Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 79(8): 1672-1682, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524327

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the potential bone regeneration capacity of combining melatonin and simvastatin, with a goal of producing more osteogenic bone substitutes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into 4 groups. The following were administered into critical-sized calvarial defects of the rats: Group I-human allograft; Group II-human allograft + 10 mg melatonin; Group III-human allograft + 0.1 mg simvastatin; and Group IV-human allograft + 10 mg melatonin + 0.1 mg simvastatin. Histopathologic, histomorphometric, and microcomputed tomographic evaluations were performed postprocedurally at 4 and 8 weeks. A P value < .05 was considered significant for all evaluations. RESULTS: Groups II and III had significantly superior regeneration compared to Group I at weeks 4 and 8. Group III had significantly superior regeneration compared to Group II, particularly in week 4. Group IV had significantly superior regeneration compared to all groups at week 8. CONCLUSIONS: The local administration of melatonin and simvastatin resulted in increased new bone mass and quality of bone microstructure than was seen in the control group. Simvastatin shortened the defect regeneration time more effectively than melatonin did. The combined use of melatonin and simvastatin provided a synergic effect on bone regeneration, particularly in the late phase of healing.


Asunto(s)
Sustitutos de Huesos , Melatonina , Animales , Regeneración Ósea , Masculino , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Simvastatina/farmacología , Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cráneo/cirugía
2.
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 46(2): 125-132, 2020 04 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32364352

RESUMEN

Objectives: The requirement for overnight hospital stay should be considered preoperatively according to patient-related factors, type of surgery, and anesthetic management plan. In this study, we aimed to define the major factors that influence consideration of overnight hospital stay in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial (OMF) surgery in an operating room (OR) of a dental hospital in an outpatient setting. Materials and Methods: The records of patients who underwent oral procedures under general anesthesia between 2014-2017 were reviewed. Results: A total of 821 patients underwent oral procedures under general anesthesia; 631 of them underwent OMF surgery in the OR of a dental hospital, and 174 of these patients were hospitalized for overnight stay. There was no significant difference in the number of patients with comorbidities between the outpatient and hospitalized patient groups (P=0.389). The duration of surgery was longer in the hospitalized patient group (105.25±57.48 vs 189.62±82.03 minutes; P<0.001). Double-jaw (n=15; 310.00±54.21 minutes) and iliac crest grafting surgeries (n=59; 211.86±61.02 minutes) had the longest durations. Patients who underwent iliac crest grafting had the highest rates of hospitalization (79%). The overall recovery period was longer in outpatients (119.40±41.60 vs 149.83±52.04; P<0.001). Conclusion: Duration of surgery was the main determinant in considering whether a patient required overnight hospital stay. However, patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology physical status score <3 may be scheduled for OMF surgery in the OR of a dental hospital in an outpatient setting regardless of duration of surgery if overnight hospital stay is planned or an extended recovery period is provided until patients meet the discharge criteria.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...