Feasibility and Acceptability of a mHealth Self-Management Intervention for Pediatric Transplant Families.

Families of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients need ongoing education and support in the first 30 days following hospital discharge for the transplantation. The purpose of this report is to describe the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a mHealth family-self management intervention, (myFAMI), designed to improve post-discharge outcomes of coping, family quality of life, self-efficacy, family self-management, and utilization of health care resources. We enrolled 46 primary family members. myFAMI was feasible and acceptable; 81% (n=17/21) of family members completed the app at least 24/30 days (goal 80% completion rate). Family members generated 134 trigger alerts and received a nurse response within the goal timeframe of < 2 h 99% of the time. Although there were no significant differences between groups, primary outcomes were in the expected direction. The intervention was well received and is feasible for future post-discharge interventions for families of children who receive an organ transplant.

Engaging Parents in Education for Discharge (ePED): Evaluating the Reach, Adoption & Implementation of an Innovative Discharge Teaching Method.

PURPOSE: This paper describes the evaluation of the implementation of an innovative teaching method, the "Engaging Parents in Education for Discharge" (ePED) iPad application (app), at a pediatric hospital. DESIGN AND METHODS: The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to guide the evaluation. Three of the five RE-AIM elements are addressed in this study: Reach, Adoption, and Implementation. RESULTS: The Reach of the ePED was 245 of 1015 (24.2%) patient discharges. The Adoption rate was 211 of 245 (86%) patients discharged in the five months' study period. High levels of fidelity (89.3%) to Implementation of the ePED were attained: the Signs and Symptoms domain had the highest (93%) and Thinking Forward about Family Adjustment screen had the lowest fidelity (83.3%). Nurse themes explained implementation fidelity: "It takes longer", and "Forgot to do it." CONCLUSIONS: The ePED app operationalized how to have an engaging structured discharge conversation with parents. While the Reach of the ePED app was low under the study conditions, the adoption rate was positive. Nurses were able to integrate a theory-driven practice change into their daily routine when using the ePED app. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The rates of adoption and implementation fidelity support the feasibility of future hospital wide implementation to improve patient and family healthcare experience. Attention to training of new content and the interactive conversation approach will be needed to fully leverage the value of the ePED app. Future studies are needed to evaluate the maintenance of the ePED app.

Using the Engaging Parents in Education for Discharge (ePED) iPad Application to Improve Parent Discharge Experience.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of the Engaging Parents in Education for Discharge (ePED) iPad application on parent experiences of hospital discharge teaching and care coordination. Hypotheses were: parents exposed to discharge teaching using ePED will have 1) higher quality of discharge teaching and 2) better care coordination than parents exposed to usual discharge teaching. The secondary purpose examined group differences in the discharge teaching, care coordination, and 30-day readmissions for parents of children with and without a chronic condition. DESIGN/METHODS: Using a quasi-experimental design, ePED was implemented on one inpatient unit (n = 211) and comparison group (n = 184) from a separate unit at a pediatric academic medical center. Patient experience outcome measures collected on day of discharge included Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale-Delivery (QDTS-D) and care coordination measured by Care Transition Measure (CTM). Thirty-day readmission was abstracted from records. RESULTS: Parents taught using ePED reported higher QDTS-D scores than parents without ePED (p = .002). No differences in CTM were found between groups. Correlations between QDTS-D and CTM were small for ePED (r = 0.14, p 0.03) and non-ePED (r = 0.29, p < .001) parent groups. CTM was weakly associated with 30-day readmissions in the ePED group. CONCLUSION: The use of ePED by the discharging nurse enhances parent-reported quality of discharge teaching. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The ePED app is a theory-based structured conversation guide to engage parents in discharge preparation. Nursing implementation of ePED contributes to optimizing the patient/family healthcare experience.

