RESUMEN
CASE: We present the case of a 54-year-old man who underwent elective hip disarticulation complicated by third-degree burn of the left antecubital fossa requiring skin graft. After careful review, it was determined that "antenna coupling" as a result of electrosurgery was the likely cause. We present an experiment demonstrating this phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Antenna coupling is a real but rare cause of intraoperative burns not previously described in the orthopaedic literature. Care should be taken to avoid coiling or running bovie or other electrosurgical device cords with other metallic cords or corded devices.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quemaduras/etiología , Electrocirugia/efectos adversos , Piel , Trasplante de PielRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The orthoplastic approach to patient care has changed the way patients with a wide variety of lower extremity pathology are treated. Through a systematic review, we aim to analyze outcomes in adult patients with lower extremity soft tissue sarcomas who undergo an orthoplastic flap management approach to their care. METHODS: A systematic review of adult lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma excision with plastic surgery flap reconstruction was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines searching the Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 2023. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening, and full-text review, 26 articles were accepted for inclusion. The total mean follow-up duration was 32.0 ± 24.3 months. Reconstruction used microvascular free flaps in 65.5% (487/743), while 34.5% (256/743) were local flaps. 85.8% (307/358) of patients ambulated postoperatively. Revision surgery was required in 21% of patients during their respective follow-up periods. The limb salvage rate was 93.4% (958/1,026). Among pooled surgical outcomes, 22.2% (225/1,012) of patients experienced a perioperative complication. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates that although complication rates in lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma reconstruction may be further optimized, a multidisciplinary flap reconstructive approach provides high rates of limb salvage and functional postoperative ambulation.
Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Sarcoma , Humanos , Sarcoma/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Adulto , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Colgajos Tisulares Libres , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Identifying ways to improve equitable access to healthcare is of the utmost important. In this study, we analyzed whether patient race was negatively associated with surgical start times for total joint arthroplasties (TJA). METHODS: The surgical case order and start times of all primary TJAs performed at a large academic medical center between May 2014 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if > 21, had a documented self-reported race, and were operated on by an arthroplasty fellowship-trained surgeon. Operations were categorized as first-start, early (7:00 AM-11:00 AM), mid-day (11:00 AM-3:00 PM), or late (after 3:00 PM). Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed, and odds ratios (OR) were calculated. RESULTS: This study identified 1663 TJAs-871 total knee (TKA) and 792 total hip arthroplasties (THA) who met inclusion criteria. Overall, there was no association between race and surgical start time. Upon sub-analysis by surgical type, this held true for TKA patients, but self-identifying Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients undergoing THA were more likely to have later surgical start times (ORs: 2.08 and 1.88; p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Although there was no association between race and overall TJA surgical start times, patients with marginalized racial and ethnic identities were more likely to undergo elective THA later in the surgical day. Surgeons should be aware of potential implicit bias when determining case order to potentially prevent adverse outcomes due to staff fatigue or lack of proper resources later in the day.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Racismo , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Cirujanos Ortopédicos , Humanos , Microagresión , Grupos Raciales , Negro o AfroamericanoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have highlighted the association between insurance status and poor outcomes after surgical treatment of sarcomas in the United States.1-3 It is unclear how much of this disparity is mediated by confounding factors such as medical comorbidities and socioeconomic status and how much can be explained by barriers to care caused by insurance status. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linkage data were procured for 7,056 patients undergoing treatment for bone and soft-tissue sarcomas in the extremities diagnosed between 2006 and 2013. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the relative contributions of insurance status, medical comorbidities, tumor factors, treatment characteristics, and other demographic factors (race, household income, education level, and urban/rural status) to overall survival. RESULTS: Patients with Medicaid insurance had a 28% higher mortality rate over the period studied, compared with patients with private insurance (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.60, P = 0.026), even when accounting for all other confounding variables. The 28% higher mortality rate associated with having Medicaid insurance was equivalent to being approximately 10 years older at the time of diagnosis or having a Charlson comorbidity index of 4 rather than zero (hazard ratio, 1.27). DISCUSSION: Insurance status is an independent predictor of mortality from sarcoma, with 28% higher mortality in those with pre-expansion Medicaid.4,5 This association between insurance status and higher mortality held true even when accounting for numerous other confounding factors. Additional study is necessary into the mechanism for this healthcare disparity for the uninsured and underinsured, as well as strategies to resolve this inequality.
