RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of reinsertion of the stylet after a spinal anesthesia procedure on the Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH). METHODS: We have enrolled into this study 630 patients who were undergoing elective operations with spinal anesthesia and randomized them to Group A (stylet replacement before needle removal) and Group B (needle removal without stylet replacement). These patients were observed for the duration of 24 hours in the hospital and they were checked for PDPH on the 3rd and the 7th day of the study. RESULTS: Overall, the PDPH incidence was at 10.8% (68 patients). Thirty-three of these patients (10.5%) who were in Group A (stylet replacement before needle removal) and the other 35 patients (11.1%) who were in Group B (needle removal without stylet replacement) experienced PDPH. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the PDPH. CONCLUSIONS: In contrary to the diagnostic lumbar puncture, reinsertion of the stylet after spinal anesthesia with 25-gauge Quincke needles does not reduce the incidence of PDPH.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Anestesia Raquidea/instrumentación , Cefalea Pospunción de la Duramadre/epidemiología , Cefalea Pospunción de la Duramadre/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Este estudo foi conduzido para investigar os efeitos da reinserção do estilete em cefaleia pós-punção dural (CPPD) após raquianestesia. MÉTODOS: Foram selecionados para este estudo 630 pacientes submetidos a cirurgia eletiva com raquianestesia. Os pacientes foram randomicamente designados para dois grupos: Grupo A (reinserção do estilete antes da retirada da agulha) e Grupo B (retirada da agulha sem reinserção do estilete). Os pacientes foram observados durante 24 horas no hospital e avaliados quanto à CPPD no terceiro e sétimo dias do estudo. RESULTADOS: No geral, a incidência da CPPD foi de 10,8% (68 pacientes). Trinta e três desses pacientes (10,5%) que estavam no Grupo A e 35 (11,1%) no grupo B tiveram CPPD. Não houve diferença significativa entre os dois grupos em relação à CPPD. CONCLUSÕES: Ao contrário da punção lombar diagnóstica, a reinserção do estilete após raquianestesia com agulhas tipo Quincke de calibre 25 não reduz a incidência de CPPD.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of reinsertion of the stylet after a spinal anesthesia procedure on the Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH). METHODS: We have enrolled into this study 630 patients who were undergoing elective operations with spinal anesthesia and randomized them to Group A (stylet replacement before needle removal) and Group B (needle removal without stylet replacement). These patients were observed for the duration of 24 hours in the hospital and they were checked for PDPH on the 3rd and the 7th day of the study. RESULTS: Overall, the PDPH incidence was at 10.8% (68 patients). Thirty-three of these patients (10.5%) who were in Group A (stylet replacement before needle removal) and the other 35 patients (11.1%) who were in Group B (needle removal without stylet replacement) experienced PDPH. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the PDPH. CONCLUSIONS: In contrary to the diagnostic lumbar puncture, reinsertion of the stylet after spinal anesthesia with 25-gauge Quincke needles does not reduce the incidence of PDPH.
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Este estudio fue hecho para investigar los efectos de la reinserción del estilete en la cefalea pos punción dural (CPPD) después de la raquianestesia. MÉTODOS: Un total de 639 pacientes sometidos a la cirugía electiva con raquianestesia se seleccionaron para este estudio. Los pacientes fueron aleatoriamente designados para dos grupos: Grupo A (reinserción del estilete antes de la retirada de la aguja) y Grupo B (retirada de la aguja sin la reinserción del estilete). Los pacientes fueron observados durante 24 horas en el hospital y evaluados CPPD en el tercero y en el séptimo día del estudio. RESULTADOS: En general, la incidencia de CPPD fue de un 10,8% (68 pacientes). Treinta y tres de ellos (10,5%) que estaban en el Grupo A (reinserción del estilete antes de la retirada de la aguja) y 35 (11,1%) en el grupo B (retirada de la aguja sin la reinserción del estilete) tuvieron CPPD. No hubo diferencia significativa entre los dos grupos con relación a la CPPD. CONCLUSIONES: Al contrario de la punción lumbar diagnóstica, la reinserción del estilete posterior a la raquianestesia con agujas tipo Quincke de calibre 25 no reduce la incidencia de CPPD.
Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Anestesia Raquidea/instrumentación , Cefalea Pospunción de la Duramadre/epidemiología , Cefalea Pospunción de la Duramadre/etiología , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of reinsertion of the stylet after a spinal anesthesia procedure on the Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) METHODS: We have enrolled into this study 630 patients who were undergoing elective operations with spinal anesthesia and randomized them to Group A (stylet replacement before needle removal) and Group B (needle removal without stylet replacement). These patients were observed for the duration of 24 hours in the hospital and they were checked for PDPH on the 3(rd) and the 7(th) day of the study. RESULTS: Overall, the PDPH incidence was at 10.8% (68 patients). Thirty-three of these patients (10.5%) who were in Group A (stylet replacement before needle removal) and the other 35 patients (11.1%) who were in Group B (needle removal without stylet replacement) experienced PDPH. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the PDPH. CONCLUSIONS: In contrary to the diagnostic lumbar puncture, reinsertion of the stylet after spinal anesthesia with 25-gauge Quincke needles does not reduce the incidence of PDPH.