diagnosis and treatment of the UM. The liquid biopsy is a new diagnostic tool that supports an early decision for a more invasive diagnostic procedure or treatment. Molecular biological techniques enable a risk stratification and provide a foundation for decision making for neoadjuvant forms of treatment. CONCLUSION: The present concept of personalized medicine for UM is restricted to the treatment of the primary tumor. New diagnostic options, such as liquid biopsy and molecular genetic investigations help to acquire a better understanding of the mechanisms involved and provide the foundation for precision medicine in the development of further personalized treatment concepts.

Toxicity testing of the VEGF inhibitors bevacizumab, ranibizumab and pegaptanib in rats both with and without prior retinal ganglion cell damage.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of intravitreally introduced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in rat eyes with healthy retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and into others with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced RGC damage. METHODS: Bevacizumab, ranibizumab and pegaptanib were intravitreally injected each at two different concentrations. Respective vehicles of the three substances served as controls. In a different group, additionally a rat anti-VEGF antibody was injected after NMDA treatment. Retrogradely labelled RGC were counted on retinal wholemounts 1 week or 2 months after intravitreal introduction of the VEGF inhibitors. Electron microscopy (EM) was performed on normal rat eyes 2 months after introduction of the VEGF inhibitors. RESULTS: RGC counts in healthy rat eyes were essentially unchanged from those of the control animals after the administration of both low and high concentrations of bevacizumab, ranibizumab or pegaptanib. Compared to the other two substances, however, high doses of pegaptanib and its respective vehicle significantly decreased RGC after 1 week and led to a marked increase of mitochondrial swelling in EM. In eyes with NMDA-induced RGC damage, no changes of RGC numbers were detected after rat anti-VEGF antibody or bevacizumab, ranibizumab and pegaptanib at both tested concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Even at higher doses, bevacizumab and ranibizumab showed no toxic effects on RGC in vivo in either untreated rats or in the NMDA-induced RGC damage model. Also a rat anti-VEGF antibody showed no adverse effects after NMDA. Anti-VEGF therapy therefore appears safe even for eyes with additional excitotoxic RGC damage. Potential harm from the pegaptanib carrier solution at very high local concentrations cannot be excluded.