Asunto(s)
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Adulto , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Medicare , Sarcoma/terapia , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Cobertura del Seguro , Extremidades , Pelvis , Seguro de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The complexity of sarcoma surgery often justifies surgical assistants of higher levels of academic training: senior residents, fellows, or co-surgeons. The association between the level of training of assistants and outcomes of these procedures has yet to be studied. METHODS: The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes comprising the "core" procedures for musculoskeletal oncology fellowships were gathered. After CPTs primarily capturing nononcologic procedures were excluded, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to find procedures with these CPTs. The severity of complications was assessed using the Severity Weighting of Postoperative Adverse Events in Orthopedic Surgery (SWORD) score. Resident/fellow presence was analyzed both as a binary variable and stratified by level of training. RESULTS: In 159 cases meeting inclusion criteria, higher-level assistants were associated with increased rate of any complication (p=0.006) and greater need for transfusion (p=0.001) but also tended to be used in cases of longer duration (p=0.001) and with higher total work relative value units (wRVUs) (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that while higher-wRVU procedures persisted as an independent predictor of increased complications (OR 1.028 per RVU unit, p=0.002), neither the presence nor level of training of assistants had an independent effect on complication rates. Other independent predictors of 30-day complications were treatment comorbidity (OR 3.433, p=0.010) and lower extremity location of the tumor (OR 4.393, p=0.006). Severity of complications did not differ between any of the groups on either univariate or multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees of higher levels of academic training tend to be present for longer, higher-complexity musculoskeletal oncology cases, but the overall severity of complications from these do not significantly differ from lower-risk cases without trainees. Orthopedic oncologists may reassure patients that the presence of trainees and co-surgeons is not only safe but it may also help reduce the severity of complications in more complex procedures.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Fragility Index (FI) and the Fragility Quotient (FQ) are powerful statistical tools that can aid clinicians in assessing clinical trial results. The purpose of this study was to use the FI and FQ to evaluate the statistical robustness of widely cited surgical clinical trials in orthopaedic trauma. METHODS: We performed a PubMed search for orthopaedic trauma clinical trials in high-impact orthopaedics-focused journals and calculated the FI and FQ for all identified dichotomous, categorical outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 128 studies with 545 outcomes. The median FI was 5, and the median FQ was 0.0482. For statistically significant and not statistically significant outcomes, the median FIs were 3 and 5, and the mean FQs were 0.0323 and 0.0526, respectively. The FI was greater than the number of patients lost to follow-up in most outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The orthopaedic trauma literature is of equal or higher quality than research in other orthopaedic subspecialties, suggesting that other orthopaedic subspecialties may benefit from modeling their clinical trials after those in orthopaedic trauma.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , HumanosRESUMEN
CASE: A 57-year-old man presenting with two months of insidious shoulder pain was found to have a large thoracic chondrosarcoma invading the spinal canal. The patient's orthopedic oncologist organized an interdisciplinary team including interventional radiology, thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, and plastic surgery. This allowed safe, en bloc tumor resection. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by COVID-19 pneumonia, which was rapidly identified and medically managed with full recovery. CONCLUSION: Postoperative COVID-19 pneumonia can present insidiously and mimic other postoperative complications. Early identification and testing can promote rapid isolation, proper personal protective equipment use, and guide outcome-improving treatments.
