RESUMEN
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the standard of care but new guidelines have approved the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). By conducting an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of NOAC versus LMWH in cancer patients, we aim to determine an ideal strategy for the prophylaxis of VTE and prevention of VTE recurrence. Three databases were searched from inception until 19 October 2022. IPD was reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves. Shared frailty, stratified Cox and Royston-Parmar models were fit to compare the outcomes of venous thromboembolism recurrence and major bleeding. For studies without Kaplan-Meier curves, aggregate data meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. Eleven RCTs involving 4844 patients were included. Aggregate data meta-analysis showed that administering NOACs led to a significantly lower risk of recurrent VTE (RR = 0.65; 95%CI: 0.50-0.84) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (RR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.40-0.90). In the IPD meta-analysis, NOAC when compared with LMWH has an HR of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.49-0.86) for VTE recurrence. Stratified Cox and Royston-Parmar models demonstrated similar results. In reducing risks of recurrent VTE and DVT among cancer patients, NOACs are superior to LMWHs without increased major bleeding.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Cancer therapies including trastuzumab and anthracyclines are cardiotoxic and cause cardiac dysfunction. To prevent cardiotoxicity, pharmacological agents used in heart failure have been administered concomitantly with cardiotoxic cancer therapy, but few studies to date have performed a head-to-head comparison of these different agents. This systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials aims to evaluate the efficacy of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers, namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), aldosterone receptor blockers (ARBs), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), in primary prevention against chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction in patients receiving anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in major web databases for studies from inception to 15 September 2022. A Bayesian network meta-analysis model was used to assess the relative effects of competing treatments on the primary outcomes of risk of significant decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mean LVEF decline. Secondary outcomes included left ventricular diastolic function, global longitudinal strain, and cardiac biomarkers. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022357980. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Nineteen studies reported the effects of 13 interventions (N = 1905 patients). Only enalapril (RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00-0.20) was associated with reduced risk of patients developing significant decline in LVEF relative to placebo. Subgroup analysis showed that the beneficial effect of enalapril was driven by protection against anthracycline-associated toxicity. In addition, no RAAS-inhibiting agents showed efficacy in protection against treatment with both anthracycline and trastuzumab. The use of RAAS inhibition therapy did not conclusively impact on other markers of cardiac function, including left ventricular diastolic function and cardiac biomarkers.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anthracyclines form the backbone of many systemic chemotherapy regimens but are accompanied by dose-limiting cardiotoxicity. We elucidate the progression and severity of cardiac function over time, in the absence of cardioprotection, which less is known about. METHODS: This PRISMA-guideline-adherent review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022373496). RESULTS: 26 studies met the eligibility criteria including a total of 910 patients. The overall reduction in post-anthracycline pooled mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in placebo arms of the included randomised-controlled trials was 4.5% (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.4). The trend in LVEF showed a progressive decline until approximately 180 days, after which there was no significant change. Those receiving a cumulative anthracycline dose of 300 mg/m2 experienced a more profound reduction. The overall pooled risk of a 10% absolute decline in LVEF from baseline, or a decline to an LVEF below 50%, was 17% (95% CI: 11 to 24; I2 = 71%). Sensitivity analyses of baseline LVEF and trastuzumab treatment status did not yield significant differences. CONCLUSION: While the mean LVEF decline in patients without cardioprotective therapy was clinically small, a vulnerable subset experienced significant impairment. Further research to best identify those who benefit most from cardioprotective therapies when receiving anthracyclines is required.
