Short-Term Patient Outcomes after Placement of an Internal Joint Stabilizer for Terrible Triad Injuries: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional and patient-reported outcomes after the use of the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) for unstable terrible triad injuries. Specifically, we sought to determine our complication rate and the impact of complications on patient outcomes. METHODS: We identified all patients who had an IJS placed as a supplemental fixation for a terrible triad injury at two urban, level 1 academic medical centers. We reviewed these patients' charts for demographic information, complication profiles, postoperative range of motion (ROM), and pain-level data. We also collected the QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) scores. Descriptive statistics were reported. Final visit data were compared between patients who returned to the OR for a complication and those who did not. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2020, 29 patients had an IJS placed for a terrible triad injury. The median final follow-up was 6.3 months after surgery (IQR: 6.2 months). There were 38 complications in 19 patients (65.5%) that required 12 patients to return to the OR (41.3%) for procedures beyond simple IJS removal. There were no significant differences in the ROM between patients who returned to the OR for a complication and those who did not. QuickDASH and PREE scores were greater (indicating more disability) in patients who had a complication that required a secondary surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive an IJS incur a high rate of complications. When patients sustain complications that require secondary surgeries, their ultimate functional outcome scores worsen. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Malpractice Litigation in Hand Surgery: A Comprehensive Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The circumstances surrounding claims against hand surgeons have not been elucidated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in malpractice litigation regarding hand surgery through a nationwide legal database. METHODS: The Westlaw legal research database was queried for verdicts and settlements between 1985 and 2017 for hand surgery-related malpractice cases. Cases were included if the hand surgeon was sued for malpractice. Procedure type and complications and/or adverse events that resulted in litigation were recorded. Patient characteristics, state, date of case, case outcomes, and indemnity payment were also noted. All dollar amounts were adjusted to 2017 values using the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: In all, 171 cases (35 states) were included. The most frequently litigated surgeries were carpal tunnel releases followed by fracture treatment. Nerve injury was the predominant cause of litigation. The median nerve was predominantly injured, followed by the ulnar and radial nerves. In fracture surgery, malunion was the predominant cause, followed by weakness, nerve injury, and infection. In total, 72.5% of cases yielded verdicts in favor of the defense, 21.6% favored the plaintiff, and 5.9% were settled. Indemnity varied between $7800 and $8.99 million, averaging $570,397 for cases when the jury ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. Settled cases averaged $1,140,527. CONCLUSIONS: Malpractice litigation has substantial financial implications on surgeons and the health care system. Litigation arises most commonly from routine procedures (carpal tunnel release and fracture fixation) rather than complex surgical cases, potentially due to the high variability in operating surgeon subspecialization, with discrepant training.

Dynamic Brachial Artery Entrapment After Distal Biceps Repair: A Case Report.

CASE: A 57-year-old man presented with paleness and coolness of the hand with elbow flexion 4 months after primary distal biceps repair. Diagnosis of dynamic brachial artery entrapment was confirmed with ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography. During revision surgery, the brachial artery was identified traveling underneath the repaired distal biceps tendon. After revision surgery, the patient made a full recovery with no residual symptoms. CONCLUSION: Adverse vascular events have been rarely reported in distal biceps repairs. Before and immediately after repair, the path of the tendon should be critically evaluated to ensure neurovascular structures were not placed under the repaired tendon.

Mental health of orthopaedic trauma patients during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been associated with reports of increased anxiety, depression and fear among the general population. People with underlying psychiatric disorders are more susceptible to stress than the general population. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of concomitant psychiatric conditions in the orthopaedic trauma population during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated orthopaedic trauma patients who received care at our institution between February through April of 2019 and February through April of 2020. Patient sex, age, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, fracture location, tobacco use, employment status, mental health diagnosis and presence of interpersonal violence were documented. Mental health diagnoses were defined based on International Classification of Diseases-10 classification. RESULTS: The study included 553 orthopaedic patients evaluated at our institution during the defined time period. Patients in the 2020 cohort had a higher prevalence of mental health diagnoses (26% vs. 43%, p < 0.0001) compared with the 2019 group. The odds ratio for mental health disorder in the 2020 patients was 2.21 (95% CI 1.54, 3.18) compared with the 2019 cohort. The 2020 cohort had a higher percentage of patients who reported interpersonal violence (20% vs. 11%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study showed a higher prevalence of psychiatric disease among orthopaedic trauma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with those seen during the same time of the year in 2019. Stress induced by the coronavirus pandemic can place patients with mental illness at a higher risk for perilous behaviours and subsequent fractures.