Efficacy of Auricular Neurostimulation in Adolescents With Irritable Bowel Syndrome in a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Auricular neurostimulation therapy, in which a noninvasive device delivers percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) to the external ear, is effective in pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain disorders. Preclinical studies showed that PENFS modulates central pain pathways and attenuates visceral hyperalgesia. We evaluated the efficacy of PENFS in adolescents with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: We analyzed data from pediatric patients with IBS who participated in a double-blind trial at a tertiary care gastroenterology clinic from June 2015 through November 2016. Patients were randomly assigned to groups that received PENFS (n = 27; median age, 15.3 y; 24 female) or a sham stimulation (n = 23; median age, 15.6 y; 21 female), 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was number of patients with a reduction of 30% or more in worst abdominal pain severity after 3 weeks. Secondary endpoints were reduction in composite abdominal pain severity score, reduction in usual abdominal pain severity, and improvement in global symptom based on a symptom response scale (-7 to +7; 0 = no change) after 3 weeks. RESULTS: Reductions of 30% or more in worst abdominal pain were observed in 59% of patients who received PENFS vs 26% of patients who received the sham stimulation (P = .024). The patients who received PENFS had a composite pain median score of 7.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3.6-14.4) vs 14.4 for the sham group (IQR, 4.5-39.2) (P = .026) and a usual pain median score of 3.0 (IQR, 3.0-5.0) vs 5.0 in the sham group (IQR, 3.0-7.0) (P = .029). A symptom response scale score of 2 or more was observed in 82% of patients who received PENFS vs 26% of patients in the sham group (P ≤ .001). No significant side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Auricular neurostimulation reduces abdominal pain scores and improves overall wellbeing in adolescents with IBS. PENFS is a noninvasive treatment option for pediatric patients with functional bowel disorders. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02367729.

Neurostimulation for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in adolescents: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Development of safe and effective therapies for paediatric abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders is needed. A non-invasive, US Food and Drug Administration-cleared device (Neuro-Stim, Innovative Health Solutions, IN, USA) delivers percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) in the external ear to modulate central pain pathways. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of PENFS in adolescents with abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders. METHODS: In this randomised, sham-controlled trial, we enrolled adolescents (aged 11-18 years) who met Rome III criteria for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders from a single US outpatient gastroenterology clinic. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a computer-generated randomisation scheme to active treatment or sham (no electrical charge) for 4 weeks. Patients were stratified by sex and presence or absence of nausea. Allocation was concealed from participants, caregivers, and the research team. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in abdominal pain scores. We measured improvement in worst abdominal pain and composite pain score using the Pain Frequency-Severity-Duration (PFSD) scale. Participants with less than 1 week of data and those with organic disease identified after enrolment were excluded from the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02367729. FINDINGS: Between June 18, 2015, and Nov 17, 2016, 115 children with abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders were enrolled and assigned to either PENFS (n=60) with an active device or sham (n=55). After exclusion of patients who discontinued treatment (n=1 in the PENFS group; n=7 in the sham group) and those who were excluded after randomisation because they had organic disease (n=2 in the PENFS group; n=1 in the sham group), 57 patients in the PENFS group and 47 patients in the sham group were included in the primary analysis. Patients in the PENFS group had greater reduction in worst pain compared with sham after 3 weeks of treatment (PENFS: median score 5·0 [IQR 4·0-7·0]; sham: 7·0 [5·0-9·0]; least square means estimate of change in worse pain 2·15 [95% CI 1·37-2·93], p<0·0001). Effects were sustained for an extended period (median follow-up 9·2 weeks [IQR 6·4-13·4]) in the PENFS group: median 8·0 (IQR 7·0-9·0) at baseline to 6·0 (5·0-8·0) at follow-up versus sham: 7·5 (6·0-9·0) at baseline to 7·0 (5·0-8·0) at follow-up (p<0·0001). Median PFSD composite scores also decreased significantly in the PENFS group (from 24·5 [IQR 16·8-33.3] to 8·4 [3·2-16·2]) compared with sham (from 22·8 [IQR 8·4-38·2] to 15·2 [4·4-36·8]) with a mean decrease of 11·48 (95% CI 6·63-16·32; p<0·0001) after 3 weeks. These effects were sustained at extended follow-up in the PENFS group: median 24·5 (IQR 16·8-33·3) at baseline to 12 (3·6-22·5) at follow-up, compared with sham: 22·8 (8·4-38·2) at baseline to 16·8 (4·8-33·6) at follow-up (p=0·018). Ten patients reported side-effects (three of whom discontinued the study): ear discomfort (n=6; three in the PENFS group, three in the sham group), adhesive allergy (n=3; one in the PENFS group, two in the sham group), and syncope due to needle phobia (n=1; in the sham group). There were no serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Our results show that PENFS with Neuro-Stim has sustained efficacy for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in adolescents. This safe and effective approach expands treatment options and should be considered as a non-pharmacological alternative for these disorders. FUNDING: American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society.