Treatment Patterns in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Crohn's Disease Who Received Biologics Following Diagnosis: A Nationwide, Retrospective, Longitudinal, Observational Study Using a Medical Claims Database in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting any part of the gastrointestinal tract. Current therapies involve pharmacological efforts to dampen inflammation. Biologics are recommended for patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory disease; however, little is known about current biologic use in real-world settings in Japan. METHODS: This observational, longitudinal, cohort study utilized the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database to analyze claims data of patients who were prescribed ≥1 biologic (adalimumab, infliximab, or ustekinumab) following a new CD diagnosis made between January 2009 and January 2019. We primarily assessed the type of first-line treatment prescribed within 6 months of a patient's first CD diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 1,346 eligible patients, the most common prescriptions were 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) monotherapy (26.8%), 5-ASA plus biologic combination (26.3%), and biologic monotherapy (12.9%). First-line biologics were prescribed within 6 months of initial CD diagnosis in 61.1% of patients, either alone or in combination with other therapies. As an individual first-line treatment, the proportion of patients receiving prescriptions of infliximab was high (66.3%) and steroids, low (1.3%). Patients who had a procedure to inspect the small intestine, such as endoscopy (n = 508), were mostly treated with a nonbiologic therapy (74.8%), whereas those who had not (n = 838), mostly received biologics (alone or in combination, 82.8%) as a first-line treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we discovered the typical treatment pattern of patients with CD who received biologics and are registered in the JMDC database in Japan. Biologics were commonly used in the early phase of CD treatment. Treatment with traditional approaches such as steroids and nutritional therapy with evaluation for small intestine lesions, before turning to the use of biologics, may be prudent for achieving optimal outcomes.

Optimal use of biologics with endoscopic balloon dilatation for repeated intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease (CD) have a high rate of repeated surgery. As alternatives to surgery, endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD), immunomodulators (IMs), and antitumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) have been proposed. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the combined therapy with anti-TNFα and EBD in preventing intestinal stricture recurrence and surgery in patients with CD. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients from the nationwide administrative database in Japan who were hospitalized and underwent at least one EBD between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2017. The effectiveness of anti-TNFα was evaluated by performing survival analysis for the primary outcome. We selected the inverse probability of treatment weighting method for adjustment of covariates. As an exploratory analysis, we evaluated the association of anti-TNFα initiation timing with intestinal stricture recurrence. RESULTS: The anti-TNFα exposed group had a significantly lower risk of intestinal stricture recurrence than that of the anti-TNFα nonexposed group (hazard ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.48, P < 0.001). Surgery-free rate was shown to have the same tendency. Anti-TNFα therapy initiation before or after EBD resulted in a lower risk of intestinal stricture recurrence than that of simultaneous treatment. CONCLUSION: The combined therapy with anti-TNFα and EBD could have preventive effects for intestinal stricture recurrence and surgery in hospitalized patients with CD. In particular, anti-TNFα initiation may be recommended before or after EBD, not immediately after EBD. With respect to EBD, it is important to clarify the effectiveness of combination therapy with several new medication treatments, such as biologics.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Japanese patients with ischemic heart disease receiving vonoprazan or a proton pump inhibitor with multiple antithrombotic agents: A nationwide database study.

BACKGROUND: Vonoprazan has been launched as an alternative to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). This was the first study to compare the occurrence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) with vonoprazan treatment to that with PPI treatment in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) taking ≥2 antithrombotic agents, including those receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: Using Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination data from 2016 to 2017, we identified 16,415 patients with IHD who were prescribed ≥2 antithrombotic agents, including new antiplatelet medication with concurrent vonoprazan (n = 2226 or PPIs n = 14,189). UGIB occurrence was analyzed using an inverse probability-weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Non-inferiority of vonoprazan to PPI treatment for UGIB occurrence was assessed. RESULTS: Six-month incidence of UGIB in patients treated with vonoprazan and PPIs was 3.14% 70/2226 and 4.17% (591/14,189), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.84 was significantly below the non-inferiority margin (HR 2.06) (p < 0.0001), and thus demonstrated that vonoprazan treatment was non-inferior to PPIs in terms of occurrence of UGIB events. The difference between the 2 treatments was also not statistically significant [aHR 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-1.07; p = 0.154). In a subgroup analysis, UGIB occurrence with vonoprazan and other PPI treatment in patients receiving DAPT was 2.82% (22/779) and 3.96% (209/5276) respectively; a non-significant difference (aHR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.48-1.16; p = 0.189) that demonstrated non-inferiority (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Vonoprazan was non-inferior to PPIs in terms of UGIB occurrence over 6 months in patients with IHD receiving ≥2 antithrombotic agents, including new antiplatelet medication.