Alternate treatment approach to subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee utilizing genicular nerve cooled radiofrequency ablation and adjunctive bisphosphonate supplementation: A case report.

Subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee are commonly misdiagnosed fractures that are both very painful and difficult to treat. A conservative treatment modality to control symptoms during rehabilitation has not previously been described. This case report presents the alternate use of cooled radiofrequency ablation technique of the genicular nerves for pain relief and bisphosphonate infusion to address the underlying poor bone mineralization/density with imaging follow-up before and after instituted treatments. A middle-aged female patient presenting with atraumatic pain in the medial aspect of the left knee diagnosed on an original magnetic resonance imaging as an insufficiency fracture and debilitating pain. Multiple-surgeon opinions of total knee arthroplasty were not a consideration the patient wanted or could consider given her lifestyle. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerve branches was performed with significant-complete pain relief achieved that lasted at least 6 months. Bisphosphonate infusions were instituted to address the underlying osteoporosis detected by a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. Clinical performance after the radiofrequency ablations was followed with clinically validated surveys (The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)) at 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months. Patient was also asked to follow a restricted-modified weight-bearing plan for 3 months followed by physical therapy. Eight weeks apart of bisphosphonate infusions were delivered after proper administration of vitamin D. There was resolution of the insufficiency fracture at the medial femoral condyle between the magnetic resonance imaging exams within 4.5 months apart treated with restricted weight-bearing regimen. Pain resolution, significant improved function, and range of motion were the end results of our instituted treatment plan. This case reports presents an alternate pathway for the treatment of this condition especially when there is lack of consensus among physicians in how to best address this condition.

Routine use of commercial antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total joint arthroplasty: a critical analysis of the current evidence.

Antibiotic-loaded cement (ABLC) has been widely utilized as an adjuvant treatment for patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) but has also evolved to play a prophylactic role against infection in primary total joint arthroplasties (TJA). Nevertheless, there is currently a paucity of studies that systematically investigated this concept. This review aimed at answering the following questions: (I) Can routine use of ABLC help reduce the current infection rates in primary TJA? (II) What are the risks associated with this approach? And (III) can routine use be justified in primary TJA from an economic standpoint? Multiple databases were queried including PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO Host, and SCOPUS. Studies published between January 1, 1990 and March 31, 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting: (I) clinical outcomes of routine use of ABLC in primary hip and knee arthroplasty with 2-year minimum follow-up, (II) complications related to the use of ABLC, (III) cost of using ABLC. The final analysis included 24 studies. Data from multiple studies demonstrate contradictory results for infection rates when ABLC is used in all primary procedures with a majority of studies showing similar infection rates between ABLC and plain cement. The main concerns associated with routine use of ABLC are negative effects on the mechanical stability of cement, possible systemic and local toxicity of the absorbed antibiotic, and development of resistant bacterial strains. However, current literature has not clinically validated these concerns. Lastly, with an estimated increase in 117 million dollars with the routine use of ABLC in only 50% of TJAs performed each year, it is difficult to justify the use of ABLC without clear superiority in reducing infection. The use of ABLC has undeniably changed the way orthopaedic surgeons deal with PJI today. However, the large-scale, prophylactic use of ABLC in primary TJAs requires further research and justification.

Total hip arthroplasty in the setting of tuberculosis infection of the hip: a systematic analysis of the current evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a viable option to restore mobility and relieve pain in patients with severe post-tuberculous arthritis, but has been controversial due to concerns of disease reactivation. Over the past several decades, a number of authors have reported outcomes of THA for tuberculosis (TB) infections. However, there is marked heterogeneity in regard to disease activity, surgical approaches, and the use of chemoprophylaxis in these studies. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this review was to critically assess: 1) patient characteristics; 2) perioperative planning; 3) clinical outcomes; 4) radiographic outcomes; and 5) complications of THA in the setting of tuberculosis of the hip. EXPERT OPINION: THA is an effective treatment for post-TB hip arthritis. There has been controversy regarding its safety during the past several decades, as it has been thought to increase the risk of disease reactivation. While studies thus far have shown generally favorable results, they have been limited by small sample sizes and their design as retrospective case series. Comparison of these studies reveals marked heterogeneity in the clinical management of this complex disease. However, synthesis of their findings demonstrates favorable outcomes and low rates of complication, including disease reactivation particularly when perioperative anti-tuberculosis therapy is instituted.