RESUMEN
The fragility index (FI) is a powerful tool that can be used to assess the statistical strength of a study outcome. This metric is defined as the number of patients who would need to have an alternative outcome to convert a clinical trial result from statistically significant to not statistically significant, or vice versa. No studies to date have used the FI to evaluate surgical and procedural clinical trials in the orthopaedic oncology literature. The primary purpose of this study was to use the FI to evaluate the statistical strength of widely cited surgical and procedural clinical trials in orthopaedic oncology. Methods: We performed a PubMed search for orthopaedic oncology clinical trials in high impact orthopaedics-focused, oncology-focused, and general medicine journals. For each study included in this analysis, we calculated the FI for all identified dichotomous, categorical outcomes. Results: We identified 23 studies with 48 outcomes. Twelve of these outcomes were statistically significant, with a median FI of two. Nine studies addressed the number of patients lost to follow up, and the FI was less than the number of patients lost to follow up for most outcomes (60%) in these studies. Conclusions: The orthopaedic oncology literature has substantial statistical fragility, likely explained by a high number of patients lost to follow up and small sample sizes. More multicenter, cooperative studies are necessary to increases the robustness of clinical research in orthopaedic oncology.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Humanos , Neoplasias/cirugía , Proyectos de Investigación , Tamaño de la MuestraRESUMEN
CASE: A 26-year-old woman developed a painful enlarging mass in her left leg over the course of 4 years. Marginal resection and local adjuvant therapy was undertaken, and pathology confirmed the mass to be an apocrine hidrocystoma. CONCLUSION: Giant apocrine hidrocystomas with osseous involvement outside of the head and neck are extremely rare. Although these tumors have a low recurrence rate, this case presents a single giant apocrine hidrocystoma that recurred and was successfully treated.
Asunto(s)
Glándulas Apocrinas/patología , Hidrocistoma/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Sudoríparas/patología , Adulto , Femenino , Hidrocistoma/cirugía , Humanos , Pierna , Reoperación , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Sudoríparas/cirugíaRESUMEN
CASE: A 78-year-old woman who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for proximal humerus fracture developed a Type-3 acromial stress fracture, resulting in increased pain and decreased function 9 months post-op. She was managed nonoperatively with adjunctive teriparatide (FORTEO), and after a 4-month course, she had regained excellent motion and achieved union. CONCLUSION: Teriparatide is a viable adjunct in treating patients nonoperatively with acromial stress fractures after RTSA.
Asunto(s)
Acromion/lesiones , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Fracturas por Estrés/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Teriparatido/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/métodos , Femenino , Fracturas por Estrés/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Radiografía , Fracturas del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common complications after surgeries involving musculoskeletal tumors, but we know little about SSI risk factors unique to orthopaedic oncology. A greater understanding of these factors will help risk-stratify patients and guide surgical decision-making. METHODS: A retrospective review at a single-institution identified 757 procedures done on 624 over 6 years. The patients had a preoperative diagnosis of a malignant or potentially malignant neoplasm of the bone or soft tissues. Patient-specific and procedure-specific variables and diagnosis of SSI were recorded for each case. Data were analyzed through univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, significant patient-specific risk factors for SSI included malignancy (P < 0.001), smoking history (P = 0.041), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Score (P = 0.002). Significant procedure-specific risk factors for SSI on univariate analysis included surgery time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), blood transfusion volume (P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), neoadjuvant radiation therapy (P < 0.001), inpatient surgery (P < 0.001), and number of previous surgeries within the study period (P < 0.001). The two factors that independently predicted risk of SSI when controlling for all other variables in a multiple logistic regression were whether the surgery was done on an inpatient basis (P = 0.005) and the number of previous surgeries done on the same site (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a number of risk factors that correlate markedly with SSI after orthopaedic oncology surgery. The surgeon can use these risk factors to aid in surgical decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Ortopedia , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several recently published population-based studies have highlighted the association between insurance status and survival in patients with various cancers such as breast, head and neck, testicular, and lymphoma [22, 24, 38, 41]. Generally, these studies demonstrate that uninsured patients or those with Medicaid insurance had poorer survival than did those who had non-Medicaid insurance. However, this discrepancy has not been studied in patients with primary bone and extremity soft-tissue sarcomas, a unique oncological population that typically presents late in the disease course and often requires referral and complex treatment at tertiary care centers-issues that health insurance coverage disparities could aggravate. