Comparison of bioactive material failure rates in vital pulp treatment of permanent matured teeth - a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is the gold standard for vital pulp treatment (VPT), but its superiority over novel calcium silicate-based cements in permanent teeth lacks systematic evidence. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of these materials in VPT through a network meta-analysis. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until January 20, 2024. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials involving VPT with biomaterials and reversible or irreversible pulpitis diagnoses in mature permanent teeth. The primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of failure rates with 95% confidence intervals. In the 21 eligible trials, failure rates were significantly higher with calcium-hydroxide than MTA at six (OR 2.26 [1.52-3.36]), 12 (OR 2.53 [1.76-3.62]), and 24 months (OR 2.46 [1.60-3.79]). Failure rates for Totalfill at six (OR 1.19 [0.55-2.58]) and 12 months (OR 1.43 [0.71-2.92]), and Biodentine at six (OR 1.09 [0.66-1.78]), 12 (OR 1.21 [0.74-1.96]), and 24 months (OR 1.47 [0.81-2.68]) were not significantly different from MTA. The results were similar in the direct pulp capping subgroup, whereas, in the partial and full pulpotomy subgroup, there was not enough evidence to achieve significant differences. MTA, Biodentine, and Totalfill are the most efficient materials for VPT. However, calcium-hydroxide-based materials are not recommended in VPT.

The effect of nicotine-containing products on peri-implant tissues: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Smokers have a higher chance of developing peri-implant diseases and are therefore considered an at-risk population. Our aim was to compare peri-implant characteristics in users of electronic cigarettes (EC), waterpipes (WP), cigarettes (CS), smokeless tobacco (ST), and non-smokers (non-users of any nicotine and tobacco product; NS). METHODS: A systematic search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL) was performed until April 2023, restricted to English language. Thirty-nine observational studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 32 studies were included in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Using a predesigned form, two researchers independently collected data about marginal bone loss (MBL), probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), modified plaque index (mPI), probing pocket depth > 4mm (PPD>4), gingival index (GI), peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) volume, and TNF-α and IL-1ß levels. QUIPS and CINeMA were used to evaluate the risk of bias and certainty of evidence. RESULTS: NS had the smallest MBL. Most nicotine-containing product users had significantly higher MBL (CS, MD:1.34 CrI: 0.85, 1.79; WP, MD:1.58 CrI: 0.84, 2.35; ST, MD:2.53, CrI: 1.20, 3.87) than NS. EC did not show significant difference compared to NS (MD:0.52 CrI: -0.33, 1.36). In secondary outcomes NS were ranked in first place. Subset analysis based on smoking habit, implant duration, and maintenance control revealed no differences in ranking probability. CONCLUSION: Most nicotine-containing product users presented worse peri-implant parameters compared to non-smokers, while EC users did not show significant differences to NS in many outcomes. IMPLICATION: Alternative nicotine-containing products are gaining popularity and are often considered less harmful by the general public compared to traditional cigarettes. This is the first network meta-analysis comparing users of four nicotine-containing products and non-smokers. This study shows that CS, WP and ST have a detrimental effect on the overall health of peri-implant tissues. EC users also presented inferior parameters compared to NS, however, the difference was not significant in many outcomes. It is essential to educate patients who are using nicotine-containing products, and to provide proper maintenance and appropriate cessation support. Well-designed multi-armed studies are needed for direct comparison of different products, including heated tobacco products. Greater transparency of confounding factors is needed regarding smoking habit and oral hygiene.

Acute effects of traditional and electronic cigarettes on palatal blood flow in smokers: A cross-over pilot study.

Background: Smoking is a significant health hazard and contributes to cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. It can increase postoperative complications during oral and maxillofacial surgery due to its topical effect on the oral mucosa. New alternatives to traditional tobacco products are gaining popularity, in particular, electronic cigarettes. Objectives: This pilot study investigated the acute effects of nicotine-containing and nicotine-free electronic cigarettes on palatal blood flow (PBF), and compared their effects to traditional cigarettes. Materials and methods: 14 medically healthy volunteers (8 males, 6 females, age: 34.7 ± 7.0) were recruited for the study. All patients (N = 14) were requested to smoke nicotine-containing (ECN) and nicotine-free electronic cigarettes (EC0) and a mouthpiece (end of a traditional cigarette) as a control sham smoking blind test (BT). EC users did not smoke a traditional cigarette (TC), resulting in 10 people in the TC group. Palatal blood flow was measured by Laser Speckle Contrast Imager before, immediately after, and 15 min after the exposures. Exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) were measured before and immediately after smoking with a piCO+ Smokerlyzer machine. Results: In all groups, no significant differences were observed in the changes of palatal blood flow between time points. Exhaled carbon monoxide and carboxyhemoglobin were significantly higher in the traditional cigarette (TC) group compared to the nicotine-containing electronic cigarette (ECN) and nicotine-free electronic cigarette (EC0) groups, both before and after the exposure (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Acute use of either traditional or electronic cigarettes may have minimal impact on palatal blood flow, but additional studies are required to clarify their impact on the mucosa.