Racial Disparities in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of 125,901 Patients in National US Private Payer Database.

INTRODUCTION: There is a relative paucity of studies that characterized racial disparities in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, this study was specifically conducted to evaluate the following: (1) incidence; (2) annual burden; (3) causes; and (4) age group distribution of revision TKA among different racial groups in the US sample population. METHODS: The PearlDiver database was utilized to identify patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent primary then subsequent revision TKA from January 2007 to December 2014. Patients were stratified by race, and subset stratification by age was also performed. In each racial cohort, the overall incidence of revision TKA, annual revision burdens, and causes of revisions were calculated and compared. Additionally, a sub-analysis for the incidence of revision TKA stratified by age, in each cohort, was performed. Statistical analysis was performed to demonstrate revision incidence, burden, causes, and age distribution. RESULTS: Revision incidence and burden were the highest in the African-American cohort (12.4%, 11.1%), (p < 0.001) and was lowest in the Asian cohort (3.4%, 3.3%) (p < 0.001). Across all cohorts, mechanical complications of the joint prosthesis were the most common cause of revision followed by periprosthetic joint infection, while contracture was the least common (p < 0.001). Subset analysis by age revealed that the highest incidence of revision TKA was in patients less than 40 years old in the Caucasian cohort (27.1%). The African-American (17.8%), other races (7.9%), and Hispanic (16.5%) cohorts had the highest incidence of revision in the 40 to 64 years age range. Among the Asian (4.1%) and Native American (9.7%) cohorts, revision incidence was highest in patients older than 65 years. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that racial disparities, highlighted by previous studies mainly in primary TKA, extend to influence revision TKA. Among the studied racial cohorts, race may affect outcomes and our results will help expand the current literature particularly on its role in revision TKA.

Effect of a Dedicated Orthopaedic Advanced Practice Provider in a Level I Trauma Center: Analysis of Length of Stay and Cost.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of an orthopaedic trauma advanced practice provider on length of stay (LOS) and cost in a level I trauma center. The hypothesis of this study is that the addition of a single full-time nurse practitioner (NP) to the orthopaedic trauma team at a level I Trauma center would decrease overall LOS and hospital cost. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients discharged from the orthopaedic surgery service 1 year before the addition of a NP (pre-NP) and 1 year after the hiring of a NP (post-NP) were reviewed. Chart review included age, gender, LOS, discharge destination, intravenous antibiotic use, wound VAC therapy, admission location, and length of time to surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The hiring of a NP yielded a statistically significant decrease in the LOS across the following patient subgroups: patients transferred from the trauma service (13.56 compared with 7.02 days, P < 0.001), patients aged 60 years and older (7.34 compared with 5.04 days, P = 0.037), patients discharged to a rehabilitation facility (10.84 compared with 8.31 days, P = 0.002), and patients discharged on antibiotics/wound VAC therapy (15.16 compared with 11.24 days, P = 0.017). Length of time to surgery was also decreased (1.48 compared with 1.31 days, P = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a dedicated orthopaedic trauma advanced practice provider at a county level I trauma center resulted in a statistically significant decrease in LOS and thus reduced indirect costs to the hospital. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hyperglycemia during total parenteral nutrition: an important marker of poor outcome and mortality in hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of total parenteral nutrition (TPN)-induced hyperglycemia on hospital outcome. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study determined whether blood glucose values before, within 24 h, and during days 2-10 of TPN are predictive of hospital complications and mortality. RESULTS: Subjects included a total of 276 patients receiving TPN for a mean duration of 15 +/- 24 days (+/-SD). In multiple regression models adjusted for age, sex, and diabetes status, mortality was independently predicted by pre-TPN blood glucose of 121-150 mg/dl (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.4, P = 0.030), 151-180 mg/dl (3.41, 1.3-8.7, P = 0.01), and >180 mg/dl (2.2, 0.9-5.2, P = 0.077) and by blood glucose within 24 h of >180 mg/dl (2.8, 1.2-6.8, P = 0.020). A blood glucose within 24 h of >180 mg/dl was associated with increased risk of pneumonia (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-7.1) and acute renal failure (2.3, 1.1-5.0). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperglycemia is associated with increased hospital complications and mortality in patients receiving TPN.