Confidence in airway management proficiency: a mixed methods study of intensive care specialists in Australia and New Zealand.

Objective: To explore self-confidence, and the respective facilitators and barriers, among intensive care specialists in Australia and New Zealand in relation to airway management. Design: A mixed methods study. Setting: 11 intensive care units across Australia and New Zealand. Participants: 48 intensive care specialists. Intervention: A structured online interview and the presentation of three discrete airway management clinical scenarios - routine endotracheal intubation, awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI), and emergency front of neck access (FONA). Main outcome measures: Graded Likert scale responses regarding confidence in airway management were analysed, and perceptions of facilitators and barriers to confidence in each select scenario were obtained as free text. A deductive thematic analysis was done iteratively on free text entry and allowed for the development of a coding framework. NVivo software used the coding framework to run coding queries and cross-tabulations for comparison of relationships between themes and participant demographic characteristics. Results: Participants reported differing levels of confidence. Clinical experience, an anaesthetic qualification and training (including simulation) were the major facilitators to influencing confidence. Participants were more confident performing routine intubation than AFOI or FONA. Equipment, checklists or protocols, and availability of video-laryngoscopy were also identified as facilitators to confidence by most participants. Work relationships, teams and other staff availability were identified as further facilitators to confidence; lack of these factors were less commonly identified as barriers. Conclusions: Confidence in airway management among intensive care specialists in Australia and New Zealand varies, both between specialists and depending on clinical context. Multiple facilitators to improving this exist, including additional mandatory training.

The haemodynamic effects of bolus versus slower infusion of intravenous crystalloid in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: This pilot study aimed to characterise the haemodynamic effect of 1L of IV normal saline (NS) administered as a rapid versus slow infusion on cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), systemic blood pressures, and carotid blood flow in six healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six healthy male volunteers aged 18-65years were randomized to receive 1L NS given over 30min or 120min. On a subsequent study session the alternate fluid regimen was administered. Haemodynamic data was gathered using a non-invasive finger arterial pressure monitor (Nexfin®), echocardiography and carotid duplex sonography. Time to micturition and urine volume was also assessed. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, rapid infusion of 1L of saline over 30min produced a fall in Nexfin®-measured CO by 0.62L/min (p<0.001), whereas there was a marginal but significant increase during infusion of 1L NS over 120min of 0.02L/min (p<0.001). This effect was mirrored by changes in HR and blood pressure (BP) (p<0.001). There were no significant changes in carotid blood flow, time to micturition, or urine volume produced. CONCLUSIONS: Slower infusion of 1L NS in healthy male volunteers produced a greater increase in CO, HR and BP than rapid infusion.