Evaluation of the Optimal Position for Vedolizumab in the Japanese Treatment Paradigm for Ulcerative Colitis Using Markov Modeling.

Background: This analysis assessed the optimal position of vedolizumab for Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods: A Markov model was used to evaluate the performance of 4 treatment algorithms of vedolizumab position: after azathioprine (Algorithm 1); after tacrolimus/cytapheresis (Algorithm 2); after a first anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) (Algorithm 3); and after a second anti-TNFα before colectomy (Algorithm 4). Results: Algorithm 1 was the dominant strategy, with an incremental benefit over the other algorithms of 0.028-0.031 quality-adjusted life years. Conclusions: This simulation predicts that introducing vedolizumab immediately after a thiopurine and before other therapies will provide most benefit.

Erratum: Evaluation of the Optimal Position for Vedolizumab in the Japanese Treatment Paradigm for Ulcerative Colitis Using Markov Modeling.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otaa017.].

Current Status of Helicobacter pylori Diagnosis and Eradication Therapy in Japan Using a Nationwide Database.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection increases the risk of stomach cancer; therefore, eradication therapy is recommended for infected individuals. Although several methods are recommended for the diagnosis and therapy of H. pylori infection, their frequency and effectiveness have not been fully investigated in Japan. METHODS: A nationwide claims database including >1.6 million patients (April 2008 - -October 2016) in Japan was utilized. We analyzed the distribution of methods for H. pylori diagnosis and therapy, waiting period between eradication and diagnostic test, and success rate of primary therapy. RESULTS: Data for 481,041 patients were extracted. After primary eradication therapy, urea breath test was used for >80% of diagnoses, and antibody measurement for 0.7%. The success rate of primary eradication was >80% for most diagnostic methods and 69.0% for antibody measurement; inappropriately-timed antibody measurement may have contributed to this disparity. The overall success rate of eradication therapy decreased from 2011 to 2014, but increased from 2015, coinciding with launch of the potassium-competitive acid blocker vonoprazan, which showed a higher success rate of eradication than proton-pump inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic tests of H. pylori infection mostly followed Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research guidance, although some antibody measurements were timed inappropriately. Vonoprazan appears to increase the success rate of primary therapy.

Impact of immunomodulator use on treatment persistence in patients with ulcerative colitis: A claims database analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is unclear how adding an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent to immunomodulator (IM) treatment, as a step-up strategy, affects long-term outcomes in ulcerative colitis. This retrospective study investigated persistence associated with biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents combined with IMs versus biologic monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study of patients in the Japan Medical Data Center claims database who had been newly prescribed infliximab or adalimumab as induction (completed) and maintenance (2010-2016). Biologic persistence (i.e. no switch/discontinuation during maintenance) was compared among patients prescribed biologic monotherapy (Bio) and those prescribed a biologic combined with an IM, as step-up (Bio + prior IM) or simultaneously (Bio + IM). RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-nine eligible patients were analyzed (233, 78, and 58 in the Bio, Bio + prior IM, and Bio + IM subgroups, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed a lower probability of nonpersistence during maintenance for infliximab-treated patients in the Bio + prior IM versus Bio subgroup (hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.99; P = 0.045). No such effect was seen in adalimumab-treated patients (P = 0.222) or in the overall population (P = 0.398). The probability of nonpersistence during maintenance in the Bio + IM subgroup was not significantly different from that in the Bio subgroup in either the biologic subpopulation or in the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: Adding infliximab to an existing IM results in a lower probability of nonpersistence compared with infliximab monotherapy in ulcerative colitis patients. This effect is not seen in adalimumab-treated patients.