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the relationship between insurance status and cause-specific mortality? (2) What is the relationship between insurance status and the prevalence of distant metastases? (3) What is the relationship between insurance status and the proportion of limb salvage surgery versus amputation? METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) was used to identify a total of 12,008 patients: 4257 patients with primary bone sarcomas and 7751 patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcomas, who were diagnosed and treated between 2007 and 2014. Patients were categorized into one of three insurance groups: insured with non-Medicaid insurance, insured with Medicaid, and uninsured. Patients without information available regarding insurance status were excluded (2.7% [113 patients] with primary bone sarcomas and 3.1% [243 patients] with extremity soft-tissue sarcomas.) The association between insurance status and survival was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, extent of disease (lymph node and metastatic involvement), tumor grade, tumor size, histology, and primary tumor site. RESULTS: Patients with primary bone sarcomas with Medicaid insurance had reduced disease-specific survival than did patients with non-Medicaid insurance (hazard ratio 1.3 [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.6]; p = 0.003). Patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcomas with Medicaid insurance also had reduced disease-specific survival compared with those with non-Medicaid insurance (HR 1.2 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.5]; p = 0.019). Patients with primary bone sarcomas (relative risk 1.8 [95% CI 1.3 to 2.4]; p < 0.001) and extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (RR 2.4 [95% CI 1.9 to 3.1]; p < 0.001) who had Medicaid insurance were more likely to have distant metastases at the time of diagnosis than those with non-Medicaid insurance. Patients with primary bone sarcomas (RR 1.8 [95% CI 1.4 to 2.1]; p < 0.001), and extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (RR 2.4 [95% CI 1.9 to 3.0]; p < 0.001) that had Medicaid insurance were more likely to undergo amputation than patients with non-Medicaid insurance. Patients with primary bone and extremity soft-tissue sarcomas who were uninsured were not more likely to have distant metastases at the time of diagnosis and did not have a higher proportion of amputation surgery as compared with patients with non-Medicaid insurance. However, uninsured patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcomas still displayed reduction in disease-specific survival (HR 1.6 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.1]; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities manifested by differences in insurance status were correlated with an increased risk of metastasis at the time of diagnosis, reduced likelihood of treatment with limb salvage procedures, and reduced disease-specific survival in patients with primary bone or extremity soft-tissue sarcomas. Although several potentially confounding variables were controlled for, unmeasured confounding played a role in these results. Future studies should seek to identify what factors drive the finding that substandard insurance status is associated with poorer survival after a cancer diagnosis. Candidate variables might include medical comorbidities, treatment delays, time to first presentation to medical care and time to diagnosis, type of treatment received, distance travelled to treatments and transportation barriers, out-of-pocket payment burden, as well as educational and literacy status. These variables are almost certainly associated with socioeconomic deprivation in a vulnerable patient population, and once identified, treatment can become targeted to address these systemic inequities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias Óseas/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Extremidades , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , Sarcoma/economía , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/economía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Artropatías/diagnóstico , Artropatías/terapia , Membrana Sinovial/patología , Artroscopía , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Artropatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Artropatías/patología , Radiografía , Líquido Sinovial/citologíaRESUMEN
The American Orthopaedic Association-Japanese Orthopaedic Association (AOA-JOA) traveling fellowship was established in 1992 as a method for creating collaboration between the American and Japanese orthopaedic communities and providing a friendly exchange of current practices and scientific endeavors. The fellowship is designed to allow early-career orthopaedic surgeons the opportunity to participate in international travel and scholarship. This year's traveling fellows (Hassan Mir, Wakenda Tyler, Leo Kroonen, and Dan Zlotolow) all hail from different parts of the United States and have a variety of practice subspecialties. During the fellowship, the fellows were able to visit five academic centers that spanned the entire country of Japan as well as the JOA meeting in Kobe. The experience is one that contributed to the growth and development of each fellow's practices and depth of understanding of orthopaedic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Becas , Intercambio Educacional Internacional , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Sociedades Médicas , Japón , Ropa de Protección/clasificación , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Viaje , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a benign, locally destructive neoplasm, with tumors comprised of mesenchymal fibroblast-like stromal cells; monocytic, mononuclear cells of myeloid lineage; and the characteristic osteoclast-like, multinucleated giant cells. Hampering the study of the complex interaction of its constituent cell types is the propensity of longstanding, repeatedly passaged cell cultures to undergo phenotypic alteration and loss of osteoclast-inducing capacities. In this study, we employed a novel, single-step technique to purify freshly harvested stromal cells using a CD14-negative selection column. Using 9 freshly harvested GCTB specimens and the purified stromal cell component, we performed analyses for markers of osteoblast lineage and analyzed the capacity of the stromal cells to undergo osteoblastic differentiation and induce osteoclastogenesis in co-cultures with monocytic cells. Successful purification of the CD14-negative stromal cells was confirmed via flow cytometric analysis and immunocytochemistry. Osteogenic media upregulated the expression of osteocalcin, suggesting an osteoblastic lineage of the GCTB stromal cells. The effects of the Wnt pathway agonist, SB415286, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 on osteoblastogenesis varied among samples. Notably, osteogenic media and SB415286 reversed the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) expression ratio resulting in diminished osteoclastogenic capacity. Recombinant human BMP2 had the opposite effect, resulting in enhanced and sustained support of osteoclastogenesis. Targeting the giant cell tumor stromal cell may be an effective adjunct to existing anti-resorptive strategies.
