Discharge C-reactive protein predicts 90-day readmission after pancreatoduodenectomy: a conditional inference tree analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of discharge C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) levels for 90-day readmission after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: A two-centre, retrospective study was performed between 2008 and 2022. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the predictive value of CRP level and WBC count at discharge. A conditional inference tree (CTREE) was constructed to identify combined risks within subgroups using variables associated with readmission. RESULTS: Of 438 patients, 54 (12%) were readmitted. The median WBC count at discharge was comparable between the readmitted and not readmitted groups (9.1 vs. 8.5 G/l). The CRP levels at discharge were predictive of 90-day readmission, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.55-0.63). A CRP concentration below 105 mg/l ruled out 90-day readmission, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% (95% CI: 81%-95%). CTREE confirmed the diagnostic value of CRP at discharge (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI 0.60-0.68). CTREE additionally identified previous wound infection as a second risk factor for readmission in patients with CRP levels less than 101 mg/l (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: CRP levels below 105 mg/l at discharge allow for a safe discharge with a low 90-day readmission rate. Wound infection, but not WBC count, was a positive predictor of 90-day readmission with moderate accuracy, suggesting the need for predischarge imaging for undetected complications in this patient cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our retrospective analysis did not require registration with a publicly accessible registry.

Partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus total pancreatectomy in patients with preoperative diabetes mellitus: Comparison of surgical outcomes and quality of life.

PURPOSE: To reduce perioperative risks among patients with a preoperative diabetes mellitus (DM) a total pancreatectomy (TP) might be a alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to compare the postoperative quality of life (QoL) of patients with preoperative DM undergoing PD or TP. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective study was conducted, all consecutive patients with preoperative DM undergoing PD or TP between 2011 and 2023 were identified in a prospective database. The primary endpoint was QoL, prospectively assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and then annually until death. Secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included, 17 after TP and 54 after PD. Insulin-dependent DM occurred in 21 (39%) of the PD patients. QoL was worse after TP, especially in terms of physical functioning (-31.7 points; 95% CI: -50.0 to -13.3; P < 0.001), role functioning (-41.3 points; 95% CI: -61.3 to -21.3; P < 0.001), emotional functioning (-27.5 points; 95% CI: -50.4 to -4.6; P = 0.019), fatigue symptoms (20 points; 95% CI: 2.7 to 37.4; P = 0.024) and pain symptoms (30.2 points; 95% CI: 4.1 to 56.3; P = 0.024). The rates of postoperative major complications (29% vs. 35%; P = 0.853) and mortality (11% vs. 7%; P = 0.857) were similar between TP and PD. CONCLUSION: Postoperative morbidity and mortality were comparable between PD and TP, however QoL is significantly lower after TP. Importantly, patients with preoperative DM have a 60% chance of remaining noninsulin-dependent after PD.

The influence of delayed gastric emptying on quality of life after partial duodenopancreatectomy.

PURPOSE: Quality of life (QoL) is temporarily compromised after pancreatic surgery, but no evidence for a negative impact of postoperative complications on QoL has been provided thus far. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pancreatic surgery and is associated with a high level of distress. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the influence of DGE on QoL. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study analysed QoL after partial duodenopancreatectomy (PD) via the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The QoL of patients with and without postoperative DGE was compared. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2022, 251 patients were included, 85 of whom developed DGE (34%). Within the first postoperative year, compared to patients without DGE, those with DGE had a significantly reduced QoL, by 9.0 points (95% CI: -13.0 to -5.1, p < 0.001). Specifically, physical and psychosocial functioning (p = 0.020) decreased significantly, and patients with DGE suffered significantly more from fatigue (p = 0.010) and appetite loss (p = 0.017) than patients without DGE. After the first postoperative year, there were no significant differences in QoL or symptom scores between patients with DGE and those without DGE. CONCLUSION: Patients who developed DGE reported a significantly reduced QoL and reduced physical and psychosocial functioning within the first year after partial pancreatoduodenectomy compared to patients without DGE.

Quality of Surgical Outcome Reporting in Randomised Clinical Trials of Multimodal Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) continue to provide the best evidence for treatment options, but the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical outcomes and complication data vary widely. The aim of this study was to measure the quality of reporting of the surgical outcome and complication data in RCTs of rectal cancer treatment and whether this quality has changed over time. METHODS: Eligible articles with the keywords ("rectal cancer" OR "rectal carcinoma") AND ("radiation" OR "radiotherapy") that were RCTs and published in the English, German, Polish, or Italian language were identified by reviewing all abstracts published from 1982 through 2022. Two authors independently screened and analysed all studies. The quality of the surgical outcome and complication data was assessed based on fourteen criteria, and the quality of RCTs was evaluated based on a modified Jadad scale. The primary outcome was the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical results and complication data. RESULTS: A total of 340 articles reporting multimodal therapy outcomes for 143,576 rectal cancer patients were analysed. A total of 7 articles (2%) met all 14 reporting criteria, 13 met 13 criteria, 27 met from 11 to 12 criteria, 36 met from 9 to 10 criteria, 76 met from 7 to 8 criteria, and most articles met fewer than 7 criteria (mean 5.5 criteria). Commonly underreported criteria included complication severity (15% of articles), macroscopic integrity of mesorectal excision (17% of articles), length of stay (18% of articles), number of lymph nodes (21% of articles), distance between the tumour and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (26% of articles), surgical radicality according to the site of the primary tumour (R0 vs. R1 + R2) (29% of articles), and CRM status (38% of articles). CONCLUSION: Inconsistent surgical outcome and complication data reporting in multimodal rectal cancer treatment RCTs is standard. Standardised reporting of clinical and oncological outcomes should be established to facilitate comparing studies and results of related research topics.