Lack of Increased Risk of Lymphoma by Thiopurines or Biologics in Japanese Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Large-Scale Administrative Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases may have higher incidences of non-melanoma skin cancers and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, potentially linked to underlying disease and treatments. This analysis assessed incidence rates of these malignancies in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease, and their association with thiopurine and/or anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment, using data from a nationwide administrative database in Japan. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease without malignancy were identified from the Medical Data Vision database. Incident cases of non-melanoma skin cancers and non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed after prescription of thiopurine and/or anti-tumor necrosis factor-α were identified between April 2008 and January 2018. Age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate ratios were calculated relative to the total treated patient population. RESULTS: A total of 75 673 eligible patients were identified at the index date. Thiopurine prescription with or without anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents increased incidence rate ratios for non-melanoma skin cancers relative to the overall population (3.39 and 4.03, respectively). There were no notable differences in non-Hodgkin lymphoma incidence relative to the total population in any treatment subgroup, regardless of prescription of thiopurine and/or anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (all incidence rate ratios, ~1). CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for an increased incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma attributable to thiopurine or anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment in Japanese patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The impact of racial differences on non-Hodgkin lymphoma incidences should be considered. Thiopurine therapy may be a risk factor for non-melanoma skin cancers in Japanese patients.

Cost-utility analysis of a 'vonoprazan-first' strategy versus 'esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-first' strategy in GERD.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be treated using a vonoprazan-first strategy (first-line treatment with vonoprazan), or esomeprazole-first/rabeprazole-first strategies (first-line treatment with proton-pump inhibitors [PPIs], esomeprazole/rabeprazole, followed by a switch to vonoprazan). This cost-utility analysis used long-term simulation modeling to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a vonoprazan-first strategy compared with the esomeprazole-first and rabeprazole-first strategies. METHODS: A Markov simulation model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan-first, esomeprazole-first, and rabeprazole-first strategies, comprising healing and maintenance therapies, over 5 years (4-week cycles). Healing therapy began with the administration of a normal dose of drug per real-world practice. If patients were not healed endoscopically, either a longer duration of healing therapy was provided (vonoprazan), the dose was increased (rabeprazole), or patients were switched to vonoprazan (immediately for esomeprazole, and after dose-escalation for rabeprazole, respectively). Healed patients received maintenance (lower/same dose as healing therapy). Recurrence resulted in re-challenge with healing therapy. Transition probabilities were derived from the results of indirect comparisons (network meta-analysis) and costs calculated from the Japanese payer perspective. Outcomes were defined as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with utilities based on published values. RESULTS: Expected costs of the vonoprazan-, esomeprazole-, and rabeprazole-first strategies were ¥36,194, ¥76,719, and ¥41,105, respectively, over 5 years. QALY gains for vonoprazan-first strategy versus the esomeprazole- and rabeprazole-first strategies were 0.014 and 0.003, respectively. Both estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were dominant and robust to two sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Vonoprazan-first strategy increased QALYs and appeared to be cost-effective for GERD patients compared with the esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-first strategies.

Vonoprazan versus proton-pump inhibitors for healing gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease caused by reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended as a first-line therapy to treat GERD. Recently, a new potassium-competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan, was launched in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of vonoprazan and other PPIs in healing GERD. METHODS: We used MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to search the literature. Double-blind randomized controlled trials for PPIs and/or vonoprazan that were published in English or Japanese and assessed healing effects in adult GERD patients were included. To estimate the comparative efficacy of treatments, we performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to assess the consistency assumption. RESULTS: Of 4001 articles identified in the database, 42 studies were eligible. One study was hand-searched and added to the analysis. For the main analysis of healing effects at 8 weeks, odds ratios (ORs) of vonoprazan (20 mg daily) to esomeprazole (20 mg), rabeprazole (20 mg), lansoprazole (30 mg), and omeprazole (20 mg) were 2.29 (95% credible interval, 0.79-7.06), 3.94 (1.15-14.03), 2.40 (0.90-6.77), and 2.71 (0.98-7.90), respectively. Subgroup analysis for patients with severe esophagitis at baseline showed significantly higher ORs for vonoprazan versus most of the comparator PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that the GERD healing effect of vonoprazan is higher than that of rabeprazole (20 mg) but not higher than other PPIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that vonoprazan is more effective than most PPIs for patients with severe erosive esophagitis.