Asunto(s)
Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/patología , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Aminofenoles/farmacología , Aminofenoles/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Morfogenéticas Óseas/metabolismo , Diferenciación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Separación Celular , Medios de Cultivo/farmacología , Femenino , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Ligandos , Masculino , Maleimidas/farmacología , Maleimidas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoblastos/metabolismo , Osteoblastos/patología , Osteoclastos/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoclastos/metabolismo , Osteoclastos/patología , Osteogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoprotegerina/metabolismo , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Ligando RANK/metabolismo , Células del Estroma , Vía de Señalización Wnt/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Periprosthetic fractures after massive endoprosthetic reconstructions pose a reconstructive challenge and jeopardize limb preservation. Compressive osseointegration technology offers the promise of relative ease of prosthetic revision, since fixation is achieved by means of a short intramedullary device. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 221 patients who had Compress((R)) devices implanted in two centers between December, 1996 and December, 2008. The mean followup was 50 months (range, 1-123 months). Six patients (2.7%) sustained periprosthetic fractures and eight (3.6%) had nonperiprosthetic ipsilateral limb fractures occurring from 4 to 79 months postoperatively. All periprosthetic fractures occurred in patients with distal femoral implants (6/154, 3.9%). Surgery was performed in all six patients with periprosthetic femur fractures and for one with a nonperiprosthetic patellar fracture. The osseointegrated interface was radiographically stable in all 14 cases. All six patients with periprosthetic fracture underwent limb salvage procedures. Five patients had prosthetic revision; one patient who had internal fixation of the fracture ultimately underwent amputation for persistent infection. Periprosthetic fractures involving Compress((R)) fixation occur infrequently and most can be treated successfully with further surgery. When implant revision is needed, the bone preserved by virtue of using a shorter intramedullary Compress((R)) device as compared to conventional stems, allows for less complex surgery, making limb preservation more likely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Falla de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/patología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Prótesis e Implantes , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Radiografía , Recuperación de la Función , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Pigmented villonodular synovitis is a proliferative condition of the synovium. Monoarticular involvement, the most common process, occurs in two forms: localized and diffuse. The localized form is characterized by focal involvement of the synovium, with either nodular or pedunculated masses; the diffuse form affects virtually the entire synovium. The localized form has an excellent prognosis and a low recurrence rate when managed surgically. The more common diffuse form has a reported recurrence rate of up to 46%. Although the condition can present in any joint, the knee is the most commonly affected site. Pigmented villonodular synovitis is often aggressive, with marked extra-articular extension. Open synovectomy is the standard method of management. Arthroscopic synovectomy, which has gained popularity, has several advantages over the open technique, but it is associated with higher recurrence rates in diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis. Synovectomy by any approach, however, may prevent secondary osteoarthritis and subsequent joint arthroplasty. Radiation-induced synovectomy has shown mixed results. Combined surgical and nonsurgical approaches may be necessary, and in some patients, total joint arthroplasty may be the only effective treatment.