Systematic review with network meta-analysis: indirect comparison of the efficacy of vonoprazan and proton-pump inhibitors for maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Long-term maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is important to prevent relapse. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used for both treatment and maintenance therapy of GERD. Recently, a potassium-competitive acid blocker vonoprazan was launched in Japan. We evaluated the comparative efficacy of vonoprazan and other PPIs for GERD maintenance. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PPIs, vonoprazan, and placebo for GERD maintenance published in English or Japanese were selected. Among them, studies conducted at the recommended dose and for the recommended use, and containing information on maintenance rate based on endoscopic assessment, were included. The comparative efficacies of treatments were estimated by performing a Bayesian network meta-analysis, which assessed the consistency assumption. Outcomes were number or rate of patients who maintained remission. RESULTS: Of 4001 articles identified, 22 RCTs were eligible for analysis. One study published as an abstract was hand-searched and added. The consistency hypothesis was not rejected for the analysis. The odds ratio of vonoprazan 10 mg to each PPI was 13.92 (95% credible interval [CI] 1.70-114.21) to esomeprazole 10 mg; 5.75 (95% CI 0.59-51.57) to rabeprazole 10 mg; 3.74 (95% CI 0.70-19.99) to lansoprazole 15 mg; and 9.23 (95% CI 1.17-68.72) to omeprazole 10 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of vonoprazan in GERD maintenance treatment may be higher than that of some PPIs. However, a direct comparison of vonoprazan and PPIs is required to confirm these effects.

Cost analysis of leuprorelin acetate in Japanese prostate cancer patients: comparison between 6-month and 3-month depot formulations.

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the economic value for leuprorelin acetate 6-month depot compared with leuprorelin acetate 3-month depot from a societal perspective in Japanese prostate cancer patients. METHODS: The cost analysis estimated the reduction in direct and indirect costs as well as intangible costs saved by having one less injection. Claims data were used for the analyses of direct and indirect costs reduction. A discrete choice experiment based on a web-based survey estimated the monetary value of the intangible costs for one injection. Another web-based survey of prostate cancer patients, who had received treatment with leuprorelin acetate injections, was carried out to calibrate the results of the discrete choice experiment. RESULTS: Reductions in medical costs and loss of productivity for having one less injection in prostate cancer patients receiving leuprorelin acetate were JPY 5,670 and JPY 1,723, respectively. Intangible costs saved by using a 6-month depot formulation instead of a 3-month depot formulation for the injection of leuprorelin acetate were estimated to be JPY 19,872, including the values for a reduction in pain (JPY 3,131), injection site reactions (JPY 11,545), waiting time (JPY 9,479), and subtracting the value of medical consultation (JPY 4,283). The total cost reduction for having one less injection was JPY 27,265. LIMITATIONS: The respondents from the internet panel provided by a survey company are not necessarily a representative population of Japanese society. CONCLUSIONS: Leuprorelin acetate 6-month depot has an advantage in monetary value in the reduction in medical costs, loss of productivity, and intangible costs for having one less injection in prostate cancer patients compared with leuprorelin acetate 3-month depot. In the costs for treating with leuprorelin acetate, the percentage of intangible costs might not be negligible. The intangible costs will probably be actively evaluated to proceed to patient-centered healthcare in society.

Cost analysis of leuprorelin acetate in Japanese pre-menopausal breast-cancer patients: comparison between 6-month and 3-month depot formulations.

AIMS: The aim in this study is to evaluate economic value for leuprorelin acetate 6-month depot compared with leuprorelin acetate 3-month depot in Japanese pre-menopausal breast cancer patients from a societal perspective. METHODS: The cost analysis was conducted by estimating direct and indirect cost, and intangible costs associated with one 6-month injection compared with two 3-month injections. Claims data were used for the analyses of direct and indirect cost and Medical Fee Schedule Table for direct cost. Discrete choice experiments were conducted by web-based survey to determine the intangible costs. Another web-based survey was also conducted on premenopausal breast cancer patients with injections of leuprorelin acetate, to calibrate the results of discrete choice experiments. RESULTS: The medical costs saved for having one less injection in pre-menopausal breast cancer patients with leuprorelin acetate injection were JPY 6,183. The productivity loss saving was JPY 1,419. An estimation of intangible costs saved for having one less injection of leuprorelin acetate was JPY 58,430, which included the disbenefit due to pain (JPY 8,535), injection site reactions (JPY 44,051), waiting time (JPY 9,595), and subtracting value in medical consultation (JPY 3,751). The total cost saved for having one less injection was JPY 66,032. LIMITATIONS: The respondents from the internet panel provided by a survey company do not necessarily reflect a population of Japanese society. CONCLUSIONS: Leuprorelin acetate 6-month depot demonstrates a higher value than leuprorelin acetate 3-month depot through saving medical costs and loss of productivity, as well as intangible costs saved for having one less injection when treating pre-menopausal breast cancer patients. In the costs for treating with leuprorelin acetate, the percentage of intangible costs might not be negligible. The intangible costs will probably be actively evaluated to proceed to patient-centered healthcare in society.